User talk:Túrelio/Archive7

Talkpage archive from 2012

NP

No problem. Thank you for informing me. mickit 20:17, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Rothschild Schloss

Hi Turelio,

You instantly deleted the photo Rothschild Schloss, without waiting for me to reply. It would have been helpful to wait a few hours, because the photographer was just about to change the license. She put CC-non-C by mistake. If you look at the photo now, it's already changed to the correct the license. http://www.flickr.com/photos/anuwintschalek/5797515782/

I will now re-upload.

Best, Scotty123123 (talk) 18:43, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

It's not allowing me to upload it again? Please can you undelete the file or help me to re-upload it? Best Scotty123123 (talk) 19:24, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Undeleted and Flickreview repeat-run. --Túrelio (talk) 00:02, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! Scotty123123 (talk) 06:15, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

File deletion

Hello, Túrelio! Happy New Year!

Well, I have tagged some files (Caj.jpg, Lab Geral.JPG, CampusSantoAmaro CentroConvencoes b.jpg, CampusSantoAmaro Biblioteca a.jpg, CampusSantoAmaro PredioGastronomia b.jpg, CampusSantoAmaro AreasdeConvivencia a.jpg) for speedy deletion as I felt they meet the criteria for that. I saw your comments and I understand your doubt.

You know that anyone can create an account with the name they want. I could create an account with the name Sony Ericsson, but that does not give me the right to use the images registered in their Picasa album without the required permission. I think someone tried to impersonate Senac São Paulo, a well known institution in Brazil, and thereby promote the images improperly.

To me there is no problem in deleting the images, since in the albums can be seen clearly that all rights are reserved, according to the author. But if you think evidence is still needed, I can try to contact Senac.

Ah! I've made a mistake about the file Caj.jpg, sorry. They are not the same image, as you wrote. You can remove the speedy delete tag from this file. Agente Rolf (talk) 19:12, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

File:RIM_BlackBerry_8707v_Vodafone.jpg

Hello Túrelio. The actual RIM_BlackBerry_8707v_Vodafone.jpg is not my image. I have uploaded this

http://www.flickr.com/photos/museo8bits/325096239/

But at 02:13 18 oct 2009‎ User:Nasa-verve upload the actual image, and not change description or licences. This are the second (firts at 2011) deletion quest. I consider more logig, due images are very very very diferent, do upload as a new name, but... five pages have in use actual image.

Please consider do revert to my original image. museo8bits (talk) 22:38, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 00:04, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

User:64.107.219.155

Just wanted to give you a heads up, this IP crossed over from en.WP as a response to my trying to get them to behave at en:User talk:Tombak2 and en:Tommy Hurricane Jackson. It also appears that they attempted to use the commons "Reset Password" feature to hijack my account. Please consider upping the ban (or explaining to the user) that this disruptive behavior must stop. This "editor" has hopped in the 64.107.219 netblock, but according to WhoIs, it extends across the 64.107 netblock so a rangeblock is out of the question. Hasteur (talk) 19:36, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi, regrettably I'm not well-versed with range-blocks. I would recommend to put your request either at User:Herbythyme or at COM:AN/B. --Túrelio (talk) 19:38, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Response

You said I should be blocked for 3 months but there hasn't been an evidence of wrong doing. Instead, many of the votes were canvassed from WR. Additionally, I have not been blocked for over a year and a half and there is a reason for that. Ottava Rima (talk) 22:45, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Besides of the disproportionate call for de-admin of Rd232 and quite some additional points mentioned in the discussion, I think a medium break would be healthy for you as well as for the Commons community, in order to calm down passions and to re-focus on the mission of Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 22:51, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

I called for de-admin because I believed there was no other way to get Rd232 to stop making the RevDels when consensus went against their usage. I was frustrated and upset, and I withdrew the request based on the advice of Russavia. Also, blocks are not used for "breaks" but to prevent actual disruption that needs to be shown with diffs (i.e. nasty personal attacks, vandalism, etc.). There has not been anything to show that I have violated our policies, and asking for an admin to be de-admined is definitely not blockable. I have repeatedly asked for diffs and links to back up many claims but no one has been able to produce them. Instead, I was outed twice, had nasty attacks on, etc. I said my peace here and I mean what I said there. I honestly feel that the way this has gone about is proof that there is no more community in Commons that cares about our policies anymore. I have turned to you for advice multiple times because of your experience and neutrality. Your opinion probably matters more to me in there than the others. Ottava Rima (talk) 23:27, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

I put up a section asking for admin to block those, including admin, who make negative claims about my actions while refusing to put up any evidence. That is all there is because there is no proof. Here are the actions that can be blocked for, and I haven't violated anything there. You called for me to be blocked for 3 months, but where is the proof? Ottava Rima (talk) 15:26, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Colchicum hungaricum

Dear Túrelio,

For your info: I have taken pictures of Colchicum hungaricum, which is currently flowering in my garden. I have put a couple of these pictures to illustrate the page devoted to this rare winter-flowering species on the German wikipedia (Ungarische Zeitlose).

Best regards, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 12:18, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Wow, a blooming flower on January 4th, that is really something! --Túrelio (talk) 15:27, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Permanent_calendar_greg.svg

Guten Tag Turelio, einen Teil der Antwort hat der Benutzer "Botaurus" schon gegeben. Den großen Teil meiner Antwort möchte hier nur umschreiben.. (Näheres gern über E-Mai; da lesen nicht Alle mit) Durch meine konkreten Lebensumstände bedingt konnte und kann ich nicht so wie ich möchte. So bin ich erst im höheren Lebensalter mit Herrn Computer in näheren Kontakt gekommen. Weiterhin hatte ich nie Englisch, was sich als großer Nachteil bei Wikipedia herausstellt. So konnte ich mich mittels Google-Übersetzer auch nicht gut mit "AnonMoos" verständigen; es ist also nicht so, dass ich 2 Jahre lang nichts versucht hätte. Bei dieser Gelegenheit muss ich doch gleich meine Meinung mal offen legen zu der GNU-Lizenz, die bei o.g. Bild/Datei enthalten ist (warum auch immer). Die dieser folgende Lizenz (von mir vergeben) ist meines Erachtens die "schärfere" Lizenz. Wenn ich demnach gestatte die weichere GNU anzuwenden, wird die Vergabe der anderen Lizenz sinnlos, oder ? Freundiche Grüße --LenderKarl (talk) 14:43, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Karl, der angesprochene Unterschied zwischen schärferer und weicherer GNU-Lizenz ist mir nicht klar. Insgesamt wird die GFDL/GNU-Lizenz als weniger geeignet für Bilder betrachtet. Aber was stört dich an der Lizenz, die vermutlich sowieso niemand benutzen wird? Das Problem, dass ich mit einer Löschung von File:Permanent calendar greg.svg sehe, ist dass diese Datei laut Google-Suche auch auf einer Reihe von nicht-Wikimedia-Seiten verwendet wird. Wenn man sie jetzt einfach löscht, dann verschwindet das Bild (sofern ge"hot"linkt) von diesen Seiten oder es fehlt ihnen pötzlich die Quelle. Da ich aus der Löschdiskussion den Eindruck habe, dass dich eigentlich mehr die mindere Qualität der SVG-Umsetzung (kann ich selbst nicht beurteilen) stört, wäre es m.E. eine bessere Lösung, die "mangelhafte" Version durch eine bessere/korrekte Version zu ersetzen, also einfach drüberzuladen. Das geht allerdings nur SVG -> SVG, nicht SVG -> PNG. Könntest du dich damit anfreunden? --Túrelio (talk) 15:40, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, könnte ich; vielen Dank !--LenderKarl (talk) 10:20, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

O.k., dann die Frage: gibt es eine bessere Ausführung von File:Permanent_calendar_greg.svg im SVG-Format? --Túrelio (talk) 10:22, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Nein, oder besser: Nicht bekannt. Wenn ich an die umfangreiche Arbeit denke, die dem Vernehmen nach die Umwandlung einer png in eine svg macht, bin ich fast der Meinung, wir lassen es so wie es ist. Es sind doch nur Kleinigkeiten, welche die Aussagen des Kalenders nicht beeinträchtigen. Betreffs der Lizenzen habe ich vertrauen in Deine Aussagen !--LenderKarl (talk) 10:33, 5 January 2012 (UTC)--LenderKarl (talk) 14:39, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Category:Roman Catholic churches in Baltimore

Could you restore Category:Roman Catholic churches in Baltimore? I think the bad-name nominator (NeverDoING (talk · contribs)) misunderstood what that category is for: it's a subcategory of Category:Churches in Baltimore and is for the many Catholic churches that are actually in the city of Baltimore, Maryland, not just within the archdiocese. If not: Is there any reason I shouldn't recreate it? (Especially since the nominator didn't bother adding any of the churches back to Category:Churches in Baltimore!)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:11, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1985, MiNr Block 081 (cropped) Bach-Handel.jpg

Ich glaube, ich habe einen schweren Fehler gemacht: Du kannst die Datei noch ansehen: War es ein Ausschnitt aus einer Marke (Teilbild oder wie auch immer das heisst), oder das Ausschneiden einer kompletten Marke aus einem Block? Nur das erste ist verboten; das zweite mach ich oft selbst. Sorry für die Arbeit, die ich verursacht habe. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 21:58, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

So, wie es aussieht, war es das 2. Deshalb erstmal entlöscht. Die speedy-tags kannst du selbst entfernen, ich geh in die Heia. --Túrelio (talk) 23:14, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

This uploader's images

This uploader says the author 'gave me permission' but without OTRS permission its not meaningfull. Its the same case for his 4-5 images. Many times, there isn't a proper source anyway. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:15, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Taken care of. --Túrelio (talk) 09:00, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

• Thank you for acting on this uploader's images. I thought it was not possible that several different people would give permission for their photos to be used on wikipedia to this one uploader without OTRS permission. It was suspicious. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Väståboland

Shouldn't Category:Väståboland be undeleted and transformed into a category redirect? People visiting Väståboland last summer will not necessarily know that it is now called Pargas - and neither people finding an image with a caption referring to the old name. It is not an incorrect, but a former, name. --LPfi (talk) 12:51, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

O.k., undeleted. Please add the correct redir-template/syntax, can't remember it. --Túrelio (talk) 12:56, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. Should be correct now. --LPfi (talk) 14:15, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Siehe auch...

...Commons:Deletion requests/File:SeaLandExchange.jpg.--D.W. (talk) 23:31, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

{{PD-NKR-exempt}}

Hi Túrelio. Could you help me? The Nagorno-Karabakh Republic remains unrecognised by any UN-member state, including Armenia. How Copyright extends to the works by its law on Wikipedia. Where should the Copyright Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan apply for protest?--Melikov Memmed (talk) 09:00, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I have no idea what line should be followed in such a case. Also, I don't fully understand your question: "Nagorno-Karabakh Republic" is unrecognized, but has a copyright law, true? Or doesn't it have a copyright law? Does your question refer to any works from people in "Nagorno-Karabakh Republic" or to government works? I would recommend you to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or at COM:VP. --Túrelio (talk) 09:10, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks--Melikov Memmed (talk) 09:44, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Titanic gym.jpg (deleted, then redirected)

Hi Turelio,

Would you undelete the above image. When I added it to "other versions" of File:Gym.jpg, I didn't strike me as a duplicate. I might be wrong though. The same probably applies to several other images of the Titanic/Olympic's interior. Thus I'd like to double-check.

Best Wishes for 2012. --  Docu  at 11:19, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:01, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. The new versions of File:Gym.jpg seems so much better that it's probably not worth keeping File:Titanic gym.jpg now. --  Docu  at 07:51, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Note: File:Titanic_gym.jpg is "temp. undeleted" for 19 days now. ;-) Please either delete it or correct the desc page. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 19:46, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

deleted File:Dhwani 10 fashion show.jpg

Hai,
you have deleted File:Dhwani 10 fashion show.jpg due to Screenshot of non-free content: Speedydelete.But the image was taken by me and later edited using gimp (which may be felt as Screenshot).I have also shared this picture to many free picture sharing websites.
so please restore the image in Commons. Abilngeorge (talk) 17:09, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Could you please upload the original (un-edited) photo in a somewhat higher resolution than File:Dhwani 10 fashion show.jpg? --Túrelio (talk) 22:03, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Deletions of old PSm images names

Many many thanks for your help and deleting the old links from this page. Als, a not so belated, happy New Year. - Ineuw talk page on en.ws 03:56, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 07:24, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

User:Túrelio/monobook.js

Ich bearbeite diese gleich, weil sie wahrscheinlich die Ursache des Fehlers ist. Ich hoffe, das erlaubst Du mir aber so geht's am schnellsten. -- RE rillke questions? 13:34, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Eigentlich kannst Du sie ganz löschen. Alles mit Häkchen über Gadgets verfügbar. -- RE rillke questions? 13:36, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Du hast freie Hand. Ich habe, soweit ich mich recht erinnere, ohnehin nichts drin selbst "gemacht", sondern es nur aufgrund irgendwelcher Empfehlungen in früheren Zeiten zusammenkopiert. Vielen Dank für deine Hilfe. --Túrelio (talk) 13:48, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Also geht jetzt alles ohne Fehler? Toll. Ich empfehle sie ganz zu löschen. Wenn Du sie wieder brauchen solltest, ist es ja kein Problem sie wieder anzulegen. Vermisst Du jetzt irgendwelche Funktionen? Wenn dem so ist, sag' mir Bescheid. Grüße RE rillke questions? 13:58, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

fyi

You deleted Category:Housing in Bucuresti. Your edit summary said Bucuresti was an incorrect spelling of Bucharest. Bucharest is the capital of Romania, and "Bucuresti" is the correct spelling of this city's name -- in Romanian. Geo Swan (talk) 02:07, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Well, it wasn't my edit summary, but by CaptainFugu, who tagged the cat for speedy, though it looked rational to me. But, no problem with your redirect. --Túrelio (talk) 07:23, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick reply. Geo Swan (talk) 21:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy request

Hi,

I can't reach him because his e-mail no longer works but I'm sure he would be okay with it. – Alensha ^msg 15:33, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

I've notified him now on his :hu talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 16:28, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for deleting them :) – Alensha ^msg 18:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

File_talk:Test_Wall_After_4_hour_Exposure_at_2000f.jpg

Hallo Túrelio! Glaubst Du wirklich, daß das Urheberrecht aufgehoben ist, wenn ich ein Bild in einer anderen Resolution speichere und benutze?--Achim Hering (talk) 13:53, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Ähem, deine "Frage" klingt ziemlich suggestiv. Zunächst mal zu den Formalien: dein speedy hätte auf die Bildseite gehört, nicht auf die Talkpage. Du hast 2 mögliche URLs für das Original von File:Test Wall After 4 hour Exposure at 2000f.jpg angegeben und ich habe festgestellt, dass das Foto dort nur in deutlich geringerer Auflösung zu finden ist. Dies spricht prima facie dagegen, dass deine beiden hits die Quelle sind. Genau das besagt auch mein Kommentar. Hätte ich deine Bedenken insgesamt als unsinnig angesehen, dann hätte das speedy einfach entfernt. Es kann natürlich sein, dass es eine weitere Quelle gibt, die bislang aber nicht gefunden wurde, oder dass das Foto früher in der hohen Auflösung auf http://www.oldcastleprecast.com gelegen hat. Das könntest du untersuchen, indem du die URL deines 1. hits in archive.org eingibst. Ein anderer Ansatz wäre dem vom Uploader angegeben string "OTRS pending" die korrekte Syntax zu geben, also {{OTRS pending}}, womit die Datei automatisch in die OTRS-Warteschlange eingefügt und ggf. nach einiger Zeit automatisch gelöscht wird. --Túrelio (talk) 14:46, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Aufschluss darüber sieht man eigentlich in Wikipedia Englisch. Opticks3 hat dort auch eine Identität. Ein vorheriges Bild von Oldcastle wurde schon wegen Urheberrecht entfernt. Beide Photos stammen von derselben Broschüre und Website. Wahrscheinlich ist Oldcastle der Arbeitgeber von Opticks 3. Allerdings gelang es ihm nicht seinem Chef die Zusage abzuringen das Copyright aufzugeben. Er setzte auch eines der Bilder seines Arbeitgebers in einem Artikel über bauaufsichtliche Zulassungen (Certification listings) ein, obwohl sein Produkt nur geprüft ist, allerdings nicht zugelassen. Er benutzt diese Bilder zu Werbezwecken für Oldcastle. Wenn es etwas den Artikeln beiträgt ist das ja auch nicht das Schlechteste. Irgendwo müssen unsere Bilder ja herkommen. Aber er setzt Oldcastle Bilder so ein, das man meint das Produkt wäre SWRi zugelassen. Dem ist nicht der Fall. Der Unterschied ist einfach. Eine Prüfung ohne Zulasungsverfahren ist nur zu Informationszwecken, wie wenn man z.B. sein Wasser zu Hause prüfen läßt um sicherzustellen das keine Schadstoffe drin sind. Wenn ich aber ein Sicherheitsprodukt herstelle und verkaufe, wie eine Brandwand, ist dies zulassungspflichtig. Im Zulassungsverfahren wird die Fabrik regelmäßig (4x/Jahr hierzulande) untersucht um sicherzustellen, daß das Produkt welches verkauft wird identisch ist mit dem Produkt was zum Zwecke der bestandenen Prüfung hergestellt wurde. Nur dadurch kann ich das Prüfzeichen einsetzen auf dem Produkt und in der Werbung, um der Baupolizei zu verstehen zu geben, daß das Produkt amtlich zugelassen ist und regelmäßigen, amtlichen Qualitätsprüfungen unterliegt. Opticks3 stellt die Produkte seines Arbeitgebers in ein besseres Licht als was dort wirkllich am Bach ist. Durch diesen Werdegang in Wikipedia Englisch läßt sich ein Muster erkennen. Daher besteht keine Frage über die Herkunft des Bildes, weil dies nicht das erste mal ist.--Achim Hering (talk) 15:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC).

Danke für den ausführlichen Hintergrund, der - sorry - für die "Zulässigkeit" der Bilder hier auf Commons nicht wirklich relevant ist. Diese Dinge müssen auf den Projekten, die die Bilder nutzen, diskutiert werden. Um den Ablauf hier zu vereinfachen, scheint es mir am besten, wie oben angeregt, die OTRS-pending-Vorlage zu "aktivieren". Wenn er darauf nicht reagiert, werden die Fotos in Bälde gelöscht sein. --Túrelio (talk) 15:21, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Bedarf diese Aktivierung eines Eingreifens anderer oder passiert das von alleine? Dies ist jetzt ein halbes Jahr her. --Achim Hering (talk) 16:25, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

OK, alles klar, ich habe jetzt gesehen, daß Du eingegriffen hast. Alles paletti. Vielen Dank! --Achim Hering (talk) 16:41, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Attribution license

Please be advised that {{attribution}} is a free Creative Commons license per COM:CT. Accordingly, I have removed the speedy delete tag from File:Gandhi_Smriti.jpg. JGHowes ^talk - 14:13, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Please look into the file history (and here) before posting. --Túrelio (talk) 14:15, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Of course I looked at that, Turelio, to learn why in the world two (File:Gandhi_site.jpg being the other one) of the hundreds of images I've photographed and uploaded to en-wiki and Commons would be tagged for Speedy Delete. As a fellow admin here at Commons, you should be aware that there are many free licenses accepted at Commons besides CC-BY-SA (see COM:CT). Even when an image is freely licensed by the photographer, the photographer is "copyright holder" and can require attribution. To reiterate, {{attribution}} is a fully acceptable free license at Commons as it does allow for all use, including commercial use, derivative works, etc. Regards, JGHowes ^talk - 15:06, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Of course - seems not, or somehow we are not really communicating. Both images were speedy-tagged as "Copyrighted image" by User:AroundTheGlobe, not by me. When I found these files in the speedy-queue, I questioned this speedy-tagging by refering in my comment to the alleged speedy-rationale, in order 1) to prevent other admin-colleagues from inadvertently performing the speedy request and 2) to eventually get more information from the tagger about his "rationale". Being an admin with >100k deletions, I was well aware of all what you have written above and feel somewhat funny to get lectured on that issue, though it may help to learn humility. Anyway, let's keep it that way. --Túrelio (talk) 15:49, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Didn't mean to come off as lecturing, I was responding to your comment "Why should this be "Copyrighted", which puzzled me. Btw, I've addressed {{attribution}} licensing with the original tagger AroundTheGlobe here and here. Anyway, thanks for your time and here's a cup of coffee on me!

. JGHowes ^talk - 19:31, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Over reaction maybe

Relating to the edit I reverted on your user page - see here. The block I am happy with - I'll leave the length to you maybe - I just dislike that sort of edit. regards --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:44, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your attention, Herby. I think we really don't need users who start their history on Commons with such an edit. --Túrelio (talk) 18:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Hyperemesis pic

Hi Turelio,

The hyperemesis gravidarum picture is of myself with my two boys, and I own the picture.

02:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC)~~Elizabeth (Ep11904)

Replied at your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 18:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Eureka preschool

When I first saw this on new page patrol, I was ready to blow it away as pure advertising. Then I saw that you had edited it down from much worse -- so you must see something in-scope about it. I could imagine keeping it with just the images and a one-line description, but I tend to come down hard on those who come to Commons to advertise, so I would still just blow it away.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Feel free to do so (the blowing), especially as they have now cloned it to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Eurekapreschool, which wasn't the case when I edited it on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 15:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

 Done We're not alone in our opinion -- in the interim User:Prenn (a name I don't recognize) added a {{Speedy}} as "out of scope -- spam".      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Deletion

Hi Turelio, you deleted File:Antonio Ambrosetti.jpg with this motivation: "Fair use is not allowed on Commons". I took the picture from this website and i think that they release their pictures under a license allowed here in Commons. I apology in advance if i'm wrong. Sorry for my english, Baroc (talk) 20:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

You are correct. I have undeleted the image and changed the license to cc-by-sa 2.0-de. --Túrelio (talk) 20:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, Baroc (talk) 20:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Request for help

Hello Túrelio! I've recently submitted an image for deletion (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fort Lachine.jpg) and was hoping you could provide some input. When I originally uploaded the image, I thought it was in the public domain in the US. However, with a little more research and help from other Commons editors, it was discovered that the image came from a book that was published in Belgium in 1927. Since then, I've become concerned that the image isn't in the public domain in the US. After reading this table (under Works Published Abroad Before 1978) on the Cornell University website, the book from which the Fort Lachine image was taken would fall under the following category: "Solely published abroad, without compliance with US formalities or republication in the US, and not in the public domain in its home country as of 1 January 1996" for material published 1923 through 1977. Therefore, the US copyright would expire 95 years after initial publication. The book was published in 1927, so it appears to be under copyright in the US until 2022. This is in agreement with Wikipedia:Non-U.S. copyrights and the current Commons tags for Non-US works. Therefore, I suspect that the image should be tagged with {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} and deleted. If you have time, could you please provide your opinion on this matter. Kindest regards, --AlphaEta (talk) 16:58, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi AlphaEta, being from Europe, I am not so well-versed with the specialties of US copyright. Our undisputed copyright-"guru" is User:Clindberg. Just ask him whether he might take a look at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fort Lachine.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 19:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll ask the copyright guru for input. Kindest regards, --AlphaEta (talk) 13:47, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello Túrelio! As you said, Carl provided excellent insight into the US copyright status of the image. It seems that the image is almost certainly still copyrighted in the US due to the URAA rules. With this in mind, I'm VERY uncomfortable that a file I've uploaded to Commons may be copyrighted. I know I'm worrying about this a bit too much, but I was curious if you could review the case, and if you deem fit, delete the file. I hope this request is appropriate, but now that the case has been open for comment for seven days and I've pestered a handful of administrators, I think there's enough commentary to make a decision. Please know that I am very grateful for your help. Kindest regards, --AlphaEta (talk) 16:23, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

I realize that my last request is neither fair nor appropriate. Therefore, I'm striking it. Thanks, --AlphaEta (talk) 20:05, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 20:35, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

You removed "File:FionaR.jpg" from Commons but I have permission from Fiona to use it

Regarding... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiona_Ritchie -- I began updating the page after interviewing Fiona last winter and had her permission to use this photo which (I guess) you removed 69.120.196.53 23:31, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi, if you are the uploader User:Profdrew101, you should log-in before commenting.

Now to File:FionaR.jpg. This image was uploaded as "own work" of User:Profdrew101. However, User:C45207 found it on http://thistleradio.com/, a page that is marked © Fiona Ritchie and credited to Butterstone Studios. This finding questions the uploader's ownership claim. So, who is the photographer?

Also, you wrote "had her permission to use". But what kind of permission? A permission by the copyright holder (the photographer) or by the personality rights holder (the depicted)? What we mainly need is the first one. When you look now at http://thistleradio.com/, you see an (different) image of Fiona that has the credit "photo: ©Roy Summers/Scottish Field". Though it is on Fiona's page, the rights holder is Roy Summers. --Túrelio (talk)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cabedelo-pb.JPG

Yes, the alleged author of the image filled a judicial proccess against me. My lawyer checked and the same person filled a hundred judicial proccesses at the same time. The same image can be found on a lot of sites. The author have placed a small text on the image page too stating that he does not authorize the use of the image (think he doesn't know how to ask for deletion). Allgood (talk) 12:16, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

I am sorry to hear that. Did you already copy the logs of this upload, in order to be able to provide evidence for a good-faith-use on your behalf? --Túrelio (talk) 13:17, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

We are settling the proccess, looks like he stabilished a "catch-coins" scheme, and as I was very naive trying to automatically incorporate articles from Wikipedia on a local news site, ended up shooting myself in the foot. I will have to pay a not-so-small quantity to him, but in my analisys, it would cost a lot more only to defend myself, including a forced tourism travel to the beautiful city of Cabedelo/PB for me and my lawyer. So I ended closing my 'automatic clone' site that never gave me a penny. As the proccess are publicly available, I am thinking in getting it on the wild as soon as it is closed to warn all the friends to take care on this things! Allgood (talk) 00:52, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

File:V-12-engine.gif

Can you please restore File:V-12-engine.gif and delete File:V-12-engine.GIF

As described on the deletion note, these are near duplicates, not exact duplicates - one has an error in it, fixed by the later image. The filename used is irrelvant, but the bitmap needed is the one from File:V-12-engine.gif

Thanks Andy Dingley (talk) 21:37, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Your deletion note was/is not shown in the message box, see here. Anyway, restored now. --Túrelio (talk) 21:44, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

My pics

Hello Turélio! I've been posting on Wikimedia Commons some South Parked pictures of me! So, you said that you'll delete them cause they're copyright violations! D: Anyway, I've posted the owners of the image in their descriptions, I always say that they're art from Trey Parker and Matt Stone, creators of the South Park series. And I respected the copyrights page in the site where I get my images. Please dont delete them. They're so important to my Wikipedia page

Thanks, DennysOMarshall (talk) 22:12, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi, what do you mean by "pictures of me"? Aren't these the regular characters? But even if they aren't, I strongly assume that the appearance ("design") of these figures is copyrighted and/or trademarked. And what/where is the "site where I get my images"? --Túrelio (talk) 22:15, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Use of images from Flickr

Hi

I am writing a wikipedia article on Christopher Whall and two images involving St Cecilia are being deleted as the licensing does not permit the image to be used in any way commercially.

