User talk:Мико

Welcome to the Commons, Мико!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Мико!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

--EugeneZelenko 20:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

КБЧТ

Здравей, Мико! Благодаря много, че си преместил картата на България с червена точка (КБЧТ) за село Ръжево! Пиша ти само, че за улеснение тука имат шаблона {{TownBulgaria|Name in English|Име на български}} и би могъл него да го ползваш, ако някога преместваш други КБЧТ. А, и тук би било полезно да ги преименоваш, примерно от Karta_Aleksandrovo_3.png в Aleksandrovo_3_location_in_Bulgaria.png (но не се притеснявай за Ръжевската, ще я оправя заедно с някои други, с програма).

Аз пък ще побързам да направя някоя програма и да можем да преместим оставащите автоматично, с бот.

Поздрави, --5ko 11:55, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Deletion request for Image:Siméon 1er Le grand - Tsar de Bulgarie.jpg

Hi there, I noticed you initiated a deletion request for Image:Siméon 1er Le grand - Tsar de Bulgarie.jpg. However, you did not complete the request; consequently the discussion is not yet valid. Please complete the steps given in the {{delete}} template on the image description page. Thanks, ~ Riana ⁂ 18:52, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry I didn't see this note earlier. The procedure of requesting a deletion is kind of too obscure for me to follow - I provided a link to the source. --Miko Stavrev 09:47, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Anton-Krstev-Memory-Plaque-Sofia.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:28, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

J vs. Ј

Hey Miko, I think we already talked about this, but I'll have to remind you again. Please don't forget that the cyrillic Ј and latin J are Unicode homoglyphs, but have different codes. When writing in Macedonian, please make sure to switch the keyboard layout to MK, so you don't accidentally do this kind of stuff again ([1] and [2]). Oh, by the way, от in Macedonian is од, keep that in mind. ;) --iNkubusse^? 13:47, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Ha-ha - that it's од I know but I usually forget it - you know why :-)). I know that the Cyrillic and the Latin j have different codes but cause they look the same I generally don't bother to switch layouts - I will if you thinks that's a problem.--Мико (talk) 14:21, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh yeah, it's a serious problem. It's often used for malicious actions, so it's better if you don't. ;) --iNkubusse^? 15:19, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Ha - ha malicious actions??? In what way? OK - I won't mix them anymore.--Мико (talk) 20:05, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

No, seriously man, didn't you know? You can do a lot of stuff with that! Not that I have tried it, of course... You can read about it on Wikipedia or search Google, if you're eager. TO understand, of course, not to use it lol. It's a cheap trick, but you can trick inexperienced internet users into... Many things. :) --iNkubusse^? 16:30, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

What?

Haha, what? --iNkubusse^? 15:01, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Haha - what is the problem - the sign reads the same in Mk lit language and in Bg lit language - I wrote it myself :-)))))

I thought you say 'grass' differently. Also, 'те моли' looks weird to me. I thought the verb goes before 'те', like in 'не гази ме'. In Macedonian, 'не ме гази' would be way more natural, but in poetry (like this little piece of poetry written by you :P) this construction is allowed too. Oh well, ok then, nice trick. You can do the same with Serbian, Croatian, Slovenian, Ukrainian, Russian, and maybe even Czech and Slovak (I doubt Polish). --iNkubusse^? 14:04, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

All applies to Bulgarian as well :-)). You are right only for the place of the verb - in a formal text it should be "Тревата те моли, не ме гази, боли ме" but of course "Тревата те моли, не гази ме, боли ме" is normal as well as "Тревата те моли, не гази ме, ме боли". :-)--Мико (talk) 14:24, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Oh, you missed this one a bit. I don't say many things don't apply; our grammars are very similar, of course they do. But, as for this matter, „боли ме“ could never be used in Macedonian (not even in poetry :P). „Не гази ме“ can, however, but „Не ме гази“ is the right one. --iNkubusse^? 14:29, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Ooo not even in poetry - there are no rules for poetry :-)) Imagine a poet with Macedonian national conscience from lets say Sersko - "боли ме" is the standart in Southeastern Macedonia.--Мико (talk) 15:07, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

I was refering to Macedonian standardized language. ;) --iNkubusse^? 15:21, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Ха - ха. You'll come to our point of view, my friend. :-))))

