Commons:Kandidaten für Qualitätsbilder

↓ Zu den Nominierungen springen ↓

Dies sind die Kandidaten für Qualitätsbilder. Beachte bitte, dass es sich hierbei nicht um die exzellenten Bilder handelt. Falls du nur Kommentare zu eigenen Bildern erhalten möchtest, ist die Seite Fotokritik (z. Z. nur englisch) der richtige Ort.

Hintergrund

Der Zweck der Qualitätsbilder ist, die einzelnen Benutzer anzuregen, einzigartige Bilder zur Verfügung zu stellen, um diese Ansammlung zu erweitern. Während exzellente Bilder die absolut besten Bilder darstellen, sollen Qualitätsbilder dazu anregen, selbst solche qualitativ hochwertigen Bilder zu erstellen.

Außerdem sollen Qualitätsbilder dazu dienen, anderen Benutzern die Methoden der Verbesserung eines Bildes zu erklären.

Richtlinien

Alle vorgeschlagenen Bilder sollten von Commons-Benutzern erstellt worden sein.

Für Vorschlagende von Qualitätsbildern

Unten werden die wichtigsten Richtlinien für Qualitätsbilder genannt, ausführliche Informationen findet man unter Qualitätsbildrichtlinien.

Anforderungen an die Bilder

1. Urheberrechtsstatus. Qualitätsbilder müssen unter einer verwendbaren Lizenz hochgeladen werden. Alle Lizenzanforderungen sind unter COM:CT zu finden.
2. Bilder sollten den Commons-Richtlinien entsprechen, einschließlich COM:Photographien erkennbarer Personen.
3. Qualitätsbilder müssen sinnvoll benannt, brauchbar kategorisiert und genau beschrieben sein. Mehrsprachige Beschreibungen sind besser, eine englische Beschreibung wird dabei gerne gesehen, ist aber nicht vorgeschrieben.
4. In den Bildern soll keine Werbung oder Signatur enthalten sein. Die Copyright- und Autor-Hinweise sollen auf der Seite mit angegeben sein. Sie können auch in den Metadaten enthalten sein, sollen aber den Bildinhalt nicht behindern.

Urheber

Bilder müssen von einem Wikimedianer erstellt worden sein, um als Qualitätsbilder ausgezeichnet werden zu können. Das bedeutet, dass Bilder von z. B. Flickr nicht geeignet sind. (Die Auszeichnung als exzellentes Bild hat diese Einschränkung nicht.) Von Wikimedianern erstellte photographische Reproduktionen zweidimensionaler Kunstwerke sind zulässig (und sollten der Richtlinie entsprechend als PD-old markiert sein). Wenn ein Bild ausgezeichnet wird, obwohl es nicht von einem Wikimedianer erstellt wurde, sollte die Auszeichnung wieder entfernt werden, sowie der Fehler bemerkt wird.

Technische Anforderungen

Ausführliche technische Anforderungen stehen unter Qualitätsbildrichtlinien.

Auflösung

Die Grafiken bei Commons werden nicht nur auf dem Bildschirm betrachtet, sie sollen auch für den Ausdruck oder für die Betrachtung auf hochauflösenden Bildschirmen geeignet sein. Da auch niemand vorhersehen kann, welche Geräte in der Zukunft verwendet werden, sollten Bilder eine brauchbare Auflösung bieten und nicht unnötig verkleinert werden. Als Untergrenze gelten zwei Megapixel, wobei an Aufnahmen, die relativ einfach zu erstellen sind, von den Bewertern auch höhere Ansprüche gestellt werden können.

Bildqualität

Digitale Bilder sind verschiedenen Problemen beim Aufnehmen und beim Speichern ausgesetzt, wie z. B. Bildrauschen, Artefakte bei der JPEG-Kompression, abgesoffene Schatten- oder Spitzlichter-Bereiche oder falscher Weißabgleich. All diese Kriterien sollten berücksichtigt werden.

Bildaufbau und Beleuchtung

Die Anordnung des Hauptgegenstandes sollte zum Inhalt des Bildes beitragen. Der Vordergrund und Hintergrund des Bildes sollte nicht ablenken. Beleuchtung und Fokus tragen auch zum gesamten Resultat bei; der Hauptgegenstand sollte scharf sein.

Wert

Unser Hauptziel ist es, Qualitätsbilder zu sammeln, die wertvoll für alle Wikimedia-Projekte sind.

Wie man ein Qualitätsbild vorschlägt

Einfach eine Zeile unter Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list im Abschnitt Nominations einfügen.

File:HierDerBildname.jpg|{{/Nomination|1=Sehr kurze Beschreibung --~~~~ |2=}}

Die Beschreibung sollte sehr kurz gefasst sein und aus wenigen Worten bestehen. Bitte lasse zudem zwischen deinem neuen Eintrag und einem noch existierenden alten Eintrag eine Zeile frei.

Wenn du das Bild eines anderen Wikimedianers nominierst, dann füge dessen Benutzernamen in die Beschreibung ein, Beispiel:

File:HierDerBildname.jpg|{{/Nomination|Sehr kurze Beschreibung (by [[User:BENUTZERNAME|BENUTZERNAME)]] --~~~~ |}}

Hinweis: Es existiert ein Helferlein, QInominator, mit dem man Bilder einfacher vorschlagen kann. Es fügt einen kleinen „Nominate this image for QI“-Link oben auf jeder Dateibeschreibungsseite hinzu. Klickt man auf den Link, wird das Bild zu einer Liste möglicher Kandidaten hinzugefügt. Sowie diese Liste vollständig ist, bearbeite Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. Oben im Bearbeitungsfenster wird ein grüner Balken angezeigt. Klickst du auf den Balken, werden alle möglichen Kandidaten in das Bearbeitungsfenster eingefügt.

Anzahl der Vorschläge

Wähle sorgfältig deine besten Bilder zur Nominierung aus. Jeder Teilnehmer darf täglich bis zu fünf Bilder nominieren.

Bilder bewerten

Jeder angemeldete Benutzer bis auf den Vorschlagenden darf Bilder bewerten. Voraussetzung ist außerdem, dass sein Benutzerkonto mindestens 10 Tage existiert und der Benutzer mindestens 50 Bearbeitungen nachweisen kann.
Beim Bewerten von Bildern sollten Rezensenten dieselben Richtlinien beachten wie der Vorschlagende.

Wie man bewertet

Betrachte aufmerksam das Bild, öffne es in voller Auflösung und überprüfe, ob die Qualitätsstandards eingehalten worden sind.

• Wenn du Dich entscheidest, das Bild zu unterstützen, ändere folgende Zeile von

File:HierDerBildname.jpg|{{/Nomination|Sehr kurze Beschreibung --~~~~ |}}

nach

File:HierDerBildname.jpg|{{/Promotion|Sehr kurze Beschreibung --Signatur des Antragstellers|Warum Du dafür bist. --~~~~}}

In anderen Worten, ändere die Vorlage von /Nomination in /Promotion und füge Deine Signatur hinzu, eventuell mit einem kurzen Kommentar.

• Wenn Du Dich entscheidest, das Bild abzulehnen, ändere folgende Zeile von

File:HierDerBildname.jpg|{{/Nomination|Sehr kurze Beschreibung --~~~~ | }}

nach

File:HierDerBildname.jpg|{{/Decline|Sehr kurze Beschreibung --Signatur des Antragsstellers |Warum es Dir nicht gefällt. --~~~~}}

In anderen Worten, ändere die Vorlage von /Nomination in /Decline und füge Deine Signatur hinzu, eventuell mit Angaben zu den Gründen der Ablehnung (Überschriften von entsprechenden Abschnitten in den Richtlinien reichen). Wenn zahlreiche Probleme erkennbar sind, nenne am besten nur die zwei bis drei dringlichsten oder füge einfach die Phrase multiple problems ein. Bei einer Ablehnung hinterlasse bitte den ausführlichen Kommentar auf der Diskussionsseite des Benutzers. Denke daran, höflich zu bleiben. In dieser Nachricht solltest Du eine ausführlichere Begründung für Deine Ablehnung geben.

Hinweis: Bitte zuerst die ältesten Bilder bewerten und möglichst für jede eigene Nominierung eine andere auswerten.