Am I right in thinking that the Flickr user must choose option 4 of this 6 options given to allow the image to go into a wikipedia article. Here are the six options.

---

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Creative Commons
Attribution Creative Commons
Attribution-ShareAlike Creative Commons
Attribution-NoDerivs Creative Commons

I usually ask the Flickr user to opt for "Attribution Creative Commons" but sometimes they are happy that the image goes into wikipedia but are not happy that it may be used commercially.

Is "Attribution Creative Commons" the only option that will work?

Many thanks for clarifying this.

Weglinde (talk) 14:19, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Options 4 (CC-BY) and 5 (CC-BY-SA) are compatible to Commons policy. --Túrelio (talk) 14:22, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Many thanks for clearing this up.

Weglinde (talk) 17:46, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

St Cecilia 2.jpg

I would be grateful if you would re-check this image. It has been rejected but the Flickr user has selected option 4 so I thought this would enable me to use image. Sorry to be a nuisance. Weglinde (talk) 18:16, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:11, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

question

You deleted File:MSC ocean surveillance ship USNS Able use firefighting hoses to deter simulated attackers.jpg, an image uploaded by a real human being, in favor of an image uploaded by a robot.

I was surprised that the robot uploaded image remains poorly categorized.

I am sure I have written to you before about how counter-productive it seems to me to favor images uploaded by robots over images uploaded by real human beings, as (1) real human beings are more likely to make sure an images categories are wisely chosen; (2) robots have no feelings to be hurt.

It doesn't seem like me to have failed to put this image in useful categories. Did I really fail to do so? If I did add meaningful categories I am going to assume not adding them to the image you kept that was kept was an oversight.

Can I ask when I uploaded the version you deleted? Geo Swan (talk) 01:43, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Yours was newer (ie the robot uploaded one was here first). You uploaded in Aug 2010 and the bot did it in Nov 2009. Yours only contained these categories: Category:USNS Able, Category:Piracy. The former seems to redirect to the category that's currently on the robot uploaded version and the latter can be easily added. Did you mention something about wisely chosen categories? Killiondude (talk) 07:33, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Honestly, I increasingly hate this kind of dupe-deletions that result from our may-be-not-so-well-thought do-not-overwrite policy. As already mentioned by Killiondude, the bot-uploaded image was uploaded about 10 months earlier than yours. The upload-precedence is an important forensic point in the choice which image should stay. If you provide me an easy-to-handle solution how to legally-safe record the original upload date of the other version, this point might become less critical. --Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

File:VictorHurtado-LaSublevacion-Sevilla1.jpg

Hi. I sent the e-mail with the authorization to permissions@wikimedia.org right after uploading the file. The OTRS ticket has already been filed. I hope everything is ok, as I plan to upload similar images from the same source in the next few days. Regards, --Hispalois (talk) 05:54, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Hispalois, an OTRS ticket has been added to your image yesterday, though by an unknown user. --Túrelio (talk) 07:18, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

OTRS member

Hi, thanks for the notice... I don't knew the rule :(, I'll try don't screw up again. Superzerocool (talk) 13:32, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

No, problem. Welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 13:40, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

PD-1996 und so

Huhu. Aufgrund einer Anfrage auf WP:UF kam ich auf deinen Edit hier. Könntest du mal da nachschauen? PD-1996 ist da meines Erachtens nach nicht richtig, da Juni 1976 + 20 Jahre = Juni 1996, aber das liegt doch nach dem URAA-Datum vom 1.1.1996, oder? Da ich mich damit nicht auskenne kannst du dich drum kümmern? Danke. --Quedel (talk) 14:25, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Ömm, also ich halte mich von den inkonsistenten PD-Bestimmungen der USA i.a. eher fern, weil ich es schwer durchschaubar finde. Auch die Hinweis im PD-Italy-Fenster sind unklar: "es wurde vor 1976 erstellt" oder "es nach 1976 erstellt". Dieses wurde aber in 1976 erstellt, was gilt hier? Aber egal, ich hab jetzt mal {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} gesetzt, weshalb das Foto wohl gelöscht werden muss. --Túrelio (talk) 14:38, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Da ich mich noch weniger damit auskenne als du, wirst du schon das richtige tun, auch wenn mir jede Behaltensmöglichkeit lieber ist. Aber konsequent müssen wir schon sein. Und es ist auch kein Foto, was wir nach de.wp retten können :( --Quedel (talk) 16:30, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Rathenower Torturm.gif

Hallo Túrelio, wir brauchen hier mal deinen Rat. Waageberlin hat diese Datei hochgeladen, und zwar zunächst eine Version, die mit Freeware erstellt wurde, die eine komerzielle Nutzung verbietet (siehe Metadaten). Die zweite Version ist jetzt mit einer entsprechenden Software gestaltet worden, die ich selbst geprüft habe, da ist kommerzieller Gebrauch erlaubt. Jetzt stellt sich die Frage, ob man die alte Version der Datei separat löschen kann, oder ob erstmal die ganze Datei gelöscht werden sollte, um die nichtkommerzielle Version zu entsorgen, auf die man ja immer noch zugreifen kann. Gruß, De728631 (talk) 23:23, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

 Done. Ich hab die Version gelöscht statt sie nur zu verstecken, weil der Log-Eintrag in der Tabelle sowie fehlte, also nichts relevantes verloren ging. --Túrelio (talk) 07:57, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Vielen Dank. De728631 (talk) 18:45, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Programm-Screenshots

Siehe User talk:Pill. Grüße, —Pill (talk) 02:39, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Danke, werds mir heut abend anschauen. --Túrelio (talk) 07:57, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

question

Hi Túrelio. whats the reason for this? As I see it, upload is the person quoted in author. This image for example is here (same account name). Amada44  ^{talk to me} 19:24, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Nun, mal abgesehen davon, dass dieser Uploader offenbar zu faul war, die Beschreibung auch nur annähernd vernünftig auszufüllen (er kopiert einfach 5-6x den Dateinamen in nahezu alle Felder (und das bei sämtlichen Uploads dieser Serie), hat Infoxp2500 (talk · contribs) Bilder eines Jankó Péter hochgeladen, von dem dein 2. & 3. Link nun noch zusätzlich belegt, dass zumindest dieses Beispiel sogar "© Alle Rechte vorbehalten" ist (Panoramio-Upload älter als Commons-Upload). Der account auf Panoramio heißt Peter Janko, der auf Commons aber "Infoxp2500". D.h., es fehlt einfach der Beweis, dass der Uploader tatsächlich dieser Jankó Péter ist (obwohl ich momentan nicht von einer URV ausgehe). --Túrelio (talk) 20:33, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Naja, hat auf jeden Fall UVRs im Uploadstream. Hier zB. File:Jackass_-_rúg_el_a_széket_2.gif. Das kommt von Jackass. Die anderen Bild sind zu schlecht als das sie von wo anders kopiert wären :) . LG, Amada44  ^{talk to me} 20:51, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Mgr JCL Hollerich cath 20111016.jpg

Hi, i just added the permission with an English translation, the precise source link and I categorized the picture --Sultan Edijingo (talk) 18:06, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Could you also add a link to the page where this permission can be found. --Túrelio (talk) 19:11, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

You can read the permission (in Luxembourgish) directly on the (new) link of the indicated source page: http://cathol.lu/mediatheque-mediathek/phototheque-photothek/article/de-fotosalbum-vun-der-beschofsweih The English translation can be read under permission. The photo I choose is the 61th of the gallery "D’Zeremonie um Altor". I only cropped it a bit. --Sultan Edijingo (talk) 20:25, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

2012-01-12 deletion of File:YukkuriShiteIttene!!!.png

Hello Túrelio. Your deletion of File:YukkuriShiteIttene!!!.png [1] was incorrect because the PNG file was of a higher resolution than the SVG file which is in fact a bitmap image wrongly stored in SVG format. --Pabouk (talk) 10:42, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

I have found info about the deleted PNG in the Google cache: 589 × 321 pixels, file size: 3 KB [2]. The image was correctly and smoothly rendered at the resolution 589 × 321 pixels while the SVG is very ugly (jagged and blurred) even at 324 × 206 pixels and it has unbelievable 137 kB. --Pabouk (talk) 10:59, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

O.k., I'll revert the redirect and undelete it in 1 hour from now. --Túrelio (talk) 12:02, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:25, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

It is not even transcluded yet

But many thanks :) --Herby ^{talk thyme} 09:40, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Centre Georges-Pompidou

As I had already {{Derivative}}-tagged two of the images it was unnecessary to tag them as {{Copyvio}}

Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Palmiers_Domaine_Moulin_Mer.jpg

I'm inclined to believe this newbie and not bother with OTRS, but you're the one who deleted it, so it's your call. He's had a few things deleted for no source, but I think he's just new, not a liar or a problem.

And, I certainly can't solicit votes, but I can say "Thank you very much" to those who have voted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:34, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Replied

Replied here File:Exydrus_gibbosus.jpg Stho002 (talk) 01:38, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

O.k., "I can reup the file and relink the pages easily" - but I hope you will really do it: [3], [4]. --Túrelio (talk) 07:57, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Permissions to use images

Hello Turelio

Tiisetso here. Just to refresh your memory. I had a problem with deleted images last week on the Absa Group page. I have now sent a permission's letter to Commons. Please let me know what it is I need to do from now. Below are the images I need to upload:

1. Absa CSI.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:ABSA_CSI.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1

2. Absa Group logo.png http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Absa_Group_logo.png

3. Absa ATM.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:ABSA_ATM.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1

4. Sponsorship KKNK.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Sponsorships_KKNK.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1

Thank you so much for your help.

Regards Tiisetso 11:45, 27 January 2012

O.k., I have temporarily undeleted the 3 deleted images and tagged all 4 with OTRS pending. --Túrelio (talk) 09:52, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi

I've been the first day. These images that I uploaded, I bought a internet-site shop which I have in the copyright notice. For them to pay money, then they are legal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Артём Алтухов (talk • contribs) 28. Januar 2012, 22:10 Uhr (UTC)

Hi Артём, images (and any other files) uploaded to Commons have to be free for any kind of use and without any further payment or similar. Images on websites are generally considered unfree, except if they are expressedly put under a free license by the photographer. The smugmug.com website carries a (C) note and none of the subpages of individual photographers is under a free license. I do not fully understand what you mean by "I bought". Did you pay the photographer for these images? If yes, what kind of use does that include? I rather doubt that this would include redistribution under a free license, because that would mean that the photographer no longer can sell these images. For some general information, see COM:CB. --Túrelio (talk) 21:15, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Вид на Мончегорск.jpg

Can you please tag this image as 'no source'? Trusted user Techman passed this image but this is impossible as the image on the panoramio link is not the image on the uploaded picture. So, I reverted Techman's pass. I think the uploader made a small mistake with the link. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:54, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment: Never mind. I found the right source. --Leoboudv (talk) 10:01, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Deine Fragen vom 28.1. bez. Bilder zu Kunst am Kanal

Hallo Turelio,

vielen Dank zunächst für Deine Rückmeldung. Da ich nur sporadisch in Wikipedia arbeite habe ich nicht viel Erfahrungen und denke nicht an alle rechtlichen Eventualitäten. Ich hoffe es ist der richtige Weg Deine Fragen zu beantworten, ich habe keine Möglichkeit für einen direkten "reply" gefunden: - Löschung des Artikels der Neumarkter Nachrichten ist korrekt. An die rechtliche Seite habe ich nicht gedacht und entschuldige mich dafür. - Alle Objekte, also auch die Kugeln und EINSTSTEIN sind Eigentum des Vereins und sind dauerhaft installiert. Die Kugeln waren ursprünglich Leihgaben sind aber inzwischen angekauft. EINST STEIN ist eine Schenkung. - Das Bild vom Model wird inzwischen nicht mehr benötigt. Ich habe es bereits aus dem Artikel gelöscht. Du kannst das Bild daher komplett löschen.

Viele Grüße, DLI25--Dli25 (talk) 12:22, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Danke für die Rückmeldung. Allerdings ist es so, dass das Eigentum an einem Kunstwerk keine wirkliche Relevanz für das Urheberrecht daran hat (ich weiß, ist vielen nicht so geläufig). Das Urheberrecht verbleibt beim Künstler, bis 70 Jahre nach dessen Tod. Allerdings gibt es in D/CH/A zum Glück die sog. Panoramafreiheit, die es rechtlich erlaubt, von im öffentlichen Raum dauerhaft angebrachten Kunstwerken Fotos usw. zu machen und diese auch kommerziell zu nutzen. Aufgrund dieser Regelung sind Fotos von den installierten Kunstwerken (sofern im Prinzip dauerhaft aufgestellt, was wohl auch für as zusammengebrochene gilt) somit legal, bedürfen allerdings eines entsprechenden Hinweises, weil unklar ist, ob die Fotos auch in Ländern ohne Panoramafreiheit (Frankreich, Belgien, u.v.a.m.) legal benutzt werden dürfen. Was das erwähnte Modell angeht, bräuchtest du nur den Künstler um eine Genehmigung zu bitten (Details: Commons:OTRS/de) und diese an permissions-commons@wikimedia.org weiterzuleiten, dann könnte es auch bleiben. --Túrelio (talk) 13:20, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

!!

Túrelio, plz delete all edits of this user. On his talk page in Russian WP he confirmed that didnt know rules and were not sure pictures uploaded by him are free or not. At the same time he continue uploading. That pictures are absolutely not free so plz delete all of them and warn him. --Алый Король (talk) 11:18, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. But today I don't have enough time for that. It will either have to wait or you might ask for another admin at COM:AN. --Túrelio (talk) 13:27, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

you know, I dont feel free with my English so I prefer to wait--Алый Король (talk) 13:59, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

up --Алый Король (talk) 18:40, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Fonticulus. --Túrelio (talk) 19:45, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

thanks a lot --Алый Король (talk) 20:17, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

BNF PD-license

Hi Thcollet, this discussion may be of interest for you. --Túrelio (talk) 14:37, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Thx, I will use also {{Anonymous-EU}}. regards,--Thcollet (talk) 15:48, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Deletion

Thanks for deletion of copy file. Also, maybe you may check this DR?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 23:56, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 21:15, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

About File:Staphylococcus aureus bacteria escape.jpg

Hi there. About the image (File:Staphylococcus aureus bacteria escape.jpg) you've deleted, according to the template you placed on my talk, had to spend at least 7 days to change the license file. I found the image is from the National Institute of Allergy and Infeccious Diseases, and as a work of United States government is public domain.

Please respect the agreed time before taking action because I can not upload until you restore the page. --Arturo Juárez Discusión 04:42, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

O.k., I've temp-undeleted it. --Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! :) --Arturo Juárez Discusión 05:42, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Category:Portrait drawings by Jean-Étienne Liotard

Dear Túrelio, I would be grateful to you if you could let me know if you intend to move the content of Category:Portrait drawings by artist to Category:Drawings by artist for the same reason, namely “for easier navigation”? Thank you.--Thorvaldsson (talk) 21:09, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi Thorvaldsson, as I only executed the deletion request by User:Vincent Steenberg, who also provided this rationale, it might be better to ask him directly. If, in the end, you both agree to revert to the former state, I have no problem with that. --Túrelio (talk) 21:13, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Henri Bienvenu Ntsama.jpg

Please delete this image that I speedied. I didn't know that a second user had typed in a fake flickrpass in my name. I never even saw this image. If an anon IP does this, just revert the flickrpass and either 1. tag it for deletion or 2. allow another trusted user or Admin to mark it. This image is obviously a derivative anyway and a flickrwash. I only mark images with my signed in user account. Thank You for notifying. One day, I may be away...but I would never pass an image with an anonymous IP account. That is for sure. Best Regards from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:05, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Quick request

After reading this, can you follow up and strikeout the phrase, "violation of personality rights", from your nom statement, since you no longer agree with that comment? Thank you very much for your thoughtful and reasoned re-evaluation. :) -- Cirt (talk) 03:46, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Well, personally I still consider this a personality rights violation, but I acknowledge that in the relevant country (U.S.) it may be not and therefore it seems to be no longer be valid for the DR. --Túrelio (talk) 07:24, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. -- Cirt (talk) 14:56, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

User:Аbrape

Hallo Túrelio, bitte lösche auch User talk:Аbrape. Vielen Dank --Abrape (talk) 11:34, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 15:53, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

one more request

Hi, Turelio. Can you rename this file from Tang Wei 2007.jpg to Li Xiaolu 2007.jpg?--Алый Король (talk) 15:50, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

But why? Doesn't it show Tang Wei (as the Flickr user claims)? --Túrelio (talk) 15:52, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

no, author was wrong. Take a look at my talk page --Алый Король (talk) 15:56, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

thanks a lot, and now you can delete File:Tang Wei 2007.jpg --Алый Король (talk) 16:03, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Aso natsuko.png

Hola, La Fotografía sacada de Flickr, el autor Dj ph puso la licencia con la etiqueta Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.0 Genérica (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0) a la que la borraste según con la licencia No Comercial , Sin obras derivadas , or Todos los derechos reservados , Por favor vuelve a revisarla --Asaraya (talk) 00:02, 4 Febrero 2012 (UTC)

Hi, images licensed[5] no-commercial-use are not allowed on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

您好

• 請解除[[User:Tp61i6m42008]|我用戶頁]用戶頁面的封鎖。
• Uninstall my user page, the protection of the user page,Please.--Tp61i6m42008 (talk) 16:23, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 16:28, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

for the deletion of retouch sample.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:57, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Thamnophis sirtalis infernalis 002.jpg

Moin. :-) Ich hab kein Verschiebe-Flag hier. Kannst du die Datei umbenennen zu File:Thamnophis elegans terrestris 002.jpg? (war auf deWP jetzt schon wieder falsch eingesetzt) Danke im Voraus. --Martina talk 01:37, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done. Der alte Dateiname wird als Weiterleitung aber wohl erstmal erhalten bleiben. --Túrelio (talk) 06:43, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Wie imemr: 1000 Dank --Martina talk 23:14, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Licencia

No entiendo por qué tiene que ser borrado este archivo, si está siendo utilizado por infinidad de sitios web. Y son libres, no compraron, ni vendieron la licencia. Cómo puedo adquirir la licencia?User_talk:Ninrouter

Hi Ninrouter, File:Irina Shayk2.jpg is clearly a professional shot, very likely by an commercial agency photographer, such as from Getty Images. Such images are (nearly) never under a free license, because the agency wants to sell the image as long as possible. Usually you cannot buy it from them to distribute it by yourself or to upload it under a free license. Other people (re-users) who use such an image, may get taken to court by te agency for copyright infringement. If you still want to check for the minimal possibility that this image might be free, you first need to find out who it the real photographer. Your "source" is a blog, which is rather surely not the original photographer. I would recommend to perform a searchat gettyimages.com. --Túrelio (talk) 07:18, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Leider schon wieder

eine traurige Nachricht - schau mal bitte hier und hier. lg, --4028mdk09 (talk) 20:06, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Danke für die Info; hab ihn in COM:RIP eingetragen und werde an ihn denken. --Túrelio (talk) 21:05, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

File:MakSim.jpg

Hello. I got permission to use photo via private message. How can I prove it? --Lexusuns (talk) 10:48, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Forward it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. --Túrelio (talk) 10:53, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Restore my image T-J-10.jpg

Sir you have deleted the image T-J-10.jpg due to liscense issue. It is to inform you that this image belongs to me regarding the article at wikipedia(Tando Jahania).I know that you had informed me but as i am new to wikimedia therefore i could not get the exact point, so Please if you restore the image i 'll try my best to provide the source and improve it. thanks.--Shahenshahkillz (talk) 12:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, but both File:T-J-10.jpg and File:TJ-10.jpg are a derivative of File:Tando Jahania.jpg, which is a copyrighted satellite image from Google. Besides, 2 days ago I had asked you at File talk:T-J-10.jpg to provide a source, which you haven't done so far. --Túrelio (talk) 13:08, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Rail vandal

RE: this edit. See also User:Krinkle/Socks#Rail-related nonsense. –Krinkle^talk 18:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Copyvio

Hello Túrelio, could you please take a look at File:Gianluca Sansone.jpg? Thank you so much, --Delfort (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:20, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio

... schaust du bitte mal über meine Beiträge. Ich hoffe ich hab nicht allzuviel grobe Fehler eingebaut (Bei Commons übe ich ja noch...). P.S. ich hatte mal im de:WP Artikel Rumänien nachgeschaut, dort konnte ich nur den Hinweis finden "Mitglied der NATO (2004) sowie der Europäischen Union (2007)". Einen Hinweis auf das Schengen-Abkommen fand ich im Artikel nicht. Im Artikel Schengener Abkommen wird zu Rumänien der Hinweis: "Bestimmungen über die Außengrenze sind bereits in Kraft" gegeben. Just for Info! LG --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 23:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, kurz als Hinweis: Ich habe auch schon einige Beiträge durchgeschaut: de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Saibo#Commons_Fragen. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 00:29, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Ihr Beiden, mir ist es ganz recht wenn mehr als zwei Augen mal etwas Obacht geben. Auf Commons übe ich ja noch. Lieben Gruß in die Runde --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 01:40, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Ich hoffe, dass ich morgen dazu komme. Die hemmungslosen URV-Hochlader hindern unsereiner zu oft daran, das zu tun, was wir viel lieber täten. Bzgl. Rumänien war ich schon zur selben Schlußfolgerung gekommen, hatte das aber nur Rehgina mitgeteilt. --Túrelio (talk) 08:53, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Ich hoffe ich bin mit meinen Fehlern soweit durch? Wäre nett ne Rückantwort zu bekommen. Frage: Was haltet ihr davon? Für Kritik und Tipps immer ein offenes Ohr... --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 03:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Da hab ich Euch ne Menge Arbeit gemacht, ich glaub ich nehm da aber ein paar neue Erkenntnisse mit. Dank Euch für die Mühen. LG --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 20:23, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

RfCU

Thank you for your support and kind words.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:10, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Benet Rossell

Hi Túrelio, yes, I'm the artist, and the photos are mine. Sorry for my english, almost forgot it!--Benet Rossell (talk) 13:58, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

File Guillaume Sarkozy

Hi, I understand I might have done something wrong with Guillaume sarkozy file. The thing is the current image is no longer displayed on Flickr. That's why I displayed a new image. Is there any other way I can change the current image ? Thanks for your help. TheYoungPilgrim

Hi, your new version of the image is NC/ND-restricted on Flickr, which is not allowed on Commons. However, the fact that the older version is no longer available on Flickr doesn't really matter as the correct license was checked at the date of upload (see the green box). CC licenses are considered to be non-revokable. We would consider this to be a problem only if there would be solid evidence that the image was already a copyvio when originally uploaded to Flickr. --Túrelio (talk) 23:38, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Sock block

Confirmed - thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 09:06, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Sometimes the nose works as a CU surrogate ;-). --Túrelio (talk) 09:11, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Jean Pierre Saltarelli.jpg

Hi Veronique, could this image, File:Jean Pierre Saltarelli.jpg, be intended as an attack on you (see author entry)? See also here. --Túrelio (talk) 09:03, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Dear Turelio,

I don't this the attack was against me. Jean-Pierre Saltarelli is also a wikipedian, with a different username, on french wikipedia. On the same day, he had attack against him on french wikipedia, and on this commons picture. the problem on French wikipedia (revelation of name IRP) is solved, or almost, but the problem against him on commons is to be solved. Véronique PAGNIER (talk) 18:31, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Wiki demotivator Bulgarian.png

Hey, the photograph in the picture is taken from Commons and the rest is done by myself. I have even cited the user whose photograph I have used. If that is not enough to ensure that there's no breach of copyright please let me know. --Dimi z (talk) 22:49, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Now it's o.k., after I have added a few more infos. At the time of my tagging you had neither mentioned the file which you had used nor its author, but instead claimed "own work" for all. It's also nice to put a note on the original image, which I have one now[6]. --Túrelio (talk) 07:24, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Okay! Thanks for the advice. Will do so in future. --Dimi z (talk) 21:40, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Image Confprensa4.png

In Commons:Deletion requests/File:Confprensa4.png. I'm a journalist. I took that picture. So obviously I have the copyright of that image, why I can not upload? RonsonPeru2 (talk) 17:40, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi RonsonPeru2, I didn't say to be sure that you are not the copyright holder, just that it seemed unlikely to me, as is very often with shots from celebrities. Anyway, if you are really the photographer, then I recommend you to follow the advise of my colleague PierreSelim on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 14:35, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Francisco Martínez (saxofonista)

Stop deleting all my images because I am the owner of all the images uploaded and shown in Francisco Martínez (saxofonista). I want you to restore every image you deleted of this article.--Pablobetes (talk) 23:21, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

I deleted only a few of your uploads, but notified you of most deletion requests. So, obviously my other admin colleagues who also performed the deletion, were also convinced that you are not the copyright holder. For the most definite answer see here. --Túrelio (talk) 14:32, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Help with sourcing

Hello Túrelio, I have a question. There is an image which was transferred from Wikipedia, uploaded in simpler days when one didn't have to write "own work" in the upload. So now I fear that it is at risk of deletion, as the original uploader has been inactive for a long time. However, I found the same image in the user's paper on the Brazilian auto industry (page 18, footnote), as linked from a page linked to from his Wikipedia userpage. Do you think that this is enough to write "own work" in the source section? Thankful for your help, I have been frustrated by the needless deletion of several older pictures which have been transferred without having the full modern documentation. Cheers, Mr.choppers (talk) 17:00, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

I'll look into it tomorrow. --Túrelio (talk) 17:34, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Fully justified as "own work". I've added it a moment ago. Thanks for your care. --Túrelio (talk) 07:32, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to look into this. Best regards, Mr.choppers (talk) 04:25, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Another week?

