Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo FC Bayern München.svg
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Logo FC Bayern München.svg[edit]
could this really be treated as trivial? I don't think so, what do others think? rubin16 (talk) 08:22, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- Yes it can, see the examples at Commons:Threshold of originality#Germany. So
Keep. It would have been a good idea to look there before making this unnecessary DR. --Rosenzweig τ 10:26, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Comment - do we need to make sure this item is PD in the US as well, per Commons policy? This is probably below the US threshold, although frankly it's borderline. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:52, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
- Personally I think it is PD in the US as well. Now for the general situation, COM:TOO and COM:FOP are areas that we historically ignore US law if a foreign country has more permissive terms (and we treat US law as only applicable with regards to PD due to age). I know this is bad, but unless a policy is created regarding this, we should not be singling images out, leading to inconsistent handling of essentially the same case. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:24, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Logo FC Bayern München.svg[edit]
I don't agree with PD-textlogo. I think not simple Fonts and geometrical drawing. Bertrouf (talk) 11:09, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. About the only thing in this that could be construed to be more than the simplest geometrical shapes is the lozenge pattern. And that has been around for centuries (it's part of the Bavarian coat of arms), so any period of copyright protection it might have had is long over. --Rosenzweig τ 11:20, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. It is very simple geometry, a circle is the simplest figure in geometry. The de:Wecke (Heraldik) are ineligible as heraldic element. In Germany the threshold of originality seems higher than in other states. ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 11:37, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- Bayern München is one of the biggest and richest sport clubs in the world. Do you really think they would not protest in many years against this copyright violations?!? The really question to this argumentation is, what is in you eyes is an simple font?? (this is one of the simplest fonts I know, the letters got also not stretched in the circle way) Anyway this is an revenant DR, so speedy keep. ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 11:45, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Speedy Kept: Bavarian flag + simple text. Everything else covered by Trademark warning template. --Denniss (talk) 17:41, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Logo FC Bayern München.svg[edit]
Copyright violation; according to FC Bayern's website's Terms and Conditions(https://fcbayern.com/us/terms-and-conditions) "All of the logos, photographs and other images on FC Bayern’s internet presence are protected by trademark/copyright. Any use thereof without consent of FC Bayern, in particular the unauthorised downloading of images, is prohibited and FC Bayern will pursue violators under civil law/criminal law." gunsROSES 13:08, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Speedykeept: not again, see the above closures. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:40, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
