User talk:ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. If you have experience contributing to Wikipedia, we have information that you might find useful.

Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can see the files you have uploaded in your gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg Only upload freely licensed or public domain content. Fair use is not allowed on commons. If you're copying files from another Wikimedia project, use the CommonsHelper You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Simply use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Simply tag it as {{speedy|reason for deletion}}. For more information read the full deletion guidelines.

-- 04:19, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Bliss.png

File:Bliss.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Codename Lisa (talk) 00:44, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

File:فلفل حلو.PNG

File:فلفل حلو.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 10:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

File:فلفل حلو أحمر.PNG

File:فلفل حلو أحمر.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 10:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

File:طفل رضيع 6.PNG

File:طفل رضيع 6.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 10:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

---

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.  

--Steinsplitter (talk) 13:47, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:قرداتي.jpg
• File:عش وبيض.jpg
• File:ذيل أسد.jpg
• File:منجم.jpg
• File:ذيل حوت.jpg

Yours sincerely Эlcobbola _talk 15:04, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

The pictures seem to be scanned from a book. A permission from their author (who drew the pictures initially) is required here or an evidence that the book has been published under a free license (like CC_BY-SA-3.0, for example). And we doubt tht you are the author who drwe the initial pictures, as you claim they are your own work. If you are, please prove it. Ankry (talk) 06:36, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:قرداتي.jpg
• File:عش وبيض.jpg
• File:ذيل أسد.jpg
• File:منجم.jpg
• File:ذيل حوت.jpg

Yours sincerely, Steinsplitter (talk) 06:55, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

File:ظل 6.jpg

File:ظل 6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ies (talk) 16:12, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

File:King Fahd International Stadium, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, April 2014.jpg

---

Hello!

Thank you for uploading File:King Fahd International Stadium, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, April 2014.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:47, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

File:ظل 16.jpg

File:ظل 16.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ies (talk) 10:19, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

File:ظل 9.jpg

File:ظل 9.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 19:34, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:ظل سلك 5.jpg

File:ظل سلك 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 19:35, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:زجاج مكسور 4.jpg

File:زجاج مكسور 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 19:35, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:ظل 5.jpg

File:ظل 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 19:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:ظل 4.jpg

File:ظل 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 19:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:زجاج مكسور.jpg

File:زجاج مكسور.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 19:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:ظل سلك 2.jpg

File:ظل سلك 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 19:39, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:ظل سلك 3.jpg

File:ظل سلك 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 19:40, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:ظل سلك 4.jpg

File:ظل سلك 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 19:40, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:ظل سلك.jpg

File:ظل سلك.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 19:40, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:ظل 2.jpg

File:ظل 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 19:41, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:ظل سيارة.PNG

File:ظل سيارة.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 19:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:ظل إنسان 13.jpg

File:ظل إنسان 13.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 19:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:ظل إنسان 14.jpg

File:ظل إنسان 14.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 19:43, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:ظل إنسان 10.PNG

File:ظل إنسان 10.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 19:44, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:ظل إنسان 2.PNG

File:ظل إنسان 2.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 19:44, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:ظل إنسان 6.PNG

File:ظل إنسان 6.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 19:44, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:ظل إنسان 4.PNG

File:ظل إنسان 4.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 19:45, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:ظل إنسان 3.PNG

File:ظل إنسان 3.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 19:45, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:ظل إنسان 7.PNG

File:ظل إنسان 7.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 19:45, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:ظل.PNG

File:ظل.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 19:46, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:ظل إنسان 16.jpg

File:ظل إنسان 16.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 19:46, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:القمر 2.PNG

File:القمر 2.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 19:50, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:نافورة 6.PNG

File:نافورة 6.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 20:03, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:نافورة 5.PNG

File:نافورة 5.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 20:05, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:ظل 15.jpg

File:ظل 15.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 20:07, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

File:ظل 12.jpg

File:ظل 12.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 20:07, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Redirection of gallery pages

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 ; Please follow the guidance of Commons:Galleries and Commons:When to create a gallery. Note especially, "Galleries should not be created if they merely duplicate the purpose of a category. However, this does not mean they should be deleted or "merged". Categories will always be categories, but galleries can turn into something much more." If you wish, you can improve galleries by adding headings and editing their content to better illustrate their subject. Reviewed images, featured, quality and valued, should almost always be included. Only the best of very similar images should be retained. Thank you, Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:56, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued images

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 , may I invite you to join COM:VI, please? It is a good place to see and review the work of other editors and have your own photographs reviewed.

I responded to your post on my talk page.[1] Thank you for explaining your reasoning in your edit summary.[2] I think that was a reasonable edit. Such pages are permitted by Commons:Project scope/Pages, galleries and categories. But the page you redirected was inactive.

If you wish to reply, please respond below. Otherwise it is difficult to follow a discussion without adding permanent links. Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:32, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Stop redirecting galleries to categories

Please stop redirecting galleries to categories. As I explained to you on my talk page, "the category has more images" is not a valid reason.[3][4] BerndH has reverted your edit.[5] The gallery, Baeomyces rufus, is linked from de:Baeomyces rufus at the top of its "Weblinks" section. Editors on other projects (including me) often use galleries on Commons instead of galleries within their article. Your edits of this sort are unhelpful. I have reverted some of them. You may show good faith by reviewing your edits and reverting those that do not comply with the guidance that I cited earlier. Thank you. Walter Siegmund (talk) 15:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

I don't understand your edit summary, "no Scientific description".[6] What is your reasoning? This is a well-organized gallery page with taxonavigation and useful captions and links. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:15, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Allium lusitanicum

Can you explain this edit to Allium lusitanicum, please?[7] When you make edits that may be unclear, it is helpful to write an explanation in the "Edit summary" box. GRIN says the accepted name is Allium senescens subsp. montanum (Fr.) Holub).[8] ThePlantList says that Allium lusitanicum Lam. is an accepted name.[9] What is the source for your edit? Thank you, Walter Siegmund (talk) 18:08, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Mass deletion request

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 ; Thank you for nominating Category:Annamaria Suppa.[10] To create a mass deletion request, please see Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request. I didn't know how to do this. I used sidebar link "Nominate for deletion" to nominate File:La-mia-arca-9.jpg, then edited Commons:Deletion requests/File:La-mia-arca-9.jpg that it created.