The user was notified in January. Regards, --Elitre (talk) 11:00, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

I've notified him now on http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussioni_utente:Sbmoggiona. --Túrelio (talk) 11:29, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

2 Bilder

Hallo Túrelio, könntest Du bitte folgende zwei Bilder überprüfen. Leider wird in dem template der Link nicht angezeigt. File:Dendrophylax lindenii cultivated by Jeff Hale.JPGund File:Ghost Orchid of Jeff Hale.jpg. Mit Dank für Deine Mühe grüße ich. Orchi (talk) 12:24, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Es fehlte nur das 1= hinter dem "|". Vergess ich auch manchmal. --Túrelio (talk) 13:02, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Kleiner Tipp wie du das Problem umgehst und gleichzeitig noch den abarbeitenden Admins Arbeit erspart: statt Vorlage und Link manuell einzugeben, benutze doch einfach das Link "Urheberrechtsverletzung melden" in der Werkzeug-Box links am Bildrand. Das erzeugt automatisch eine Benachrichtigung auf der Disku des Uploaders. --Túrelio (talk) 13:09, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Ähem, nachdem ich mir die beiden Bilder angeschaut habe, vermute ich eigentlich, dass der Uploader tatsächlich Jeff Hale ist. Ich habe ihn aber direkt darauf angesprochen. --Túrelio (talk) 13:06, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

...danke für Deinen Hinweis zur Handhabung für zukünftige Vermutungen von Copyright Verletzung. Ich würde mich freuen, wenn durch Deine Nachfrage das schöne Bild der seltenen Orchidee in commons bleiben könnte. Grüße. Orchi (talk) 19:03, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Luciann Mosescu‎ possible serial copyright violator

Greetings Túrelio, Thank you for dealing with the deletion of copyrighted image File:Malta Eurovision Song Contest 2012.PNG (as shown on this deletion log). I have deepest concerns that the user, who I named above, may be a serial copyvio. Luciann has uploaded several images over the last 12 months, all of which are based upon the non-free Eurovision Song Contest image; which s/he appears to manipulate into a new image of their own, and then adds licencing tags stating the work belongs to them. On his main Wikipedia page, the user has had several warnings about this, and yet s/he still continues to violate copyright legislations. Another image that was added is this Eurovision Selectia Nationala on Wikipedia. That image that was previously added on commons, but then nominated for deletion on February 3, 2012; and subsequently deleted for copyvio on February 11, 2012. During the nomination process, Luciann personally removed deletion tags, to which s/he was is warned. Now the image has been re-added despite the fact that s/he has been warned about it being copyvio. With all of these copyright issues cropping up time and time again, I fear that the user may be wandering down a disruptive path unknowingly. Is there any action that should now be taken to prevent further copyvio disruptions from this user? Thank you in advance for your time reading this. Wesley☀Mouse 23:06, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

I'll try to look into it this evening. --Túrelio (talk) 08:14, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Much appreciated - Thank you again for your time dealing with this serious matter. - Wesley☀Mouse 15:33, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi Wesley Mouse, sorry that it took longer than I had planned. After looking into the user's actions and putting an end-of-copyvios warning on his talkpage, I think at the moment there is nothing more to do than watch and wait, as he hasn't any edit activity or uploads since February 9th. It might be surely helpful if you'll have an eye on him. If he goes on with uploading clear copyvios, he will be blocked. In case of image with questionable copyright status (not obvious copyvios), some more explaining to him might help. Thanks for your help. --Túrelio (talk) 17:32, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio, sorry for the late reply back. I have the user on my watchlist, both here and at Wikipedia too; just to keep a close eye on uploading activity. I've also managed to get a few other users from the Eurovision Project to keep an eye out too for obvious copyvios. Also, I have posted a polite message on their wikipedia talk page can be viewed here), explaining to the user that they may not be aware of the seriousness of copyvio, and provided a few links helpful links as a guide for them. I have that gut feeling that they are unaware about copyright issues, and think it only fair to allow them the chance to learn from the mistake. However, if they continue to upload copyvios despite this advice I've provided for them, then by all means I would agree to looking down the blocking route. Thanks again for looking into this and for the advice too. Regards - Wesley☀Mouse 15:52, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Dombóvári Helytörténeti Múzeum előtér.jpg

Helo Túrelio! This is a wallpaper. --Gnagyrobi (talk) 13:08, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. But then it is the work of a photographer and is likely copyrighted. Obviously being inside the house, it is unlikely to be covered by FOP exemption. --Túrelio (talk) 13:17, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Dombóvári Helytörténeti Múzeum rajza.jpg

This is a drawing, isn't yet ready. I don't who taken it. --Gnagyrobi (talk) 13:26, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Chausie article - photo ChausieBTT.jpg

Yesterday (2/13/2012) I forwarded to wikimedia a copy of the email correspondence from Lance Klausner, in which he states he created the photo ChausieBTT.jpg and wishes to release that photo to public domain.

Thanks,

PiBeseth — Preceding unsigned comment added by PiBeseth (talk • contribs) 14. Februar 2012, 20:02 Uhr (UTCTúrelio (talk) 19:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC))

O.k. I've tagged the image accordingly. --Túrelio (talk) 19:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Alisha_Glass_2012.jpg

Hi, this picture is croppped from the original one. As I know pictures like this one doesn't have meta data. Why is it a crop? I made pics to players of Atom team yet, so this time I went to the match without a special attitude to making good quality portait pics (made some only to my fan FB site). But, as a addicted wikipedist ;) I can't refrain to put even not very good quality photo to player who didn't have any one. I've added some location informations yet.--Zorro2212 (talk) 09:19, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

O.k., thanks for the feedback. However, there is no principal problem why crops should/could not have the EXIF data of teh original uncropped image. It simply depends on the settings of the software you use. For example in the freeware IrfanView, maintaining the EXIF is the default. So, you might look at your cropping program and change the settings. --Túrelio (talk) 10:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Danke!

Danke schön für deine Hilfe. :) Liebe Grüße --Amy.Leonie (talk) 22:57, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Trasformazione politropica esponenti particolari.PNG

Yes I'm agree: delete the file, I want to correct it, but the system don't let me to upload until the file exists. Excuse me for bad english.--Frank50 s (talk) 22:14, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Mekenna Melvin.jpg

Hello, about the image, I'm not ready yet, sorry. I added a new image Hoping that this time I'm doing correctly. cordially. --Skarock (talk) 11:23, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 08:09, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

1971markus

Hallo Túrelio, geht das so in Ordnung?. Lieben Gruß --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 22:41, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Markus, ja, da habe ich keine Bedenken; außer vielleicht, dass dadurch die vorher bestehende Namensvorgabe in der GFDL-Vorlage nun weggefallen ist. Aber das dürfte im Alltag eh kein Problem sein, weil kaum jemand GFDL benutzt. Du könntest im Feld "|Source=" vielleicht noch {{own}}</br> vor den vorhandenen Eintrag setzen und danach ggf. die 3. Zeile "...selbst erstellt" entfernen. Die Own-Vorlage hat den Vorteil, dass sie in jeder Sprachversion automatisch angepasst wird, d.h. ein Franzose sieht den Text in französisch, und außerdem dürfte sie problemlos von bots und anderen Skripts auslesbar sein, was der alte Eintrag nicht ist. Hab Tante heute angemailt, so dass wir in den nächsten Tagen vielleicht auch ihre Bilder bzgl. Attribution finalisieren können. --Túrelio (talk) 09:09, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Fut.Perf.

Hallo Túrelio, kannst du mal auf User talk:Saibo#My talkpage vorbeischauen? Du hattest den letzten Seitenschutz gemacht, den ich gestern aufhob. Dank dir. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 15:32, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:11, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

"Actually I didn't take this photo, My brother take this photo and he want remove, i have to remove."

Hi Túrelio, my answer to your question: Yes, i have to remove 4 photo, "File:Belltower of N. D. de Lourdes.jpg" and "File:Bomonti.JPG" and "File:პროტესტი რუსეთს.jpg" and "File:Georgians in Turkey, Istanbul.jpg", That's all.. (I am sorry i am not good at english, but i can say finally, this files deletion reason is same with others...)--Rime 01:36, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback. I've deleted them now. --Túrelio (talk) 09:11, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Category:789 Adelia (ship, 1984)

Hi Turelio,

I noticed you deleted the above, probably on request of someone else. Just curious: where did this go or who asked it to be deleted? I tried search but without much result. --  Docu  at 07:57, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi Docu, the request was by User:Mike1979 Russia and it should eventually have gone to Adelia (ship, 1984), to which the same user directed an earlier move command ({{move|Adelia (ship, 1984)|in Soviet Navy hull number wasn't constant and isn't part of the ship's name|3=2012-02-04}}). However, I can't find such a cat. --Túrelio (talk) 08:29, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Category:Exerzierplatz (Kiel)

Die Kategorie bezieht sich auf den Platz, während Category:Kiel-Exerzierplatz sich auf den Stadtteil Kiel-Exerzierplatz bezog. Siehe dazu de:Exerzierplatz. -- Elendsredder (talk) 11:02, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Sorry und danke für die Info. Ich habe jetzt in beide Kats. einen kurzen verweis auf die jeweils andere gesetzt. --Túrelio (talk) 19:38, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Bei dem DR fehlt die Einbindung in die Tagesliste

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lalique car mascots for the club website 021.JPG - als Hinweis falls dir das vllt. noch öfters passiert ist. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 02:35, 19 February 2012 (UTC) Vergiss es.. da ist irgendwas anderes faul...--Saibo (Δ) 02:37, 19 February 2012 (UTC) Commons:Deletion_requests/2012/02 ist in Category:Pages where template include size is exceeded (automatisch von mediawiki) - daher werden Tage ab dem 9. Feb. nicht eingebunden (sieht man ganz unten auf der Seite)... Ich schreibs mal auf Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 03:04, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Oops, war mir garnicht aufgefallen. Die DR hatte ich ganz konventionell mit dem Skript/Link aus der Toolbox gestellt, also nicht manuell. Danke für die Aufmerksamkeit. --Túrelio (talk) 09:06, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Du hast ja auch nichts falsch gemacht und das Tool auch nicht - siehe Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Es betrifft alle DRs. :-) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 14:37, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Wdalogo.jpg

Hello Túrelio, do you think this file is ok? I don't think so, can you please have a look? Bye, --Delfort (talk) 12:33, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Though it might not be copyrightable at all, I've contacted the likely rightsholder in Austria. --Túrelio (talk) 13:08, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

SLA ?

Hallo Túrelio,

ich denke beide Bilder sind URV, bevor ich dies melde wollte ich nachfragen ob dies auf Deutsch möglich ist?

• File:Verhaftung Öcalans.jpg
• File:Zeitungsausschnitt von Öcalan und eimen seiner Opfer.jpg

LG --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 17:49, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Markus, ja, mit deiner Vermutung liegst du ganz richtig. Die Vorlage "löschen" funktioniert hier m.W. auch, ist in solch einem eher klaren Fall aber nicht sinnvoll. Hier gäbe es 2 Möglichkeiten: falls du am linken Seitenrand eine mit "Werkzeuge" überschriebene Box siehst, dann kannst du daraus entweder das Link "Keine Berechtigung" oder "Urheberrechtsverletzung melden" anklicken. Im letzteren Fall öffnet sich dann 1 Fenster, in das du entweder einfach das hier als Quelle angegebene Link oder, wie ich es nun gemacht habe, den Copyright-Hinweis von der Quell-Website hineinkopieren solltest. Gruß --Túrelio (talk) 18:51, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Nachfrage: ich hatte die Box schon ausgeklappt, wurde mir auch auf Deutsch angezeigt aber ich war mir nicht sicher ob ein Deutscher Eintrag auf Commons sinnvoll ist. Und noch ne Frage: Wenn ich die box ausfülle ist damit auch ne Benutzeransprache verbunden?

Neues Bild zur URV-Frage File:F 03.jpg Ist die Lizenz hier ausreichend? Gilt hier Panoramafreiheit...?

Lieben Gruß --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 23:30, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

P.S. Danke...

Die Anzeige erfolgt auf deutsch, weil du in deinen Benutzereinstellungen "deutsch" gewählt hast; auf die Skripte, die du mit den Befehlen in der Toolbox auslöst, dürfte das aber keine Auswirkung haben. Was du in das Eingabefenster hineinschreibst wird natürlich so wiedergegeben, wie du es eingibst. Bei einem Link/einer URL oder einer Copyright-Notiz von einer Website spielt die Sprache eh keine Rolle. Erklärender Text/Kommentar sollte aber möglichst in englisch sein; deutsch wird aber auch abgearbeitet.

Das merkwürdige Kunstwerk in File:F 03.jpg ist mir noch nicht vor die Augen gekommen (kein Wunder bei > 12 Mio. Dateien). Nein, die derzeitigen Angaben reichen nicht aus. Um zu beurteilen, ob es unter FOP fällt, müsste erst einmal der Aufnahmeort (Land, Gebäude) bekannt sein. Erübrigt sich, da das Foto geklaut ist. --Túrelio (talk) 23:39, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Markus, mal so gesagt: wenn dein Kommentar halt auf Deutsch ist, dann können ihn eben nur deutschsprachige Admins bearbeiten bzw. nur deutschsprachige kommentieren - außer sie nehmen automatische Übersetzungsprogramme, was mittlerweile auch mit Vorsicht brauchbar ist. Wenn du dich auf Englisch nicht so wohl fühlst, dann schreibe es einfach auf Deutsch hin eh du nichts unternimmst, oder erst einen anderen Benutzer auf der Diskussionsseite bitten musst. Commons ist multilingual - Deutsch ist erlaubt (nur eben bei solchen Sachen wie Löschanträgen nicht so praktisch, aber möglich). Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 23:59, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Ich weiß der Saibo hört das Wort nicht so gerne...^^

Aber ich danke Euch - kommt von Herzen.

LG --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 00:06, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

ich bin im englischen und auf Commons noch nicht zu Hause. Vielleicht könnt Ihr mir ne Linksammlung zusammenstellen zu den Hilfe-Seiten (analog zu de:WP - Hilfe:XXX oder Wikipedia:XXX).

Und mal ganz "altklug" ...

@Túrelio - Zusammenfassungszeile ausfüllen?

@Saibo - Als COM-A- nen rotes Benutzerkonto?

LG --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 01:15, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Zuallererst, hast du de:WP:BT durchgeschaut? ;-) Hilft viel. Hilfeseiten? ÖÖööh, wie wär's mit Help:Übersicht, Commons:Gemeinschaftsportal (ist hier in der linken Sidebar verlinkt) oder auch den Links in template:Welcome/de?
Wenn du auf meine Benutzerseite klickst, siehst du, warum sie rot ist. Zuvor war z.B. User:Saibo/Loves_Commons drauf. Tja - so läufts. ;-) Eigentlich sollten Commons-Admins eine Benutzerseite haben, in einer Wahl sähe es so auch nicht so gut aus. Wenn mich mehrere bitten eine anzulegen, dann werde ich ihnen auch anbieten dann eben das Admin"amt" abzugeben. So zumindest meine Gedanken - ich denke, ich werde mir aber bald wieder eine anlegen. Als Ersatz habe ich ja die wichtigsten Babels auf meine Disk. getan. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 02:52, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Hey, hey lieber Admin...

Nix Amt abgeben... welch böser Gedanke...?

Durch die Tipps werde ich mich durchlesen...

Danke... Saibo...

Ich bin doch so froh dich zu haben...

Lieben Gruß zur guten Nacht --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 03:11, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

can you give me advice?

Hi, Turelio. can you give me advice with this--Алый Король (talk) 19:59, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

If a (C) note is truely missing, it should be PD as per File:PD-US table.svg (see upper left block). --Túrelio (talk) 20:38, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

that's good, thank you a lot --Алый Король (talk) 20:50, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Röntgenbilder

Hallo Túrelio, du hattest mal nach meinen Röntgenbildern gefragt. Ich hatte auch geantwortet, dass ich keine Freigabe beibringen kann. Den Abschnitt habe ich bereits ins Archiv geschickt. Ich bin natürlich nicht begeistert aber wenns sein muss... LG --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 20:59, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Hier ist der Hintergrund des Problems. Um deinen Upload-Log sauber zu halten, solltest du selbst einen LA (eigener Wunsch, unter Verweis auf das obigen Link) stellen mit {{delete}} (und dann Abarbeiten der 3 Schritte). --Túrelio (talk) 21:03, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

tut in der Seele weh, aber erledigt. LG --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 21:42, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Selbst aufgenommenes Foto; Copyright

Hi Túrelio, das Problem ist einfach nur, dass ich die Datei selbst nicht mehr online gestellt haben möchte. Darum geht es. Dieser Anspruch wird ja wohl mein gutesRecht sein. ;-) --CherryX (talk) 21:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Leider kann ich dir darauf ehrlicherweise nicht die erwünschte Antwort geben. Wenn du dir in der Hochlade-Maske Schritt 3 anschaust, liest du dort "... Wenn du dein Werk in Commons hochlädst, spendest du es der Weltgemeinschaft, indem du es unter einer freien Lizenz veröffentlichst, die jedem die Nutzung, Bearbeitung und Weiterverbreitung zu jedem Zweck erlaubt. Diese Freigabe kann nicht widerrufen werden. ..." Selbst wenn ein Foto, das länger auf Commons gelegen hat, gelöscht würde, könnte jeder, der es vor der Löschung heruntergeladen hat, es legitimerweise weiter nutzen und sogar hier hochladen (korrekte Angabe des Urhebers usw. vorausgesetzt). Der korrekte und noch am ehesten zielführende Weg ist das Stellen eines regulären LA. Vielleicht hast du Glück und die community erlaubt eine courtesy-Löschung. --Túrelio (talk) 21:47, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Gebe es denn wenigstens die Möglichkeit, den Namen umzuändern? P.S.: Die CC mal etwas näher betrachtet, geht es meiner Auffassung nach nicht, dass jemand einfach mein Bild erneut hier hochlädt, ohne eine Namensnennung etc. Ebenso sind großartige Veränderungen oder die kommerzielle Verwendung auch untersagt. --CherryX (talk) 08:04, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Ähem, also bzgl. des Fiktivszenarios erneutes Hochladen hatte ich ja als Voraussetzung "korrekte Angabe des Urhebers ..." geschrieben. Dein letzter Satz überrascht mich aber doch etwas, da beides (Veränderungen und kommerzielle Verwendung) ja ausdrückliche Voraussetzungen für das Hochladen auf Commons sind, weshalb CC-NC/ND-lizensierte Medien hier ja auch nicht erlaubt sind. Was meinst du konkrete mit "den Namen umzuändern"? --Túrelio (talk) 08:11, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Den Dateinamen "File:Kölner-Zoo-Fisch (CherryX).jpg" würde ich dann gerne in etwas anderes ändern (lassen).--CherryX (talk) 08:15, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Dann setze entweder {{rename}} unter Angabe des neuen Namens auf die jeweilige Bildseite oder gib hier deinen Wunschnamen an. --Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Wunschname ist "File:Paletten-Doktorfisch.jpg"--CherryX (talk) 08:19, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 23:03, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Hilfe...

Hallo Túrelio, da ist mir ein grober Fehler unterlaufen (ausgerechnet bei Geolinas Bild). Der Commons Transfer zu File:Endlichit.png hat wohl nicht funktioniert, ein erneuter Versuch lief schief (File:Commonsfähig.png). Bitte helfen... LG --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 23:54, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Ich glaub ich hab die Situation etwas retten können, puuh stress... --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 00:05, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Guten Morgen Markus, ich war 2 Tage unterwegs und gestern abend zu müde, um noch lange online zu gehen. File:Commonsfähig.png war ja ein lustiger Dateiname; hab sie inzwischen gelöscht; also kein Problem mehr. Als du Category:Files by Geolina163 angelegt hast, hattest du sicher nicht gesehen, dass es bereits Category:Images uploaded by Geolina163 gibt, die ich angelegt hatte, um Geolinas Usernamenstransfer zu unterstützen, oder hast du diese Kat. für spezielle Dateien angelegt? --Túrelio (talk) 08:24, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, die bisherige Kategorie hatte ich glatt übersehen, damit ist die neue hinfällig - ich stelle dazu den LA und werde meine Einträge wieder korrigieren. LG --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 23:37, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Nachtrag: einen LA-Button hatte ich nicht gefunden, daher die Kategorie zur Diskussion gemeldet mit dem Eintrag Delete. Die Kategorie ist geleert. Gibt es einen externen LA-Baustein den ich setzen könnte? LG --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 01:03, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

In einem solch klaren Fall kannst du einen SLA stellen. Da es sich nicht um eine copyvio handelt, musst du es aber manuell machen: einfach {{speedy|1=Löschgrund}} eingeben. --Túrelio (talk) 14:14, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Bitte um Prüfung

Hallo Túrelio, darf ich Dich bitten, Dir mal folgende Seite anzusehen: [7]. Fast alle Bilder konnte ich leider als Bilder aus fremden Quellen identifizieren. Neben dem Einstellen der Bilder in Commons hat User:Raabbustamante die Bilder auch in der englischen WP verwandt und teilweise mit Artikel gestaltet. Viele Grüße. Orchi (talk) 11:10, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
P.S. ... auch dieses Bild: File:5329627871 34fce48b70.jpg scheint ein Problem mit dem copyright zu haben.

Nun fast alle schnellgelöscht. Bei solch klaren copyvios kannst du statt einer regulären DR ruhig gleich mit dem Werkzeugkasten-Link "Urheberrechtsverletzung melden" einen SLA stellen. Danke für den Hinweis. --Túrelio (talk) 09:39, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

...danke für Deine Mühe. Gruß. Orchi (talk) 14:27, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Industry_park_Höchst_south_side_panorama_-_Industriepark_Höchst_Südseite_-_01.jpg

Hallo Túrelio, ich habe ein recht großes Foto (42MB) ohne Fehlermeldung hochgeladen: Industry_park_Höchst_south_side_panorama_-_Industriepark_Höchst_Südseite_-_01.jpg. Die Thumbnail-Versionen lassen sich in Commons problemlos aufrufen, aber wenn ich die Datei in voller Größe aufrufe, gibt es eine Fehlermeldung: "Grafik...kann nicht gezeigt werden, weil sie Fehler enthält." Ist das Commons-intern behebbar oder soll ich die Datei noch einmal hochladen? Gruß -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 20:40, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Norbert, ich habe selbst mal auf "Volle Auflösung‎" geklickt, woraufhin das Foto im IE8 beim Aufbau zunächst einwandfrei angezeigt wurde, dann im letzten Moment aber durch eine weiße Fläche ersetzt wurde. In Chrome (Google) wurde es in verkleinerter Form einwandfrei dargestellt, aber ebenfalls durch eine weiße Fläche ersetzt, sobald ich auf die +-Lupe klickte. Offline: in Irfanview wurde das Foto einwandfrei angezeigt, auch in >100%-Darstellung. Das spricht dafür, dass das "Problem" nicht in einem Bildfehler besteht, eventuell einfach in der Größe, denn unkomprimiert sind 268 MB. --Túrelio (talk) 14:38, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

DANKE! -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 19:17, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Toni PBB.JPG

Hello Turelio please dont go from speedy deletion this picture because its was really my work and this picture is not a screen capture it was shot for myself and this picture was a shooting from a episode.. please dont delete.... Cessytine (talk) 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Well, Cessytine, then may I ask where did you shot it for myself? I assume you did shoot it, while sitting infront of your TV, it clearly looks like that. You should know that TV content is copyrighted and it is illegal to distribute it. --Túrelio (talk) 14:54, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Yeah i shot it for myself and it was a shooting from a big brother house while the host is have a break i try her to take a shot so thats it... its not from a tv... Cessytine (talk) 27 February 2012 (UTC)

With what kind of device did you take the photo and at which date? --Túrelio (talk) 15:14, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

I was used a digital camera and its casio and its last February 2 when i come from the shooting.. =) Cessytine (talk) 27 February 2012 (UTC)

O.k., if it was a digital camera, then why are there no EXIF/meta data? Every digital camera includes such data in the image file. --Túrelio (talk) 15:30, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

I dont what's happen its not appear the data.. and please be back my upload.. it was delete.. Cessytine (talk) 27 February 2012 (UTC)

The file was deleted by another admin, not by me. Anyway, as every digital camera puts EXIF data into the image file, hoq about re-uploading the original image file (not the same file that was deleted) with intact EXIF data? --Túrelio (talk) 15:52, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Help again

Hello Túrelio - you have been helpful and logical in the past, so maybe you can help me with this one? This is one of 87 pictures uploaded from Garage de l"Est's website over the last six years. They have all been targeted for deletion for a few weeks now, for various causes all of which I am trying to fix. I received permission from the owner of the Garage (still languishing in OTRS) but since many shots were uploaded long ago, the original images are no longer available. So while I managed to find a source for the image in question, the link is now dead. I did find a shot of another car, taken in the same location. If you could be so kind so as to look at the shot, originally uploaded by 328cia and then again by Love Krittaya. Both of those users stated the image came from delest.nl, the image size, subject, and background all match the other images available on delest.nl. Thanks again for your consideration.

Also, perhaps you can aid in somehow establishing a way to confirm the source for these images, so that I won't have to go through this all over again next year? Mr.choppers (talk) 16:28, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi Mr.choppers, will try tomorrow, as I don't how enough time today. --Túrelio (talk) 14:15, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Redir deletion after move

Hallo Túrelio, please do not delete redirs like File:Doggy_sex.jpg. Redirs are there for a reason (alleviate the negative effects of moves) and it was no misleadingly wrong title. It is in doggy position. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 17:45, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, but the 1) the rationale ("Unnecessary redirect, potentially misleading as dogs are not involved and the photograph does not fully illustrate a sexual position") was not from me, but from the colleague who moved the file (though I support it) and 2) the file was uploaded only about 1 month before the move, which makes external use less likely. When I am the one who performs the move, I sometimes do a TinEye search for external uses of the "old" filename before deciding whether to have a redir. --Túrelio (talk) 19:16, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Tineye is really bad in finding images. Also you do not find simple text links (which may be on other wikis or on Commons with an URL) with that. Redirs to not really waste resources. Yes, 1 Month is not really long, but also not short. Just an example of where redirs are useful, too: if you look in the uploader's log now it seems as if this image had been deleted - in fact it is still there but just renamed. Also see: m:User:Krinkle/Don't_delete_redirects. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 19:33, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Agreed about TinEye. If I think it's worth the effort and the image isn't already deleted, I also use the special image search function of Google. --Túrelio (talk) 07:22, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

you asbik arabi

Pictures posted on the my albums page Facebook sent me some friends

Crown right disposition is if you find they have caused a breach of rights, I ask you to delete ..

ولد ببال 20:34, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

الصور المرفوعة من ألبوماتي على صفحة الفيس بوك أرسلها لي بعض الأصدقاء

ولي حق التصرف فيها حاليا اذا كنت تجد انها قد سببت خرقا للحقوق فأنا اطلب منك حذفها ..