Schonfrist und Ernennung

Wenn es innerhalb von zwei Tagen (genau 48 Stunden) nach der Bewertung keinen Widerspruch gibt, ist das Bild entweder ernannt oder gescheitert. Wenn du Einwände hast, kannst du das Bild in den Abschnitt einvernehmliche Beurteilung (consensual review) verschieben, indem du den Status des Bildes in Discuss änderst.

Weitere Vorgehensweise

QICbot macht dies automatisch zwei Tage, nachdem eine Entscheidung getroffen worden ist. Ausgezeichnete Bilder werden unter Commons:Quality_Images/Recently_promoted zwischengespeichert, um kategorisiert zu werden, bevor sie automatisch auf die entsprechenden Qualitätsbilder-Seiten eingefügt werden.

Wenn du glaubst, ein Ausnahmebild gefunden zu haben, das den Status „Exzellentes Bild“ verdient, dann nominiere es auch auf Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder.

Vorgehensweise per Hand (nur in Notfällen öffnen)

Wenn ein Bild ernannt wurde,

1. Füge das Bild in die Gruppe oder Gruppen auf der Seite Qualitätsbilder ein. Das Bild muss auch in den entsprechenden Unterseiten eingefügt werden. Nur drei bis vier der neuesten Bilder sollten auf der Hauptseite angezeigt werden.
2. Füge den Text {{QualityImage}} ganz unten auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite ein.
3. Verschiebe die Zeile mit der Nominierung und Kommentar nach Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives Juli 2017
4. Schreibe die Vorlage {{File:Bildname.jpg}} in die Diskussionsseite des Benutzers.

Wenn ein Bild abgelehnt wird,

1. #verschiebe die Zeile mit der Nominierung und Kommentar nach Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives Juli 2017

• Bilder, die noch bewertet werden müssen, sind blau umrandet.
• Bilder, die ernannt wurden, sind grün umrandet.
• Bilder, die abgelehnt wurden, sind rot umrandet.

Nicht beurteilte Bilder (blau umrandete Bewerbung)

Vorgeschlagene Bilder, die weder Stimmen für eine zustimmende noch für eine ablehnende Bewertung gesammelt haben oder Einvernehmen – gleicher Widerstand wie Unterstützung in einvernehmlicher Beurteilung – in der Bewertung erzielen, sollten nach acht Tagen auf dieser Seite ohne Auszeichnung von dieser Seite entfernt werden. Archiviert werden solche Bilder unter Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 21 2017, kategorisiert mit Category:Unassessed QI candidates auf der Beschreibungsseite des Bildes.

Einvernehmliche Beurteilung

Einvernehmliche Beurteilung (consensual review) wird immer dann eingesetzt, wenn der oben beschriebene Prozess nicht ausreicht und eine Diskussion erforderlich ist, um zu mehr Meinungen zu kommen.

Wie man um einvernehmliche Beurteilung bittet

Um eine einvernehmliche Beurteilung zu fordern, ändere einfach das /Promotion, /Decline zu /Discuss und füge unmittelbar an die Beurteilung deinen Kommentar an. Ein automatisierter Bot wird es innerhalb eines Tages in den Abschnitt Einvernehmliche Beurteilung verschieben.

Bitte schicke nur Dinge zur einvernehmlichen Beurteilung, die als angenommen oder abgelehnt beurteilt wurden. Im Falle, dass Du als Urteilender Dich nicht entscheiden kannst, hinterlasse Deine Kommentare, aber lasse den Kandidaten auf der Seite.

Regeln für die einvernehmliche Beurteilung

Siehe Commons:Quality_images_candidates#Rules

Seite neu laden: purge this page's cache

Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures are only working on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 13:22, 21 Juli 2017 (UTC)

• Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC).
• Please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
• Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first, many are still unassessed.

Thank you.

Please nominate only a maximum of 5 images per day.

July 21, 2017

• 

  • Nomination So called Opel Kadett Gill Coupé built from 1965 to 1970 at foodrallye in Neuwied. Disturbing people in the background retouched. -- Spurzem 12:28, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 12:32, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Muntijela in the Puez-Geisler Nature Park (Dolomites). --Moroder 12:19, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good -- Spurzem 12:30, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Common blues (Polyommatus icarus). Giresun, Turkey. --Zcebeci 11:25, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Rock Sparrow (Petronia petronia). Giresun, Turkey. --Zcebeci 11:25, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Male house sparrow (Passer domesticus). Adana - Turkey. --Zcebeci 11:25, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: The Pastura de Ncisles pasture in the Puez-Geisler Nature Park (Dolomites). --Moroder 11:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Pink blue and white silage bales. --W.carter 10:18, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 10:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Carandolet Palace, Quito, Ecuador --Poco a poco 08:19, 21 July 2017 (UTC) Comment That fliyng object on top could be removed--Moroder 11:29, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Beach of the Pointe Rouge, Marseille, France --Poco a poco 08:19, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 10:50, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Blue-footed booby (Sula nebouxii), Las Bachas, Baltra Island, Galapagos Islands, Ecuador --Poco a poco 08:19, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:26, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Hall of hundred columns, Persepolis, Iran --Poco a poco 08:19, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:30, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Beach of Silgar, Sangejo, Pontevedra, Spain --Poco a poco 08:19, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:31, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Bożków 1 --Jacek Halicki 07:59, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:29, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Bożków 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:59, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:29, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Bożków 3 --Jacek Halicki 07:59, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:29, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Statue of Heinrich Bender in Bożków 1 --Jacek Halicki 07:59, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:29, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Statue of Heinrich Bender in Bożków 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:59, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:29, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Interior of church in Immensen --Hydro 07:11, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline Burned out highlights which is normal for an estreme light situation like this. I recommend HDR processing using a tripod. It will take a few years until sensors can manage such a dynamic range. --Ermell 10:56, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination The Euroca freight engine when entering the lock of Strullendorf going uphill --Ermell 06:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 07:13, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Building of the European Parliament in Strasbourg --Ermell 06:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:01, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Building of the European Parliament in Strasbourg --Ermell 06:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:01, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Door of the main entrance to the monastery church Schlüsselau --Ermell 06:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:01, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Sculpture at Laurenziplatz in Bamberg --Ermell 06:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 07:15, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Opel Kadett C Aero --Berthold Werner 06:14, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:02, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Opel Kadett C Aero --Berthold Werner 06:14, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Citroën Type C4, Modell F --Berthold Werner 06:14, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:01, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Citroën Type C4, Modell F --Berthold Werner 06:14, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Movable floating buoy.
    --Famberhorst 05:52, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:56, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Walking tour of the Balloërveld. Wooden bench above tank canal.
    --Famberhorst 05:52, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:56, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Bozen/Bolzano gegen die Mendel, Südtirol, Italy 1913.
    Mirek256 04:52, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Foot and cycle path through the area.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Walking tour of the Balloërveld. Bottom of a tank canal.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Dr.-Grolmus-Haus, Monastery Endowment of the Holy Grave, Heiligengrabe, Brandenburg, Germany --XRay 03:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Perhaps slightly more contrast, the picture made less flat. But good quality for me.--Famberhorst 04:30, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
     Fixed Thank you. It's fixed now. --XRay 13:20, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Sewing machine at a flea market at the port, Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany --XRay 03:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: St. Jakobi Church, Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany --XRay 03:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Theaterfigurenmuseum, Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany --XRay 03:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Skt. Jørgens Sø in Copenhagen, Denmark --XRay 03:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination A famous hundred years old entrance of Comilla Victoria College, Comilla,Chittagong Division,Bangladesh --Shahidul Hasan Roman 09:01, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
    Extremely noisy, very far from Q1quality --Michielverbeek 05:04, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline {{{2}}}
• 

  • Nomination Neck ditch (circumfluent the Collegiate church) at the south side of the sacristan house and the rectory, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:18, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 02:31, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Northern view of the mortuary on Domplatz #6, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:18, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 02:31, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Wrought iron cross at the mortuary on Domplatz #6, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:18, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 02:29, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Epitaphs and Latin grave inscription (ILLPRON 777) at the western wall of the parish and pilgrimage church Assumption of Mary, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:18, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 02:29, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Bronze epitaph for Johannes Andreas Orsini-Rosenberg with relief of coat of arms for the Rosenberg family, set up at the northern interior wall of the parish church Assumption of Mary, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:18, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 02:35, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Spoladea recurvalis --Vengolis 02:05, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:19, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Crabronidae --Vengolis 02:05, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:08, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Trithemis aurora .Female --Vengolis 02:05, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:08, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Hymenopodidae, Mantodea --Vengolis 02:05, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:19, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Glipa,Mordellini' --Vengolis 02:05, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:08, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Pyrus pyrifolia Shinko leaf --PumpkinSky 00:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 01:58, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Pyrus pyrifolia Raja leaf --PumpkinSky 00:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 01:58, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