What? That was really awkward... Was it supposed to be an evil-sounding 'be one with the Borg'-like statement? I must say, you're a bit foolish, having your mind focused on one thing only, day and night... Trying to prove something that even you don't believe in. I haven't changed my attitude towards these issues for a long time now and I don't think I am going to, ever. But I doubt you even know my position, my friend. You see, I'm very interested in languages and I've perforated deep through the barrier of south-Slavic grammar, especially my own grammar, of course. It's a fact that the Macedonian grammar and the Bulgarian grammar are very similar to each other, more than to any other of the Slavic grammars. Just like the Russian and the Ukrainian one, but not as much as the Serbian and the Croatian (which act as nothing else but two dialects). Now, if two languages have similar grammar, it doesn't make them the same langauge, does it? Grammar is not all that counts (and remember, it's only similar). You're also forgetting that languages develop and evolve over time, which led to the present situation of having a vast number of languages on a small territory (such as Earth). Remember the time when we all spoke the old Slavonic language? Then it branched into several similar languages, and here we are now, speaking two distinct languages. Of course our two languages have many similarities; all the Slavic languages do! And of course Macedonian is the closest to Bulgarian - they're territorially the closest! I really can't see your problem... What's troubling you? Jeez, I can't believe you made me write all this! --iNkubusse^? 16:05, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Ha-ha, me too - I was just joking.:-)))--Мико (talk) 16:37, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

By the way, Konstantin Miladinov was not from Bulgaria, but I don't mind the category. --iNkubusse^? 15:03, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Neither from RM :-) - but I don't mind the Cat either.--Мико (talk) 17:55, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

No, my friend, but he was from what is now the RM, right? I mean, in my passport, it says I was born in Serbia! That's not damn right, but what can I do, those are the rules for passports. --iNkubusse^? 14:04, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

He was from what is now the RM for sure. --Мико (talk) 14:24, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Why did you revert the deletion request?

In Image:Vevcani oddaleku.jpg you have reverted my tag for deletion. You have transferred the image from mk.wiki, but the image was missing some essential information about the source of the PD claim. For all we know, the image could be a copyright violation. I asked the original uploader before I deleted the image at mk.wiki, and I've asked him again about the source (still waiting for a reply). Maybe I should have been more specific while marking the image, to specify the problem. --Brainmachine (talk) 14:30, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Yes - I reverted it cause there was no reason given. For all we know it could be of course a copyright violation but I assume good faith and think that Boyan really owns the rights and has released his own picture in pd. --Мико (talk) 15:33, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Мико, the image most probably was not made/taken by the original uploader. He just put a random free tag (pd, actually), without specifying the source. It's definitely going to oblivion. :) --iNkubusse^? 16:51, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

OK - if he doesn't provide a source - delete it. :-)--Мико (talk) 16:56, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

It's my fault. I should have been more specific. Btw, I'm not counting on it (on the OP giving a source). There are many, many pics like this one that need to be cleaned up. --Brainmachine (talk) 19:20, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

It's always your fault, Brainmachine! DIE BASTARD, DIE! :D I'm kidding. I just don't have anyone else to say this to, so I'm abusing the Commons. :) Cheers (and delete aaaall the copyvios!)! :D --iNkubusse^? 20:12, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Мико!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:30, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Anton-Ketskarov-document.jpg is uncategorized since 23 January 2009. BotMultichillT 06:30, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Bulgarian Constitutional Clubs Members Gorna Dzhumaya.jpg is uncategorized since 13 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:25, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Bucciarelli of Skopje 1869 - Fratelli d'Alessandri - Rome.jpg is uncategorized since 5 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:35, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Mapa Srbije.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Vlahov Kazanlak.jpg was uncategorized on 3 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:02, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Ortaköy June 1871.jpg was uncategorized on 25 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:35, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Otets gerasim's biographical notes3x.jpg was uncategorized on 7 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:31, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Otets Gerasim's biographical notes1x.jpg was uncategorized on 7 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:31, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Otets Gerasim's Biographical notes2x.jpg was uncategorized on 7 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:31, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Yurdan Stoyanov Rayna Kanazireva.JPG was uncategorized on 26 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:18, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Spiridon Gopcevic 1.jpg was uncategorized on 15 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:15, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Kushnitsa Monastery Icon Georgios Piska Linotopi NHM Sofia.jpg was uncategorized on 5 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 01:12, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Reliquary 1788 Dionysios Kushnitsa Monastery NHMB.jpg was uncategorized on 5 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 01:12, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Athanasios Souliotis.jpg was uncategorized on 31 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:20, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
• Image:Konstantinos Boukovalas.jpg was uncategorized on 31 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:20, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Incorrect filename and description of a picture you uploaded