Hi ولد ببال, no I don't speak or read Arabic. The problem is that you have claimed "own work" for all your uploads, when in reality they were taken from a lot of different websites. Content of websites is considered to be copyrighted, except when the true rights holder has released it under a free license. For details see Commons:نگاره مطلوب برای بارگذاری. --Túrelio (talk) 21:12, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

File:20012012THOMASMEYER0050.jpg

Merci beaucoup.--Shatabisha (talk) 20:20, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 07:20, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Giordano Pantano.jpg

Hello Túrelio! Sorry if I write you very often, but you are the best admin ;-) Can you please check File:Giordano Pantano.jpg? It seems to be a copyviol from this image. P.S.: the uploader has been blocked on it.wikipedia after 4 edits... Thanks again, --Delfort (talk) 20:51, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Yes, unlikely his own work as it was uploaded to Facebook in April 2011. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 21:01, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Category verschieben

Hallo Túrelio, die Category:Geert Grote ist falsch geschrieben korrekt sollte der Titel Geert Goote lauten. Ich leg mal ne neue Cat an, die alte kann daher gelöscht werden. LG --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 23:48, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Verwirrung: die Mehrheit der Interwikis schreibt Goote mit zwei oo, ausgerechnet die nl.WP schreibt Grote mit einem o. Verwirrung - ich füge die Bilder wieder in die Category:Geert Grote ein. Welche Cat nun richtig ist vermag ich nicht zu beurteilen. LG --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 00:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Markus, Foroa, der ja aus nl kommt/spricht, hat hier folgendes eingefügt "In oudere publicaties wordt zijn naam ook wel als Geert Groote (met dubbel 'oo') gespeld, maar dit is een negentiende-eeuwse schrijfwijze voor een middeleeuwse naam", was der Google-Übersetzer zu "In earlier publications, his name is also known as Geert Groote (double 'oo') spelled, but this is a nineteenth-century format of a medieval name" umsetzt. Insofern dürfte "Geert Grote" historisch korrekt sein. Allerdings müssen unsere Kategorien sich nicht zwangsläufig danach richten, denn sie ersetzen ja keinen enzyklopäd. Artikel, sondern sollen das Auffinden der Bilder erleichtern. Ich denke, die jetzige Lösung mit einem redir von Groote auf Grote ist o.k. --Túrelio (talk) 07:19, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Category:Casualties of the International Solidarity Movement in the Palestinian territories

Re Category:Casualties of the International Solidarity Movement in the Palestinian territories it was not an overlap a few hrs b4 it was deleted. I have now re-added R Corrie to this cat, there please undelete. Also, it is not 100% clear that Tove was injured by settlers (read source), so the other cat should be deleted. Thanks. Chesdovi (talk) 18:13, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Though I don't want to get involved into your cat-war with User:Orring, for me from this source it is rather clear that the attackers were settlers. So the removal of the other cat from this image is not acceptable. Of course, one might think about replacing the word settler in the cat name by extremists, which seems to be nearly equivalent. --Túrelio (talk) 21:37, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Spam blacklist

Hi Túrelio, I just created bugzilla:34928 because I saw that you are really affected by this list. Kind regards -- RE rillke questions? 11:44, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Easy answer - whitelist anything you need regularly - let me know if you want me to do it. Cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:52, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

But not was I was looking for. If you whitelist, all users can (ab)use it. Would be better if this is limited to autopatrolled or autoconfirmed. And if you need to whitelist while tagging copyright violations, this would just eat a big portion of your time and create loopholes for anon spammers. -- RE rillke questions? 12:01, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Point taken and thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:06, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Great, thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 14:44, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

File:PBB GE PCDHB7 221450 x at tn.png replacement

I wasn't going to do these as they talk about being different genes, and I had no confidence that they are the same graphic, or had minute differences.  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:22, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

O.k. for me. Actually, I don't even remember that I requested replacement and I couldn't find myself in the edit history. --Túrelio (talk) 08:21, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Over a year ago I actually asked the creator about this but never got an answer.... Cheers, Amada44  ^{talk to me} 08:27, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

The files are bitwise identical, the only difference is the description identifying them as of different subjects.

Given the subject material, I'm not sure what the graph shows, never mind if we need identical images for them. I've just asked at w:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology#Gene expression graphs about these, hopefully will get a response to that.

I'm tempted to edit these and add a PNG comment. That will prevent the duplicate detector from reporting these files in future.--Nilfanion (talk) 09:13, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Might be a good idea. The other option would to delete the dupes replacing them by redirects. But we should do one of the two otherwise folks will keep wasting time with those images. Amada44  ^{talk to me} 21:05, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

AjaxQuickDelete server errors

If you process duplicates using the tool, and a server error shows up, in most cases the operation was done and you can simply click ignore&continue. But thanks for the error-reports. -- RE rillke questions? 16:28, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Ah, o.k., thanks. I was somewhat confused, first by the high frequency of such errors today, and second by the increasing number of options I was presented by the error message. --Túrelio (talk) 16:32, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Images from Sony Music

Hello! You tagged a few of my uploades and I was notified here. According to the respective sources, Sony Music licensed these images under a Creative commons attribution 3.0 license through their account at mynewsdesk.com. (If you reply here, we can keep this discussion in one place) --Bensin (talk) 16:31, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Well, I would prefer the discussion at your talkpage, but I've spread it already by myself [8]. You know, this is nothing against you. Formally you seem to be correct about the licensing. I simply doubt that Sony etc. would give away high-qual promo shots under CC-BY and, at least in part, even not remove the "All rights reserved" from the EXIF data. --Túrelio (talk) 16:38, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello again! Don't worry. I know it's not personal :-) You tagged a few images (File:Amanda Jenssen 2012.jpg, File:Markoolio 2011.jpg, File:Newkid - Alexander JR Ferrer cover.jpg, File:Marc Mysterio.jpg, File:The Shins - Port of Morrow cover.jpg, File:Chris Medina - What Are Words cover.jpg and File:Bruce Springsteen - Wrecking Ball cover.jpg) with the template {{no permission since}}, which says that "there is no proof that the author of the file agreed to license the file under the given license". I think there is proof on the source page. If you think the proof is not sufficient it might be better to nominate the images for deletion instead. I also added a link to the discussion on the Village pump in my edit comment, and if the consensus there is to remove the images from mynewsdesk, we'll revisit these images later anyway when that discussion is closed. --Bensin (talk) 22:37, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Schaust du mal

wenn du Zeit hast auf meine Commons-Disk wegen der J.L.-Fotos und ev. alternativ bei deWP auf meinen Artikel über Joachim Lutz! Der Fotograf kann nicht mehr ermittelt werden - ev. sogar Privataufnahmen ca. 1930 - 1938). Es handelt sich um Erbstücke meiner Mutter, deren Alleinerbe wiederum ich bin, genau wie bei den Zeichnungen von J.L.! Eventuell hätte ich für die Fotos eine andere Lizenz nehmen müssen, das war aber zum damaligen Zeitpunkt noch unklar. VG.--Martin ^{der Ältere} 20:11, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, ich darf auch um Rücksprache mit Saibo zum Thema bitten. Gruß --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 00:16, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Hab ich gemacht, kann mich diese Woche aber nicht mehr drum kümmern, da offline. --Túrelio (talk) 19:52, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

URV ?

Hallo Túrelio, dieses Bild: File:Gertrude Stein.jpg sorgte in der de:WP für nen EW (in der en:WP scheint es ähnliche Probleme zu geben..). Das Porträt scheint von 1945 zu sein, somit stellt sich die Frage nach der Urheberrechts-Schutzfrist. Für de:WP kenn ich PD-Old 100 Gruß --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 00:14, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Da der Maler Francisco Riba-Rovira erst 2002 gestorben ist, ist es m.E. eine klare URV, was auch für alle anderen Uploads des betreffenden Users gilt; deshalb jetzt SLA. --Túrelio (talk) 08:18, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Bilder der Gemeinde Jüchen

Hallo Túrelio, beim Wiki Loves Monument habe ich am 30. September 2011 im letzten Moment 84 Bilder der Stadt Jüchen hochgeladen. Es waren meine ersten Bilder die ich hochgeladen habe. Die Bilddateien waren schlecht beschrieben, die Bildbeschreibungen fehlten ganz. Die Bilder sind zu finden unter Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Jüchen (84D). Die Bilder sind verknüpft in der Liste der Baudenkmäler in Jüchen. Diese Liste wird jedoch neu erstellt und erweitert. Ich habe die Bilddateien von Jüchen neu beschrieben und könnte diese nach einer Löschung der alten Bilder erneut hochladen. Ich versichere, das es sich ausschließlich um meine Bilder handelt. Ich beantrage hiermit die Löschung der Bilder der Category:Culturale heritage monuments in Jüchen (84D). Mit freundlichen Grüßen und Danke --Huckety (talk) 11:14, 10 March 2012 (UTC)--

Ich habe die Datei markiert. Grüße --Huckety (talk) 10:11, 12 March 2012 (UTC)--

--Huckety (talk) 10:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)--

Sorry, war bis gestern offline und dann gleich zuviel admin-Arbeit (URVs etc.). Werds heut abend mal anschauen. --Túrelio (talk) 11:24, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Huckety, ich muss leider nochmal nachfragen: du willst alle derzeit 84 Dateien in Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Jüchen gelöscht haben, ja? In dieser Kat. gibt es aber auch Dateien, die nicht von dir sind, wie File:Schloss Dyck Esskastanien Allee - Jüchen.jpg. Was meintest du mit "Ich habe die Datei markiert"? --Túrelio (talk) 21:28, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, ja es ist richtig, ich möchte nur die 84 von mir hochgeladenen Bilder gelöscht haben. Die beiden markierten Bilder sollten bleiben. Danke und Grüße --Huckety (talk) 21:39, 12 March 2012 (UTC)--

Hallo, ich bins nochmal. Mit "Ich habe die Datei markiert" wollte ich die Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Jüchen markieren. Hatte einen Doppelpunkt vergessen. Sorry --Huckety (talk) 23:43, 12 March 2012 (UTC)--

Hallo Túrelio, die ersten 82 Bilder bitte löschen und File:HausKatzWinter2010.JPG sowie File:Schloss Dyck Esskastanien Allee - Jüchen.jpg nicht löschen. Grüße --Huckety (talk) 22:59, 14 March 2012 (UTC)--

O.k., nun erledigt. --Túrelio (talk) 23:30, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Herzlichen Dank und beste Grüße --Huckety (talk) 07:47, 15 March 2012 (UTC)--

Hallo Túrelio, zu deiner Information, ich habe 112 Bilder nach Jüchen hochgeladen. Damit ist der Austausch abgeschlossen. Bin sehr zufrieden. Danke und Grüße --Huckety (talk) 16:23, 15 March 2012 (UTC)--

Prima. Wenn es nochmal ein Problem gibt, kannst du mich ja kontaktieren. --Túrelio (talk) 09:47, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Suppression catégorie non justifiée

Bonjour Turelio. Pourquoi as-tu supprimé la Category:Diocese of Périgueux and Sarlat qui est l'appellation officielle depuis 1854 des deux évêchés réunis ? Voici le site du diocèse qui l'affiche clairement aussi bien dans son titre que dans son logo, et l'article sur WP/fr parle bien de Diocèse de Périgueux et Sarlat. Père Igor (talk) 14:35, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour, I don't know enough French, so I write in English. Category:Diocese of Périgueux and Sarlat had been tagged for deletion by User:NeverDoING with the rationale "duplicate of Category:Roman Catholic Diocese of Périgueux", which seems to be correct. While I understand that for you and most people living in this area, "Diocese of Périgueux and Sarlat" is clearly identified as the "Catholic Diocese ...", there may exist (now or in the future) dioceses of other Christian denominations. Or is your main problem with the missing "and Sarlat"? --Túrelio (talk) 14:45, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Look for my rename-proposal at Category:Roman Catholic Diocese of Périgueux. --Túrelio (talk) 20:07, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

My (big) problem is to understand and write in english. Officially, since 1854, « Diocese of Sarlat » and « Diocese of Périgueux » are united. This is the official web site of Diocese of Périgueux and Sarlat (in french : « Diocèse de Périgueux et Sarlat ») and I want that Category:Diocese of Périgueux and Sarlat take the place of Category:Roman Catholic Diocese of Périgueux which no more exists. Père Igor (talk) 09:32, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Si vous parlent mieux l'allemand que l'anglais, nous pouvons communiquer en allemand. --Túrelio (talk) 09:55, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Copyright

The picture that I just uploaded is copyrighted. It was just a test. I'm new on common.--Ezzex (talk) 17:25, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

O.k. See Commons:CB for a tutorial. --Túrelio (talk) 17:31, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Help

Hello, can you help me with this picture? File:Rafael Roldós Vinyolas.jpg The point it's that this guy born in 1846 and dead in 1918, so, i think that now this pic is free, because the rights are expired. It's right? Can you help me putting the correct info in the pic?

Thanks a lot, and excuse me because my english and because i'm new in commons.--Wiay22 (talk) 17:28, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi, first you should provide the source from where you got this image. "Periodico" is not enough. I assume you got it from a website; so put the URL/address into the source entry. I'll go offline for the next 12 hours and will look into it later. --Túrelio (talk) 17:30, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi, i put the URL that i got the pic in the source. What else? It's enough? Thanks! --Wiay22 (talk) 20:28, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

No, do not link the image file itself, but the page on which the image is shown on the newspapers website. --Túrelio (talk) 20:55, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for your help. I did the change that you said me. Something else? What i have to do more? --Wiay22 (talk) 09:59, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

O.k., that's better. The image caption doesn't really help, as the "credit" likely refers only to the second image, not to the portrait. In order to find out whether the image is still protected (Spain had 80 years pma already in 19th century), you should contact[9] the editors of elperiodico.com and ask them for the name of the photographer of the photo of Roldós Vinyolas. If they say, we don't know, then it might go as anonymous work. Please forward their reply to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. --Túrelio (talk) 11:35, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello and really thanks for your help. I sent an email to the people in El Periódico. Anyway, this pic have at least 94 years, because the man was dead in 1918; so I understand that the picture is free of rights? Thank you so much, --Wiay22 (talk) 12:25, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

That is not automatically ensured. If the photographer died 20 years after taking the photo and if you consider the 80-year-after death-of-the-author proection of Spain, it might still be protected. --Túrelio (talk) 13:06, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

I still not have answer of El Periodico. In the other hand, as you can see in El Periódico new, the picture is from the familiar archive of Rafael Roldós, so only the familly have the original. I know the family and they want that this picture will be free. Can they do something for it? It is enought with a mail from the familly? I don't know what i have to do... Thanks a lot again. --Wiay22 (talk) 01:37, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm on travel today and cannot look into it today. --Túrelio (talk) 07:00, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Ok, when you can, i need your help ;) Thanks a lot! --Wiay22 (talk) 09:46, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Alberto Favero.jpg

Estimado: Soy Alberto Favero, y he querido cambiar mi foto, y leo que la has marcado como que infringe el Copyright basado en una publicación sin permiso de un sitio Last, que la ha publicado y está haciendo uso de mis grabaciones poniéndolas a disposición fuera del ámbito de la Editorial y de los Derechos de Autor. Te pido que corrigas esa marcación porque los derechos de esa foto, que está editada, pues el original es compartida con mi hermano, y se utilizó previa compra de los derechos de publicación en temporada de Clásica Moderna. Por todo esto, no siempre el hecho de una aparición anticipada debe interpretarse como que es una flagración del derecho de copia, pues, por ej. en este caso esta gente está publicando todo, foto y files de mp3 sin autorización. La Compañía grabadora (Acqua Records) se está haciendo cargo en éste instante de este sitio pirata. Agradezco y te pido que accedas a mis razones y desmarques esa foto como ilegal, puesoto que no lo es. Muchas gracias Alberto Favero (Alfavero, para Wikipedia) alfavero10@hotmail.com www.albertofavero.com.ar

Hola, I have removed the copyvio-tag, but added a no-permission-tag, as we need to know who was the photographer and we need his permission. --Túrelio (talk) 17:16, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Well . . . this is impossible dream, the photografers (I even can recall their names . . . ) are dissapair from the profession stage in Argentina. If it's so important even though I'm making the statement that this photo belong to my property, ou can erase it, if you have the enaugh autority to do that. I will put another which photographer would be present to make the authorization of copyright. Really does not matter. Thanx.

Hola Alberto, the copyright (and the right to be credited) remains with the original artist/photographer til 70 years after his/her death. Only very few countries allow so-called work-for-hire which may include a full transfer of copyright to the buyer. If you ordered a photographer to take this photo, then you really should have some of the original prints with his/her name on the backside. --Túrelio (talk) 22:51, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

RE:

Wie ich deinen kontekt mit dem endsprechenden admin endnehmen konnte werden mir irgendwelche dinge angehafte mit dennen ich nichts zutuhen habe! Ich habe einfach nur von der benutzer seite mir etwas für meine eigene kopiert. ( Wikipedia meldung das es sich um orginale wiki seite handelt).

Das ich gegen über dir die regel verstöße geschildert habe! Liegt daran das es mir auf gefallen ist wie irgendwelche nutzter richtig feritg gemacht werden! <redacted to avoid legal problems>

Aber das man dies jetzte mir anhaften möchte und man solche nutzter schütz die der artige straftaten begehen verwundert mich schon sehr.

Ich habe mir auch mal den bearbeitungs verlauf angesehen von der benutzerin ist auch sehr fragwürdig die bearbeitungen ( keine nachweise), sehr oft wird der endsprechende artikel an sich als nachweis angefügt! Benutzerin:Aquilea Pumila die Stalkerin ist! <redacted to avoid legal problems>! Dies ist eine tatsache und keine androhung!--*wwwppb-gerade* (talk) 19:31, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

O.k. Ich hab weder die Zeit noch Lust mich in deinen Konflikt mit einer :de-Nutzerin reinzuhängen, muss dich aber bitten, Aussagen über Straftatbestände wie die jetzt von mir in deinem Posting entfernten, besser zu unterlassen, weil du dafür juristisch belangt werden könntest. Deine Bemerkung auf File talk:Gera Historisches Kaufhaus (1).JPG greift m.E. nicht; jedenfalls sehe ich hier keine Persönlichkeitsrechtsverletzung, da die im Bild befindliche Person eindeutig nur Beiwerk ist. (noch als erklärender Hinweis: wenn man in der Wiki-Welt von "stalking" spricht, ist das nicht zwangsläufig mit dem potentiell kriminellen gleichnamigen Verhalten in der Realwelt gleichzusetzen, sondern wird oft einfach benutzt, um ein unerwünschtes wiederholtes Angehen eines anderen zu etikettieren.) --Túrelio (talk) 22:50, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Beiwerk wird hier wohl nicht greifen weil man in diesem Fall kaum über die Person hinweg schauen kann, der Gesamtcharakter des Bildes von der Person unten links also wesentlich geprägt wird und die Blicke auf sich zieht, insbesondere begünstigt durch die Tatsache, dass sie alleine im Bild gut sichtbar (trotz Schatten) zu sehen ist. Vergleiche hierzu die Entscheidung des OLG Oldenburg 13 U 72/88. Aber da die Person, wie mir die Fotografin versicherte in diesem Fall eine Bekannte ist und wohl eine Einverständnis vorliegt und zweitens das Bild momentan durch die Fotografin eh zur Löschung beantragt wurde ist die Sache ohnehin halb so wild. --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:31, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Danke für die Expertise, aber dem User geht es offensichtlich um etwas ganz anderes. --Túrelio (talk) 22:53, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Subsistent Farming Southern China.jpg

Hi, regarding to the image File:Subsistent Farming Southern China.jpg, I requested a voluntary withdrawal. You said it could not be removed within 2 years after submission. But this images has been in wiki since Feb 2009, more than three years. So it should qualify your criterion. Jialiang Gao JialiangGao (talk) 06:13, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, but the underlying rationale is just the opposite. What I meant was that after such a long time (2 or even 3 years) after you had released this image under a free license, you cannot expect that we delete it. As it is a nice image, many people outside of Commons may use this image already and when you now remove their image source, they may get into trouble. Anyway, if you insist on having this fine image deleted, you should file a regular deletion request. --Túrelio (talk) 17:15, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Copyviol

Hello Túrelio; sorry but File:Pallacanestro-Trapani.jpg is a copyviol from the official site of the basketball team (pallacanestrotrapani.com); this is the copyrighted logo. Thank you ;) --Delfort (talk) 16:46, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Tagged accordingly. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 17:15, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Category:Coats of arms and flags of Zelenograd

Plx, restore this category with its history. It was incorrectly emptied. Alex Spade (talk) 18:29, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:27, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

File:AK-12 Izhmash.jpg

Thank you for your speedy action.130.91.93.243 19:39, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 08:09, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

HELP: Permission of Licensing

I 'm sorry to bother you,

I wonder if you can help me with loading an image, so I loaded the image via OTRS, but it was proposed for disposal until it be confirmed the author's permission. It turns out that the image has been loaded a few months ago and the OTRS email has been sent also to a few months and the picture is still proposed for deletion, I wonder if there is any problem, do not know if you can help. The image refers to the following link: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vanessa_como_Judy_Garland.png

Sorry for bad English... Tanks, Shania Twain Portugal (talk)

Hi, I am not an OTRS volunteer and therefore I have no access to their database. You might ask by yourself at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard if there is any problem with the permission your sent. --Túrelio (talk) 22:13, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Permission: VANESSA RICHE Page

Just as you asked on VANESSA RICHE Page ("File:Vanessa Riche.jpg") in Commons, I send a message to 'permissions-commons-pt@wikimedia.org'. I believe it's everything ok. If there is something more to do, please send me a new message. I wait. Thanks for all. --Jlsendim

O.k., I've tagged the file accordingly. --Túrelio (talk) 22:53, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Danke & eine kleine Bitte

Vielen herzlichen Dank für das schöne Bild für meine BS. Gleichzeitig wieder zwei klassische "Anfängerbitten". Kannst Du mir bitte eine "Category:Aachener Bild- und Tonarchiv" einrichten und kurz nachschauen, ob ich die letzten Bilder richtig lizensiert habe? Das wäre sehr nett. Gleichzeitig noch eine weite Lizensfrage: Ich würde gerne von dem besagten Verein Fotos und Ansichtskarten hochladen, die aufgrund des Alters usw. schon gemeinfrei sind. Gibt es auch dafür einen Baustein , wo die Namensnennung (des Vereins) auftauchen kann? Wenn dem so wäre, könnte ich sicherlich einen ganzen Schwung von den Vereinsbilder hochladen...Schon mal vielen Dank im Voraus, LG, --Geolina163 (talk) 19:12, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Gern geschehen. Nr. 1a ist erledigt; Nr. 1b später. Nr. 2 wird noch einiges an Brainstorming erfordern, weil "gemeinfrei" nach derzeit hier herrschender Auffassung als vogelfrei gedeutet wird, d.h. ohne jegliche Ansprüche auf Namensnennung. Daß eine solche Haltung äusserst unklug gegenüber Bildspendern ist, versteht sich von selbst. Vor demselben Hintergrund läuft derzeit eine schon fast juristische Auseinandersetzug mit einem User, der formal gemeinfreie Kunstwerke aus dem eigenen Archiv aufwendig reproduziert hat und ein Nennungsrecht für die Fotos beansprucht. Da er derzeit eine externe Klage gegen einen Verlag laufen hat, sollten wir vor endgültigen Schlußfolgerungen vielleicht noch das Ergebnis dieses Verfahren abwarten, weil damit die "herrschende Meinung" fallen oder bestätigt werden könnte. --Túrelio (talk) 19:25, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Besten Dank schon mal für 1a)...ich weiß, 2. es ist ein unendliches Problem. Mir wäre es auch wurscht, aber viele der Bildgeber möchten nun irgendwie erwähnt werden...was ich auch verstehen kann. Aber Kero und ich haben heute schon mal einen Teilerfolg bei einem Sammler eines der spannendsten Themen der Wikipedia - Fahrzeuge auf Räder - erzielen können. Das könnte was wirklich tolles geben. Schau'n wie mal..Nochmals besten Dank für sämtliche Aufmerksamkeiten und Support...LG, --Geolina163 (talk) 20:13, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Zu Nr. 1b: besser erstmal keine weiteren von diesen "Kollagen" hochladen, denn die sind vom urheberrechtlichen Status durchaus eine Herausforderung. Z.B. das Hitlerfoto in File:Ausstellung Weihnachtszeiten Vorweihnachten 4.jpg: von wann ist es, wer hat es gemacht? Wenn es der bekannte Hitler-Photograph de:Heinrich Hoffmann (Fotograf) war (ja, ist es [10]), was ich befürchte, dann ist das Foto noch geschützt. Das Goebbels-Gedicht dürfte auch noch bis Ende 2015 geschützt sein[11]. Du könntest es aber abschreiben und dann als Zitat in den Artikel setzen, das ist urheberrechtlich kein Problem. Weißt du etwas über den in der Zeichnung rechts in File:Ausstellung Weihnachtszeiten Vorweihnachten 2.jpg erwähnten "Knabe"? Die Noten/Das Lied in File:Ausstellung Weihnachtszeiten Vorweihnachten 3.jpg war/ist (?) Eigentum eines Verlages, der inzwischen vom de:Karl Heinrich Möseler Verlag übernommen wurde. Die Autorin des Liedes könnte diese Karola Wilke sein. Hier gibt es interessante Hintergrund-Infos.

Du hast bei den 3 Kollage-Fotos jeweils redundante Lizenzvorlagen eingebaut, immer die "personalisierte" CC-BY-SA-3.0-de und dazu, überflüssig, die Standard CC-BY-SA-3.0 (nicht de), sowie in einem Fall sogar noch die GFDL. Da das vermutlich ein Versehen war, solltest du (selbst) die überflüssigen Vorlagen schnell wieder entfernen. --Túrelio (talk) 13:57, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

File:PaLmY.jpeg

I would like to know if that is my own work how I can prove to you .I don't know how to do it. If you want to change my picture that is ok but please tell me How I suppose to do . Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wantip (talk • contribs) 22. März 2012, 09:45 Uhr (UTC)

Hi Wantip, this is rather clearly a professional promo shot. If you are working for her agency or similar, then send a confirmation from your business email account to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (hotmail etc. will not be accepted). In addition, as this was surely taken by a digital camera, why does the file not have an EXIF meta data? Please upload the file with intact EXIF data. --Túrelio (talk) 09:46, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi

I wish it were not you who undeleted my archive. of course it would have been done by somebody else, and honestly I hardly care about anything anymore, but I wish it were not you. My archive has absolutely nothing to do with my post about renaming my account. russavia requesting undeleting it was russavia's way to harass me more and to turn attention away of the issue on hand, which is renaming of my account. Yes, I wish it were not you to act at that unwarranted request.--Yyxx? (talk) 13:30, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, but your accusations against Russavia seem to require some research. After that, I will be glad to delete it. --Túrelio (talk) 13:32, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Well, the only research that my accusations against russavia require is responding my questions about the policy of renaming accounts, and why no other renamed accounts, but mine was blocked. So far I got no response except a rant with personal attacks by Billinghurst.

Could you please unblock my mbz1 account until the matter is investigated? It cannot be recreated anyway.--Yyxx? (talk) 13:51, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Please put this request (or ask for a temporary undelete) to COM:AN, as I am offline for today. --Túrelio (talk) 13:54, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Offline? You undeleted my archive, did you not? Anyway...--Yyxx? (talk) 14:13, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

I consider the matter with renaming of my account to be resolved now. I am not going to discuss russavia's misuse of tools any more, not because russavia did not misuse the tools, but simply because it is no use to discuss anything here, and I have no time for this. So, may I please ask you, when you are back online, to delete my archive that you undeleted? Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 17:49, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Already done by Eugene Zelenko at 16:36, 23. Mär. 2012. --Túrelio (talk) 22:49, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Please restore File:Calea Mosilor Street in the afternoon.jpg

Hello,

You deleted the file Calea Mosilor Street in the afternoon.jpg. I talked to the owner of the photo on Flikr and he now changed the permission to Creative Commons. The original file can be found at http://www.flickr.com/photos/32578610@N08/3394189447

Please restore the file, Thanks

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 22:55, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

re File talk:Osho.jpg

You think it should be deleted as copyvio? -- Cirt (talk) 15:12, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

So far, I don't have a clear opinion. My posting on the image talkpage resulted from this request. --Túrelio (talk) 15:33, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

supression du fichier RTL9

Vous avez formulez une demande de suppression rapide de mon fichier RTL9 (8). Ce fichier est un habillage fictif qui n'existe pas! Et n'est donc pas un capture tv! Cet habillage comporte l'ancien logo RTL9 qui n'est plus utilisé ainsi qu'une photo du film américain L'Inspecteur Harry. De plus cette photo pour mon usage strictement personnel n'ayant pas d'hébergeur d'image. Monsieur sachez que je respecte votre contribution pour ce site!