July 20, 2017

• 

  • Nomination Suastus gremius --Vengolis 22:06, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion The leaf looks a bit over exposed but the butterfly is fine. PumpkinSky 02:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination An 53 years old Opel Kadett A in motion at Oldtimertreffen Mülheim-Kärlich -- Spurzem 20:47, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion von vorn bis hinten scharf, Umgebung und Räder unscharf, QI --Ralf Roletschek 21:03, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Bahnhof Tanvald --Ralf Roletschek 20:40, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 21:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Martinlaakso, Vantaa, Teppich-Mangel an öffentlichem Teppichwaschplatz vor Trockenstangen. --Ralf Roletschek 20:40, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 21:03, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Maidan Nezalezhnosti in Kiew --Ralf Roletschek 20:40, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Threatening but good -- Spurzem 21:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Flughafen Bratislava, Boeing 737-86J der Go2Sky --Ralf Roletschek 20:40, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 20:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Metro Kiew --Ralf Roletschek 20:40, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 20:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Umeda Sky Building --Martin Falbisoner 20:25, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good -- Spurzem 20:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Umeda Sky Building, escalator --Martin Falbisoner 20:25, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Interesting and good quality -- Spurzem 20:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Church in Torcello, Italy. --Till.niermann 18:56, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:15, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge in Heidelberg, Germany --Kontraproduktivität 18:32, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --PumpkinSky 20:21, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Waterloopbos. Natuurgebied van Natuurmonumenten. Information board.
    --Famberhorst 17:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 20:28, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Movable floating buoy.
    --Famberhorst 17:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:15, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Walking tour of the Balloërveld. Wooden bench above tank canal.
    --Famberhorst 17:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:15, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Part of the paradise (entrance hall) of the Herrenalb Abbey, Bad Herrenalb --Llez 16:21, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 16:39, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Victor Kusin received the certificate of honor on the Sportspeople day. --Бахтиёр Абдуллаев 16:19, 20 July 2017 (UTC) The photo is too bright for me, I would do it like that.
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: «Slavich» office building, Pereslavl-Zalessky. --Бахтиёр Абдуллаев 16:19, 20 July 2017 (UTC) better so? --Ralf Roletschek 21:23, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination 10-14 Cours Jean Jaures in Pézenas, Hérault, France. --Tournasol7 13:11, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Halavar 14:26, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Castle of Onet-le-Château, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 13:11, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Halavar 14:26, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Church of Souyri, commune of Salles-la-Source, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 13:11, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 16:31, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Front door of Castle of Severac, Severac-le-Chateau, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 13:11, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 20:28, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Porte de l'Horloge in Cordes-sur-Ciel, Tarn France. --Tournasol7 13:11, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality (including the pigeon ;-) ) --Llez 16:33, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination View of Arequipa, Peru --Poco a poco 11:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:06, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination View of Nuévalos, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 11:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:06, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Viru bog, Lahemaa National Park, Estonia --Poco a poco 11:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:06, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination View of Quito from El Panecillo, Ecuador --Poco a poco 11:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:06, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination View of Baku, Azerbaijan --Poco a poco 11:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination View of the Ria Vigo from Liméns beach --Harpagornis 10:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. A lot of issues. The main issue: Nothing is sharp. --XRay 12:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Sunset at Klong Khong beach. Ko Lanta Yai. Ko Lanta District, Krabi Province, Thailand. --Halavar 10:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Nice. Please check the image. At the beach there is a green lens flare. --XRay 12:06, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
     Done Thanks for the hint! New, fixed version uploaded now. Please take a look again. --Halavar 12:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
    Weak  Support IMO OK for a sunset. --XRay 12:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Views from the ship on the Lanta Old Town. Ko Lanta Yai. Ko Lanta District, Krabi Province, Thailand. --Halavar 10:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --PumpkinSky 20:22, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Klong Khong beach. Ko Lanta Yai. Ko Lanta District, Krabi Province, Thailand. --Halavar 10:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Views from the ship sailing on the route Ao Nang - Ko Lanta Yai. Krabi Province, Thailand. --Halavar 10:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Tuol Sleng Genocide Museum. Phnom Penh, Cambodia. --Halavar 10:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:33, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Harebells by a road. --W.carter 10:03, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:33, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Kaiser Josef Platz, Lienz, Tirol, Österreich, 1911.Mirek256 09:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. A simple scan with no crop at three sides, one side missing. --XRay 10:33, 20 July 2017 (UTC) Habe verbessert, mir der Seite vertehe ich nicht --Missing sign
    Weak  Support IMO OK as scan like paintings. --XRay 12:41, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Depuis le lieu dit la Moutette (444m). Sur la droite on perçoit Puech Camp (471m), point culminant du massif de Coutach. --Nunux34 09:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Volvo Amazon, 1960 --Berthold Werner 07:47, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --W.carter 10:03, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Volvo Amazon, 1960 --Berthold Werner 07:47, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 14:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Opel GT --Berthold Werner 07:47, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
     Comment Vertical lines are not straigh (see the notes). Image needs perpective correction. --Halavar 10:05, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
     Done --Berthold Werner 11:15, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 11:52, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Pipe organ of the Catholic parish church St. Laurentius in Aisch (Adelsdorf) --Ermell 07:22, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:36, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Residential house at Oberen Kaulberg in Bamberg --Ermell 07:22, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:26, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Old engine shed in Bamberg --Ermell 07:22, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Vertical lines on the right side of the image leaning outward (see the note). Image needs perspective correction. --Halavar 10:07, 20 July 2017 (UTC) Done Tanks for the review--Ermell 14:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Coat of arms over the entrance of the Pfarrgasse 1 house in Bamberg --Ermell 07:22, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:36, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Inland Shipping Tokaj 2 and Constellation 1 on the Main Danube Canal near Bamberg --Ermell 07:22, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 08:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Bożków Palace 1 --Jacek Halicki 06:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:13, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Bożków Palace 2 --Jacek Halicki 06:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:35, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Bożków Palace 3 --Jacek Halicki 06:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:35, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Bożków Palace 4 --Jacek Halicki 06:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:35, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Statue of Heinrich Bender in Bożków --Jacek Halicki 06:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:35, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Eurasian collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto). Mersin, Turkey. --Zcebeci 06:12, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:07, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Cattle Egret (Bubulcus ibis). Mersin - Turkey. --Zcebeci 06:12, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline Interesting image of a difficult subject, but not sharp enough & the sunlit whites are overexposed --Alandmanson 10:23, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Larva of Cucullia blattariae . Giresun, Turkey --Zcebeci 06:12, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:06, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Waterloopbos. Research closure of seas Delta Works M995.
    --Famberhorst 05:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Engine Pusher Pernilla, detail.
    --Famberhorst 05:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Boat at the Genin Bank (Elbe-Lübeck Canal, Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany --XRay 05:25, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Rosenhaus, Monastery Endowment of the Holy Grave, Heiligengrabe, Brandenburg, Germany --XRay 05:25, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:52, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: (Remote view of) Turning Torso in Malmö, Sweden --XRay 05:25, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment That license issue is a problem for me. What do we think of it?--Peulle 13:15, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
     Comment IMO the building is FoP in Sweden. I don't know, why {{FoP-Sweden}} gives such a disturbing text. May be the template is wrong or I should use another one. But I don't know which one is the right one. --XRay 19:40, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
     Comment Sorry, next answer. IMO the FoP problem in Sweden can't be a problem of QIC. IMO we should not wait for a decision in Sweden. --XRay 13:17, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Peblinge Sø in Copenhagen, Denmark --XRay 05:25, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Zcebeci 06:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination House “An der Mauer 51”, Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
    The building itself is strong tilted, in the background rain clouds, the house itself is in sunshine. --XRay 05:25, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Yes, the verticals are vertical, the house is not ;-) --Llez 11:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Walking tour of the Balloërveld. Panorama.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Walking tour of the Balloërveld. Bottom of a tank canal.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Renault Megane, Camet beach, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 02:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:54, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Enter to Costa del Sol beach, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 02:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment You can remove dust spots right?--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 20 July 2017 (UTC)  Done Ezarate 23:17, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Stream La Tapera, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 02:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment It's strong tilted CCW and the sharpness could be improved. --XRay 05:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)  Done Ezarate 23:17, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Mc Donald´s at Constitucion Avenue and Camet Avenue, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 02:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion The picture could have been a bit sharper. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Ricaniidae sp --Vengolis 02:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:42, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Sepsidae --Vengolis 02:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Agriocnemis splendidissima --Vengolis 02:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:42, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Olios milleti --Vengolis 02:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Western view of the parish and pilgrimage church Assumption of Mary, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 02:37, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Marienhof, home for the handicapped, on Hauptstrasse #6, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 02:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Memorial plaque for Willibald Zunk at the west wall of the building on Hauptplatz #1, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 02:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Northeastern view of the residential building on Domgasse #5, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 02:37, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Guesthouse "zur Post" on Hauptstrasse #1, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 02:35, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