Do you object to my reversion of your edits to Allium lusitanicum (see above)? --Walter Siegmund (talk) 20:25, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked

This user has been blocked The reason for the block is available in the block log. The administrator listed in the block log can give you further information. See also the contributions of this user or the upload log in order to find out why this user has been blocked.

Steinsplitter (talk) 07:32, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks but

Thank you for your work on Category:Uploads by LasPo rocks needing category review. I can see you have made a lot of good work removing bad categories from the files that were there. But there is a problem. Many useless categories still persist on the files (such as Tumblr, Pinterest, Tears, Emo on File:Dark Angel Tears (5051938202).jpg) and now they cannot be found easily because you removed the files from Uploads by LasPo rocks needing category review as well. Please be more careful in the future, and if you're not sure if some categories are accurate and useful for the file, you can remove or enhance useless categories but leave the "category review" type of category in place so someone else will also have a look. --Pitke (talk) 21:10, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Not like this

Your rotation of File:Palace a la plage en Cascaes.jpg resulted needlessly in a much smaller image; I reverted it. Please make sure you didn’t do the same for other images needed rotation; this loss of resolution might becaused by the tools you use to create the rotated image, I’m sure you did not intend it — but please review your process for future rotations. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 19:07, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

I see the same occurred with this photo, but not with this other. All your rotations will have to be confirmed now. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 19:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Convite

CONVITE - CONCURSO FOTOGRÁFICO Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil 2015 Patrimônio Histórico

Olá ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2,

Obrigado por ter participado do concurso Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2014/2015.

Ao longo destas duas edições contamos com a participação de quase 3.000 fotógrafos e recebemos ao todo mais de 20.000 imagens que estão sendo usadas para ilustrar artigos da Wikipédia e enriquecendo o nosso repositório de imagens aqui no Wikimedia Commons. Devido ao grande sucesso das duas edições do WLE, decidimos trazer para o Brasil o maior concurso fotográfico do mundo, que será realizado de 1 a 30 de setembro de 2015.

O Wiki Loves Monuments é organizado em vários países do mundo e é considerado desde 2011 pelo Livro dos Recordes como maior concurso fotográfico do mundo. Estamos aqui para te convidar a fazer parte da historia e do maior concurso fotográfico já realizado!

Acesse o site do Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil 2015 - Patrimônio Histórico confira nossa lista de monumentos a serem fotografados e submeta suas imagens para concorrer a premiação de R$6.000 em dinheiro.

Contribua também divulgando para seus amigos, contatos e curtindo nossa página no Facebook e seguindo nossa conta no Twitter.

Atenciosamente,

Comitê organizador do Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil 2015

Grupo Wikimedia Brasileiro de Educação e Pesquisa, Rodrigo Padula (talk). 16:50, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sony A77.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sony A77.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

---

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.  

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 07:14, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bottle with Fish, Joseon dynasty (1392-1910), 15th-early 16th century.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bottle with Fish, Joseon dynasty (1392-1910), 15th-early 16th century.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

رد: مساحة

مرحبا دييد، لست محترفاً، ولكن هذه أل باء تصوير... يمكنك أن تعرف المزيد عنها من خلال مقال ويكيبيديا العربية. ومقال آخر خارج ويكيبيديا للمزيد من المعلومات. تحياتي... --Faris El-Gwely (talk) 06:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Cartucho 8 pistas.jpg

File:Cartucho 8 pistas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan2 (talk) 22:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Complete heterochromia and anisocoria.png

File:Complete heterochromia and anisocoria.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ies (talk) 09:05, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:-Penn (in Marcel Rochas's 'Mermaid Dress') by Irving Penn - 1950 (21338935969).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:-Penn (in Marcel Rochas's 'Mermaid Dress') by Irving Penn - 1950 (21338935969).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:A lovely slinky 1940's nightie.... (22498026659).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:A lovely slinky 1940's nightie.... (22498026659).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:43, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

File:A lovely slinky 1940's nightie.... (22498026659).jpg

File:A lovely slinky 1940's nightie.... (22498026659).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

★ Poké⁹⁵ 09:55, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Explaining Public Domain Mark 1.0

Hello, to explain, the Public Domain Mark 1.0 license is only used for works known to be out of copyright (for example, old works). It should not be used to release a work into the public domain. To release a work to the public domain, CC0 must be used instead. To know when Public Domain Mark 1.0 is used, look for the icon which is a small circle with a "C" that is slashed. While CC0 is a small circle with a "0" that is slashed. If you see an image that is licensed under Public Domain Mark 1.0, check first if it is used correctly. It should be an old work. I hope this will help you in uploading Flickr images. Not a warning, but a reminder. Thank you! ★ Poké⁹⁵ 09:48, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

You can see the differences between Public Domain Mark 1.0 and CC0 by visiting these two pages: Public Domain Mark 1.0 and CC0. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 09:58, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Lynn tate, Mufee6.jpg

File:Lynn tate, Mufee6.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Ponyo (talk) 17:07, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license has been found on File:Sailor fuku in Second Life 5.jpg

This media may be deleted.

---

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Sailor fuku in Second Life 5.jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedily deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY) or (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again. Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Sailor fuku in Second Life 6.png

This media has been deleted.

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Sailor fuku in Second Life 6.png, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY) or (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request. Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license has been found on File:Sailor fuku in Second Life 7.jpg

This media may be deleted.