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sk-Te_highway.jpg

This is not the Skopje-Tetovo motorway, but Skopje-Miladinovci, on the eastern side of Skopje. I'm new to Wikipedia so I'm not sure what should be done in these situations. Can you please fix it. BuildMk (talk) 01:44, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

As sure as it gets cause that picture was taken by me :) I don't know how it found its way to flickr under that name. BuildMk (talk) 17:23, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

I've been through the SK-TE highway an infinite number of times (once on my bike) and I don't really remember this instance. :) I don't know for sure, but I think it's another one. --iNkubusse^? 21:40, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Flickr problem

Hi, there seems to be a problem with a batch upload from flickr you made in January. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files credited to flickr user "vesnamarkoska". Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:49, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Naousa, Greece sacrifice monument 2007.jpg

File:Naousa, Greece sacrifice monument 2007.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

-Iconoclast (talk) 05:10, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Noap my friend. The image is under CC. See: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0. --R ašo 22:48, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

The photograph violates the rights of the sculptor. Same for Flickr, they have no copyright. Iconoclast (talk) 23:48, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Please do not be ridiculous. There is no such thing. According to your logic all panoramas of cities violated the rights of developers.--R ašo 06:32, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Naousa,_Greece_sacrifice_monument_2007.jpg

File:Naousa,_Greece_sacrifice_monument_2007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Iconoclast (talk) 23:58, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Jewish_Memorial_Drama.jpg

File:Jewish_Memorial_Drama.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Iconoclast (talk) 13:55, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Resistance-Monument-Drama.jpg

File:Resistance-Monument-Drama.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Iconoclast (talk) 13:57, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Arta-Pyrrhus.jpg

File:Arta-Pyrrhus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Iconoclast (talk) 09:53, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Bgwiki Bg Site 2009 Plaquette.jpg

File:Bgwiki Bg Site 2009 Plaquette.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Sandstein (talk) 09:58, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Zakas-Kastoria-Bust.jpg

File:Zakas-Kastoria-Bust.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Iconoclast (talk) 14:20, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Tsonchev-Hales-Tageev.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:54, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Kotas

Здрасти to you too :)! You are quite right, although "Kottas" is by the more common form of the man's name, it is also found as "Kotas", incl. in the village's name. Good catch! Constantine ✍ 13:31, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Yordan_Meshkov.JPG

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Yordan_Meshkov.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 11:32, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

File:PanchoMihailov.JPG

File:PanchoMihailov.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ireas :talk: 11:07, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

File:IMRO-united-statute.jpg

File:IMRO-united-statute.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:56, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Vladimir Kanazirev and Headquarters of 12 Bitolya Battalion and Sharkoy mayor.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 10:20, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Dispilio6185.JPG

File:Dispilio6185.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gotse daje (talk) 17:45, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Todor Paskalev Hristo Nikolov Neofit Paskov Kosta Nikolov.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:18, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Kosta Nikolov Solunska Gimnaziya 02.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:21, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Kosta Nikolov Solunska Gimnaziya 01.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:22, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Zhefarovich - Ohrid.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:19, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Balkan revolutionaries

Hi! I have noticed your improved uploads of Balkan revolutionaries, and I'm interested in where you found them?--Zoupan (talk) 11:53, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Different sources. Which one in partucular?--Мико (talk) 06:53, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Source

Hi, Miko. Could you provide source for File:Staff of the Action Army.jpg ? Takabeg (talk) 07:35, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

It was a postcard I found here [3] but unfortunately I cannot find it anymore.--Мико (talk) 19:44, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

merci. Takabeg (talk) 15:27, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Alkiviadis Ikonomidis Receit Ioannis Rallis.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 07:21, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Ioannis Mavrogenis Letter.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 07:39, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Macedonian Constantinople Brotherhood.jpeg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:40, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Original sources

Hi, Miko. How are you ? Do you know date of original publication of File:Izmir15Mayis1919.jpg and File:AntepGaziler.jpg ? Have you ever seen them in karamitsos ?Takabeg (talk) 15:21, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

No, I'm sorry, I've never seen those photos. --Мико (talk) 05:45, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Bitola-military-school-1885.Ottoman-Empire.png

File:Bitola-military-school-1885.Ottoman-Empire.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rapsar (talk) 16:18, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Uskub (Skopje) Ottoman Postcard 1903.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:02, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Bulgarian wikipedia

Hi, Miko. Wikipedia is neither a mirror nor a repository of links, images, or media files. :) Takabeg (talk) 09:55, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

I don't seem to understand. I have nothing to do with this article - the images are really too much and I'll clean them immediately cut you could have done it youself. :) --Мико (talk) 13:58, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Merci. Takabeg (talk) 23:35, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Hrysostomos of Phyladelphia Letter to Ion Dragoumis 2 April 1913 01.jpg

File:Hrysostomos of Phyladelphia Letter to Ion Dragoumis 2 April 1913 01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.