July 19, 2017

• 

  • Nomination: Camet Beach, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 22:29, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review I guess, you will find these dust spots on every image from that day, showing blue sky in the middle of your sensor (see PlayaCametatardecer1MDP-jul2017.jpg) --PtrQs 23:51, 19 July 2017 (UTC) OK But the problem isn´t in all the photos, may be sand on the lens, thanks!! Ezarate 02:19, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
     Not done After about 50k images I can assert: It is not about sand on the lens. I just spent 15 minutes checking 4 of your playaCamet images. There still are a lot of dust spots in all pictures - see Annotations! About the mechanism of dust spots: their visibility is enhanced by higher stops (smaller apertures), as the narrower beam of light cannot enlighten the area of the sensor behind the dust particle. So not seeing them at f3.5 does not prove anything. --PtrQs 00:39, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: San Luis Gonzaga chapel, Park Camet, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 22:29, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review Titled. PumpkinSky 00:21, 20 July 2017 (UTC)  Done Ezarate 02:19, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
     Oppose I'm very sorry, but a short check showed 23(!) dust particles in this picture, too much to ignore. I only annotated the most visible. --PtrQs 00:58, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Camet Beach, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 22:29, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline Only the foreground is sharp while I consider the background as much more important, sorry --Michielverbeek 05:15, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Camet Beach, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 22:29, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Tilted little bit (see the note) --Halavar 23:01, 19 July 2017 (UTC)  Done Ezarate 02:19, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
     Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 10:08, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Camet Beach, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 22:29, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review There are at least four creepy animals (dust spots) on your sensor - just above the horizon. --PtrQs 23:41, 19 July 2017 (UTC)  Done Ezarate 02:19, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
     Not done there still are dust spots, see comments to 'PlayaCametMDP3-jul2017.jpg'. You really should check your sensor to save time of checking images - mine and yours . --PtrQs 00:39, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination House "Under three eagles" in Bydgoszcz --Albertus teolog 21:30, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:21, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination VL80K-093 electric freight locomotive -- George Chernilevsky 21:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:32, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Montsoreau Castle (France) -- MJJR 21:18, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 21:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Krämerbrücke and Ägidienkirche in Erfurt, capital of Thuringia, Germany. -- Neptuul 20:51, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline Blown sky, sorry. --Peulle 21:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Shell of a South African Turban, Turbo sarmaticus --Llez 20:40, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, clearly. --Peulle 20:42, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Korean fir - branches with cones. --W.carter 18:55, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:04, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Lanta Green Garden Resort. Ko Lanta Yai. Ko Lanta District, Krabi Province, Thailand. --Halavar 18:43, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 20:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Pier in the Lanta Old Town. Ko Lanta Yai. Ko Lanta District, Krabi Province, Thailand. --Halavar 18:43, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
    Good quality, but there are at least 3 dust spots Poco a poco 19:04, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review  Done I see only on, on the right side. New fixed version uploaded, hope it's better now:) --Halavar 19:44, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Karst rocks seen from the ship. Krabi Province, Thailand. --Halavar 18:43, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline Not really sharp, sorry, not a QI to me --Poco a poco 19:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Sunset at Klong Khong beach. Ko Lanta Yai. Ko Lanta District, Krabi Province, Thailand. --Halavar 18:43, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 19:50, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Karts rocks. Views from the ship sailing on the route Ao Nang - Ko Lanta Yai. Krabi Province, Thailand. --Halavar 18:43, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Braconidae --Vengolis 18:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Shankar Raman 18:19, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Argyreia elliptica --Vengolis 18:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Shankar Raman 18:19, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Myrmarachne plataleoides --Vengolis 18:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Shankar Raman 18:19, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Myrmarachne plataleoides --Vengolis 18:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Shankar Raman 18:19, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Rufous-vented Laughing Thrush photographed in Arunachal Pradesg. By User:Rohitjahnavi --Shankar Raman 18:04, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 18:16, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Rufous-vented Laughing Thrush in Arunachal Pradesh, India. By User:Rohitjahnavi --Shankar Raman 18:04, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Blue-capped Rock Thrush immature in Anamalai hills, India. By Shankar Raman --Shankar Raman 18:04, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Attractive flowers of Argyreia involucrata native to Peninsular India. By User:Ajtjohnsingh --Shankar Raman 18:04, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Steppe Eagle in flight, Gurgaon, India By Shankar Raman --Shankar Raman 18:04, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline It's a nice capture, but not really sharp. --Peulle 21:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Waterloopbos. Research design of the new harbor mouth in IJmuiden M526. Part of the project.
    --Famberhorst 17:59, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quality high enough for Q1, but main object might have been a bit sharper --Michielverbeek 18:07, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Bolts and nuts to connect temporary pipelines.
    --Famberhorst 17:59, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --W.carter 18:55, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Walking tour of the Balloërveld. Information board.
    --Famberhorst 17:59, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --W.carter 18:55, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Bossed keystone (13^th ctry.) at the Chapel "Notre-Dame-des-Anges", Perpignan. --Palauenc05 17:32, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI (although an specific cat about the subject, that I added, was missing) --Poco a poco 19:11, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: The Lech da Iman pond in Gröden --Moroder 17:16, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Mausoleum of Saadi, Shiraz, Iran --Poco a poco 15:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --XRay 15:53, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Emamzadeh Abu Lolo mosque, Kashan, Iran --Poco a poco 15:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --XRay 15:53, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Masoudieh Mansion, Tehran, Iran --Poco a poco 15:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 16:01, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Mezquita Seyyed, Isfahan, IránEnglish: Seyyed mosque, Isfahan, Iran --Poco a poco 15:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:05, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Persepolis, Iran --Poco a poco 15:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, Tournasol7 17:19, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination The port crane "Henrik" in Drammen harbour. (image forcably cropped after perspective correction) --Peulle 15:21, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 15:34, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Port cranes in Drammen harbour.--Peulle 15:21, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:42, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Le barrage de Cotatay, dans la Loire, a été construit tout début XXème siècle. Haut de 45m, il alimente notamment en eau la commune du Chambon-Feugerolles. --Nunux34 14:12, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Chapel of the Penitents of Saint-Come-d'Olt, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 13:27, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Harsh shadow but QI as I think -- Spurzem 13:51, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Castle of Belcastel, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 13:27, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Beautiful composition and good quality -- Spurzem 13:49, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Wall of Castle of Severac in Severac-le-Chateau, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 13:27, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion That's rather a wall (I added a cat), but ok --Poco a poco 15:49, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Outbuildings at the Castle of Cas, commune of Espinas, Tarn-et-Garonne, France. --Tournasol7 13:27, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality and here with interesting shadow -- Spurzem 13:52, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Castle of Onet-le-Château, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 13:27, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Zcebeci 13:52, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Self built racing motorcycle based on Kreidler at Oldtimertreffen in Mülheim-Kärlich -- Spurzem 13:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Category still not fixed --A.Savin 21:05, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Male Yellowjack Notogomphus praetorius on the Mkomazi river, KwaZulu-Natal. --Alandmanson 13:05, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review The wings are not sharp... Tournasol7 13:30, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
    Seems like QI to me, body and head sharp, wings are not (can't be?) the focus of the image at this angle.--Shankar Raman 13:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Yamaha XS 750 with three cylinders DOHC engine built from 1977 to 1980 and self built racing motorbike based on Kreidler at Oldtimertreffen Mülheim-Kärlich. -- Spurzem 12:54, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 13:54, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Yamaha XS 750 with three cylinders DOHC engine built from 1977 to 1980 and self built racing motorbike based on Kreidler at Oldtimertreffen Mülheim-Kärlich. -- Spurzem 12:54, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:40, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Dryad (Minois dryas). Giresun, Turkey. --Zcebeci 11:00, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --XRay 12:43, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Rock Sparrow (Petronia petronia). Giresun, Turkey. --Zcebeci 11:00, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 11:16, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Ground woodpecker foraging. Garden Castle, KwaZulu-Natal Drakensberg. --Alandmanson 10:39, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Shankar Raman 13:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Ground woodpecker foraging. Garden Castle, KwaZulu-Natal Drakensberg. --Alandmanson 10:39, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Shankar Raman 13:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Ground woodpecker foraging. Golden Gate Highlands National Park, South Africa. --Alandmanson 10:39, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:02, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Opening ceremony of the Internationales Deutsches Turnfest 2017 in Berin on 03 June at the Straße des 17. June --Freddy2001 09:32, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review The title could be "Man taking selfie" but not "Opening ceremony …“ -- Spurzem 10:03, 19 July 2017
• 