---

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Sailor fuku in Second Life 7.jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedily deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY) or (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again. Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Souk Al Milh, Sana, Yemen (4324865585).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Souk Al Milh, Sana, Yemen (4324865585).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates

Hi, Please read the guidelines: Commons:Featured picture candidates. I know there isn't an Arabic translation, but you could make one. ;o) Regards, Yann (talk) 11:52, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi, You confuse megapixels with megabytes. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:34, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Old woman draught at Ratcliffe Highway.png

Hello, if you would like to have it cropped, I suggest the separate upload of a derivative version. Cheers, — Racconish^☎ 19:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Categories

This was not a useful edit. The image hardly shows a polytail so is a very bad example to put in that category. Please remove it. Ww2censor (talk) 14:00, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

I see the opposite --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 14:08, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

So half the ponytail is missing and you think that is good. You can hardly even see that the woman has a pony tail. (moved your post back here to keep all of a discussion in one place as clearly requested on my talk page). Ww2censor (talk) 14:19, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

@Ww2censor:Categories should explain the contents of the images.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 14:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Leighton-God Speed!.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leighton-God Speed!.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism is not appreciated

---

 You have vandalized the content of Wikimedia Commons. Please stop. If you continue making inappropriate edits you may be blocked from editing Commons. You may test freely in the sandbox.

Hi, I already asked you several times not to add images in links in your FP nominations. Do not do that again. This is a warning. Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:12, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:UGC 1810 and UGC 1813 in Arp 273 (captured by the Hubble Space Telescope).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:UGC 1810 and UGC 1813 in Arp 273 (captured by the Hubble Space Telescope).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:ظل إنسان 1.PNG
• File:ظل إنسان 12.jpg
• File:ظل إنسان 15.jpg
• File:ظل إنسان 17.jpg    FDMS  4    14:19, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Flag of the Pakistan army (Non-Ceremonial).jpg

File:Flag of the Pakistan army (Non-Ceremonial).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 10:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Flag of the Pakistan army (Non-Ceremonial).jpg

File:Flag of the Pakistan army (Non-Ceremonial).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 10:35, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected: File:St Nicholas chocolate.JPG

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 14:38, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Bliss location in 2014.PNG

File:Bliss location in 2014.PNG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Storkk (talk) 12:03, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Fat girl and thin girl.PNG

File:Fat girl and thin girl.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

czar 04:16, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Guepier d'europe au parc national Ichkeul.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Guepier d'europe au parc national Ichkeul.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Deleted content

Afrikaans | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | हिन्दी | magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | Nederlands | polski | português | svenska | українська | +/−

---

Hello ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2,

the following content you uploaded is not free and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Jehad Mohamed set himself on fire using gasoline and a match outside the UNHCR office in Hargeisa - the capital of the self-declared republic of Somaliland - Oct 6 2015.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files which can be used for any purpose, including:

• use in any work, regardless of content
• creation of derivative works
• commercial use
• free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload works you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, Jcb (talk) 14:58, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Please revert your redirects

You changed Category:Low quality food and drink pictures into a redirect. In my opinion this isn't correct. There is also no rational at all given to have it changed in to a redirect. It is also very strange that you start a discussion and then you yourself end the discussion making a decision for which there was no consensus. Can you please revert your actions and restore the files that were originally in there back in to this category? - Takeaway (talk) 22:27, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

tilting images

Please do not tilt images as you've done with File:Jerusalem's Old City (4159529435).jpg and many other images. Tilting images (as opposed to properly straightening them) results in a significant amount of whitespace and thus makes inclusions in Wikipedia articles and other Wikimedia pages look inappropriate. Also, tilted images can hardly be used in educational material.    FDMS  4    16:12, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Also, don't alter images in a way that decreases the visibility of important parts of the image (File:USMC-10273.jpg et al.).    FDMS  4    20:42, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

[re Special:Diff/198170719] Category:Images requiring rotation is mainly for images requiring rotation by a right or straight angle, not tilting. I have undone your tilts for the reasons given – you must revert your re-overwrites until consensus has been reached in your favour (probably at another venue); edit-warring is prohibited on all Wikimedia projects.    FDMS  4    14:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

[re Special:Diff/198202194] So you're saying File:Praia do Norte, Nazaré in December 2015 10.jpg is straight? This is absurd. @Geagea: I see you have reverted this user's tilting of one of your uploads – please help, he's done the same with many others.    FDMS  4    16:54, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

@FDMS4:I mean The Things tilted and I make them straight.Example:The sea tilted and "Requesting rotation of the image" then I make it straight.Do you want to make it tilted?! --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 17:09, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Please do not overwrite files

---

I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:Jerusalem's Old City (4159529435).jpg. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you.

For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

Also File:Praia do Norte, Nazaré in December 2015 10.jpg-- Geagea (talk) 17:41, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

@Geagea:I respond to these requests --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:48, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

these requests was a request to rotation of the file with 180°. Either 180°, 270° or 90° may be acceptable. Request to other degree is vandalism. see also explanation by user:FDMS4. Please stop doing so. This is last warning. -- Geagea (talk) 07:58, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

@Geagea: So You can stop "other degree" by Abuse filter --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:19, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Yes, maybe. Or I can block user that violate COM:OVERWRITE. -- Geagea (talk) 09:23, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

@Geagea:For "consult the creator or original uploader" Can I edit my files as I want? --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:32, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Yes, but be aware that they might be a subject to deletion requests as out of project scope as in the way you present the file it can not be used in our projects. -- Geagea (talk) 09:43, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Tokyo Doll Event (8239924613).jpg

File:Tokyo Doll Event (8239924613).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Grand-Duc (talk) 20:46, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Evolutionary algorithm

Don't start an edit war! Your edition is not proper -- the category can not redirect to itself!

مترجم جوجل: لا تبدأ حرب تحرير! طبعة ليست صحيحة - فئة لا يمكن إعادة توجيه لنفسها!