 

Constantine ✍ 10:46, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Agathangelos of Drama Letter to Ion Dragoumis 31 March 1913.jpg

File:Agathangelos of Drama Letter to Ion Dragoumis 31 March 1913.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.

 

Constantine ✍ 10:49, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Alexandros of Thessaloniki Letter to Ion Dragoumis 18 June 1909 02.jpg

File:Alexandros of Thessaloniki Letter to Ion Dragoumis 18 June 1909 02.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.

 

Constantine ✍ 10:49, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Arsenios of Strumitsa Letter to Ion Dragoumis 23 February 1913 02.jpg

File:Arsenios of Strumitsa Letter to Ion Dragoumis 23 February 1913 02.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.

 

Constantine ✍ 10:49, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Arsenios of Strumitsa Letter to Ion Dragoumis 23 February 1913 03.jpg

File:Arsenios of Strumitsa Letter to Ion Dragoumis 23 February 1913 03.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.

 

Constantine ✍ 10:49, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Arsenios of Strumitsa Letter to Ion Dragoumis 23 February 1913 01.jpg

File:Arsenios of Strumitsa Letter to Ion Dragoumis 23 February 1913 01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.

 

Constantine ✍ 10:49, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Voden Philharmonia Orchestra 1908.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Sz-iwbot 16:53, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

---

Hello. Thank you for uploading File:Avram Sadikario.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the file correctly? If you are not able to do this, the file will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the Help desk. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.

--Filnik 08:57, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Dilofo Zagori Bridge.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Dilofo Zagori Bridge.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 13:02, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Doliani Zagori village.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Doliani Zagori village.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

moogsi (blah) 03:28, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Kato Pedina Church.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kato Pedina Church.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 16:25, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Kipoi Bagia Zagori village.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kipoi Bagia Zagori village.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 17:30, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:LakeKastoria.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:LakeKastoria.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 19:11, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Gligor Tashkovich Minister of Foreign Investment of ROMacedonia.jpg

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 10:10, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:C VIII 16.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:C VIII 16.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 18:47, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Solun Bulgarian Municipality Document Header.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Solun Bulgarian Municipality Document Header.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 22:03, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Ohrid Bulgarian Mitropoly Document Header.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ohrid Bulgarian Mitropoly Document Header.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 09:19, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Lerin Bulgarian Municipality Document Header.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Lerin Bulgarian Municipality Document Header.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 20:21, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Debar Bulgarian Mitropoly Document Header.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Debar Bulgarian Mitropoly Document Header.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 20:01, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Lastuni2.jpg

File:Lastuni2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

//  Gikü  said  done  Saturday, 28 December 2013 07:26 (UTC) 07:26, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Korce

Hi. Are you really sure this image is from the North-Bohemian village of Korce? Please, be more careful when reverting. --ŠJů (talk) 15:23, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Yes, sorry - my mistake. --Мико (talk) 20:27, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

where I can find the doc for the Lerin region ?

File:Agios Dimitrios Church in Dion Pieria Fresco.jpg

File:Agios Dimitrios Church in Dion Pieria Fresco.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

5.55.63.163 10:40, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Chetnik group photo, 1908, no. 2.jpg

File:Chetnik group photo, 1908, no. 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zoupan (talk) 18:42, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Vojin Popović-Vuk in the First Balkan War.jpg

File:Vojin Popović-Vuk in the First Balkan War.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zoupan (talk) 16:19, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ismail Strazimiri.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ismail Strazimiri.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 00:20, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Naoussa Zaferakis Theodosiou Monument.jpg

File:Naoussa Zaferakis Theodosiou Monument.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Geraki ^T_L^G 11:21, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Nepokoren.jpg

File:Nepokoren.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Stefan4 (talk) 21:41, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

File mover

Dear Мико, I think you will strongly benefit from having the File rename user right, with respect to your tireless contributions and current participation in the m:Archives Challenge. Keep up the good work! :) →Spiritia 22:45, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. :) --Мико (talk) 16:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Нужна помощь