  • Nomination Opening ceremony of the Internationales Deutsches Turnfest 2017 in Berin on 03 June at the Straße des 17. June --Freddy2001 09:32, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline The ceremony is not sharp. -- Spurzem 10:05, 19 July 2017 (UTC)(UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Der Eingang Messe Süd auf dem Internationalen Deutschen Turnfest 2017 in Berlin am 08. Juni --Freddy2001 09:28, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination near Oud-Loosdrecht-NL, lake: de Loosdrechtse Plassen --Michielverbeek 06:52, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality and nice.--Famberhorst 15:36, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination River cruise ship Da Vinci in the harbor in Bamberg --Ermell 06:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:48, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Inland cargo vessel Bavaria 80 on the Main-Danube Canal in Bamberg. --Ermell 06:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:48, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Coat of arms of the family Stauffenberg over the former Adelspalais in the Judenstraße in Bamberg --Ermell 06:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Altar of the Catholic parish church St. Laurentius in Aisch (Adelsdorf) --Ermell 06:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:41, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Saints in the Catholic Church of St. Lawrence in Aisch (Adelsdorf) --Ermell 06:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion The saints are too bright especially Johannes Nepomuk at the left. -- Spurzem 07:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review.--Ermell 12:42, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
    Weak QI -- Spurzem 13:27, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination The horizon over the sea close to Corfu (Boukaris) --Kritzolina 06:25, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
     Comment there is a disturbing black something (see annotation) --Berthold Werner 06:33, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
    I am not absolutely sure, but I do believe it is a bit of wood floating on the water.--Kritzolina 11:00, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok, I like it --Berthold Werner 05:41, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz 230 SL (W 113) --Berthold Werner 06:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 06:36, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz 230 SL (W 113) --Berthold Werner 06:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 13:55, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Mercedes Benz 180 W120 --Berthold Werner 06:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 06:37, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
     Comment This image as some others of cars is too bright for me. -- Spurzem 07:03, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Mercedes Benz 180 W120 --Berthold Werner 06:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 12:41, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Bożków Palace 1 --Jacek Halicki 06:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Bożków Palace 2 --Jacek Halicki 06:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Bożków Palace 3 --Jacek Halicki 06:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 06:40, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Bożków Palace 4 --Jacek Halicki 06:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very sharp photo, good perspective but main object is completely shadowed. However quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:33, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Bożków Palace 5 --Jacek Halicki 06:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:34, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Patisserie (Ian Baker) --Partynia 05:57, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline Strong loss of quality on the left side. --Ermell 06:42, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Waterloopbos. Research closure of seas Delta Works M995.
    --Famberhorst 05:48, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:49, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Almost opening flower bud of an Agapanthus 'Windlebrook'. A fairly new English cultivar, beautiful dark blue in color.
    --Famberhorst 05:48, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very, very good! --Basotxerri 06:03, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Abbey, Monastery Endowment of the Holy Grave, Heiligengrabe, Brandenburg, Germany --XRay 05:33, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 06:39, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Abbey, Monastery Endowment of the Holy Grave, Heiligengrabe, Brandenburg, Germany --XRay 05:33, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Sink in the town hall, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:33, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:30, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Bank of the “Alte Trave”, Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany --XRay 05:33, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination An der Mauer 134, Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany --XRay 05:33, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 06:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Western view of the parish and pilgrimage church Assumption of Mary, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:49, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:21, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Upper part of the epitaph (16th century) for Hanns Pruggmayr at Tentschach with relief of coat of arms, exposed on the northern exterior wall of the charnel house on Domplatz #6, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:49, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:21, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Gothic light pillar on Domplatz, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:49, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:21, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

July 18, 2017

• 

  • Nomination: Galapagos brown pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis urinator), Cerro Brujo, San Cristobal Island, Galapagos Island, Ecuador --Poco a poco 22:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review
    Good image but seems like it has a slight overall blue cast?--Shankar Raman 13:56, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: War memorial of Resistance, La Chapelle-du-Châtelard. --Chabe01 21:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Northern chequered skipper (Carterocephalus silvicola) female , Estonia --Charlesjsharp 21:16, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment The background is quite noisy, otherwise a QI for me. --C messier 19:06, 18 July 2017 (UTC) Done Thanks. New version uploaded. Charlesjsharp 10:01, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Goldmoss stonecrop (Sedum acre) -- George Chernilevsky 20:29, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Good image but seems to me it could use a slight (5%?) crop along the top.--Shankar Raman 13:56, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
    Good quality. Agree with your response in my talk page --Shankar Raman 17:32, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Church in Ziros, Crete. --C messier 18:47, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
    IMHO a denoising of the sky is necessary. --Berthold Werner 06:26, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Hersonisos square, Crete. --C messier 18:45, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: View of Zou, Crete. --C messier 18:42, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Martinlaakso, Vantaa --Ralf Roletschek 17:47, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Ko Ngai. Mu Ko Lanta National Park. Ko Lanta District, Krabi Province, Thailand. --Halavar 13:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Reconstructors and roleplayers perform at the festival «Times and epochs». Moscow, Tverskaya square. --PereslavlFoto 11:06, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: View of Saint-Laurent-sur-Saône from the Saint-Laurent bridge. --Chabe01 10:32, 18 July 2017 (UTC) Comment CA should be removed.--Ermell 12:55, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Bahnhof Tanvald --Ralf Roletschek 10:24, 18 July 2017 (UTC) Comment Leaning to the left and the railing fragment in the corner should be cropped out.--Ermell 12:52, 18 July 2017 (UTC)  Done --Ralf Roletschek 15:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Dryad (Minois dryas). Giresun, Turkey. --Zcebeci 08:44, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline For me, a butterfly QI usually needs better depth of field than f8. For me, not enough of the subject is sharp. --Alandmanson 09:49, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
    There was clearly not enough light for better than F8. I'm not sure a photographer with 12 FPs of butterflies needs a lesson here. Charlesjsharp 21:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
    Sorry! No lesson intended. --Alandmanson 16:28, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

July 17, 2017

• 

  • Nomination Bahnhof Tanvald --Ralf Roletschek 22:07, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:39, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Verkehrszeichen in Finnland, Martinlaakso, Vantaa --Ralf Roletschek 22:07, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review The crop is a bit tight but IMO the image is OK. However, could you add some sign-related category, please? --Basotxerri 06:01, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Watchtower of Castle of Severac in Severac-le-Chateau, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 15:16, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Saint-Julien Church of Ayrinhac, Bertholene, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 15:16, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: View on Lac des Salhiens, Nasbinals, Lozere, France. --Tournasol7 15:16, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Immature swee waxbill, KwaZulu-Natal Drakensberg. --Alandmanson 12:50, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Shankar Raman 14:00, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