Wieralee (talk) 12:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

File:البابا شنودة وتاريخ الكنيسة القبطية الغلاف 1.jpg

File:البابا شنودة وتاريخ الكنيسة القبطية الغلاف 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

   FDMS  4    08:47, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Beirut_River_crocodile

Category:Beirut_River_crocodile has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

الواد الجامد (talk) 07:54, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Ahdut.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ahdut.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ahdut.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

-- Geagea (talk) 13:59, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Removing votes from Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Roadkill on Route 170 Okatie Hwy by the Chechessee River, SC, USA, jjron 09.04.2012.jpg

Why are you removing other people's votes as you did here? - Takeaway (talk) 20:07, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Mother doll 1.jpg

File:Mother doll 1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

INeverCry 18:39, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Mother doll 2.jpg

File:Mother doll 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

INeverCry 18:40, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	السلام عليكم هبة بوبنان (talk) 09:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wadi Al Hitan1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wadi Al Hitan1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

File:الأجبية 1984 1.jpg

File:الأجبية 1984 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ibrahim.ID ♒ 20:51, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

رد:

بنود الملكية العامة في مصر واضحة، والعملية لا تبنى على تقدير شخصي ، يعني لا يجوز ان تقول اعتبر هذا عمل فنيا !!
الصور الفوتوغرافية شيء والكتب شيء أخر .. قالب الترخيص في كومنز سليم ولا يوجد به أي أخطاء .. وبشكل عام لا يجوز التعلل بسوء فهمك لما هو مكتوب في قالب (الملكية العامة مصر) لأن وضع الصور غير قانوني وسيتم حذفها عاجلاً أو أجلاً --Ibrahim.ID ♒ 07:11, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

مسألة 25 سنة بتنطبق فقط على الصور الفوتوغرافية والأعمال السمعية فقط .. لم تنص على الكتب إطلاقاً ولا يجوز اعتبارها هكذا ..

وأي شخص مطلع على قواعد التراخيص يعرف أنه في فارق كبير بين الكتب والصور ولا يعاملون نفس المعاملة

مسألة كتب عين شمس كارثة أخرى، أنا لا افهم كيف يكون شخص مخضرم مثلك يقول هذا ! منذ متى ويتم رفع الملفات على كومنز مؤقتا ؟؟ أي ملف غير حر لا يجوز إطلاقاً رفعه على كومنز ، يجب أن يكون حر فقط --Ibrahim.ID ♒ 07:36, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

يا ديفيد: كومنز ليس بموقع رفع أو حفظ ملفات، وليس مختص بالاحتفاظ بملفاتك التي تخاف عليها من الضياع هناك مواقع مخصصة لذلك مثل: Dropbox - onedrive - googledrive.

ثانيا: هذه الصور لن تقدر على استرجاعها، حتى لو فرضنا أنك تقصد استرجاعها بعد أن تصبح في الملكية العامة، وبما أن مؤلفين هذه الكتب لا يزالون أحياء، فلو فرضنا أنهم قد يتوفون بعد 20 عام فستحتاج أنك تنتظر 75 سنة حتى تمر 50 سنة على وفاتهم (يعني ستصبح في الملكية العامة سنة 2081) !!!

ثالثاً: فكرتك الجهنمية في رفع صور كتب كي تستخدم في تطوير مقالات، فكرة عديمة الجدوى وليس لها فائدة إطلاقاً، لأنها صور كاميرا موبايل غير واضحة ولا يوجد شخص عنده صبر يتصفح كل هذه الصور (سيقوم بتحميل الكتاب PDF اسرع وهي كثيرة على الأنترنت)، الكتب التي ترفعها كتب أكاديمية ودينية ليست مطلوبة في المقالات ولا لها أهمية، للأسف أنت تضيع وقتك ومجهودك وأيضاً تقوم برفع ملفات كثيرة مخالفة وقد تعرضك للمنع هنا في كومنز --Ibrahim.ID ♒ 08:15, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Girl practicing exercises.jpg

An image must transmit clearly an idea, or shows a place, a person, etc .. This file doesn't transmit the idea of anorexia nervosa, neither know whether GypsyLee Bilenda would like to be remembered for this disease nor this girl is a famous personality in order to be included in Commons. Please remove this file from Category:Anorexia nervosa. Jmarchn (talk) 06:54, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

You say The Image about a girl overcome the disease.. I had already read this in the description of the photo. I do not put in doubt.

You say The Image associated with this disease.. We know that there are people who overcome disease. Not for this reason you have to put that photo in the category of disease that she has overcome. It is the story (and not the image) that associates GypsyLee Bilenda with this serious disease. Similarly, it would make no sense that I put my photo in Category:Chondrosarcoma because I passed a bone cancer nine years ago.

Jmarchn (talk) 21:17, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 1.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 10.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 11.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 12.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 13.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 14.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 15.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 16.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 17.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 18.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 19.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 2.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 20.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 21.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 22.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 23.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 24.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 25.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 26.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 27.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 28.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 29.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 3.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 30.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 31.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 32.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 33.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 34.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 35.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 36.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 37.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 38.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 39.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 4.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 40.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 41.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 42.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 43.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 44.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 45.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 46.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 47.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 48.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 49.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 5.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 50.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 51.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 52.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 53.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 54.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 6.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 7.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 8.jpg
• File:Hypertrophy of breast in Second Life 9.jpg

Yours sincerely, Revent^talk 06:20, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

File:TOC.png

File:TOC.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Revent^talk 06:26, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Celticairesinside.jpg

File:Celticairesinside.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Revent^talk 06:40, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Assaf sheep.jpg

مرحباً ديفيد، منذ قرابة سنتين تقريباً توقفت عن ترشيح صوري لجيدة أو مختارة كوني أعتقد أن دقة الصورة يفترض أن تكون أفضل ، ورجوعا لصورة
File:Assaf sheep.jpg
فقد التقطتها من خلال ضبط الفلاتر وللأسف ففلتر التشبع
Saturation
كان مضبوطاً على الكاميرا في ذلك اليوم وقد حاولت اصلاح الصورة عند رفعها ولم اتمكن من ذلك لكن منذ 3 أشهر تقريباً تعرفت على خيار في الفوتوشوب يتيح تعديل التشبع ولذا أصلحت الصورة وفي الحقيقة فحتى زاوية الصورة لم تعجبني والسبب يعود أني لم احصل على مشهد جيد حيث التقطت العديد من الصور وكانت الأغنام في تشكيلة غير مناسبة تحياتي
--بدارين (talk) 04:57, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:تصنيف مستخدم في ويكيبيديا العربية 2.PNG
• File:شرك بالله في ويكيبيديا العربية 1.png
• File:كفر في ويكيبيديا العربية.png
• File:شرك بالله في ويكيبيديا العربية 2.png
• File:اسم قالب سيء.PNG
• File:أشياء غير موجودة في ويكيبيديا.PNG
• File:قالب خيالي.PNG
• File:قوالب بذور غريبة.png
• File:نص جميل.png
• File:تعاون بين نسخ ويكيبيديا.PNG