TRES CORDIALEMENT

Hi Damien martinet, the problem is "une photo du film L'INSPECTEUR HARRY". Legally, your composition is a derivative of this image. If you can provide proof that this film still is public domain or under a free license, then there would be no problem with your composition. --Túrelio (talk) 20:02, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Please restore File:Calea Mosilor Street in the afternoon.jpg

Hello, You deleted the file Calea Mosilor Street in the afternoon.jpg. I talked to the owner of the photo on Flikr and he now changed the permission to Creative Commons. The original file can be found at http://www.flickr.com/photos/32578610@N08/3394189447 Please restore the file, Thanks Vlad1918 (talk) 09:30, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Hmm, you are rather late. I restored File:Calea Mosilor Street in the afternoon.jpg more than 58 hours ago and I had told you about long time ago[12]. --Túrelio (talk) 09:42, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I've seen it in the page history now. I didn't know you delete the messages after you take care of the request. I'm a newbie. Thanks anyway Vlad1918 (talk) 11:29, 26 March 2012 (UTC) :)

User:Участник

Basically he understood that without unifying account I cannot block him on Commons :| --Vituzzu (talk) 10:54, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Copyvios?

Could you have a look of the files uploaded by LUIGI19956? Several of the uploads was deleted by you and Sreejithk2000 yesterday, after I had marked them as copyvios. I suspect the rest also to be copyvios; some of them seem to be television screenshots. See e.g. [13] - File:Franco Ricciardi Wikipedia.png can be found 53 seconds out in this official video. - 4ing (talk) 07:24, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

I'll look into this tomorrow. --Túrelio (talk) 12:33, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Did you have a look into this user's uploads? - 4ing (talk) 08:47, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Finally  Done. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 13:15, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. Would you care to take a look at Amin5530's and Yea14's uploads, too? - 4ing (talk) 16:39, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Berita Harian Newspaper (7th September 1957).jpg

Hye Túrelio, please don't delete this image, it should {{PD-Malaysia}}, but I mistakenly choose the {{PD-old}} license. — NZscout  12:28, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

May be; then please correct the license template and remove the copyvio-tag. But I would also like the see some evidence about the publication in 1957. --Túrelio (talk) 12:32, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

You can see it right here on intercomicon, the image description says it was published on 1957 by Berita Harian. — NZscout  12:38, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:56, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Victim of Xen article at Wikipedia and Victim of Xen.png (deleting is easy)

Hi,

I am notifying you that the talk page has been updated for Victim of Xen.png (which was deleted). Please, read this as quickly as one deletes (honestly).

Sincerely,

Sam Smolders (talk) 12:48, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 12:56, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Monteaperta et palazzo Cobai.jpg

Hi Jean-Marc, did you really shoot the original photography of which File:Monteaperta et palazzo Cobai.jpg is a reproduction? If not, who is the photographer? Where did you get it? --Túrelio (talk) 07:45, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Yes it was my own shoot but only a bad copy of a old paper photography because negative is lost during terrible earthquake 1976. No problem.Jean-Marc Pascolo (talk) 08:08, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

See my reply on your talkpage. (It's better to have the discussion at one place only.) --Túrelio (talk) 09:04, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

I really took those photos.

I really took those photos.

I've got the authorization from that television station. These photos are really okay for the Wikipedia.

I've also uploaded some similar photos before, but those files are not deleted.

Please let me upload those files again.

Danke:)--竹筍弟弟 (talk) 09:41, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi 竹筍弟弟, actually I did not delete these, but only tagged them and notified you. Anyway, we need a written permission from the true rights holder. If you got "authorization from that television" company, then forward it (include all headers) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org and don't forget to mention the filenames. --Túrelio (talk) 09:50, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Do you know the name of that game show? I don't think that those files are forbidden.--竹筍弟弟 (talk) 11:59, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Every creative work belongs to its author and he/she can decide whether to retain the full copyright (that is the default per law) or to release it under a free license. If you reproduce a creative work, which is copyrighted by someone else, you infringe his/her copyright and therefore you nee his/her permission. --Túrelio (talk) 12:24, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

英文對我來說，太複雜了，我看不是很懂。(English is too hard for me. I can't understand very much.) 我也看不懂德文(I can't understand Deutsch language, too.) 反正我的檔案就是不允許放在維基共享資源就對了？(Anyway, my files are forbidden in the Wikipedia and Wikicommons, right?)──竹筍弟弟 (talk) 16:30, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

And I don't know Chinese ;-). Contact my Chinese-speaking colleagues User:Jusjih, User:KTo288 or User:Shizhao. --Túrelio (talk) 17:55, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

The uploader told me that he took both photos as the audience. I know that Taiwanese TV progeam admitting audiences.--Jusjih (talk) 15:10, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Andreas.hoesch

Hallo Turelio, ich bitte um Entschuldigung, aber die Bilder, die ich versucht habe, zu überschreiben, dürfen nicht mehr sichtbar sein. Mir droht wegen der Bilder ein Strafverfahren Ich weiß nicht, an wen ich mich wenden soll und wie ich sie löschen kann. Daher bitte ich Dich, mir zu helfen. Das Überschreiben ist keine böse Absicht.

Gruß Andreas Hösch <redacted>— Preceding unsigned comment added by Andreas.hoesch (talk • contribs) 17:55, 5. Apr. 2012‎ (UTCTúrelio (talk) 08:44, 25 April 2012 (UTC))

O.k., werd mich drum kümmern. Du solltest das aber gleichzeitig an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org (OTRS) mailen, damit zur Berechtigung der Löschung ein Vermerk vorliegt. Die dort hingesandten Informationen werden vertraulich behandelt. Ich gehe davon aus, dass es nur um die 3 echten Fotos geht, richtig? --Túrelio (talk) 15:59, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Danke Vielen Dank, vielen Dank, aber ich war eben in Panik!!! Und dummerweise kenne ich mich in Wikimedia nicht aus, das war extrem dumm von mir. Ja, es geht um diese ersten drei Bilder, die ich versucht habe, zu überschreiben. Sorry für die Mühe!

Andreas

Gern geschehen. Aber denk bitte daran, einen kurzen Hinweis unter Andeutung des drohenden Verfahrens und Nennung der 3 Dateinamens an OTRS zu mailen. Frohe Ostern. --Túrelio (talk) 16:10, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Danke für die Hinweise. Ich glaube eher, daß die Ostern für Dich froh werden, jedenfalls wünsche ich Dir das. Gruß, Andreas

Also ich habe gerade mal per Google nach den 3 Dateinamen gesucht und nur nur 3 tote Hinweise darauf gefunden. Nur im Google-Cache sind die 3 leider noch. Ich habe mal gehört, dass man dort gezielte Löschungen verlangen kann, weiß aber auch nicht wie das geht. Ich drück dir jedenfalls die Daumen. --Túrelio (talk) 16:25, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Request for undeletion of photo

Hi Turelio,

I wish to address your copyright violation concern.

The uploaded photo was, in fact, taken by me. It was later used by the organization Dadabhagwan.org for their events page. I can get documentation for you regarding this if it helps.

deleted photo title: Shree Simandhar Swami.jpg

I would like get the photo undeleted, and use it once again on the article page.

Please assist? Thank you, Kaushal Kaushal Jasani (talk) 11:45, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi Kaushal, o.k., but I wonder why you did accept that Dadabhagwan.org put their "Dadabhagwan.org" as a watermark on the image, thereby suggesting that they hold the copyright? In addition, your upload to Commons had 220x289 Pixels, whereas the image at Dadabhagwan.org has 420x640 Pixels. Therefore, your upload to Commons could have easily been produced out of the image at Dadabhagwan.org, simply by cropping the lower part with the watermark and shrinking the image size. If you could upload this image in a resolution somwhat higher than 420x640 Pixels and with the lower part, but without the watermark, this might be convincing. Otherwise, I would recommend you to request it for undeletion at Commons:Undeletion requests, which allows other admin to look into it. --Túrelio (talk) 18:55, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Why did you delete my article?

Hey Turelio. I wonder why you deleted my article about Søren Toft væsel? What do I have to do if I want the article to be accepted? - fisseglenn42

Hi Fisseglenn42, as you were notified on User talk:Fisseglenn42, articles are out of the COM:SCOPE of Commons. We are a media repository, not an encyclopedia. --Túrelio (talk) 21:04, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

My Uploaded Images

Hello, I see you you went through all of my images and marked them as copyright violations. I have tried to research how to send or signify the appropriate copyright information, but the wikipedia policies are far too confusing. I work at Sender Films, and every image I have uploaded was provided to me by them. I therefore have the permission from the source to use these, but how can I show this permission? I don't understand how this could be so complicated when I am providing my own company's work. Any help is appreciated. Thank you.

Forresbj (talk) 21:19, 6 April 2012 (UTC)forresbj

Hi Forresbj, please understand that far too many users upload copyrighted material and claim it as "own work" etc., when it is not. We are especially suspicious when it comes to professional images. If you have permission from the true legal rights holder of your uploads, then please forward this permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. If you are not sure what to write into that permission, go to Commons:Email templates, copy the boxed template to your computer or email client, add the filenames of all concerned images and the name of the license to which the rights holder agreed upon, and then forward the complete permission text to the authorized person of the rights holding company and ask him/her to read and sign it with his/her full name and the date, and to mail it to the above mentioned email address. The permission will not be published, but checked by an OTRS volunteer, who will then issue an OTRS-ticket that will be put all the concerned image pages. --Túrelio (talk) 21:27, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Review of Category: Flora Batava, Netherlands

Dear Túrelio,

As you can see I am currently involved in the (peer) review of the Category: Flora Batava, Netherlands, with User:Chris.urs-o.
I have already reviewed about 2/3 of the pictures (except the mushrooms, mosses and seeweeds which I do not know).
En passant, I am reviewing the allocated categories. So I am redirecting some obsolete categories to the right ones, or asking for deletion of mispelled ones.

Happy Easter and best regards from Belgium, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 10:13, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Joyeuses Pâques! --Túrelio (talk) 11:37, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

OTRS?

Ahoj Túrelio, bist du im OTRS-permission-team hier aktiv? Es geht nämlich um dieses Bild. Da kam bisher noch keine Rückmail bei der Freundin von der ich das Bild habe, auch keine automatische Nachricht wie ich es normalerweise gewohnt bin... Beste Grüße aus dem Allgäu, alofok 10:10, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Alofok, nein, ich bin kein OTRSler. Hier Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard wirst du aber rel. schnell Auskunft bekommen. Gruß. --Túrelio (talk) 11:35, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Message from Skapheandros

Dear

Sorry Sir

I am the author myself of this file for what I received the message of " This file is missing evidence of permission", user:Skapheandros, same author and user Oliver Castaño Mallorca, what´s problem, sir?

I see several of them files and this is the user, editor Túrelio (talk) 2 in me user(talk):Skapheandros has blocked what I do?

I will see all perfectly sir, have look! in these files.I didn´t Know the reason what must I do? Send me a request exactly of what I must do.olivercmallorcagmail.com {{no permission since|month=April|day=8|year=2012}} user:Skapheandros, same author and user Oliver Castaño Mallorca, what´s problem, sir? TXK YOU — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skapheandros (talk • contribs)

The message above has been placed on your userpage. I've moved it here. Mathonius (talk) 00:58, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Karimeen.jpg

I also support the deletion of File:Karimeen.jpg .--Sivahari (talk) 05:01, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your feedback. --Túrelio (talk) 06:17, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

A question

I was surprised at this deletion[14] since this statue is placed in the center of Copenhagen and is photographed by hundreds of tourists daily. It is hard for me to believe that it is covered by copyright. As far as I know I am allowed to take photos of anything that is displayed publicly in the street and sell it for money. Could you explain what you mean by "no freedom of panorama" and where you've found the information suggesting that this photo was covered by copyright? Maunus (talk) 13:01, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

I know that this may be surprising, but that's resulting from the difference between shooting photos for private use or publishing them under a free license. As I had written in the deletion summary, this "Statue by Henry Luckow-Nielsen (1902-1992)". As copyright lasts until "70 years PMA" (death of author), the statue will be copyrighted til end of 2062, which includes any reproductions. Of course, many countries have an exemption from copyright for photos from works located permanently in public space (see Commons:Freedom of panorama for an explaination). But, regrettably in Denmark this is valid only for buildings, not for other works of art[15]. --Túrelio (talk) 13:08, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Wappen Duesseldorf.jpg

Hallo Túrelio, du hast dort geschrieben, dass wir eine Lösung für das Erlaubnisschreiben finden müssten. Ich sehe da aus mehreren Gründen keinen Handlungsbedarf. 1. Das Wappenzeichen (der Name der Datei ist falsch) ist extra "für Jedermann" frei downloadbar 2. Die Datei wurde bereits überschrieben (auf De:) 3. Sind solcherlei E-Mails wohl nicht öffentlich in der Dateibeschreibung zu platzieren. 4. Selbst für das richtige geschützte Wappen bräuchte man nicht derlei Erlaubnis!? 5. ist die Datei praktisch identisch (hier wohl schlechtere Qualität) mit File:Dus4c full (1).jpg (wohl besserer Name nötig), daher verstehe ich den Behalten-Grund wirklich nicht. Freundliche Grüße -- πϵρήλιο ℗ 13:36, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Mein Motiv ist, dass sich da jemand einige Mühe gemacht hat (Stadt anschreiben, dort hat jemand positiv geantwortet, Uploader hat es in die Beschreibung gesetzt) mit der Genehmigung, die nicht einfach so "vernichtet" werden sollte. 1) wäre nur eine Frage der Umbenennung; 2) "überschrieben" ist etwas zuviel gesagt, dort steht "Skalierungsfehler in der Datei behoben"; das Bild ist also wohl dasselbe; 3) ist nicht meine Schuld, zumal der Emailtext da seit fast 8 Jahren steht; eine Lösung könnte sein, es an OTRS weiterzu"schieben", damit ein Ticket vergeben werden kann; 5) auf den 1. Blick kann ich keinen Qualitätsunterschied sehen, was aber auch nicht mein Thema ist; 4) weiß ich nicht, da kein Wappenspezialist; wenn man das hier auf der Quellseite von File:Dus4c full (1).jpg liest, dann kann man sich schon fragen, ob das frei genug im Sinne von "Abwandlungen müssen erlaubt sein" ist. Da es sich bei der von dir favorisierten Version laut [16] um ein "Wappenzeichen" handelt, das offenbar kein Hoheitszeichen ist (wenn ich das richtig verstanden habe), frage ich mich als nicht-Wappenkundler, ob die PD-Rationale per {{PD-Seal-Germany}} hier überhaupt greift, wobei das für diese Diskussion nur ein Randproblem ist. --Túrelio (talk) 14:55, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Tut mir leid aber in einem Wiki wird nun mal auch viel "unnütze Arbeit" getan und die sollte/muss beseitigt werden. Eines der obersten Gebote: "Weniger ist mehr" niemand will sich diesen - entschuldige - unnützen, da mehr als redundanten Text durchlesen. Mit der Lizenz hast du recht, es ist weder ein amtliches Logo noch ein amtliches Wappen, daher denke ich ist: "Abwandlungen müssen erlaubt sein" erfüllt. Darüber steht jedoch nichts genaues in der Quelle. @Qualität: im Log sieht man noch die originale selbe Dateigröße, der Unterschied mag zwar minimal im Pixelbereich liegen, aber er ist da, jedes "normale" Neuspeichern als JPG ist verlustbehaftet. Was geändert wurde kann ich beim besten Willen nicht nachvollziehen. Wie wär's wenn wir die Beschreibung einfach Teil-zusammenführen. -- πϵρήλιο ℗ 16:58, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Mach es ruhig mal. Du kennst ja jetzt meine "Vorstellung", insofern wirst du das schon richtig hinkriegen. Bin jetzt offline. --Túrelio (talk) 17:02, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Aber jetzt!? -- πϵρήλιο ℗ 14:00, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of images of different format

May I ask why you're speedy deleting images of .gif format as a duplicate of .svg images? If anything, this should go to a deletion discussion, especially because they predate the svg images.

Also, is "this formula should represented with Tex" a valid reason for speedy deletion or shouldn't it go to discussion? Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:16, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

That GIFs were Unicode characters. So this are completely replaceable. Howsoever the GIF format is on Commons only for animations. If this characters are also represented with Tex, then the SVGs could be also deleted. S. Category:Images with a TeX equivalent. -- πϵρήλιο ℗ 17:53, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

@Perhelion, thanks for jumping in.

@Magog the Ogre, as I delete a lot of files per day, could you give an example for the gif/svg case. Not exactly gif/svg but png/svg: should we really keep File:Array of masses.png? --Túrelio (talk) 20:33, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

File:U+2193.gif; File:U+2116.gif. The reasons given above by Perhelion are reasons that should be brought up in a deletion request, not as cause for speedy deletion. The same goes for other gifs: File:Figueiredo.gif, File:Nereu.gif. The policy is directly stated at Commons:Deletion policy#Duplicates. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:55, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

a) Before performing the requested (by User:Viniciusmc) dupe-deletion, I visually compared both File:Figueiredo.jpg and File:Presidente Nereu Ramos.jpg to their gif "duplicates" and, though they show the same photography, the gif versions were slightly worse.

b) gif/svg-dupe-deletions such as File:U+2193.gif and File:U+2116.gif I do very rarely. While I hold the replacement of the down-arrow for fully justified, I have now undeleted File:U+2116.gif (and reverted Christian1985's dupe-speedy) as the character is indeed not 100% identical to the svg-version. --Túrelio (talk) 06:50, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Serguey zagraevsky wall.jpg

There are several paintings of this hobby artist being put to Commons. I think there is no correct license, because the pictures are taken out of Mr. Z.s website. Is there a correct permission by the painter? --Robertsan1 (talk) 19:46, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

You should ask that question to the uploader. I did and she responded by claiming there is. She may simply have used the wrong syntax for the OTRS ticket. --Túrelio (talk) 20:20, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

@Robertsan1, see here. --Túrelio (talk) 06:31, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Wahlplakate

Sind Wahlplakate nicht erlaubt? -- Elendsredder (talk) 08:42, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Nicht generell, aber immer dann, wenn der "Inhalt" des Wahlplakats ein geschütztes Werk darstellt. D.h., bloße Textplakate sind eher kein Problem, weil sie kaum die für einen Schutz erforderliche Schöpfungshöhe erreichen dürften. --Túrelio (talk) 08:45, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Also geht es um die Bilder, etwa von einem Politiker? -- Elendsredder (talk) 08:47, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Ja, aber egal von wem. --Túrelio (talk) 08:49, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Ich verstehe. Da es hier schon so viele Wahlplakate gab, habe ich mir darüber gar keine Gedanken gemacht. Aber es stimmt. Hinzu kommen sicher noch Persönlichkeitsrechte. Ich werde in Zukunft darauf achten. -- Elendsredder (talk) 08:50, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

"Persönlichkeitsrechte" spiele zunächst mal keine große Rolle, jedenfalls nicht bei Wahlplakaten, weil der abgebildete Politiker ja i.a. zugestimmt haben dürfte. --Túrelio (talk) 08:52, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Stimmt er denn damit auch der Weiterverwendung seines Bildes zu? Wahrscheinlich schon, denn es wird ja auch in seinem Interesse sein, an möglichst vielen Orten abgebildet zu werden. -- Elendsredder (talk) 08:57, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Das ist recht kompliziert und auch von Land zu Land unterschiedlich. Wir (Commons) fokussieren mehr auf den Urheberrechtsstatus und weisen lediglich die Wiederverwender (Nutzer) solcher Medien auf die Beachtung des Persönlichkeitsrechts hin - jedenfalls in all den Fällen, in denen wir nach erstem Anschein davon ausgehen können, dass das Bild mit Zustimmung des Abgebildeten aufgenommen wurde. --Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Okay, danke für die Erklärung. -- Elendsredder (talk) 09:03, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Too speedy deletion

Dear Túrelio,

The image I uploaded File:Moti laxmi cover.jpg was deleted even before I had a chance to review the licensing. I had intended to use it in my article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moti_Laxmi_Upasika which is without a photograph.

I cannot understand why the image which I scanned has been deleted even with the CC license. I would like to draw your attention to a similar image of a magazine cover with a portrait and license {{self|GFDL|cc-by-3.0|migration=redundant}}. It can be found at http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Bloommagazinecover.jpg&action=edit

I would like to make a request for undeletion. Thanks. Karrattul (talk) 11:28, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Just because you scanned it doesn't mean you own the copyright. Since it is a derivative of a copyrighted work, the original copyright holder still owned all the righted, even if you make your own copy of the work. Bidgee (talk) 11:35, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi Karrattul, as Bidgee provided you already with the general principle, I just want to add that the painting on your magazine cover had a signature Birat, 1996 (if I had seen correctly). That suggests, it was painted in 1996 (1 year before the death of the depicted). In most countries of the world, such works are copyrighted by the original artist until 70 years after his/her death. This copyright includes any reproductions, such as from the magazine cover. If there is no other freely licensed image of the depicted person available, you may try to re-upload a low-resolution version of this image locally on :en wikpedia claiming fair-use. But it cannot be uploaded to Commons. Thanks for notifying us about the problem with File:Bloommagazinecover.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 12:55, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

UserHdfhdh745754754

UserHdfhdh745754754 well stop upload photos to Wikipedia

You don't need to stop uploading everything. But you should not upload any more copyvios. --Túrelio (talk) 14:20, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

User UserHdfhdh745754754 well and why other users are allowed to upload photos which are copyvios and I can not upload a photo and it en their works and other administrators to give them up and not block them

UserHdfhdh745754754 Hello Turelio can you get this picture http://www.listal.com/viewimage/598029h

File:Tricana poveira.jpeg (discussion closed)

the image is public domain, no authorization is required, that can be read on the original page of the image. Follow the URL. --PedroPVZ (talk) 15:26, 11 April 2012 (UTC) every image was uploaded as public domain, similarly to wikipedia: ciclk on one random picture and it will state "Foto pública e pode ser usada em sites e blogs" As such tagging or permission text is unnecessary. -PedroPVZ (taylk) 15:44, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Hmm, the website http://fotos.sapo.pt/garatujando/fotos says "Produzido por PTC © 2012. Todos os direitos reservados.". The second problem is, that File:Tricana poveira.jpeg is not shown on http://fotos.sapo.pt/garatujando/fotos. So, you have to give the correct link to the page that actually shows File:Tricana poveira.jpeg. --Túrelio (talk) 16:49, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Well.. lost the exact link but is in there or was. You must be confusing something. The pictures, all, clearly state these are public domain, you can click in any, including the ones (seperated) that originated this one, these images are uploaded by users, while the website is owned by PTC, a major Portuguese company, but not the pictures, it is not theirs, thus the public domain that was released by the autor, which is not PTC, but users, just like wikipedia or flikr that has users uploading pictures. 1+1. no?! --88.210.88.148 20:32, 11 April 2012 (UTC) links http://fotos.sapo.pt/garatujando/fotos/?uid=mHmK2JsLvGihkSAAR9uI http://fotos.sapo.pt/garatujando/fotos/?uid=RpdGCOz1vz7m4z0iqCAO -PedroPVZ (talk) 20:36, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

The "license" statement[17] says "Foto pública e pode ser usada em sites e blogs".

1) "Foto pública" does not equal to "Photo is public domain". (This Flickr photo is also called "public", but still (C) All rights reserved.)

2) "pode ser usada em sites e blogs" is rather ambigous; Google translates it to "can be used on websites and blogs". Can it also be printed in a book, an article, on a car? Can prints of the image be sold ($)? Can the image be changed (making a derivative)? --Túrelio (talk) 20:43, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

please stop distorcing. Keep the conversation on an inteligent level or I will leave the conversation. Although I udersntand that you want this free of copyright problems.In fact, the only problems that I find, is pics of mine that I uploaded to commons being used in newspapers or commercial websites without stating they are mine! This occured to me several times! And in here, there is no information on how I can speak to them, that they are not using it correctly.

Your example has ZERO to do with this. That flikr image is copyrighted. In Portuguese Flikr states "Esta foto está visível para todos". (This picture is visible to everyone) and Licença Todos os direitos reservados (all rights reserved)

Nothing to do with this: This is a public image. period. 

Now if it equals or not a public domain: Can be discussed. in portuguese "public domain" is stated "publica", hence it has no licence, 'not copyrighted, as "dominio publico" (the direct translation from "public domain" is a public place, like a square or a street. The licence of the pictures states "this picture is Public (which means of Public domain) and can be used freely". Websites and blogs can be commercial, thus sold. ---PedroPVZ (talk) 11:40, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

You are the one who is "distorcing" with your totally unrelated claim about license abuse in newspapers or commercial websites. As I am no longer interested to hear your insinuations and insults, I close the discussion at this place. You can now comment directly at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tricana poveira.jpeg. --Túrelio (talk) 12:37, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Bildrechte

Hallo Túrelio,

bei meinem Betrag zu der Band Storm Corrosion (http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Storm_Corrosion&stable=0&shownotice=1), werde ich auf den Verstoß von Urheberrechten aufmerksam gemacht. Speziell geht es um die 2 Bilder die hochgeladen habe. Ich bzw. Wir (Roadrunner Records) haben die Rechte für die Bilder. Wieso erhalte ich diese Nachrichten?

Grüße

Hallo Rr wikiLEAK,

• File:SC Album cover.jpg ist nach eigener Angabe ein Album cover. Album cover sind grundsätzlich urheberrechtlich geschützt. Nahezu alle User, die Album cover-Reproduktionen/Fotos hochladen, schreiben "eigenes Werk", womit sie aber meist nur meinen, dass sie es selbst vom echten Cover abfotografiert oder selbst irgendwo im Internet gefunden haben, was natürlich beides eine URV darstellt.
• bei File:Storm Corrosion.jpg steht in den EXIF-Daten explizit "Copyright, all rights reserved" und "© Naki Kouyioumtzis". Du erwartest hoffentlich nicht, dass wir so etwas einfach ignorieren, so nach der Devise "wird schon nicht so gemeint sein".

Soweit zu deinen beiden Uploads. Wenn du einen Benutzernamen wie "Rr wikiLEAK" wählst, dann darfst du dich nicht wundern, dass der nicht gerade viel Vertrauen erweckt, was du dir auch selbst hättest denken können. Ich wäre bei dem Benutzernamen "Roadrunner Records" aber genauso vorgegangen. Jeder kann hier ein beliebig benanntes Konto eröffnen und damit den Eindruck erwecken, er würde jemanden oder eine Firma vertreten. Weil das so ist, verlangen wir in solchen Fällen grundsätzlich eine Lizenzerteilung seitens des Rechteinhabers. Dazu käme im Fall des 2. Fotos noch hinzu, dass derjenige, der am Ende die Lizenzerteilung an Wikimedia schickt, sich vergewissern sollte, ob Naki Kouyioumtzis tatsächlich damit einverstanden ist, dass dieses Foto unter einer freien Lizenz verbreitet wird, was natürlich etwas ganz anderes ist als wenn er euch nur ein Promo-Foto für Cover etc. verkauft hat. Aber das ist eurer Problem.