July 16, 2017

• 

  • Nomination Door lock at the Romanesque church "Sainte-Marie de Serralongue", France. --Palauenc05 21:00, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:20, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Our Lady of the Assumption cathedral, Bourg-en-Bresse --Chabe01 16:16, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
    Too soft to me, I'd apply some sharpening Poco a poco 16:28, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Allegory of Peace, state order for the Louvre palace on the occasion of the World Expo of 1878. - Daniel VILLAFRUELA 16:12, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
    It's too soft and tilted cw Poco a poco 16:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Allegory of Peace, state order for the Louvre palace on the occasion of the World Expo of 1878. - Daniel VILLAFRUELA 16:12, 16 July 2017 (UTC)]]
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Allegory of Peace, state order for the Louvre palace on the occasion of the World Expo of 1878. - Daniel VILLAFRUELA 16:12, 16 July 2017 (UTC)]]
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Südwesttrakt des Schlosses und Bildungshauses der Erzdiözes Wien in der niederösterreichischen Marktgemeinde Großrußbach. Die elfachsige spätbarocke Fassade stammt lt. Inschrift aus dem Jahr 1739. --Manfred Kuzel 15:32, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: The Orquidea de Fuego trail, close to Baños, Tungurahua province, Ecuador --Seb26 12:37, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Grey waxbill, Mkhuze Game Reserve. --Alandmanson 12:21, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Glacial polish at Hann glacier in South East Greenland --Clemens Stockner 11:54, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Symphony of the Stones, Garni Valley, Armenia --Poco a poco 07:41, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion You could relly wish for some focus stacking here, at least two photos here, but I guess it wasn't possible at the time. Ok for QI though. --W.carter 10:16, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Waterloopbos. Cooling water pond Maasvlakte central model M1193 / M1217. Part of the walls of the project.
    --Famberhorst 05:32, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:04, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Swarm of Bees located in Bundoora, Melbourne, Australia. By User:Sichy007 --Cyali 04:47, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality. Sorry, it's a very interesting (and difficult to make) photo but the DoF is simply too shallow, only the head of one bee in the swarm is sharp, just a notch more and most of them would have been sharp. --W.carter 10:10, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: The water feature located at w:UBC's w:Allard School of Law in Vancouver, Canada.--Cyali 01:00, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Please check your image. It's leaning in and there are a lot of CAs. Noise could be reduced and sharpness improved. (f/5 is not the best, IMO f/7.1 or f/8 should be much better.) The name of the author is not the name found in EXIF data. Geo location is missing. --XRay 04:45, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Japanese Garden Green Island Fig bonsai --PumpkinSky 00:02, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review A pity for the harsh light but the image is OK. However, please try to apply a horizontal correction, so you'll get the bricks straight. Perhaps I would crop the lower part below the wood bar, too. --Basotxerri 08:45, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
    Done. Can't get both straight. See upload notes to both new versions. PumpkinSky 19:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

July 15, 2017

• 

  • Nomination: Teatr Hothaus in the show "I have killed a brother of mine …" at 30. ULICA – The International Festival of Street Theatres in Kraków --Jakubhal 16:13, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Cracow Dance Theatre in the show "Estra & Andro" at 30. ULICA – The International Festival of Street Theatres in Kraków --Jakubhal 16:13, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Eröffnungsfeier des WikiBär --Freddy2001 15:13, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review Noise reduction needed. Also: who is this? A portrait should have the name of the person in the description.--Peulle 20:08, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination A snapback (hat) with the tag "Brooklyn". By User:SDKmac --Freddy2001 11:18, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice. Brightness and crop could be improved but OK for me. --Basotxerri 08:40, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Purple flowers in Teltow-Ruhlsdorf, near Berlin, Germany. By User:SDKmac --Freddy2001 11:18, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination: Barbus barbus --Freddy2001 11:15, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment QI for me, but I would prefer more information --Alandmanson 10:13, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Lama in Tambomachay, Cuzco, Peru --Poco a poco 08:26, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed

July 14, 2017

• 

  • Nomination: Marmashen Monastery (smaller church adjacent to the main church) in Armenia, Shirak provence. --Armenak Margarian 20:38, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Too dark. Can you lighten it up? PumpkinSky 22:10, 17 July 2017 (UTC) can you look now? I think it'is ok.--Armenak Margarian 09:39, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Phytolacca decandra in Jardin botanique de la Charme, Clermont-Ferrand, France. --Tournasol7 08:06, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination In the middle two (Pinus sylvestris), tree in Lajen, South Tyrol --Moroder 07:38, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:37, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

July 13, 2017

• 

  • Nomination Delosperma lineare in Jardin botanique de la Charme, Clermont-Ferrand, France. --Tournasol7 20:35, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK. PumpkinSky 00:37, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Echinacea purpurea in Jardin botanique de la Charme, Clermont-Ferrand, France. --Tournasol7 20:35, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline IMO too shallow DoF, not a QI, sorry. --Basotxerri 08:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Hemerocallis 'Neyron Rose' in Jardin botanique de la Charme, Clermont-Ferrand, France. --Tournasol7 20:35, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quakity. PumpkinSky 00:37, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: Double Decker Living root bridges of Nongriat village in East Khasi Hills district, Meghalaya --PJeganathan 10:16, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 

  • Nomination Ford Taunus XL --Berthold Werner 05:50, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:06, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

July 12, 2017

• 

  • Nomination Reflection of sunlight on a Church in Venice --Jsamwrites 20:39, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline A better categorization and the eliminating of strong orange CAs would be helpful. --PtrQs 11:12, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
     Done added location and additional category. Photograph is in its unmodified form. So, I wish to preserve the natural lighting. --Jsamwrites 11:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
    Sorry, but I think strong CAs cannot be accepted as 'natural lighting' --PtrQs 15:15, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination: The skull and horns of an adult male Argali (Ovis ammon) in Tost Local Protected Area, South Gobi Mongolia. By User:Ksuryawanshi --Shankar Raman 17:16, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review The image is nice and OK but the snow seems a bit too blueish. Could you check the white balance, please? --Basotxerri 08:05, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
     Done Please check now Basotxerri--Shankar Raman 12:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Indian Bullock cart in Ajanta, India. By User:Ksuryawanshi --Shankar Raman 17:16, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:07, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Gulgule - Food of India. By User:Suyash.dwivedi --Rahul Bott 10:55, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Needs more accurate categorization.--Peulle 11:53, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
     Done --Rahul Bott 13:39, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
    @Rahul Bott: Could you please check if Category:Gulgula might be appropriate as well? --El Grafo 16:58, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
     Done Yes, thank you El Grafo. I had missed this category as it was in wrong sub-category. Hope it is fine now :) --Rahul Bott 06:30, 16 July 2017 (UTC) OK.--Peulle 13:21, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Cistus albidus in Jardin botanique de la Charme, Clermont-Ferrand, France. --Tournasol7 07:43, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion A bit soft and could be sharper but OK for me. --Basotxerri 08:00, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

July 11, 2017

• 

  • Nomination Aesculus parviflora in Jardin botanique de la Charme, Clermont-Ferrand, France. --Tournasol7 06:18, 11 July 2017 (UTC) CommentHighlights a bit overexposed and image not sharp IMO. Not sure if fixable.--Shankar Raman 16:37, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline  Not done PumpkinSky 20:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

July 10, 2017

• 

  • Nomination: MAF D4, 1909 --Berthold Werner 05:43, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment The highlights could use some reducing; they appear almost blown.--Peulle 19:18, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

July 9, 2017

• 

  • Nomination Maidan Nezalezhnosti in Kiew --Ralf Roletschek 21:19, 9 July 2017 (UTC) Comment Noisy and dark can you fix it? --Cvmontuy 16:23, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
     Not done . PumpkinSky 20:25, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline {{{2}}}
• 

  • Nomination Morning at Open-air museum Glentleiten, Germany. --HerrAdams 20:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline It would hurt to decline such a beautiful image: the composition is good, in the color of the light we feel the cold morning - but to me it does not comply with the quality standards: it lacks sharpness, there are strong CAs on the shingles and color noise in the shadows. I'd be happy if you could fix all this, but I'm sceptic. --PtrQs 19:53, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
     Not done . PumpkinSky 20:25, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

July 6, 2017

• 

  • Nomination: Paddyfield in Kadapa district, Andhra Pradesh --PJeganathan 13:32, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review
     Comment A pity that the pylon is not whole : a really interesting picture. --MirandaAdramin 11:10, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
    Thanks MirandaAdramin for your comments. Wanted to cover major part of the paddyfield hence didn't cover the whole pylon. Is there anything else would you suggest to fix this?--PJeganathan 08:48, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
• 

  • Nomination Paddy field full of spider webs in Thanjavur district --PJeganathan 13:32, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
     Comment It looks tilted? I think in this case also the taxa name is required--Moroder 08:00, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
     Done Thanks Moroder for your comments. Have added the family name. I don't think it is tilted and I think the terrain itself is like that.--PJeganathan 08:48, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 09:51, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

• To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.