Yours sincerely, Steinsplitter (talk) 17:02, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Anders Ramsay (6784016160).jpg

File:Anders Ramsay (6784016160).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Steinsplitter (talk) 17:04, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

File talk:Barmaley (1941).ogv

Please don't remove my comment. It is also useful for administrators to consider. I've left your template up this time. 80.221.159.67 17:19, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Regarding "Only administrators can respond to the request", that is not true – at least on English Wikipedia. See en:Template:Request edit/Instructions. 80.221.159.67 17:20, 23 August 2016 (UTC) (edited: 80.221.159.67 17:22, 23 August 2016 (UTC))

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:منى عبد الغني 1.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 10.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 11.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 12.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 13.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 14.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 15.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 16.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 17.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 18.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 19.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 2.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 20.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 21.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 22.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 23.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 24.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 25.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 26.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 27.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 28.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 29.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 3.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 30.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 31.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 32.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 33.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 34.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 35.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 36.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 37.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 38.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 39.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 4.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 40.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 41.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 42.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 5.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 6.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 7.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 8.jpg
• File:منى عبد الغني 9.jpg

Yours sincerely, Steinsplitter (talk) 09:22, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

تنبيه ونصيحة

الصور التي أقوم بترشيحها للحذف هي صور مخالفة 100% لسياسات كومنز وليست إفتراء، لا داعي للحمية والعصبية في كل ترشيح حذف لأن كلامك أصلاً خاطيء وتقوم بإحراج نفسك، الملكية العامة في مصر تجعل الصور الفوتوغرافية فقط في الملكية العامة بعد 25 عام، لا الكتب ولا الأفلام ولا اللقطات ولا الوثائق خاضعة لقاعدة 25 عام (مش كل حاجة تبقى 25 سنة !!)، أنت للأسف مساهماتك المخالفة هذه ستخرب علينا الأمور وتجعل أي شخص يشكك في أي صورة ترفع تحت ترخيص الملكية العامة في مصر، وستتسبب ايضاً في التشديد على الصور المصرية واللي قد يتم حذفها لأتفه سبب --Ibrahim.ID ♒ 12:10, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

---

الأفلام بتعتبر مصنفات لمؤلف معروف، ويجب أن يمضي 50 عام على وفاته (هذا قانون دولة وليس قواعد كومنز)، لقطة الشاشة لا تعتبر صور فوتوغرافية لأنها نسخ لمحتوى أخر (عمل مشتق وليس عمل لأول مرة)، لقطات الشاشة عموما ممنوعة في كومنز لأنه ممنوع وضع أي صور استخدام عادل، خلاصة الموضوع وبشكل نهائي: أي صورة فوتوغرافية فقط التقطت قبل عام 1987 هي فقط ما ترفعها على كومنز كملكية عامة مصرية، أي شيء بخلاف هذا لا ترفعه وإلا سيحذف، انتهت المسألة.

ومن فضلك (وحشرحها باللهجة المصرية): حاول أنك تثقف نفسك أولاً وتقرأ كويس، مش كل صورة مرشحة للحذف تجادل فيها بهذا الشكل وأنت مع احترامي جاهل بالقواعد، كومنز مش موقع مخصص لوضع مقتنياتك وألبومات صورك وتحقيق رؤيتك وأحلامك لأنك تضر بالأخرين بالصور المخالفة دي، وإصرارك على المخالفات دي حيخليني أضطر لاتخاذ إجراءات غير مستحبة معاك، كم الصور المخالفة والمحذوفة عندك حتعرضك للمنع هنا في كومنز في أي لحظة، أنا بس حبيت أنبه للخطر اللي وقعت نفسك فيه --Ibrahim.ID ♒ 13:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

ملحوظة أخيرة ونهائية

ديفيد أنت في واقع الأمر كارثة على ويكيبيديا العربية والعرب والمصريين أنفسهم .. أنت تصرفاتك غير مسئولة وقمت برفع عدد ضخم من الملفات الغير صحيحة .. وهذا ما يجعل البعض يشكك في مصداقية الملفات العربية وصحة تراخيص هذه الملفات .. لو نظرت في صفحة نقاشك ستجد سجل سيء من الملفات المخالفة والتي تم حذفها ..

والمصيبة أنك بدلاً من أن تخجل من تصرفاتك تصر على الجدل .. بل وتصر على الجدل حول ملفات أنت تحتفظ بها كمعرض صور شخصي خاص بك !! ليتها صور مفيدة

حاول أنك تثقف نفسك أكثر لأن 90% من معلوماتك خاطئة .. وقاعدة (افتراض حسن النية) أو (افتراض جهل الأخرين) لن تنطبق عليك لأنك لست مسجل مبتديء وقد تجد نفسك معرض للمنع ! صدقني أنت وضعك الحالي أصبح خطير فعلاً --Ibrahim.ID ♒ 15:35, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

رد: الوضع

الترجمة بتعتبر عمل إبداعي، يعني يعتبر عمل مستقل بذاته (له حقوقه الخاصة) وليس عمل مشتق من العمل الاصلي، وبالتالي لو الكتاب كان إصدار حديث يصبح ذو حقوق محفوظة --Ibrahim.ID ♒ 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

رد: الشعار

الشعارات وضع مختلف .. لأنها علامات تجارية لا تسقط بالتقادم ولا تصبح في الملكية العامة إلا بعد 100 عام خاصة لو كانت لا تزال مستخدمة ولم يتم تصميم شعار جديد

نصيحة شخصية: كل نوعية من الصور لها وضعية مختلفة ولا تعامل نفس المعاملة .. يعني الصورة ليست مثل الكتب ليست مثل الشعار .. حاول أنك تبحث عنها في كومنز وستجد المعلومات الكافية --Ibrahim.ID ♒ 08:40, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism is not appreciated

---

 You have vandalized the content of Wikimedia Commons. Please stop. If you continue making inappropriate edits you may be blocked from editing Commons. You may test freely in the sandbox.