Nun zur Lösung: springe bitte hierhin, kopiere dir den eingerahmten Text auf deinen PC, setze bei OBJEKTNAME die beiden o.g. Dateinamen (oder die komplette URL) ein, überprüfe, ob die dort beispielhaft eingetragene CC-BY-SA-3.0-Lizenz euren Wünschen bzw. denen der Rechteinhaber entspricht (sonst anpassen) und leite es dann an den bei Roadrunner Records für Rechtsfragen Verantwortlichen weiter mit der Bitte, es durchzulesen, das Datum und seinen vollständigen Namen (am besten mit kompletter Anschrift) daruterzusetzen und es von einer offiziellen Emailadresse (also nicht hotmail o.ä.) an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org zu mailen (der Inhalt dieser Email wird nicht veröffentlicht). --Túrelio (talk) 11:07, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Okay ich verstehe. Danke für die Aufklärung. Das muss ich dann mal die Tage anpassen bzw. mich mit länger beschäftigen. Bezüglich des Usernamen. Ist es Möglich den Namen zu ändern oder muss ich einen neuen Account anlegen? Sorry for the inconvenience... aber das ist ein wenig komplex hier :)

Service: Commons:Changing username und parallel auch auf in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia: Wikipedia:Benutzernamen ändern. Leider gibt es noch keine globale Änderungsmöglichkeit :-( Raymond 14:02, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Rr wikiLEAK, du musst deinen Usernamen nicht unbedingt ändern. Für die beiden bisherigen Uploads ist das egal, wenn du eine Genehmigung vom Rechteinhaber beischaffst. Dass die beiden Dateien inzwischen gelöscht worden sind, ist übrigens nicht weiter tragisch, weil jeder Admin sie mit 2 Klicks ent-löschen kann. --Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Hilfe bei Copyvio-Verdacht

Lieber Túrelio, ich vermute in der Datei File:Dählhölzli - Gestreifter Blattsteiger 1.jpg ein Commons:Derivative works, denn es ist exakt das selbe, das in z.B. Schönbrunn auf dem Infoscreen verwendet wird Link (entschuldige die schlechte Qualitaet, dieses Bild war nur zu meiner persönlichen Info gedacht), bitte könntest Du der Sache nachgehen oder jemandem uebertragen, ich selbst möchte mir die Zeit dafuer nicht wegknapsen, die fehlte woanders, ich hoffe Du bist mir nicht böse. Vielen Dank im Voraus, lG., --birdy geimfyglið _(:> )=| 13:52, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Moin. :-) "Unser" Bild zeigt etwas mehr; das andere ist sozusagen beschnitten und aufgehellt. Das hiesige wurde vor sechs Jahren hochladen. Es kann also sehr gut eine URV durch den Tierpark sein; zumal auch der Text derselbe ist wie in de:Gestreifter Blattsteiger. --Martina talk 14:00, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Arg! Danke fuer die Hilfe, --birdy geimfyglið _(:> )=| 16:41, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Gerade erst vom Stammtisch aus Köln zurück. Ich würde mich auch Martinas Einschätzung anschließen, zumal "unser" Bild einen größeren Ausschnitt zeigt als der Infoscreen. Ich habe das jetzt mal als Re-use auf der Disku des Bildes notiert. --Túrelio (talk) 23:08, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Danke fürs Löschen von Sonnenuhr.pdf

Hallo Túrelio,

ich bin angenehm über Deine Nachricht und Deine Löschhilfe überrascht. Danke nochmals - und ein paar Anmerkungen!

Ich bin ein Anhänger von Wkipedia und profitierender Nutzer. Deshalb lag es nahe, auch selbst beizutragen zu wollen. Dazu ist mir jetzt aber die Lust vergangen, denn ich bin über zu viele Hindernisse gestrauchelt.

1. Ich hatte es als selbstverständlich angenommen, das man beim Upload einer neuen Dateiversion die Option zum Überschreiben hat. Ich bin ein unermüdlicher Optimierer, dem immer mal ein i-Tüpfelchen hier und eines da auffällt. Nach dem Upload solcher Korrekturen ist aber die Vorversion kein "successful result" mehr und kann nur noch Verwirrung stiften. Vielleicht gibt es die von mir erwartete Überschreibe-Option, aber dann ist sie gut versteckt. Jedenfalls sind meine Recherchen dazu fehlgeschlagen.

2. Ich bin in dem meinen Link-enthaltenden WikiMedia-Beitrag auf einen Nutzer gestoßen, über dessen erste "Rückgängig"-Aktion ich mich gefreut habe, weil die Begründung richtig war. Ein echter Fall von Qualitätssicherung!

Bein zweiten "Rückgängig" musste ich aber aus der (erfreulicherweise gegebenen neuen) Begründung desselben Nutzers schließen , dass er den Beitrag nicht gelesen oder verstanden hatte. Er hatte ein überflüssiges "Rechenprogramm" gesehen, das mein Beitrag nicht enthielt. Ich will Dich aber ausdrücklich nicht in die inhaltliche Diskussion hineinziehen.

In der Anonymität vermute ich mehr destruktive als konstruktive Energie: Vielleicht bin ich einfach jemand begegnet, der gerade triggerhappy war. Das tue ich mir aber nicht gern an. Da ich meine Interessen mit Usern teilen möchte, kann ich meine mit LaTeX erstellten pdf-Beiträge mit Vorteil auf eine eigene Web-Seite stellen. Dort wird sie dann auch ordentlich von Suchmaschinen indexiert, und ich habe die mir schwerfällig erscheinende und un-intuitiv programmierte WikiMPedia-Administration nicht im Nacken. Wohlverstanden - wenn es um darum geht, dass einer fremde Beiträge Löschen will, da sollte es ihm wirklich schwer gemacht werden.

Trotzdem war mein Ausflug in die Wikimedia-Welt interessant und aufschlussreich - und Dank Deiner Hilfe hat er auch glücklich geendet.

Herzliche Grüße --Modalanalytiker (talk) 14:15, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Datei: Gategory:Helpensteiner Mühle

Hi Túrelio, Ich habe aus Versehen eine Category neu angelegt und mit einem Tipfehler abgespeichert. Die Datei Gategory:Helpensteiner Mühle Wegberg-Arsbeck in der Kategory Watermills in Wegberg bitte ich zu löschen. Vielen Dank im Voraus und herzliche Grüße --Huckety (talk) 19:29, 14 April 2012 (UTC)-- --Huckety (talk) 19:31, 14 April 2012 (UTC)--

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 23:10, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Danke für die schnelle Erledigung, und Grüße --Huckety (talk) 09:52, 15 April 2012 (UTC)--

This DR

Perhaps this DR can be closed as a delete since the uploader requested that it be closed with a 'speedy delete.' Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:55, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

I've notified the uploader that it surely will be deleted and that he may file it for fair-use at :en. As he wasn't online yesterday, I haven't closed the DR. Anyway, as it is obviously a commercial/advertisement, waiting for a full week to close the DR, wouldn't really hurt the rights holder. --Túrelio (talk) 06:56, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment: No, I suppose it won't hurt to wait. I just thought that since the uploader wanted the image deleted that we could honour his request. But reminding him of this other option is acceptable too. And one week is not a long time. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:52, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Permissions

Hi, I noticed you tagged a bunch of my recent uploads as needing more permissions. All of these images are property of the company I am working for (Africa Centre) and have been given to me on a CD to add to WikiAfrica artist pages. I was told all of our images are licensed under creative commons 2.5. Could you help me fix the permissions/licensing on these images so they won't get deleted, or tell me what information I need in the future to make sure I'm not violating any copyrights? I'm very new to wikimedia and any help/advice would be greatly appreciated! Thanks! --Megzmurphy (talk) 13:47, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi Megzmurphy, I thought something like that, otherwise I would have labeled them as likely copyvios. What you need to provide is a written permission/statement from the true rights holder. If Africa Centre is in possession of the full copyright (including the release under a free license), then they could issue such a permission. If they are not, then the photographer(s) have to be asked for such a permission. To prepare a proper permission, go to Commons:Email templates, copy the boxed "Declaration of consent for all inquiries" to your computer, enter the filenames (or full URLs) of the images to-be-covered by this permission into the "SPECIFY THE WORK HERE" field and put the name of the license of choice (CC-BY-SA 3.0 is preferred) into the "STANDARD CHOICE ..." field. Mail that all together to the legal representative of Africa Centre or the rights holder and ask them to read it, date and sign it (full legal name plus affiliation) and mail it back to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org from an official email account (gmail, hotmail and alike are not accepted). The content of that email is treated confidentially. Thereafter an OTRS volunteer will take care of that and either feedback or issue an so-called OTRS-ticket to all the images. --Túrelio (talk) 13:59, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

LA: File:Thomas Sippel im April 2012 im Ratsgymnasium Erfurt.jpg

hallo turelio, es wäre schön, wenn du deine löschbegründungen derart formulierst, dass auch nutzer die hier nicht täglich aufschlagen, damit klar kommen, ich scheitere derzeit an der formulierung NC-restricted ... Bunnyfrosch (talk) 15:00, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

O.k, "NC" ist nichts Commons- oder löschspezifisches, sondern die Standardabkürzung von Creative Commons für die Lizenzkomponente "no-commercial-use". Wenn du dir das zweite Icon des etwas unschönen Wasserzeichens rechts oben im Bild anschaust, siehst du das durchgestrichene $-Zeichen, was das offizielle Symbol für NC-Lizenzen ist. D.h., dieser Videostill ist vom Urheber offensichtlich nicht für die kommerzielle Nutzung freigegeben und damit auf Commons nicht erlaubt, da wir kommerzielle Nutzbarkeit grundsätzlich verlangen. --Túrelio (talk) 15:05, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

aber copyleft und no commercial use schließen sich ja nu ein bischen aus? so als verständnis nachfrage ...Bunnyfrosch (talk) 15:17, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Nö (eher umgekehrt). Davon abgesehen, ist "copyleft", jedenfalls wie du es hier benutzt, mehr Idee/Konzept/Haltung. Bei konkreten Werken geht es aber nicht um so etwas, sondern um definierte Lizenzen. Und es gehört halt zum Grundbestand von Commons (und auch den anderen WMF-Projekten), dass die Inhalte auch kommerziell nutzbar sein müssen, jedenfalls von der Lizenz her. Natürlich kann die kommerzielle Nutzbarkeit auch bei frei lizensierten Fotos zusätzlich durch Persönlichkeitsrechte eingeschränkt sein, wie es bei deinem Upload auch der Fall sein dürfte. Letztere Einschränkung hat aber keine Relevanz beim Hochladen auf Commons, sondern muss vom Wiederverwender/externen Nutzer selbst beachtet werden.

Wenn das fragliche Foto für dich wichtig ist, kannst du ja beim Urheber nachfragen, ob er dir eine Freigabe ohne die NC-Komponente gibt (zu senden an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org). De facto ist es eh völlig unwahrscheinlich, dass das Foto kommerziell genutzt wird. --Túrelio (talk) 15:25, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

ok, ich schau mal was ich mache mfg Bunnyfrosch (talk) 16:51, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

thank you

miniature barnstar

I'm sorry it's a bit too big, it won't collapse or go left, but I wanted to thank you for helping me with licensing on the image. normally it's like this Penyulap ☏ 15:59, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 16:00, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Remzi Cavdar

What do you mean by: Please, add the source for your version of this image??? I have grabbed it from Google Images. And it's from Samsung Official promotion image for consumers.

"grabbed it from Google Images" is a perfect rationale for speedy deletion. I've therefore reverted to the old version. "Google images" is never a legitimate source; they only show you images from other people, regardless of the copyright. You have to provide proof from the true rights holder, that this image is freely licensed. --Túrelio (talk) 16:48, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

If I set as source: Samsung official promotional Consumer image? because it's a promotional image from Samsung and they don't care if it's on Wikipedia or they will like it :)

No, that is not acceptable. Promotional images are often only half-free, restricted for use in promotional articles, not allowed on Commons. Some of these Korean companies have PR channels on Flickr, where they offer really free-licensed images. You have to search for that. --Túrelio (talk) 16:55, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

comons

The two photos that you have marked are not exact are exact. the photo of Beppe Costa with Jodorosky, gave me the same beppe Costa to insert on wikipedia and the same thing for the photo of Arnoldo Foà. The photo of Arnoldo has no rights because it was taken with friends many years ago and he gave me to insert it. So? What should I do to fix those photos that I have seen the permits you need and no photos are protected by Copyright, but free?--Stefiro (talk) 21:37, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi Stefiro, it's easier to discuss if you mention the actual files instead of writing "the photo of ...".

Your claim that File:Cc.JPG "has no rights" is rather baseless. For any photography the photographer earns copyright, which usually lasts until 70 years after his/her death. Of course, the photographer can either transfer the copyright to somebody else or release a photo under a free license. But, claiming such a transfer of rights requires proof. I don't write this as I wouldn't trust you, these are just the legal facts. Also, your statement "he gave me to insert it" suggests that you may have asked him something like "can I have this photo for my wikipedia article", when - in fact - you have put this photo under CC-BY-SA and GFDL.

With File:Alejandro 1.jpg your wording "gave me ... to insert on wikipedia" suggests the same problem as outlined above.

So, what to do: if you got these files per email, you could forward the original emails to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org if they contain a statement of license or copyright. If they don't, they are of little use. In this case you should go to Commons:Modello richiesta di permesso, copy the boxed "Pubblicazione con licenza libera" to your computer, enter the filename on Commons (or the complete URL), enter the name of the license to which the licensor agreed and mail it all to the photographer/licensor and ask him/her to read, date and sign it, and then mail it back to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. In the last resort you may try to claim {{PD-Italy}} these images, which requires proof of first publication in Italy, but has the disadvantage that such image may only be used on :it Wikipedia. --Túrelio (talk) 07:31, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Requesting help and clarification

Turelio, you said that the file English-Amharic-Spanish sign.jpg "does not have sufficient information on its copyright status". I am not an expert on such. Please tell me what it lacks. I took the photo, I thought I had stated that clearly enough and posted it for free use. I find several links telling me about categories of copyright, etc., but I cannot find a way to actually change anything, even if I knew what to change. Please help me be legal. Pete unseth (talk) 13:53, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

It has no license tag. It's actually a "wonder" that it survived 19 days without a license tag. But that gives you the chance to add one now. --Túrelio (talk) 13:56, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Hu Na Tennis Club.jpg

Flickr images tagged as BY (CC-BY) or BY SA (CC-BY-SA) had changed. http://www.flickr.com/photos/60424997@N02/6921940330/ please reviewed. thank you

File:Chinese benevolent society.jpg

Flickr images tagged as BY (CC-BY) or BY SA (CC-BY-SA) had changed. please reviewed. thank you http://www.flickr.com/photos/60424997@N02/6921939630/in/photostream/

File:US Supreme Court 1.JPG

Flickr images tagged as BY (CC-BY) or BY SA (CC-BY-SA) had changed. please reviewed. thank you http://www.flickr.com/photos/60424997@N02/6784644206/in/photostream

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 16:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Requesting Message Archiving

Hi Túrelio, Hope you are fine and you remember me. I congratulate you for the excellent animated cat image of this User talk. As you are well aware, I am now a humble filemover. I receive more and more messages everyday and my User talk looks clumsy. I would like to avail archiving instead of deleting messages. Please guide me. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 18:39, 22 April 2012 (UTC).

This cat looks really scary :P -- RE rillke questions? 18:47, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Hindustanilanguage, please read Commons:Talk page guidelines#Archiving - when there is too much text -- RE rillke questions? 18:47, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Künstlerische Werke von Ernst Marow

Hallo Túrelio, vielen Dank für die Nachricht bezugnehmend auf die Werke von Ernst Marow / Schnellöschanträge. Deine Annahme, daß ich mit dem Künstler irgendwie in Kontakt stehe, ist richtig: ich bin mit ihm verheiratet. Daß die Rechtsgültigkeit bezügl. der Reproduktionen eingehalten werden muß, ist auch in diesem Fall verständlich und bedarf sicher entsprechender Form. Noch ein Tipp für weitere Informationen über den Künstler: die Website www.ernstmarow.de Mit besten Grüßen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirkebine (talk • contribs) 22. April 2012, 18:31 Uhr (UTCTúrelio (talk) 08:41, 25 April 2012 (UTC))

Rename & DR together?

Hi. You've marked Mail.png for rename without specifying target and almost at the same time marked it for DR. I removed the rename tag for the moment. Please do not go for Rename & DR together. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 08:34, 24 April 2012 (UTC).

File:Gbb_pnv_2012.jpg

You deleted the file above. I uploaded it from Flckr with cc-by-sa license, as you can see here. It's a meaningful file, as it is the executive committee for Gipuzkoa of the Basque Nationalist Party. I ask for the file restauration and, instead of it, the reasons you deleted it for. Thank you in advance. - Joxemai (talk) 15:20, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi Joxemai, it is not CC-BY-SA, but CC-BY-ND. The latter (ND = no-derivatives) prohibits its upload to Commons, as our policy requires that all uploads have to be free to produce derivatives from them. --Túrelio (talk) 15:26, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. It was my mistake (I will put more attention next time). Thank you for your appreciation. Good work. - Joxemai (talk) 05:45, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Hannahmodel.jpg

Estimado borraste una foto autorizada por su dueño, como la recupero? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xergio2010 (talk • contribs) 25. April 2012, 04:05 Uhr (UTCTúrelio (talk) 06:33, 25 April 2012 (UTC))

If you are refering to File:Hannahmodel.jpg, this was not deleted by me but by my colleague High Contrast. However, I had tagged it for deletion (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hannahmodel.jpg) as it is on Flickr since March 2011 and (C) All rights reserved. In the image description you wrote that you, Xergio2010, are the photographer. But in your comment on the DR talkpage, you wrote that some Raul is the photographer. So, if this Raúl Egúsquiza really is the photographer and if he agrees to have this image under a free license on Commons, then you need to ask him to send a written permission/release to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. For how to prepare such a permission, see Commons:OTRS/es and Commons:Modelos de mensajes#Declaraci.C3.B3n de permiso para todas las peticiones. --Túrelio (talk) 06:33, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Swiss Tram in Vinnitsa, Image

this is a permission to use this file from its author GK tramrunner229 (talk) 21:14, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Hmm, not really. "You can put it on Wikipedia" is in no way an equivalent to a free license. --Túrelio (talk) 22:20, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Cher deleted image

Hi. I'm a fan of Cher and also a user from Cher.yuku.com. There we use to share our own pictures from the shows we've been. The deleted image is mine; Mavelus posted it with his account, but I can assure you they're mine. I taked them. You can tell by the EXIF data of this other image I uploaded: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cher_February_2009_2.jpg; they're the same. If there are any rules that don't let me upload my pics just because they were already posted on Internet by other people, let me know. I don't think it's fair. See you, XSarkesian46 (talk) 13:44, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi, sure, both images seem to have been shot with the same camera, at least the EXIF data are suggesting this. But does that necessarily mean they were shot by you? Honestly, it's a bit strange that someone would led somebody else publish his photos on a forum and he himself uploads them to Commons full 3 years later. In addition to the fact that yuku poster Mavelus didn't even credit or mention you. To your question: no, it is not prohibited to upload images to Commons that were published earlier, provided 1) it are one's own images, and 2) that the first publication did not result in a transfer of exclusive copyright to the publisher. However, such pre-publication should be stated at upload.

Overall, I still have some doubts. Since this user Mavelus is still active on yuku forum, could you ask him to put a credit to you into his posting at http://cher.yuku.com/sreply/88527/Imagen-del-D-a ? --Túrelio (talk) 14:10, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi. In fact I didn't let him publish my photos (I don't have any problem with it). I sent them to an online Cher gallery and he posted it on Cher.yuku. If I had any problem with him posting my pictures on a forum I would not let an online gallery publish it. I'm okay with it.

Posting on Cher.yuku is publication.

Also, my pics on the gallery are credited to ME. http://www.cherlove.net/gallery/displayimage.php?album=842&pos=4, http://www.cherlove.net/gallery/displayimage.php?album=841&pos=4 See you, XSarkesian46 (talk) 15:31, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

O.k., I have now temporarily undeleted the image. However, as the page, where it is credited to you, is undated, and as it is linked to yuku from http://www.cherlove.net/gallery/albums/userpics/10002/cpbattle_002c.jpg, I want to see a credit to you in Mavelus' posting at http://cher.yuku.com/sreply/88527/Imagen-del-D-a. --Túrelio (talk) 15:46, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

You are not understanding me. Let me be clear: I sent my pics to Cherlove.net and, after that, Mavelus, an user not linked to the gallery, copied it to yuku. Since he's not the owner of my pics I don't get why you "want to see a credit" to me in Mavelus posting. XSarkesian46 (talk) 16:11, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

By doing that he/she would acknowledge that you are the owner/author of the image, which he should have done anyway. Especially as he is not the owner, he should credit the owner of the images he used in his posting. That is very standard. --Túrelio (talk) 18:05, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, but since anyone can copy any image on the Internet and publish on any place without giving any credit, I can't do anything. Also, the link he used to publish the image on yuku is from Cherlove.net, which means he just copied it from the gallery. XSarkesian46 (talk) 18:30, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

"I can't do anything" - sorry, that is nonsense. 1) Mavelus was still online on April 24th. As you claim to be a member of Cher.yuku.com, it couldn't be so hard to contact this Felipe guy. 2) Doesn't it go into your head that all problems with your upload of this image to Commons and the amount of my and your time lost, was caused mainly by this Mavelus posting "your" image without crediting you and thereby suggesting that it is his image? 3) The link of the image on Cher.yuku.com, http://www.cherlove.net/gallery/albums/userpics/10002/cpbattle_002c.jpg, leds to Cherlove.net, but it doesn't led to your copy of the image, http://www.cherlove.net/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=13477&fullsize=1, nor does it show your name. 4) Honestly, your resistance to do what every real photographer would do when he sees an image of his own used by somebody else without getting credited, makes me wonder whether you are really the photographer. --Túrelio (talk) 20:18, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

OK, I contacted him. Waiting for his response. XSarkesian46 (talk) 22:12, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi. I contacted him one week ago, but still no reply. What should I do? XSarkesian46 (talk) 03:48, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi, as your upload is currently undeleted, we can still wait. However, you might put some more pressure on Mavelus by a public posting here. --Túrelio (talk) 14:20, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Head of Francis of Assisi .JPG

Português: Paz e bem!

O autor é desconhecido.

Muitas peças do Brasil Colonial não são assinadas e tem a autoria de difícil identificação.

O.k., thanks. Is the place, where this sculpture is located, publicly accessible? --Túrelio (talk) 20:53, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Artemis Photo

My user name for Wikipedia is Russianamerican1. I uploaded this photo to wikipedia today.

• Photo 1

• Photo 2

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Berlinhistory (talk • contribs) 28. April 2012, 00:48 Uhr (UTC)

O.k, then please put a note on your Commons userpage about that fact. In addition, it doesn't make sense to upload the same image on Commons and locally on :en. --Túrelio (talk) 22:56, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Deletion of pictures from User:SlavicB

Hi, now Användare:SlavicB has deleted the pictures, except for one, from his user page. Please feel free to delete the rest from Commons. Rex Sueciæ (talk) 13:49, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 18:06, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi, User:SlavicB is now blocked on svwiki and identified as a sockpuppet to User:MrMm. I suggest that you delete all pictures Here and here. Rex Sueciæ (talk) 13:22, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

User:Gopanraman

This user Gopanraman (talk · contribs) seems to be quite notorious. He keeps making his promotional article on Wikipedia. Check his talk page on English Wikipedia for all notices. Can you please go through all his uploads and check them? §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 18:45, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. However, it is up to :en admin and local policy whether his article well be deleted. If that happens, then eventually his uploads to Commons might also be deleted. I've no idea whether he is a notable artist or not. However, it looks harmless compared to this en:User:DrakeUnlimited userpage. --Túrelio (talk) 19:16, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Bilder Entfernung User talk:DieBuche#Bild Entfernen

Hallo Túrelio :-)

Es wurde vorgeschlagen, dass ich mich an Dich wende.

Die Bilder http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Domtar_espanola_mortar_exterior_wall_1996.jpg und http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Domtar.JPG und haben mehrere Äquivalenten in den diesbezüglichen Kategorien. Die Firma besteht leider auf Entfernung der Bilder, nicht Namensänderung. Sie sagen, dass alle Bilder vorher genehmigt sein müssen. Daher haben wir keine Wahl. Das Bild Domtar.jpg ist nur in einer Kategorie, aber das erstgenannte Bild ist in vielen Kategorien. Dort sind sicherlich äquivalente Bilder zu finden. Die Kategorien sind reich bestückt. Wiktionary editiere ich nicht, aber wer immer dort die Bilder eingesetzt hat, hat viele andere Bilder zur Auswahl. Es ist schade drum, da besonders das erstgenannte Bild sehr schön ist und auch für das Werk sehr positiv ist, da sie eine besonders zackige Abschottung eingesetzt hat. Vielen Dank vorab für Deine Hilfe. --Achim Hering (talk) 17:14, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Achim, das würde leichter, wenn du die Nutzung von File:Domtar.JPG auf :de entfernen würdest (d.h., dort ein anderes Bild einbauen könntest), dann wäre die Datei nämlich ungenutzt, und für File:Domtar espanola mortar exterior wall 1996.jpg ein Ersatzbild vorschlagen könntest. Hat die Firma schon mit rechtlichen Schritten gegen dich gedroht? --Túrelio (talk) 19:44, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

OK, ich werde sehen was ich anderes einbauen kann. Man hat noch nicht gedroht, aber es ist zwischen den Zeilen erkennbar.--Achim Hering (talk) 22:11, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Ist geritzt. Wenn es keiner revidiert - das Foto ist mit einem gleichwertigen Foto ersetzt. Wenn dann ist der Ersatz besser, da das Bild eine höhere Resolution hat.--Achim Hering (talk) 22:24, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:32, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Schönen Dank! :---Achim Hering (talk) 17:52, 30 April 2012 (UTC))

Hello

Hola me gustaria que me explicaran un poco más detalladamente el porqué algunas imagenes que he subido ha sido tachadas como violación de copyright...cuando ya habian sido aprovadas por Flirck (File:Sailor Moon Fan.jpg, File:Sakura Card captor dvd.jpg, File:Maria sama ga miteru.jpg) considero que estas imagenes cumplen con los requisitos de Commons para poder ser alojadas, por otro lado la (File:Deskopt Tomoyo.jpg) pueden borrarla sin ningún problema puesto que no tengo los medios para conseguir el permiso y debido a que esta derivada de un salvapantallas de windows y por lo tanto es una violación a la propiedad de Microsoft.--Lizerlig (talk) 17:36, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

PD: He leido todo el http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Sobre_las_licencias por lo que justifico mi pretensión.