• You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".

• The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.

Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.

Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted

• In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
• Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add  Oppose and  Support if necessary.
• Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
• Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".

Consensual Review

File:AvCametyConstitucion-05752.jpg

• Nomination View of Felix U. Camet Avenue and Constitucion Avenue --Ezarate 02:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Quality high enough for Q1, but sky is a bit noisy --Michielverbeek 05:11, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose. Very unfavorable lighting. No QI for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 09:56, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose The main subject is in the shade, too dark IMO. --Basotxerri 05:36, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment I think, the shadows can be lightened up. Wanna giv it a try? -- DerFussi 08:31, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Basotxerri 05:36, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Light_dispersion_conceptual_waves.gif

• Nomination Light dispersion in a prism --Geek3 15:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment Sadly, the resolution is below the 2 megapixel minimum requirement for QI. There is an exception: This rule exclude images computer generated and constructed using a free licensed source code available in the image description. Somebody tell me if that's the case. --Peulle 21:16, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support See my reply on the other gif at CR. Please don't 'oppose' just because you are uncertain about how to judge a photo, ask instead. If no one had caught this, it would have been washed out needlessly. --W.carter 10:08, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Yes, I was actually planning to move this to CR today, both images should be judged the same way.--Peulle 13:17, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Nice and good but I wish the resolution was better. Should be possible as it seems to be computer-generated. --Basotxerri 05:41, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

• Each image in the gif could surely be generated in a larger size, but not the resulting gif. You always have do reduce the image size if you are making a gif with a lot of images or the software won't be able to keep up with it. This is a 90 images gif, hence the smaller size. See my reply below on "File:Rolling_Racers_-_Moment_of_inertia.gif". --W.carter 09:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

• OK, I think you're right, I didn't think about the animation smoothness. --Basotxerri 12:02, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Maybe this is the kind of image that could have been done into a bigger one by making a video file?--Peulle 13:10, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Basotxerri 05:32, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

File:NSU_Fiat_500_BW_2016-07-17_14-15-04.jpg

• Nomination NSU Fiat 500, 1953 --Berthold Werner 10:39, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment Could you please fix that tampering with the licence plate (that black frame around it)? --PtrQs 20:52, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
   Not done --PtrQs 23:33, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• ich sehe nichts Störendes:  Support --Ralf Roletschek 21:08, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose for all who are not so sharp-sighted I annotated the disturbing black frame --PtrQs 00:49, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment „Kontra“ klingt sehr hart. Aber dieses Foto ist an verschiedenen Stellen zu hell und mich stören die Zettel in der Windschutzscheibe. Deshalb kann ich nicht für QI stimmen. Einen störenden schwarzen Rahmen allerdings erkenne ich nicht. -- Spurzem 10:37, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Basotxerri 05:29, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

File: MGA 1600 Coupé (2017-07-01 Sp).JPG

• Nomination MG A 1600 Coupé from 1959/60 at “Europa Klassik” in Andernach on the Rhine -- Spurzem 20:43, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:44, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Category still not fixed --A.Savin 21:05, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

• @A.Savin: Sagen Sie bitte endlich, was Sie haben wollen. Es muss etwas sein, wofür sich außer Ihnen niemand interessiert; aber ich möchte es wissen. -- Spurzem 22:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment The category should have all necessary parent categories; that are to be related to the city, the event, the year. Otherwise no one can find the category and, as a result, the photo either. See COM:Categories (there is German version) --A.Savin 22:44, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Categories OK IMO. --Palauenc05 23:48, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support per others --Magnus (talk) 06:35, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Niemand braucht hier mehr als die angegebenen Kategorien ! User:A.Savin - take a look at Category:Europa-Klassik am Rheintor Andernach --Frze ^{> talk} 07:46, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

I did. So what? --A.Savin 11:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Support IMO OK, categories too. --XRay 10:12, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support alle notwendigen Kategorien vorhanden. --Ralf Roletschek 15:16, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support It was properly categorized. The existence of a thorough parent category hierarchy must not be part of a QI discussion. -- DerFussi 07:15, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Running total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Tsungam 06:35, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Glenfinnan_Monument.jpg

• Nomination The Glenfinnan Monument --DeFacto 20:29, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• Discussion
• Monument is not straight, please think about the verticals --Michielverbeek 20:38, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

• That's the impression which you will have standing near by the monument.

•  Support for me. -- Spurzem 20:47, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment, Michielverbeek: I think looking up from this close a small amount of perspective convergence is necessary to avoid an unnatural appearance. DeFacto 21:01, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Support -- OK to me. -- DerFussi 07:44, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --DerFussi 08:36, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Rolling_Racers_-_Moment_of_inertia.gif

• Nomination 3D animation for moments of inertia --Geek3 15:27, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:49, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose for discussion; it's below the 2MP limit - does it hit the exception in the guidelines? "This rule exclude images computer generated and constructed using a free licensed source code available in the image description."--Peulle 21:19, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

• Most QI and FP gifs are well below 2MP simply because they are many pictures stacked. Most normal software can't even produce complicated gifs as big as 2MP and the wiki software also distort the color in large gifs when they are shown in thumb. Please take a look at Commons:Featured pictures/Animated, one of the gif FPs there is only 280 × 233 pixels. If you are uncertain about how to judge a photo, it is always good to have a look at the corresponding FP category, many of those are also QIs. --W.carter 08:45, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

So we judge them individually as we would any other picture? A gif of 10 x 10 pxl I would consider too small to offer sufficient detail, but we can promote gifs that have sufficient detail even when below 2MP? This one is borderline, IMO; I would have liked it to be a bit larger so we could see better what was going on.--Peulle 13:05, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

This is actually a rather complicated gif, it is made up from 105 images whereas most normal good gifs are made up of 10-35 images. That is why it has to be made this small. When judging a gif, you need to look at both the "picture" like any normal photo but also look at how many images it is composed of and how it displays on the screen. The movement should be smooth and not jerk around too much. You can compare this QI gif with this non-QI gif. In the jellyfish gif you can see how the color becomes distorted when viewed in anything but full size, it is probably almost too big for a proper gif QI since you have to click for full size view to see it at its best. Most veiwers don't bother doing that with gifs. --W.carter 13:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

OK I'm convinced. There's another one of these coming, let's judge it the same way.--Peulle 21:25, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Support --Frze 08:07, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --W.carter 08:45, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --W.carter 08:37, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

File: Kreidler Eigenbau, Cockpit (2017-06-11 Sp).JPG

• Nomination Cockpit of self built racing motorcycle based on Kreidler -- Spurzem 13:15, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:28, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Category still not fixed --A.Savin 21:05, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Frze 08:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roletschek 15:18, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- DerFussi 07:52, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --W.carter 08:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Common_brimstone_(Gonepteryx_rhamni)_female_Estonia.jpg

• Nomination Common brimstone (Gonepteryx rhamni) female, Estonia --Charlesjsharp 22:05, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 00:47, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
• Low quality image, sorry. Blown white and unsharp, especially on head -- George Chernilevsky 15:13, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment New version uploaded. Charlesjsharp 20:59, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

• Better now, oppose removed -- George Chernilevsky 16:13, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Support -- Spurzem 08:27, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- DerFussi 09:15, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   George Chernilevsky 16:13, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Frappé.jpg