Steinsplitter (talk) 15:24, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Potter at work, Jaura, India.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Potter at work, Jaura, India.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:شعار جامعة عين شمس.png

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:شعار جامعة عين شمس.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:شعار جامعة عين شمس.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

-- Geagea (talk) 13:58, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:هاللو فريدة - صعود وهبوط المعرفية 18-3-2012.pdf

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:هاللو فريدة - صعود وهبوط المعرفية 18-3-2012.pdf. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:هاللو فريدة - صعود وهبوط المعرفية 18-3-2012.pdf]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

-- Geagea (talk) 14:01, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:شعار دوري أبطال العرب.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:شعار دوري أبطال العرب.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:شعار دوري أبطال العرب.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

-- Geagea (talk) 14:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bedouinwomanb.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bedouinwomanb.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

File:M. G. Ramachandran talking to Shivaji Ganesan.jpg

File:M. G. Ramachandran talking to Shivaji Ganesan.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

~AntanO4task (talk) 01:36, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Template:Won

Hello; Have tried to use Template:Won and it is not working! Come's up in red as TEMPLATE: WONKolforn (talk) 09:27, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Its not coming up as that on the last file I uploaded? just comes up as red text! Kolforn (talk) 09:34, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Apologies from me Typo mistake Kolforn (talk) 09:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Karnacs2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Karnacs2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Template:Black woman with women's suit

Template:Black woman with women's suit has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Speravir 04:53, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Detective Conan 2.jpg

File:Detective Conan 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ralth Galth (talk) 02:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Detective Conan 3.jpg

File:Detective Conan 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ralth Galth (talk) 02:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Tagging copyvios

Hi, When tagging copyright violations, please inform the uploader. This is best done using the gagdet. See in your preferences to enable them, tab "Gadget", section "Maintenance tools" : "AjaxQuickDelete" and "Quick delete". These add links in the left column (or right column for Hebrew, Arabic, etc., language interface). Regards, Yann (talk) 16:47, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

@Yann: Activated. Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 06:59, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Event category

David, category of event we usually place in category of day (not "Photo of day"). Please for example see Category:2014-05-31 and text above any such category: "Media or events (in subcategories)". --sasha (krassotkin) 07:40, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

@Krassotkin: But I see that we add "Category:Photographs taken on" to the whole category rather than adding "Category:Photographs taken on" to all photos individually.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:47, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

We do not add a category "Photographs taken on" for event photos in category of a day. For example see images from Category:Life Ball 2014 opening show in Category:2014-05-31. --sasha (krassotkin) 07:52, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

@Krassotkin: What about "Photographs taken on"?I want to add this info --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:54, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Category "Photographs taken on" created for groups of individual disparate photos only. --sasha (krassotkin) 07:58, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

@Krassotkin: Excuse me, and with my respect, I do not see a problem in adding this --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 08:11, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Of course. But in my opinion and our current practice it is excessive. Please think about it for the future. Thank you! --sasha (krassotkin) 08:26, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Saad Lamjarred signature.jpg and File:Saad Lamjarred signature .jpg

Hello. I have updated the licences on File:Saad Lamjarred signature.jpg and File:Saad Lamjarred signature .jpg. Please note that you should not have removed the templates {{PD-textlogo}} and {{Trademark}}, which were correctly used on these pages. Please also note that {{LicenseReview}} is not appropriate on these pages because this is intended for files coming from external website, with a link to the original website as source. This template is for administrators or bots to check if the licence on the source website is the same as on Commons. This is not the case here, so this template should not be used. {{PD-signature}} is appropriate and it is a good idea to reinforce the idea that these image are in the public domain (along with {{PD-textlogo}}). Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any question. Best regards, BrightRaven (talk) 09:06, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

@BrightRaven: I wanted an expert review files --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 06:45, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:تجربة الإحداثياثيات.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:تجربة الإحداثياثيات.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Chinstrap Penguin

Hi- Per your original DR[11], could you please let me know which sites on the internet you were referring to in the DR (that posted this image before I uploaded it to Commons) so that I can make sure they are giving me proper credit as the author. Thanks.--Godot13 (talk) 18:05, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Ala201041.jpg

File:Ala201041.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Alaa Najjar :)..! 10:59, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:HoloLens front (16337648861).jpg

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 00:29, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Mermaid dress.jpg

File:Mermaid dress.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 12:26, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Mother doll 3.jpg

File:Mother doll 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

lNeverCry 08:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

@INeverCry:Why did you request to delete this file particulary?! --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 08:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Close-up of statue of Andromeda.jpg

File:Close-up of statue of Andromeda.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rodrigolopes (talk) 22:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

I declined one of your speedy deletion requests, because you said, that it was out of scope due to bad quality, but the file was used in az.wiki and wikidata. If the files are used, then they are clearly in scope. You removed the image from az.wiki and wikidata and nominated the image again for deletion. This is bad, don't do this again. Quite big part of your speedy deletion requests is dubious. Please do not nominate files for speedy deletion with reason "very small" in the future. Instead, nominate them for regular deletion. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:What was said about the video "Me at the zoo" when it was nominated for deletion.PNG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:What was said about the video "Me at the zoo" when it was nominated for deletion.PNG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

@Magog the Ogre:Sorry.This was an unintentional mistake and it has been corrected.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 06:46, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

File:-Penn (in Marcel Rochas's 'Mermaid Dress') by Irving Penn - 1950 (21338935969).jpg

File:-Penn (in Marcel Rochas's 'Mermaid Dress') by Irving Penn - 1950 (21338935969).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 19:19, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

رد

ما تقوم به يضرُنا كمُجتمع ويكيپيدي عربي كما أنَّ قسمًا كبيرًا من ترشيحاتك غير صحيح بِالمُطلق ولا يبدو أنك تعلَّمت من تجاربك السابقة في هذا المجال. ما تقوم به يُمكن أن يكون له نتائج كارثيَّة على مُجتمع ويكيپيديا العربي وأي مُساهم عربي على كومنز. أنت تُعطي انطباعًا بأنَّ المُستخدمين العرب لا يُمكن الوُثوق بهم عندما تُرشِّح صُور فُلان الموثوق مُنذ سنوات لِلحذف وقد يستجيب لك إداري دون أن يُدقق أو قد يُخطأ أو رُبما يستجيب لك نكايةً بِالعرب. لِمَ هذه المُخاطرة؟ أتمنى عليك أن تترك هذا الأمر لِإداريين ومُستخدمين مُخضرمين في كومنز وتهتم بِأُمور التحرير في موسوعتنا فقط--باسم (talk) 08:41, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