O.k. I have to answer in english as I don't know enough Spanish. 1) about Flickr vs. Commons in general: in regard to copyright Flickr doesn't care at all what you upload. There is a lot of Flickr-washing. So, if you find something on Flickr under a free license, you still have make an assessment whether the Flickr user can really be the photographer. Contrary to Flickr, we at Commons check all uploads whether they are likely legitimate. If we have serious doubts, they are going to be deleted. If we are wrong, then the uploader can provide evidence that he/she is really the photographer/rights holder and then the upload can be restored. 2) the copyright situation is more complicated when the Flickr user or even you by yourself have made a photography of something which in itself is copyrighted. Take, for example, your upload File:Maria sama ga miteru.jpg. It shows a poster. Such posters are always copyrighted. Now, if you see such a poster on the street, in a museum or somewhere else and take a shot of it and publish it, you violate the copyright of the one who originally created the poster. In such a situation, your CC-licensing of your image would be invalid. The same problem with File:Sakura Card captor dvd.jpg and File:Sailor Moon Fan.jpg. File:Deskopt Tomoyo.jpg is even more complicated. It has a few parts of the Windows desktop which might be copyright. But, most importantly, who is the true creatur of the prominent figure on the screen? You need his/her permission. Flickr doesn't care about all this thing. Now, when you upload such a image to Commons, somebody else may use it, as he trusts Commons and the free license. Then, the true rights holder finds out. He will not sue Commons, as it is too complicated, but he will take the re-user to court and he will rather surely win, and the re-user has to pay a lot of money. --Túrelio (talk) 18:06, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Roberto11

File: Nude butts.png. (English)The woman in this picture authorizeed the publication of her image. We took this picture.

(Portuguese) Sim, a mulher que você viu na foto autorizou a publicação de sua imagem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.91.110.52 (talk • contribs) 2. Mai 2012, 23:20 Uhr (UTCTúrelio (talk) 21:26, 2 May 2012 (UTC))

O.k., then you should put this template/code {{consent}} onto the image page, but in a logged-in state, not as IP. For more information see Commons:Country specific consent requirements. --Túrelio (talk) 21:24, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Reply:Superbike/Supersport photos

Hi Túrelio, thanks for your advice, I hope not to have made other mistakes but I have no experience about uploading this kind of pictures. These photos have another issue, the watermark: is it a big problem or not? Thanks you again! --Gpmat (talk) 09:21, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Though we prefer images without watermark, the watermarks of this Picasa-User aren't really a problem. --Túrelio (talk) 09:33, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

File:CyanoCID2.jpg

The file you deleted, File:CyanoCID2.jpg, was not a copyright violation of Androtek but was from the CyanogenMod website itself. The image being used on Androtek was nothing more than a reposting of that image. - SudoGhost (talk) 16:17, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

But would that change anything in regard to copyright? I see no free licensing at cyanogenmod.com. --Túrelio (talk) 16:28, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

That's a fair point, I'll upload it to en.wikipedia under non-free criteria. Thanks. - SudoGhost (talk) 16:33, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Céramique hotel Mondial (Menton) 1.jpg and File:Céramique hotel Mondial (Menton) 2.jpg

Hi Tangopaso, these 2 images may be problematic, as the original works carry an artist's note from 1991 and as France has no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright. However, as the artist's note says "d'apres Mucha" they may be true copies of works of Category:Alfons Mucha, whose works are already in the PD. I would therefore ask you to search in the Alfons Mucha-category for the original works, so that we can compare them to the ceramics of which you photos are taken. --Túrelio (talk) 21:18, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi,

I uploaded other versions for the ceramics of Menton. I hope it is OK.

I had seen that already yesterday. Nice that you were able to locate them. Everything o.k. now with that.

But please, dont chase only my images. I try to apply no COM:FOP#France rules, but perhaps I fail sometimes. You will find images to suppress in Category:La Défense, Category:Information boards in France, Category:Signs in Paris, Category:20th-century works in France. I asked suppression for some of them. --Tangopaso (talk) 22:47, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Please! I tag the copyvios or questionable cases I recognize. I am an unpaid volunteer. --Túrelio (talk) 06:58, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Deletion Request and more by Jesussilva1803

I think that the file Alvarowiki.jpg and Adicciones Teledoce.jpg don´t violate any condition. It's only my opinion. Thanks. I speak spanish, if you can talk me in spanish, I will understand you better. Thank you very much from Uruguay!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jesussilva1803 (talk • contribs) 22:42, 3. Mai 2012 (UTCTúrelio (talk) 20:58, 3 May 2012 (UTC))

You are a new account of Jesu el1 (talk · contribs), right? You have used your Flickr account Jesu_el1 for Flickr-washing. This is illegal and actually criminal, because if other people re-use one your copyvios they may be taken to court and forced to pay a lot of money to the true rights holder. Yo no sabe sufficientemente espanol. Mira a Commons:Administradores por un collega con es. --Túrelio (talk) 21:01, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Doubt

Para subir imagenes solo pongo la imagen, de que pagina es y ya está? Porque siempre me las borran, solo quiero poner imagenes referidas a biografías de famosos.

Translation: To upload images just put the image of that page is and that's it? Because I always erase them, I just want to put pictures related to biographies of famous.

Doubt 2

Quiero saber como subir imagenes de famosos correctamente, para que los demas las puedan ver, con licencia y todo legal, si me explicas puede ser todo mejor, así no cometo ninguna violación. Desde ya Muchas Gracias

Thanks

Ok, well AlvaroWiki.jpg and adicciones_teledoce.jpg are 2 photos that Alvaro Armand Ugon(the actor is my teacher) give me and I upload it, these photos don't violate nothing or yes???? Thank you Túrelio. Ohh I don't know how can I unblock the account Jesu_el1 this is why I did this account, sorry by my ingorance.

To request unblocking, add {{[[Template:unblock|reason Túrelio (talk) 07:25, 4 May 2012 (UTC)]]}} to your user talk page. --Túrelio (talk) 07:25, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

DELETE

I'm gonna delete the photos of hamlet and the others from flickr ok only the bad uploads, AlvaroWiki.jpg y Adicciones_Teledoce.jpg no ok. Goodbye and thanks!

Request

Hi, since you are an admin, could you please do a revision deletion in a page? --SupernovaExplosion ^Talk 12:45, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Which page/revision and for what reason? --Túrelio (talk) 12:48, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

I've emailed you in detail. --SupernovaExplosion ^Talk 12:55, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. But how to reupload or overright? Should I simply use the upload form and upload the image with same title? --SupernovaExplosion ^Talk 13:17, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

If you go to File:Dalmadal Canon.jpg and look at the section "file versions", you see 2 links below the table; click on the first. --Túrelio (talk) 13:22, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Done. Thank you for the suggestion. --SupernovaExplosion ^Talk 13:42, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 14:06, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. You have mail. --SupernovaExplosion ^Talk 14:12, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

AlvaroWiki.jpg and Adicciones_Teledoce.jpg

Hi Túrelio. in OTRS I've receipt an email from Jesu_1. I don't understand the problem, because everything is so... strange. As I see: both images haven't a authorized usage, because they are in low resolution (if the teacher allow the usage, he may share a better images). Anyway, Are both images candidates to delete even if the user share on flickr with a proper license?. in OTRS (spanish message), he said almost the same thing as you read above... Any help is welcome Superzerocool (talk) 15:19, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi Superzerocool, the main problem is that Jesu el1 (talk · contribs) did Flickr-washing (see [18] and [19]). The Flickr-washed images have been speedied. Of course, one can hardly trust a user who did such a thing. As I have no direct evidence that File:AlvaroWiki.jpg and File:Adicciones Teledoce.jpg are also copyvios, I haven't speedied them, but opened regular deletion requests. If you have received credible evidence that these images are originally own work of the uploader or really freely licensed by the rights holder, then I would ask you to comment in the related DRs Commons:Deletion requests/File:AlvaroWiki.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Adicciones Teledoce.jpg. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 18:42, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the answer. Superzerocool (talk) 15:33, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

ICTY image

Hello, Tur. Can you please point me where, i also searched, but failed to find... --WhiteWriter ^speaks 16:34, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Replied on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 18:19, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

But i think you are not right, Túrelio. Here we can see

• • • None of the materials provided on this web site may be used, reproduced or transmitted, in whole or in part, in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or the use of any information storage and retrieval system, except as provided for in the Terms and Conditions of Use of United Nations Web Sites, without permission in writing from the publisher.

That includes images of those. And more you can see on Terms and Conditions of Use of United Nations Web Sites. Still, material is not free to use, as it looks like... --WhiteWriter ^speaks 10:06, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Well, it's neither my nor the uploader's fault, if the ICTY people are so idiotic to put contradictory copyright statements on their website. IMO, in most jurisdictions this will mean, that you can take the statement which favors you. As these images are encyclopedically important (documenting war crimes in a recent conflict), we should do anything to have them stay on Commons. If you want to have that discussed by a greater audience, you could open a regular DR for 1 image and in a side-note include the other 2 (without opening a mass-DR). But a speedy is surely not appropriate in that case. --Túrelio (talk) 17:52, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

speedy deletion

this file is not speedy deletion because 30 years before has been created in Iran law. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nooshafarin_album.jpg

Please sign your comments. You wrote by yourself that is was created in 27. January 2012. How is that 30 years old? Also, it is your duty to provide evidence that this image has been published 30 years ago. --Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

INCORRECT HISTORY

OK DEAR FRIEND I CHANGED THE HISTORYS.Alborzagros (talk) 08:38, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

It doesn't work like this. As I explained you already in the above thread, you have to provide proof/evidence, that these image were published at least 30 years ago. --Túrelio (talk) 08:40, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

May be you don't really understand me: you may turn to a :fa-speaking admin-colleague such as User:Mmxx or User:Mardetanha. --Túrelio (talk) 08:45, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tabby kittens india.JPG

Hallo Túrelio,

Habe deinen Kommentar zu der von mir gestarteten Löschdiskussion Commons:Deletion_requests/2012/05/07#File:Tabby_kittens_india.JPG gesehen. Und ja, die Hauptmotivation für mich diesen Antrag zu stellen war die Tatsache, dass ich wegen dieses Bildes meinen Usernamen Ahmerkhan den ich auf de:Wikipedia und en:Wikipedia verwende, nicht auch auf Commons verwenden kann. Wer auch immer dieses Katzenbild hochgeladen hat und zufällig den gleichen Namen wie ich hat, war vermutlich danach nie wieder in Wikimedia eingeloggt. Nach diesem Upload gab es nie wieder einen Beitrag von dieser Person. Das Foto selbst wird nirgendwo verwendet, weder in Commons noch in einer anderen Wikipedia. Mein Usurp Request war also zwar der Anstoß für die ganze Sache, aber inhaltlich ist der Löschantrag ja trotzdem korrekt. Oder? --212.183.20.34 14:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Formal war der LA korrekt; es ist aber immer problematisch, wenn man dabei ein Nebeninteresse verfolgt. Zudem bin ich mir weder sicher, ob dein Usurp Request im Fall der Löschung durchgeht, noch ob dieser eine Upload, auch wenn er nicht gelöscht wird, tatsächlich ein absolutes Hindernis für dein Usurp Request darstellt. Oder hat man dir letzteres gesagt? --Túrelio (talk) 14:10, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Wie du hier und hier siehst hat man mir tatsächlich letzteres gesagt. Wenn man dieses Bild also löscht, wäre EugeneZelenko's Argument entkräftet. Wobei ich persönlich es so oder so für ein unzulässiges Argument halte. --212.183.20.34 14:24, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Vielleicht solltest du das offen und ehrlich in der DR-Diskussion ansprechen. Ich wäre dann bereit meinen Kommentar (die 1. Hälfte) zu entfernen. --Túrelio (talk) 14:27, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Done. --212.183.20.34 14:43, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for reverting this little bit of vandalism on my wife's delicious Blueberry tart. Work has been too busy lately for me to edit much on Commons. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:36, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome. Sadly, Commons has no i/o interface for organic material; otherwise I might have asked for a Blueberry tart sample ;-). --Túrelio (talk) 06:48, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

JustMarriedInUdaipur

Hallo, Turelio, thanks for the idea to translate the inscription on "JustMarriedInUdaipur". I have asked a person in Udaipur about it, he told me that it was just the personal name of the persons. Thank you ArishG (talk) 11:52, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your feedback. --Túrelio (talk) 20:38, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Wild Dog unknown.jpg

You wrote: Hi Inugami-bargho, the description of this image says "it's in the public domain", but at the same time it is under a CC-BY-license. Both don't fit together, either PD or CC-BY. Besides, it would be interesting to know, where this dog was pictured. --Túrelio (Diskussion) 09:15, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Sorry I do not know where it was taken. And the license was imported from flickr via the Flinfo tool. So I cannot help you there. Should it be the case that the file has to be deleted, I have no problem with that.--Inugami-bargho (talk) 09:28, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

RE: Censoring Michaeldsuarez

I don't accept your "simply untrue" claim. It's a valid statement. I compromised anyway. In addition, Fæ did make claims of illegitimacy by stating, "Any conclusion would be rejected as 90%+…." Your accusations of libel and "associat[ing] a claim to a user who hasn't said that" aren't in line with reality. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 14:51, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

He never wrote "illegitimacy" or "illegitimate" in your linked statement and you knew that. But that surely doesn't touch your WR/Wcy/Kohs-view of the reality. Anyway, though I've little to do with Fae, I'm not interested in any discussion with Kohs and alike who simply want to destroy him. EOD. --Túrelio (talk) 15:00, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

that file

Ok, that's fine, but the source for this image is not at all clear. Before it can be successfully uploaded to a local project, a source really needs to be identified. --Hammersoft (talk) 22:23, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

• P.S. Nice cat :) --Hammersoft (talk) 22:25, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

I just wanted to try to save it for :en, as it is currently used there and as it will rather surely be deleted from Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 22:27, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

• Well, the bots took care of uploading it and tagging it as a possible copyright problem. But really, even if we accurately determined the source, and found it to be non-free, I doubt it would pass fair use review at en.wikipedia. The image is not mentioned in the prose and is there only decoratively. It shows a -29, which is already displayed in the article. Given the provenance of the image is unknown, etc., I don't think this image will survive. --Hammersoft (talk) 19:51, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Copyvio after blocking

Hello, you block this person last week, and then she's starting again. Thanks. Benoit Rochon (talk) 04:57, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. However, as all his uploads have been deleted, a new block doesn't make sense in this moment. --Túrelio (talk) 16:32, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

File:PikiWiki Israel 7485 statue quot;lone cypressquot; in tel aviv .jpg

Curious, why delete this image? Uploaders have no right for a deletion of [their] files. Nyttend (talk) 18:36, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Well, Pikiwikisrael is a special case, as these images were not originally uploaded by their owners, as far as I am informed. And usually in all cases of such speedies, the image were no longer in use on any project. --Túrelio (talk) 18:41, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:BenjaminFranklinNationalMemorial.jpg

Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 04:11, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Deletion of files

Hi,i want to make a your make kind attention.I'v uploaded several files with proper copyright tag.some of the files have been deleted cos copyright violation.if the pic is found on any website it could be coincidence.Since if i've to upload files from net or any website , i'll provide proper links. eventually expect pardon for any bad words or bad dealing.thanks and keep guiding me Majorcaptain (talk) 08:18, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi Majorcaptain, please do not remove legitimate problem/speedy tags. In case of honest concerns, you can convert a speedy into a regular DR or, as you have done only now, contact the tagging administrator. To be honest, I have strong doubts about all your recent porn actress uploads. The quality of these images simply doesn't fit to your earlier uploads of luxury car-related images. Later this day I will likely file a mass deletion request (not speedy) for them. This will give you the opportunity to provide proof about whether these images were really originally shot by you. If you think you don't have valid proof/evidence, then you might consider tagging them by yourself for deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Galo Recalde como el Capitán Expertus.jpg

El permiso bajo la licencia CC-BY-SA ya ha sido reenviada al mail permissions-es@wikimedia.org por medio de mi e-mail, locowikixd@hotmail.com saludos.--LocoWiki (talk) 06:56, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

O.k., thanks. Next time put {{OTRS-pending}} on the image page. --Túrelio (talk) 06:58, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Ya reenvie el mensaje adjuntando la URL.--LocoWiki (talk) 07:12, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

My picture

Dear Turelio, This morning I went to my page on Commons because I had decided to cancel the photo that portrays me (File:Stefania battistella.jpg), even put on my wikipedia user page in Italian. I noticed that you added Personality rights warning;but the picture shows myself and I agreed with myself when I uploaded it! I will remove my photos because I had already decided, but if it happens to me sometimes, I must do something to remove that alert? --Stefiro (talk) 09:07, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi Stefiro, this personality-rights-template is not a warning for the uploader about a problem, but for the re-users to use it properly. You know that with a freely licensed image anybody can make (more or less) everything. This is not a problem when it is an image of a car or a cat. But imagine when somebody with a malignant intention takes your portrait and either give it a bad filename (for example something "sex-related"), which recently happened with a Flickr-sourced image on Commons, or manipulates the image itself so that you are still identifiable, but with a bad/unwanted connotation/association. The template cannot prevent bad or stupid people doing such things, but they are at least warned not to do it. I would therefore strongly recommend not to remove it from your image. --Túrelio (talk) 09:31, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

• Ok, thak you so much! --Stefiro (talk) 08:55, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

For future reference

You could use this page. Dealt with anyway :) Best --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:38, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Link is now on my userpage. --Túrelio (talk) 10:41, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Thresh Wheat

I Will see again it. I mean thresh wheat around- around by horse. Thanks Dgolitsis--94.68.92.81 10:18, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Warning: the IP address, 212.121.219.1 is the source of serious hacking activities

Warning: the IP address, 212.121.219.1 registered to Oldham MBC public libraries, and which is permanently blocked in English Wikipedia since 2009, is the source of serious hacking activities right now. Please be on guard with this IP address.

UserHgfhf7657575 Hello Turelio Constantly vandalizing the article La liga please block this ip adress 77.71.212.69

tagging for speedy deletion

Hi Benoit,
thanks for detecting and tagging so many copyvios. However, the way you tag them, is somewhat suboptimal and produces additional work for the deletion admin. Per this diff I assume that you manually add "Copyvio|Notification of copyright violation|source=http://...". If that is correct, then please try to use the "copyvio" entry from the Toolbox (the third box in the left column on image pages). This way, the uploader is notified automatically and the copyvio-source-URL is put at such a place in the message template, that it is automatically pasted into the relevant field, when the deleting admin clicks on the waste-bin icon. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 15:15, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I don't see the "copyvio" entry from the Toolbox... maybe I should add a gadget on code in my js page ? Benoit Rochon (talk) 15:24, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Ok. When I changed the language in My Preferences to French, you need to go to Gadgets, then "Outils de maintenance" and then make an x at "Quick Delete". --Túrelio (talk) 15:28, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Got it!... Wow, this will save SOOOO much time! Thanks a lot buddy! Benoit Rochon (talk) 15:31, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 15:31, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

German translation needed

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wolf_Caspar&diff=71207088&oldid=57809655 – Can you please translate my comment into German? --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 12:56, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 14:56, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 18:24, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Category:Steam locomotives in Chabówka

Had you any specific reason to delete this category, apart from that it was empty? It was probably marked to deletion by IP railway vandal, who moved all photos to Polish-named category Category:Lokomotywy parowe w Chabówce. Since category names should be in English, I think that Steam locomotives in Chabówka should be undeleted or created again, and then in a free time I'll try to revert other changes? Pibwl (talk) 17:14, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

No specific reason, just that it had been speedy-tagged for being empty. I can undelete it for you.  Done now. --Túrelio (talk) 18:19, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

OK. Please, undelete also Category:PKP class Pt31, Category:PKP class Tw12, Category:PKP class TKw2, Category:PKP class Ty37. You can delete instead Category:Lokomotywy parowe w Chabówce (with its empty too detailed redundant subcategories) and Category:Lokomotywy w Chabówce. We have a problem with a vandal, who puts useless junk in the Polish Wikipedia and has own vision how the pictures should be categorized. Pibwl (talk) 14:57, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

File:2012-05-13 Nordsee-Luftbilder DSCF8961.jpg

Moin, du. Ich hab da den Ausschnitt einer anderen Datei (...60.jpg) drübergepeichert und kann das nicht zurücksetzen. Magst d das einmal für mich übernehmen. Brauch ich fürs Zurücksetzen rollback flag? Krieg ich das einfach so oder muss ich das beantragen? Ich möchte dich mit so einem Kleinkram ungerne behelligen. Schöne Grüße --Martina talk 23:58, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Was passiert denn, wenn Du File:2012-05-13_Nordsee-Luftbilder_DSCF8961.jpg#mw-imagepage-section-filehistory aufrufst, und auf den zurücksetzen-Link in der Versionstabelle neben dem Bildchen klickst, auf das zurückgesetzt werden soll und dann bestätigst?

Please purge your browser’s cache or enable JavaScript in your Browser's settings. (You only need to do it once.)

Internet Explorer: press Ctrl+F5, Firefox: hold down ⇧ Shift while clicking Reload (or press Ctrl+⇧ Shift+R), Opera/Konqueror: press F5, Safari: hold down ⇧ Shift+alt while clicking Reload, Chrome: hold down ⇧ Shift while clicking Reload nicht vergessen -- RE rillke questions? 01:07, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

@Martina, ich habs jetzt mal selbst zurückgesetzt. Fürs Zurücksetzen benötigst du mit Sicherheit keine erweiterten Rechte, sonst wäre der Versions-Revert-Vandalismus, den es leider auch gibt, seitens neuer User garnicht möglich. Wie von Rainer angeregt kannst an deinem Bild ja ruhig einmal eine Hin-und-zurück-Revertsequenz "üben", schadet ja nicht. Schönen Feiertag. --Túrelio (talk) 07:43, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Ah, vielen Dank. Ich hab jetzt auch meinen Fehler begriffen: Ich hatte anstele der Bildhistorie den zurücksetzen-Button in der Versionsgeschichte genutzt (das betrifft aber offensichtlich nur die Bildbeschreibung - hat er zwar auch nicht gefressen, aber das ist ein anderes Thema). Mächtig blond... :-D Danke für die Nachhilfe! Test hat geklappt. --Martina talk 14:08, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Unser Städtisches Archiv möchte mit Wiki-Commons kooperieren, ...

Hallo Túrelio, ich arbeite seit Jan 2012 im Eisenacher Stadtarchiv und bin für die Erschließung unseres Bildarchivs zuständig. Es gibt dort 1000e Bilder, die auch von Interesse für Wiki-Commons wären: Aufnamen von Politikern, Künstlern, Hochadel, Gegenwartsgeschichte (Kaiserreich bis 1990er Jahre). Der Stadtarchivar hat mich gebeten, dazu mal erste Recherchen durchzuführen, einfach als Archiv anmelden und Bilder uploaden ist nicht, die Provinenz Stadtarchiv soll schon mit den Bildern verknüpft bleiben. Analog zum Bundesarchiv, Sächs. Staatsarchiv (o.ä.) müsste also ein Template (Arch-License) erstellt werden, mit unseren Lizenzbedingungen usw. Kennst Du Dich damit etwas besser aus? --Metilsteiner (talk) 07:22, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Metilsteiner, Super-Initiative! Leider habe ich bislang keinerlei eigene Erfahrung mit der "Einrichtung" solcher Projekte. Wenn du nicht gleich an die BuArchiv-Leute rangehen willst, könntest du User:Ra'ike mal ansprechen, die etwas ähnliches gemacht hat, nämlich Fotos einer großen Mineraliensammlung aus den USA "erschlossen". Wenn es sich beim Eisenacher Stadtarchiv vor allem um "Fremd"fotos dreht, wäre in Bezug auf den Copyright-Status vermutlich aber doch ein Kontakt mit unseren BuArchiv-Leuten sinnvoll. Generell dürfte auch eine Anfrage bei User:Raymond und/oder User:Elya hilfreich sein. --Túrelio (talk) 07:56, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Danke für die Tips, ich bin gespannt, was da alles zu beachten ist. Die Fotorechte sind ansonsten recht bunt verteilt, Glasplatten Eisenacer Stadtphotographen, Andenken- und Touristenfotos, meist graue Provinenz sprich Familienalben, die uns als Schenkungen vorliegen, das kann natürlich nicht mehr für das einzelne Bild zweifelsfrei entwirrt werden (wer hat z.B. 1951 auf den Auslöser gedrückt??). In einen Augen besonders wertvoll sind bspsw. auch Nachlässe/Schenkungen jüdischer Einwohner der Stadt. Ettliche Biographien mit Bildern sind in den vergangenen Jahren dazu in Büchern (z.B. Stolpersteine in Eisenach) verwendet worden, z.T. sogar gerade für eine Sonderausstellung im Thür. Landtag. Dank, Gruß und schönen Feiertag --Metilsteiner (talk) 09:09, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

please help

hi turelio, plesa help me. i upload this picture [File:Abdullah frères. Constantinople. Georgian. 1870.jpg] and i add licence information but i don't know is this free (public domain). if this is not free (public domain), please remove this... thanks --Rime 17:19, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi Rime, it seems to be correct. --Túrelio (talk) 19:15, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Oath.jpg

Is this image reportedly from a 1955 US film in the public domain? Either it is or its a flickrwash. Thank You Admin Turelio. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:04, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Uh oh, a still from a US film, complicated, as there are several potentially relevant factors due to the changes in US copyright regulations over time. I would recommend to ask an US native admin, such as User:Jameslwoodward. Surely the Flickr user is not really the author, even if he took the still from the original film. --Túrelio (talk) 08:42, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

• OK, Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:01, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Panagiotis Pikrammenos.jpg

There is no need to reupload this image in other projects as fair use, since there is a free alternative available. --Ferengi (talk) 07:16, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

O.k., gone. --Túrelio (talk) 07:29, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, I've checked global usage and delinker log and replaced all occurences with the png version. --Ferengi (talk) 10:30, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Cavalomen Cavalomen (talk · contribs)

Dear Turelio,

For a user with a 4 day old Commons account, this user is very familiar with Commons policies including typing in fake flickr passes in an Admin's name here and here and uploading a low resolution image with no metadata as own work here (its likely a copyvio) This user may be a sockpuppetter, I don't know but he/she should be banned for 3-4 weeks in this serious case. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:30, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Taken care of. --Túrelio (talk) 09:57, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

• You're welcome. --Leoboudv (talk) 18:39, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

File:INF3-85 Anti-litter.jpg

Yes indeed. I was just fixing that. How's that for you now? --Mr impossible (talk) 11:06, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Fine now. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 12:06, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Retrait du lien photo FG2006.jp (page François Garagnon)

Sommes étonnés de votre décision de supprimer la photo que nous avons utilisée après enregistrement sur WIKIMEDIA COMMONS. En effet, en tant qu'éditeurs de François Garagnon, nous sommes propriétaires de cette image, et détenteurs du copyright d'origine ! Le lien pour votre “Copyright violation” renvoie à un blog daté de mars 2011, alors que la photo a été prise… en décembre 2006 ! Nous réenregistrons donc cette image. Veuillez nous contacter si vous avez d'autres objections. Merci !∼∼∼∼MCeditions, 22-05-2012, 15h12

Hi MCeditions, even if the image had been shot in 2006, you have uploaded it at a later time (May 2012) than it was published on that blog (March 2011). This is a general suggestion that you might not be the author. In addition, you provided "MCeditions" as the author. If "MCeditions" is a company, then it is hardly the photographer, as this is usually a person with a personal name, and in Europe the photographer needs to be mentioned, except if he/she has expressedly renounced this moral right. I would therefore prefer that you send written statement about your rights over this image, the name of the photographer and the name to be credited by re-users (usually indentical to the photographer's name) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org thereby mentioning the filename File:FG2006.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 13:25, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

In addition, I hope that M. Garagnon has agreed to your uploading of his signature to Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 13:26, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Need some time

I try to help this user out. Can you hold a while before deleting all her images. Thank you ! --Zorion (talk) 14:20, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi Zorion, in cases where a permission from a third party has already been sent to OTRS, you may add {{OTRS-pending}} to the image page, which may hold deletion for a while. As many of her/his uploads had been tagged as no-permission already 1 week ago, they may get deleted by any admin. I case where you are rather sure, you will get a permission or something, you might just put a notice below or above the no-permission template on the image page. Please add File:Castor (Castor canadensis) qui se régale au milieu des algues qui recouvrent le lac..jpg to your to-do-list, though it hasn't been tagged as no-permission. --Túrelio (talk) 14:32, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Same sockpuppet but different account

You blocked the other account but the sockpuppet created another account and uploaded a new image and typed in another fake flickrpass in an Admin's name here. The flickr account is blacklisted I guess there are sockpuppets on Commons too sadly. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:32, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Do you remember the name of "the other account"? --Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment: It was Cavalomen from my message to you here a few days ago. It has to be the same user since the uploader types in the same Admin's flickrpass....as in the case above. I hope this helps. Goodnight from Vancouver, Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:45, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Account indef'd. FYI: Category:Sockpuppets of Heman25. --Túrelio (talk) 07:50, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

• Sure, no problem. --Leoboudv (talk) 04:00, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Get to know something

Hi Túrelio,

is my picture's R Di Matteo.jpg wrong? if its wrong will u help me to correct that? AshikSaha (talk) 07:40, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

As you can read from the problem message, the source page is not under a free license, but says "© Copyright The Power Of Sport". Though I am aware that the page, which you mentioned as the source, may not really be the true source (the photographer), that doesn't help your cause. We only accept images that were released under a free license by the legitimate rights holder (usually the photographer) or are PD due to age or similar. --Túrelio (talk) 07:46, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

File is longer?