• Nomination greek Frappé --Kritzolina 05:28, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment chromatic aberrations need removing. Also:  Question is the glass really bent in that shape?--Peulle 19:26, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment The glass is really bent in that shape. But regarding the chromatic aberrations: since I pride myself in having QIs that are not tampered with, I will just let it go. --Kritzolina 04:47, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose OK, that's a pity since it's a nice image - declining then because of the CA on top of the straw.--Peulle 12:24, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Despite a minor flaw still QI 4 me. --Palauenc05 16:39, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support IMO the CA is very, very slight, OK for me. --Basotxerri 07:56, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support As Basotxerri -- Spurzem 08:28, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roletschek 20:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Basotxerri 07:53, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Malabar_lark_Galerida_malabarica_from_Kaas_Plateau_DSC3236.jpg

• Nomination Malabar lark Galerida malabarica from Kaas Plateau --PJeganathan 09:29, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:16, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose I edit conflicted this promotion...I was declining it because of the composition/crop...One's eyes are drawn to the blurry flowers, not the bird, which is too low in the photo. I've tagged for discussion. PumpkinSky 22:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Those flowers are kept in the frame essentially to show the habitat and especially the Kaas Plateau which is a world heritage site and known for Smithia flowers. Just by looking at the flowers one can (people who know these landscapes) roughly say from where the image was taken--PJeganathan 09:38, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with PumpkinSky regarding the crop; I also feel that it is over-saturated and possibly too dark; I have uploaded a possible edit here: --Alandmanson 12:26, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
  • I could support the alternate. PumpkinSky 12:33, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
    • Thanks for this Alandmanson. Do I have to repeat what you did with the image and upload it again? or no need? --PJeganathan 18:43, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
      • No need to repeat (although you or others may prefer a different crop or colour adjustment), but submission of the edit would presumably be needed if you want QI assessment.--Alandmanson 05:42, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
        • My suggestion, let this nom get declined. Upload a cropped version like Alandmanson's but bring the crop in so the two yellow flowers on the right can't be seen. Upload it either as a separate file or as a mod of the current nom. PumpkinSky 20:25, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --W.carter 07:45, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

File:De Meije, rivier De Meije bij Loonspuitbedrijf Kerkvliet BV foto5 2017-07-09 09.52.jpg

• Nomination De Meije-NL, river de Meije near Loonspuitbedrijf Kerkvliet BV --Michielverbeek 23:40, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Disturbing foreground objects, sorry. --Peulle 14:10, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

• It is a very small river that is used for recreation (nearly not for commercial activities); I think the foreground objects emphasize this possibility and really add something to the composition --Michielverbeek 15:23, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

• Then the boats should have been included in the image, IMO, and not cut off like this. We'll see if other people have different opinions.--Peulle 15:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Support o.k. for me.--Ermell 19:09, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roletschek 22:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- PumpkinSky 22:53, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 13:12, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

File:17-07-01-Katukuvaa_pääkaupungissa_RR73789.jpg

• Nomination Katukuvaa pääkaupungissa, Pontiac Parisienne --Ralf Roletschek 00:15, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:39, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Missing category, location --A.Savin 03:15, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment And as usual the file needs a better name, calling all these files "Street view in the capital" even if it is masked by Finish spelling is not QI policy. --W.carter 09:49, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose title. --Peulle 11:15, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Gut fotografiert. Im Dateinamen sollte noch der auf dem Fahrzeug ohne Weiteres erkennbare Markenname "Pontiac" genannt warden, wenn möglich auf noch der Typ. Wo das Auto steht, ist unbedeutend. -- Spurzem 11:40, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Gutes Foto.--Ermell 19:03, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support File name is unusual, but ok, it contains a name (street view in Finnish, a date an the authors initials. Type of car is state in the description and category where it should go normally. Location category would be nice,if you remember it. -- DerFussi 10:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --DerFussi 08:44, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

File:17-07-01-Katukuvaa_pääkaupungissa_RR73773.jpg

• Nomination Katukuvaa pääkaupungissa, Volvo PV444 --Ralf Roletschek 00:15, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:37, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Missing category, location --A.Savin 03:15, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment And as usual the file needs a better name, calling all these files "Street view in the capital" even if it is masked by Finish spelling is not QI policy. --W.carter 09:50, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose title.--Peulle 11:16, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Gutes Foto eines Volvo PV 544. Markenname und Typ sollten ergänzt werden. -- Spurzem 11:42, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Gutes Foto.--Ermell 19:02, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Frze 07:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support File name is unusual, but ok, it contains a name (street view in Finnish, a date an the authors initials. Type of car is state in the description and category where it should go normally. Location category would be nice,if you remember it. -- DerFussi 10:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --DerFussi 08:44, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

File:17-07-01-Katukuvaa_pääkaupungissa_RR73730.jpg

• Nomination Katukuvaa pääkaupungissa, Citroën 2CV --Ralf Roletschek 00:15, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:37, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Missing category, location --A.Savin 03:15, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose title.--Peulle 11:17, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Ein schöner, schon etwas in die Jahre gekommener Citroën 2 CV. Nur die Farbe gefällt mir nicht, was aber mit der Bildqualität ebenso wenig zu tun hat wie die Lacation. -- Spurzem 11:45, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Don't think it's essential for QI to locate the car --Moroder 07:43, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Location added (Finland), but title is unhelpful --Alandmanson 12:51, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Don't you know this car? On the other hand: I wonder why it is not said in the file name. -- Spurzem 17:20, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Support --Ermell 19:01, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support File name is unusual, but ok, it contains a name (street view in Finnish, a date an the authors initials. Type of car is state in the description and category where it should go normally. Location category would be nice,if you remember it. -- DerFussi 10:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promote?   --W.carter 07:32, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

File:17-07-01-Katukuvaa_pääkaupungissa_RR73768.jpg

• Nomination Katukuvaa pääkaupungissa, Opel Vivaro --Ralf Roletschek 20:26, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:43, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Missing category, location --A.Savin 03:13, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose file name.--Peulle 11:18, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Schönes und qualitativ einwandfreies Bild. Marke und Typ des Fahrzeugs sollten im Dateinamen nachgetragen warden. -- Spurzem 11:47, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Alchemist-hp 22:34, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose 0-8-15 Bild --Frze 08:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support 08/15 or not is not the point. File name is unusual, but ok, it contains a name (street view in Finnish, a date an the authors initials. Type of car is state in the description and category where it should go normally. In general, a location category would be nice,if you remember it. But on the other hand, a category like "Helsinki" would be a bit useless as well. wouldn't it? -- DerFussi 10:17, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promote?   --DerFussi 22:34, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

File:17-07-02-Maidan_Nezalezhnosti_RR74358.jpg

• Nomination Maidan Nezalezhnosti in Kiew --Ralf Roletschek 21:19, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality -- PumpkinSky 01:49, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Dust spot to the left of the flag. Noise. Why F11 and ISO-200, and not F8 and ISO-100? --A.Savin 02:51, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment I can't even see the dust spot. There is some noise but I think it ok for QI. Can't get away from McDonald's!! PumpkinSky 22:26, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
    • Die Kamera hat kein ISO 100 --Ralf Roletschek 08:53, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Question I'm irritated by that not very subliminal cw-tilt. Could that be fixed? --PtrQs 22:28, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Links scheint es auf den ersten Blick so aber wenn man sich die Senkrechten am oberen (neuen) Gebäude anschaut, ist es wieder korrekt. Rechts sowieso. --Ralf Roletschek 23:08, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but after checking your other images of 'Maidan Nezalezhnosti in Kiew' it looks like a general problem: Wether it's a distortion of your lens (which does not look very sharp, btw), or they all are tilted CW - or some other reviewer can convincingly attest, that there are whole blocks of tilted buildings in Kiew. --PtrQs 20:11, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Spurzem 13:49, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality for me. --Manfred Kuzel 08:42, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Slightly tilted CW. --Basotxerri 05:56, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → More votes?   --Basotxerri 05:56, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Zeitplan (15 Tage nach Nominierung)

Do 13 Jul. → Fr 21 Jul.
Fr 14 Jul. → Sa 22 Jul.
Sa 15 Jul. → So 23 Jul.
So 16 Jul. → Mo 24 Jul.
Mo 17 Jul. → Di 25 Jul.
Di 18 Jul. → Mi 26 Jul.
Mi 19 Jul. → Do 27 Jul.
Do 20 Jul. → Fr 28 Jul.
Fr 21 Jul. → Sa 29 Jul.