أرى أنَّهُ تمَّت إجابتك عن السؤال أعلاه، وأنا أؤيِّد ما قيل--باسم (talk) 09:43, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Dogeza 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Dogeza 02.jpg

Yours sincerely, G I Chandor (talk) 03:49, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

File:قطة في مصر 79.jpg

File:قطة في مصر 79.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DferDaisy (talk) 21:47, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Dr.Ahmed musa.jpg

Hi, The copyright status was discussed on COM:UDR, and there was a consensus that it is OK. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:35, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Revert

Regarding this edit, it is in fact a logo variant. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:10, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

@Steinsplitter:Category:German Wikipedia reaches 2.000.000 articles is a Subcategory of Category:German Wikipedia logo variants i.e. No need to the general category "Category:Wikipedia logo variants".Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:14, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Captain tsubasa-playmarket.jpg

Yours sincerely, G I Chandor (talk) 03:50, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

تنبيه

ديفيد رجاءاً لا تقم بِقص أي صورة أَقوم بِرفعها، هذه ليست المرة الأولى! تحياتي--Alaa :)..! 13:49, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

@علاء: لا أرى فائدة من كل هذا الفراغ!إذا كانت الصورة لعمل فني في الأسكندرية (كما تقول الخريطة)، يمكن استخدام {{FoP-Egypt}} --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 13:55, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

ديفيد تَحدثت مع أحد إداريي كومنز في الموضوع عبر البَريد لِذلك يرجى عدم تعقيد الموضوع، وفي المرة السابقة قام أحد الإداريين هُنا باسترجاع تعديلك والمرة هذه أنا، يُرجى الابتعاد عن مِثل هذه الأُمور، ولا أُريد الخوض في نقاش مُطول لانشغالي بأمور أُخرى على الميتا، تحياتي--Alaa :)..! 13:57, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

File:ماذا قيل عن لوحة الموناليزا عند ترشيحها في ويكيبيديا العربية؟.PNG

Salam Alaikum,

the Category:Mona Lisa is only meant for images of the actual Mona Lisa painting. Your screenshot deals about Mona Lisa, but doesn't show the painting itself (like all other files in these category).--TIB-NOA (talk) 10:35, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

@TIB-NOA:Do you have a more convenient ategory than Category:Mona Lisa?Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:39, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

In my opinion it has not enough to do with the painting to put it into this category.--TIB-NOA (talk) 10:43, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

@TIB-NOA: I dissagree with you because it expresses the importance of painting.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:48, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Imagine I would write the words "Mona Lisa" in a textfile and upload the screenshot here. Do you really think it would be justified to put it into the category about the painting Mona Lisa?--TIB-NOA (talk) 10:56, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

@TIB-NOA: If I were an Arab, and I found this picture, I would feel the value of this picture according to what the Arab Wikipidin said.Generally, categories are useful for images.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 11:01, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Jordan National Gallery of Fine Arts

Hi ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 – you added this DR to an undeletion category. As no artist was named within the DR, it would be helpful if you could add the relevant information why you believe these files to become public domain in 2030 on the corresponding talk page. Thanks & regards, AFBorchert (talk) 22:58, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

@AFBorchert:According to the local license, They will be in pd after 51 years and 1979+51=2030.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 08:38, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

The DR was not about the copyright status of the photographs (they were fine) but of the depicted artistic works. And the template {{PD-Jordan}} is about photographs but not fine art. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 10:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

@AFBorchert:Is not the license about anything in the country?!Is there a license for Jordanian artists only?!Or there is no appropriate license for these images? --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Nope, most works including fine art are protected up to 50 years after the death of the author (pma50), see en:Copyright law of Jordan#Copyright duration. As unfortunately the artists were neither named in the file descriptions nor in the deletion request, we cannot configure yet a fixed year for undeletion. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 11:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

@AFBorchert: "The author of a work only enjoys copyright protection for fifty years from the date the work was created (1979+50=2029) in the following circumstance:the author or rightsholder (الجمعية الملكية للفنون الجميلة في عمان) is a corporation, or other type of legal entity that grants some of the same rights as those that apply to natural persons" --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

No, 50pma, i.e. 50 full years have to pass after the death of the author. The rightsholders are not corporations but artists. --AFBorchert (talk) 12:20, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

@AFBorchert: OK, it was removed --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:48, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

سؤال

السَلامُ عليكم ديفيد، هل تمتلك حساباً على الفيس بوك؟ تحياتي--Alaa :)..! 19:32, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

@علاء: لا يا صديقي لدى قناة في يوتيوب وصفحات في مشاريع ويكيميديا فقط.شكرًا --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:09, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

تَمام، كُنت أود التواصل معك خارج نطاق الموسوعة، تحياتي --Alaa :)..! 10:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

@علاء: يمكن استخدام البريد.شكرًا --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:14, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

على مهلك

صديقي تمهل قليلا قبل طلب حذف الملفات. لا أحد يحب الملفات المسروقة و لكن لا أحد يحب أن يتم جره الى مطاردة غير مجدية. تقبل تحياتي. --Tarawneh (talk) 15:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Shaigiya fighters.jpg حقوق النشر و الطبع

مرحبا! هذا هو المصدر الأساسي للصورة و مكتوب فيه أنه يمكن لأي شخص أن يستخدمها و هذا هو الرابط https://digitalcollections.nypl.org/items/510d47e1-db57-a3d9-e040-e00a18064a99

@Mosab alawad: تم تصحيح البيانات.تحياتي --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:58, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

حذف ملف

شكرا لك ، ولكن الصورة لاتزال في قائمة الحذف أليس كذلك؟ و أريد أن أرفع عدة صور من نفس الموقع و المصدر فكيف أوثقها لكي أتجنب الحذف و شكرا مرة أخرى.