Есть фотография, предоставленная Министерством иностранных дел Греции. Возможно тебе известно что это за женщина с пышной причёской слева и где сделано это фото? ~ Чръный человек (talk) 04:50, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Это bg:Цецка Цачева - председатель болгарского парламента в Софии, 18 иуня 1915. --Мико (talk) 05:20, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Я имел ввиду ту, что сбоку, под фонарём. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 08:22, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Переводчик думаю. --Мико (talk) 09:12, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Я тут тем временем загрузил несколько сотен фотографий с flickr-эккаунта МИД Болгарии. Не всех конечно сумел опознать. Вот тут кто изображён? ~ Чръный человек (talk) 09:46, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

@Чръный человек. Женщина за Николая Младеновым это Raynell Andreychuk, а мужщина - ни как не уверен, но думаю может быть John Dyrby Paulsen - это сесия Парламентарной асамблеи НАТО в Варне и это не болгары :). --Мико (talk) 13:45, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Мне национальность не важна. Главное - опознать. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 13:49, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Category:Unidentified orthodox bishops

У меня небольшая просьба. Если встретится на Викискладе фото какого-либо неопознанного православного епископа, то складывай его в эту категорию. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 07:47, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

ОК. --Мико (talk) 07:52, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Нет предположений о том, что за иерарх изображён на этом фото? ~ Чръный человек (talk) 12:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Я кажется видел его - подумаю. --Мико (talk) 12:47, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Чръный человек - Это архимандрит Яков Афанасиу. [4] --Мико (talk) 13:19, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

А ты как думаеш - это File:Thessaloniki Orthodox Bishop Bairam.jpg bg:Алексадър Ригопулос или нет? --Мико (talk) 13:21, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Установить бы год снимка... ~ Чръный человек (talk) 13:36, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Не знаю. --Мико (talk) 13:38, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Чръный человек, я нашла другая версия открытки датированная 28 ноебря 1904 года, значит bg:Алексадър Ригопулос (слышком молодой), bg:Атанасий Мегаклис (слышком молодой), bg:Софроний Христидис (слышком отдаленный, но возраст подходящий). Если бы фотография нашлась...--Алиса Селезньова (talk) 17:53, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Хахаха - кто ищет, тот и найдет. --Мико (talk) 05:48, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

• File:Predstavnici SPC na obeležavanju 70. godišnjice Novosadske racije (6).JPG. Есть ли какие-ниубдь догадки о том, кто в середине в очках. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 16:46, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Нет, никаких к сожалению. --Мико (talk) 19:18, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

• File:Pehčevo, vladikata vo poseta.jpg. Македонцы утверждают, что на этой фотографии изображён Герасим Струмичский. Вроде бы Пехчево именно к этой епархии относится. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 16:56, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Чръный человек. Пехчево точно к Струмичкой епархии и я тоже думал что это Герасим, но в 1918, когада Герасим умер ему было 58 - этот слышком стар на моем взгляде. Думаю что это сербский владыка в 1920-их. --Мико (talk) 17:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Сербские епископы носили такие митры? У сербской православной церкви было в Македонии в мевоенный период только 3 епархии. Надо подумать. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 17:09, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Не знаю про митрах. Если серб - то Серафим (Йованович). --Мико (talk) 17:12, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

В сербской Википедии есть фото Серафима (Йовановича). sr:Датотека:Епископ Серафим.png. Как то мало похож. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 17:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Если это 1912 год, то это может быть и грек Арсений (Афендулис), но он ещё моложе, чем Герасим (Байрамов). ~ Чръный человек (talk) 17:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Да - возможно и Арсений - в Пехчево была и маленкая сербская община под Патриархии. Вправо от йерарха какой-то военный - болгар и серб? --Мико (talk) 17:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Polykastano-dimotiko.jpg

File:Polykastano-dimotiko.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—LX (talk, contribs) 15:26, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

File:KoteHristov.jpg

File:KoteHristov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 12:42, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Krastyu Zlatarev.jpg

File:Krastyu Zlatarev.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 23:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Rename a category

Be careful ! Take a look at Commons:Rename a category ! --Frze ^{> talk} 13:21, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

I am careful. But thanks :) --Мико (talk) 13:23, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Category:Activists of IMARO: Move the included pages (files, subcategories, galleries etc.) from the old category to the new category ! --Frze ^{> talk} 13:25, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

I will. --Мико (talk) 13:25, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

What shoud this or that? The pictures were in the categories of persons. Hystrix (talk) 11:44, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Only one picture - category is not necessary. --Мико (talk) 12:01, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Mikrolimni-Langi-Church.jpg

File:Mikrolimni-Langi-Church.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Guanaco (talk) 16:48, 18 July 2017 (UTC)