@Mosab alawad:

1. عفوًا
2. تمت إزالة القالب ولم تعد في قائمة الحذف
3. اكتب البيانات بشكل صحيح كما فعلت هنا

تحياتي

رفع ملف

آسف جدا على الازعاج لقد رفعت ملف جديدا من نفس المصدر و من نفس الموقع و أريدك أن تتأكد من المعلومات إن كانت صحيحة و أن تثبت تعديلاتي(لكي لا يحذف الملف) و آسف على الازعاج مرة أخرى هذا هو الرابط :https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D9%85%D9%84%D9%83_%D9%82%D8%A8%D9%8A%D9%84%D8%A9_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4%D8%A7%D9%8A%D9%82%D9%8A%D8%A9.jpg

@Mosab alawad: الملف مقبول.تحياتي --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 06:54, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Category:Photographs by Jose A.

• Thank you very much for your message. Well, you are right. We should have placed the remove-border and watermark templates in all files at once, in the beggining. However, now it is too late, many of the files have already been treated, by you, me, TM and others, and to do that now would be to place the templates in hundreds of files that no longer need it. the way as I see it, we should continue treating them one by one. Best regards, -- Ajpvalente (talk) 12:04, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

• Treating in the sense of placing the templates, and then editing the image in order to remove both the border and the watermark, if applicable. In other words, in the sense of leaving the image ready to be used. Best regards, -- Ajpvalente (talk) 12:13, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

• Yes, well, I usually insert the two templates in a bunch of files of that category every day. I cannot do much more because I have more tasks to do both at Wikimedia and Wikipedia. Best regards, -- Ajpvalente (talk) 13:26, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

• Oh, I forgot to tell you: I have also been reviewing the files after treatment. In some cases, the watermark and / or the border wasn't correctly removed, but the templates were deleted from the image page anyway. I tried to place the templates again, but TM has removed them without changing the image, despite the fact that the borders or watermarks are clearly still present. I do not know if it is a case of daltonism, cataracts or acute stubbornness, eheheh. Anyway, I have been reviewing the files one by one and correctly cropping them. Best regards, -- Ajpvalente (talk) 18:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

• Of course, no one is perfect. This problem has also happened to me sometimes, especially when the watermark or the border is hard to remove. For exemple, in the case of this images, the border is not solid, but it dissolves into the photo itself, and finding the exact place where it ends is sometimes a bit difficult, especially when you are processing files in mass and don't want to lose too much time with each image. TM seems to have this problem a lot, almost all the files with a bad cropping were made by him. But no one is perfect... Best regards, -- Ajpvalente (talk) 19:20, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

الألوان

بالطبع الصورة الأصلية أفضل و لكن الصورة الغير ملونة منتشرة و معروفة في المواقع العربية خاصة في الصفحات العربية في فيسبوك مثل هذا الرابط https://www.facebook.com/178943688805723/photos/a.962279050472179.1073741833.178943688805723/962283560471728/?type=3

في النهاية هي نسخة أخرى للصورة و الصورة الأصلية موجودة و لم أحذفها فقط أضفت نسخة أخرى لها و إن رأيت أن النسخة الأولى للصورة أفضل فإنه يمكنك حذف النسخة الغير ملونة

--Mosab alawad (talk) 14:40, 5 April 2017 (UTC) المصدر بالأساس موجود وهو رابط الموقع الأصلي، أما إذا كنت تقصد النسخة الغير ملونة فإن مصدرها هو فيسبوك الذي أخذ الصورة بالطبع من لمصدر الأول للصورة(الرابط الموجود في الصورة "الكتاب من أكثر من 100 عام")و إن كان فيسبوك مصدر غير موثوق للصورة فأنا أفضل حذف النسخة الجديدة الغير ملونة و الإبقاء على النسخة الصلية تجنبا لحذف الملف كاملا فأرجو منك (في حالة لم تقتنع بأن المصدر للنسخة الغير ملونة هو المصدر الأساسي) أن تحذف النسخة الجديدة أو أن تعلمني كيف أحذفها أرجو أن لا تنزعج من كثرة رسائلي هذه الأيام. --Mosab alawad (talk) 15:20, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Images date

Which date are you asking? I got them on Internet. All are created before 1923 AD which I selected purposely.

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Icon (3733314007).jpg

And also:

• File:People with Sharbat Gula 1.jpg
• File:People with Sharbat Gula 2.jpg
• File:Sharbat Gula (15172461564).jpg
• File:Sharbat Gula (4866237430).jpg
• File:Timamoon Reception Area (4351768175).jpg

Yours sincerely, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:38, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Monument to Lenin in the centre of Yoshkar Ola.jpg

• File:Monument to Lenin in the centre of Yoshkar Ola.jpg
• File:Monument to Ostap Bender in Elista.JPG
• File:Zhangir Khan.jpg

I'm not any original file uploader, stop placing senseless warnings at my talkpage, please. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 10:35, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

@Bogomolov.PL:Sorry.VFC warns all who have uploaded versions --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:38, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

And? Stop placing senseless warnings at my talkpage, please. I don't need'em anymore. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 10:58, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

@Bogomolov.PL:Unfortunately I can not stop automatic warnings.You can ignore them.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 11:33, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

You have possibility clean your warnings from my talk page, I guess. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 13:20, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

File:290_воинов_2.jpg

• File:290_воинов_2.jpg
• File:290_воинов.jpg

For some reason You are prompted for file deletion? Copyright violation is not observed. --Wirbel78 (talk) 11:31, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

@Wirbel78: See Commons:Freedom of panorama#Russia --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 11:34, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

@ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2: I've seen and studied. You interpret it as it suits You. No violations here. See discussion --Wirbel78 (talk) 11:46, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

If you don't know Italy, please..

...don't open pointless RfDs. How can, i.e. this be a no-fop if it's a 17th-century sculpture from Bernini? Please be very careful. you are doing a mess. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 12:40, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

@Blackcat:Sorry they are unintended mistakes.Their interpretation here --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:59, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

NoFoP in Italy is not a matter to be handled so lightly actually. Let's apart there are no cases of lawsuits for FoP in Italy. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 13:08, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

File:St Nicholas chocolate.JPG

File:St Nicholas chocolate.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:20, 27 April 2017 (UTC)