I'm not understanding your comment in this diff. Image is longer? They are the exact same dimensions, just different filenames, which at most means slightly different compression levels. Otherwise they are the same image. I've never heard of file sizes being a reason to retain otherwise duplicate images. — Huntster (t @ c) 10:13, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Ähem, my edit-summary was "this version is longer on Commons.", i.e. priority of publication. The version, you wanted to replace was uploaded May 31, 2006, while the remaining version was uploaded May 9, 2007. Whether that is relevant in a case of a NASA-sourced image is debatable, of course. --Túrelio (talk) 12:32, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Aha! I was confused as to what "longer" was referring to, sorry about that. I didn't care which was deleted, really; I selected that file since the other was being used in articles. I'll place the dup tag on the newer file, transfer usage to the older one. — Huntster (t @ c) 19:54, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Category:Psekups

Hi, Túrelio. I think it's not right to remove category one minute after its creation. Why do I get a job twice. Even I was surprised, but a novice in my place would have been in despair :) Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:39, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Ähem, if I read the version log correctly, Category:Psekups was created March 6, 2011 by User:Bagratun. On March 22, 2012, that is 1 full year later, it was tagged for speedy deletion due to being empty by User:Kobac. About half an hour later it was deleted by me. So, I don't really understand you complaint. Anyway, as you re-created it, the problem seems to be solved. --Túrelio (talk) 12:46, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Sorry. Indeed, perhaps I have a page has not been preserved. Ю. Данилевский (talk)

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism/Jermboy27

Hi Túrelio, I've drafted a subpage for Jermboy's vandalism: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism/Jermboy27. Feel free to edit it! Mathonius (talk) 17:50, 27 May 2012 (UTC) P.S.: I've informed DerBorg as well.

Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 10:48, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Joe Vitale.jpg

Hello Túrelio, I have permission to upload File:Dr. Joe Vitale.jpg. Furthermore and email was sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. What should I do next upload different files or wait?

(Amyxcell (talk) 17:52, 28 May 2012 (UTC)) 5/28/12

Amy

Money For Lunch.jpg

Hello Túrelio, I have permission to upload File:Money For Lunch.jpg. Furthermore and email was sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. What should I do next upload different files or wait?

(Amyxcell (talk) 17:54, 28 May 2012 (UTC)) 5/28/12

Amy

Hi Amy, in both cases you can either wait til you get the o.k. from the OTRS volunteers who processes your permissions or the image can be conditionally be restored with an OTRS-pending tag. For further uploads of not-own images, you should clearly label them as such and you should ask for permission before or at the time of upload. --Túrelio (talk) 18:30, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio, thank you for the reply, can you please conditionally restored the images or what are the steps to conditionally restored the images?

BTW - I did have permission prior to upload. :)

(Amyxcell (talk) 19:07, 28 May 2012 (UTC))

O.k., I have temp-undeleted File:Dr. Joe Vitale.jpg and File:Money For Lunch.jpg now. --Túrelio (talk) 20:32, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Deletion discussion on en-wp

Hi Túrelio, if you have a minute, could you comment on this deletion discussion on en-wp please? It's about a file that was bot-transferred from Commons when you deleted it here, and I'm not quite sure what its status is now. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:05, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Well, it took more than a minute and I doubt that it will be of much help. --Túrelio (talk) 09:29, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks anyway :-) I asked User:Matanya, and he says the reason for the request was merely that it was superceded by a better image by the same photographer ([20], cf File:PikiWiki Israel 19524 quot;Lone Cypressquot; by Zadok Ben-David Tel A.JPG). Since it's not really a licensing issue, maybe the best course of action would actually be for you to restore it here? Because as long as the license is okay people will hardly want to delete it on en-wp, and that means sooner or later some friendly soul will move it back to Commons anyway. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:23, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Anna Katharina Schwabroh - Portrait.jpg

Hi Túrelio,

iam the owner of that picture, wich was deleted. I shoot it and i have the permission from Anna Katharina Schwabroh. 10:45, 29 May 2012 Túrelio (talk | contribs) deleted page File:Anna Katharina Schwabroh - Portrait.jpg (Copyright violation: per watermark (C) Enrico Schick) (global usage; delinker log)

What can I do?

Kind regards Enrico

Hi, please do what I told you earlier at File talk:Anna Katharina Schwabroh - Portrait.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 14:36, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

File:GY 2011-03-18 Beaucourt.JPG

Hello Túrelio,

L'auteur Frédéric Gerchambeau est l'auteur de la photo copyrightée (© 2009 Frédéric Gerchambeau) reprise par l'affiche de concerts de Gabriel Yacoub. Il vient à l'instant de me donner par mail son accord pour publier librement sur wiki (en particulier sur la page "Liste des tournées de concerts de Gabriel Yacoub" http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_des_tourn%C3%A9es_de_concerts_de_Gabriel_Yacoub) mes photos de son affiche : comment faire valoir cela (pour faire interrompre le processus de suppression de ce fichier jpeg) ? D'avance merci, Lurulu (talk) 11:12, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Frédéric Gerchambeau is the ownner of the copyright (© 2009) of the photograph from the promotional poster of Gabriel Yacoub's concerts. He just confirmed to me by mail that he doesn't mind if I publish on wiki (in particular on the wiki article "Liste des tournées de concerts de Gabriel Yacoub" http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_des_tourn%C3%A9es_de_concerts_de_Gabriel_Yacoub) my own photographs of his poster : how can I prove to you this deal between Frédéric Gerchambeau and I (in order to interrupt the process of deletion of this jpeg file) ? Thanx in advance, Lurulu (talk) 11:12, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi Lurulu, see Commons:OTRS/fr how to send a permission from a rights holder. After you have sent or forwarded his permission, drop me a note. Anway, I will now change the copyvio-tag to no-permission, which give you more time. --Túrelio (talk) 12:08, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, but Frédéric Gerchanbeau just wrote to me that I should obtain the permission from the artist Gabriel Yacoub to use his photograph from the poster. I don't think I could obtain that permission. So you can delete this jpeg file! Lurulu (talk) 12:23, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

O.k.,  Done. In case you get the permission, you can request undeletion. --Túrelio (talk) 12:29, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Enfant 18 mois difficultes respiratoires.ogv

The {{own}} tag is also valid for the child (i.e. I am the father) ;-) Do I have to write it anywhere?

Cdang (talk) 09:40, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

OK, I placed a {{consent}} tag. THanks for having warning me about the issue.

Cdang (talk) 09:47, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I hope your son will get better soon. --Túrelio (talk) 09:55, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for her (it's a girl -- at this age, its quite hard to tell...). She needs a bit of assistance (i.e. O₂) for a few days, the time her body fights the virus, so she's OK except that she's not at home and has a few tubes around her. Not bad, just annoying.

Best regards

Cdang (talk) 11:15, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

BMW M328

Hi, I thought the pic was okay, because Flickr says this image has a Creative Commons licence? Thanks, 1292simon (talk) 10:02, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Well, no. Not all CC-licenses are allowed on Wikimedia projects. Allowed are CC-BY, CC-BY-SA and CC-0. Not allowed are CC-..-NC (as the above image), CC-..-ND and CC-..-NC-ND. On Flickr you can recognize NC-restricted image by the striken-through $ sign. --Túrelio (talk) 10:06, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Clemens Ernst Peter Bruckmann (* 13. Januar 1865 in Heilbronn; † 2. März 1937 ebenda), Porträt angefertigt 1920 von Karl Konrad Friedrich Bauer (* 7. Juli 1868 in Stuttgart; † 6. Mai 1942 in München).jpg

Hallo Túrelio,

das Gemälde ist vermutlich gar nicht von dem 1942 verstorbenen Bauer, sondern von jemand anders und vielleicht erst 1955 entstanden; siehe hier. Messina liest leider oft die Texte seiner Quellen, ob gedruckt oder Internet, nicht richtig und schreibt manchen Blödsinn in die Beschreibungen. Undelete in 2013 halte ich jedenfalls für nicht gerechtfertigt. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 16:14, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

O.k. bzgl. Undelete; das basiert nur auf der ursprünglichen DR-Rationale. Mit der von dir verlinkten Info wird die Sache natürlich äusserst kompliziert. Hoffen wir das die DR-Diskussion ein paar Experten anzieht. --Túrelio (talk) 16:20, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Löschen von Bildern

Hallo Túrelio, kannst du bitte folgende Bilder schnellst möglich löschen File:Lotto King Karl u. Schwichti.jpg und File:J. & J. Schwichtenberg 01.jpg. Die Mutter der beiden Kinder sitz mir im Nacken und fordert das löschen beider Bilder, wegen Persönlichkeitsverletzung usw. Sie droht mit dem Anwalt und um einen möglichen Rechtsstreit zu vermeiden binn ich auch der Meinung die beiden Bilder sollten entfernt werden. Ein großer Verlust für Commons sind sie auch nicht. Einen Antrag auf Löschung der möchte ich auch nicht machen, das dauert mit zu lange. Vielen Dank im Vorraus. Gruß --Huhu Uet 16:34, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 16:21, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Vielen Dank nochmal --Huhu Uet 18:49, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Cristina D'avena

Hi,the photo [21] is mine! I put the original to show that I just cut!--Romeparis (talk) 18:51, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Hoever, you should find out, who uploaded your image to http://www.cristinadavena.it/imgs/GALLERY/Eventi/ 3 days after your upload to Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 20:48, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Bülent YAŞARSOY's e-mail

resimlerin altına "Bülent YAŞARSOY tarafından çekilmiştir" diye not düşebilirsin

izin istediğin için ayrıca teşekkür ediyorum sana

(About File:2012VenusTransitCakabey2.JPG) bulent.yasarsoy@gmail.com BetelgeuSeginus (talk) 10:35, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't speak Turkish. Do you want to say that the original photographer has sent a permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org)? --Túrelio (talk) 10:38, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes, i'm. but I do not know how to makeBetelgeuSeginus (talk) 10:43, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

See the instructions at Commons:OTRS. You need to copy the boxed permission template on that page to your computer and then enter all the filenames (or complete URLs) of the image from that site, then the name of the license of choice and then mail it all to the rights holder/photographer and ask him to read, agree (if he will) and to "sign" (put his full name and the date below it) it and to mail it back to the above mentioned email address. --Túrelio (talk) 10:46, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Done.BetelgeuSeginus (talk) 11:04, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Re Hitler postcards

Thanks for your message. I'm working my way through a folder of old stuff, most of which was given to me by a fellow student many years ago who was given it by her mother. I believe it came originally from her Jewish grandmother who was German. It contains all sorts of things, e.g. some very interesting posters for display in primary schools, old newspaper cuttings and several postcards. I kind of guessed people would wonder whether what I was posting was original or not. I checked some old postcards on pages covering German student fraternities and saw that people had licensed them as their own work. Also, the image of the electoral map on the Hitler's rise to power page has also been so licensed, even though it is clearly either a photograph or a scan of someone's original. That made me think I was covered if I stated "Scan of ..." whatever it was, to make it clear that I had made the image of an original. One thing I'm pretty sure of is that the copyright has lapsed through the original publisher being defunct (at least one would think so). I'm sorry I don't actually understand your instruction of what I am supposed to do with the back of the postcards. There is nothing on the backs except a box for the stamp and lines for writing a message. Since this is problematical, I think you should just delete those images if you are authorised to do so. They're proving more trouble than they're worth. Kim Traynor (talk) 13:12, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi, while I am surely authorized to delete, I would prefer to keep these historially interesting images, but we need to be sure about its copyright status. I asked to scan the backside, because it usually/often contains information about the publisher and the photographer, the date of issue and possibly other useful information, which would allow us to assess the copyright status. --Túrelio (talk) 13:17, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Nope. There's not a sausage on the reverse side. While they are great images for illustrative purposes, they're not crucial. I'd really like to find pages where I could post some of the Nazi propaganda used in schools, e.g. the duty of German children to collect old bones, but I haven't found appropriate places yet. Kim Traynor (talk) 13:21, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

If the image is deleted from Commons, you can still fair-use it locally at :en. --Túrelio (talk) 13:22, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, that's beyond me. I don't know my way round all the nuances of the various copyright licences. Much of what I post is indisputably my own work, so I just stick to the 'own work' licence most of the time. I've also just spotted your message about the image I posted on the Forth Bridge page. I did the write-up on the 'Forth Bridge Raid', so it was a happy coincidence, or so I thought, that I could also illustrate it. That's what got me started on rummaging through this old folder of bits and pieces from the period. The Forth Bridge pic is on a single, rapidly crumbling page from a newspaper which I assume no longer exists, or, if it does, will no longer have any interest in laying claim to a piece clearly devised somewhere in Goebbbels' Propaganda Ministry. Do you think? Kim Traynor (talk) 13:31, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Why should this be beyond you? Please see en:Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline for instruction and this image as an example. About your last sentences: well, we have Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle, which would not allow such a rationale. I know that copyright sometimes is a pain, but we can't make political distinctions. Recently, from a :de Wikipedia article about the Nazi attempt to manipulate/pervert Christmas traditions in Germany, we had to remove a "poem" by Goebbels as it his "works" are still copyrighted; surely a pain, believe me, but we have to wait til end of 2015. --Túrelio (talk) 13:38, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

OK. I'll try to take in the guidelines once more. Have to go now because I'm due to visit a care home and am already late. Maybe we can resume discussion later if I need further clarification. I am actually quite familiar with British copyright laws, but despite what exists on paper, no-one is ever really ever worried if use of an image is not denying someone revenue. I know the situation is different in other countries and Wikipedia can hardly be guided by that! Kim Traynor (talk) 13:46, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello again. I've read the page on non-free content (and some linked pages) you recommended I should, and have come to the conclusion that I can't justify the inclusion of those images in terms of the fair-use rationale. They are neither specifically linked to the main text nor irreplaceable by free images. By the way, the example you gave of the Israeli child's drawing didn't really fit because in that case permission had been given. Also, I was wrong about the old German postcards. They are actually licensed under pdf-old-70 because the artist died in the 1920s. I'm not so sure if "irreplaceability" could be argued for the Forth Bridge newspaper extract, if there are free-use pics from the raid out there somewhere; though not, I bet, from the Luftwaffe perspective. Kim Traynor (talk) 16:04, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Well, in regard to the Israeli child's drawing, there was actually not the necessary permission, because though the material drawing was given to Mrs. Lipi, the copyright is still with the child. Therefore, the Israeli MFA couldn't provide a free license, as making a photography of an work of art doesn't transfer the artists copyright to the photographer. Otherwise, I would have uploaded it to Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 16:58, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I understand; but it's new to me that an image can be on Wikipedia without it first being held by Commons, as I thought that's where all images on Wikipedia have to come from. I've been posting a lot of images over the past year, but they are almost all my own work, so I don't normally have to do much head-scratching about copyright. These latest images are very much the exception, so I'm not surprised that I've got things wrong. Also, I often think of works of art that would enhance pages, but am terrified to add them because of fears regarding copyright. I'm sure guidelines I've read say one shouldn't use images found on the internet, but I seem to come across a lot of old paintings where contributors give a web address as a link to the internet image they've posted. Kim Traynor (talk) 23:24, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Notification

Hi, I have (slightly obliquely) referred to you in a Wikipedia Arbcom case against me here as I have used your reference to apparent canvassing material on Wikipedia Review here. If you wish to comment in that case, please take care to read the guidelines at the top of the RFAr page. The relevant sentence was "Though I did not take a screen capture at the time I did cut & paste the title text as used here and it was referenced on Commons:AN by a Commons Administrator as evidence of off-wiki canvassing." Thanks --Fæ (talk) 15:32, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi Fæ, thanks for notifying. No problem with mentioning my reasoning at Arbcom. As I am not familiar with Arbcom things, I would comment there only if you think it's absolutely necessary. --Túrelio (talk) 19:09, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Probably best to stay clear. Personally, I find the fact that I am being forced by Arbcom to use the word "faggotry" to make a case in a public discussion makes me feel disgusted enough to be sick. I think my experience shows that Wikimedia projects and the Foundation have no effective process for dealing with open harassment of minority groups. --Fæ (talk) 21:25, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Help

Can you help me transfer this picture to commons? If you can't then do you know how can do it? Thanks!Trongphu (talk) 05:52, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi, did you try using CommonsHelper, that has a direct link in the paragraph "Licensing" on the image page? --Túrelio (talk) 06:17, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Sorry if I sound rude but I wouldn't ask you for help if I could do it by myself! I have never done it before. Plus I have a really bad experiences with this crap before so I don't want to entangle myself into things I'm not familiar with! I hate doing things like this! So the your answer is "you can't help me"? Trongphu (talk) 18:43, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

O.k., the first thing in such cases is to check whether the current licensing of the image on :en is plausible. In this case it is not, at least not to me. Therefore I have asked the original uploader for comment[22]. As he is only sporadically online, his reply may take some time. --Túrelio (talk) 18:53, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

It would be nice if Trongphu didn't crosspost everywhere. Just letting Túrelio know. [23] [24] [25] [26] Killiondude (talk) 07:21, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Album Covers

You deleted a CD album cover I was trying to upload. I was reading up on it earlier and I thought I had done everything right. Could you explain to me the proper procedure for uploading that type of copyrighted image? Obviously it's allowed... Wikipedia's full of them! Thanks. Aeromob (talk) 08:19, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Though it wasn't deleted by me, I had tagged it for deletion. Album covers that contain more than plain text are copyrighted. Therefore you need a written permission from the rights holder before you can upload such an image under a free license to Commons. The cover images on Wikipedia have likely been uploaded claiming "fair use", which means they are fully copyrighted and not under under a free license, but can be used due to the fair-use doctrine of US copyright law. However, fair-use material is not allowed on Commons. You need to upload it locally at :en (or at the project where you want to use the image, provided it allows fair-use at all). --Túrelio (talk) 08:30, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Twitter logo

Thanks for the help with fixing this. Yesterday, the Twitter logos were fouled up when some users uploaded Larry the Bird over the existing versions. As w:Twitter explains, there are now three different versions of the logo, and they are all needed for use in the article. The two previous versions should not be overwritten by Larry the Bird.--Ianmacm (talk) 08:20, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Use of one of your photographs

We seek you approval to use photograph number 79 on the cover of EuroVista Journal. The is a Journal produced by the Department of Local Government Studies at the University of Birmingham. If approval is granted could you please let me know how you wish your photograph to be attributed?

Many thanks

Amanda Williams EuroVista Administrator

Hi Amanda, I have no idea what you mean by "photograph number 79". In general all my images uploaded to Commons can be freely re-used, if the license terms are met. As I release all my own images under the Creative-Commons-Attribution-ShareAlike license, a credit (Photo: (C) Túrelio (via Wikimedia-Commons), CC-BY-SA) should be added, preferably in close vicinity to the used image. But if you tell me to which image exactly you are refering to, I can tell you whether there are other terms to be met. If the cover page willbe available/visible online, I would like to know the URL. --Túrelio (talk) 08:30, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Request to use photo number 79 -car with broken window

Dear Turelio

Am very new to this page and I did send a message yesterday but now it does not seem to appear so I am messaging again.

We request permission to use photo number 79 in a Journal called EuroVisata. This Journal is published by The Institute of Local Government Studies at the University of Birmingham in England. We wish to use your photo on the cover of the Journal. If permission is granted could you please let me know the correct attribution.

Many thanks

Amanda Williams EuroVista Administrator

amanda.williams11@btopenworld.com

HI Amanda, your message did appear and I did answer; please see 2 paragraphs above "Use of one of your photographs". As you finally gave a hint about which image you are talking, I assume you are refering to File:Drogenbeschaffungskriminalitaet 9526.jpg, right? As this is completely my own work, the credit should be as written in my first answer. --Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Uploaded New Version problem

Hello Túrelio, have to bother you with a problem on File:Major William Redmond bust, Wexford city.jpg, where I uploaded a cleaned up version, but the old version still shows on the file page itself and on my personal File Liste. In the past an uploaded new version replaced the old image immediately. I am sure you can resolve it. Thanks and Greetings Osioni (talk) 10:00, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Seems to be the usual cache problem. When I looked at the image on the image page and in your upload list, I always saw the clean version. Empty your browser cache and/or try the Purge-button. --Túrelio (talk) 10:20, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your helpful suggestion. My browser cache is empty (on permanent delete after shut down), but I still see the old version. Good to know the update is visable to others. I have no "Purge button", and see it is not always advised. Don't want to bother you with an apparent problem at my Vista IE end, just wondering why it still inks to the older version? Osioni (talk) 08:55, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

The "Purge button" should be visible on the image page in the line above the file name, starting from left with "File", "discussion", etc. I use XP IE. --Túrelio (talk) 14:06, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

It's likely in the vector-dropdown next to the search-bar. And try to

Please purge your browser’s cache or enable JavaScript in your Browser's settings. (You only need to do it once.)

Internet Explorer: press Ctrl+F5, Firefox: hold down ⇧ Shift while clicking Reload (or press Ctrl+⇧ Shift+R), Opera/Konqueror: press F5, Safari: hold down ⇧ Shift+alt while clicking Reload, Chrome: hold down ⇧ Shift while clicking Reload while visiting the file in concern. But sometimes one of the file resolution does not update. This seems to be a server-problem.

(hat McZusatz auch schon im Forum angesprochen) -- RE rillke questions? 21:15, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Danke für alle die Hinweisen. Leider besitze ich einen deutschen Notebook mit einer deutschen Version von Vista. An und für sich kein Problem, nur gibt's nirgends einen "Purgebutton" zu sehen, leider nicht mal im Google herunterzuladen. (A Purge button can be downloaded only for the Englich Vista). Oddly I do see my tidied up image in the related w:Willie Redmond article, but not on the Commons nor on my upload list. Maybe it will resolve itself in time? Osioni (talk)

Ähem, der "Purgebutton", wie ich das genannt habe, hat aber weder mit deinem PC noch mit dem Betriebssystem etwas zu tun (sollte jedenfalls nicht). Wenn du eine Bildseite auf Commons aufrufst (z.B. File:Flickr - Israel Defense Forces - Pipe Bomb Captured in Askar.jpg), dann solltest auf der Seite oberhalb des Dateinamens eine ganze Reihe von Karteireitern (engl. tabs) sehen, die - von links anfangend - mit Datei, Diskussion, Bearbeiten, ... Purge beschriftet sind (vorausgesetzt du hast Deutsch als Sprache eingestellt). Auf den mit Purge beschrifteten Reiter musst du klicken. --Túrelio (talk) 15:42, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Danke nochmals, dass ist sehr hilfreich, alles ist ja auf Deutsch eingestellt (ich habe viele jahrzehnte lang in Bayern gewohnt und gearbeitet). Neben bei gesagt, ich muss zum Ausdruck bringen, dass ich deinen pausenlosen Einsatz sehr schätze und bewündere !! Osioni (talk) 16:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello lads, before I wrote all of that I should have first tried the suggested "Internet Explorer: press Ctrl-F5" - seh mal da - es hat doch funktioniert! All images are now updated. Danke schon!! Prima' Es grüsst Osioni (talk) 15:46, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Deine Bemerkung auf meiner Benutzerdiskussion bezüglich Commons:Deletion requests/File:Banknote-Composition.jpg

Ich akzeptiere zwar die teilweise Entfernung meiner Anmerkung in der oben verlinkten Löschdiskussion, da meine scharfe, aber berechtigte Kritik am Herrn Jankowski tatsächlich nur am Rande mit der dortigen Thematik zu tun hatte, ich verwehre mich aber entschieden dagegen, dass dies eine persönliche Attacke sein soll. Es ist auch nicht alleine die URV, die jenes "Kunstwerk" so problematisch macht, es ist die Darstellung selbst. Ein Geldschein ist schließlich auch ein nationales Hoheitszeichen und die fälschliche Einfügung des berühmtesten US-amerikanischen Präsidenten Abraham Lincoln auf einem irakischen Geldschein spielt mit der These, der Irak sei eine US-amerikanische Kolonie geworden. Dies würden sicherlich viele Iraker als schwerwiegende Beleidigung auffasssen.(Die Hintergründe dürften bekannt sein.) Daher auch meine Empörung über den Herrn Jankowski, was er getan hat, ist nicht nur rechtlich fragwürdig, es ist geschmacklos und in menschlicher Hinsicht eine Gemeinheit.

Außerdem würde ich gerne wissen, was es in Bezug auf diese Datei überhaupt zu diskutieren gibt. Der Tatbestand der Urheberrechtsverletzung ist nach meinem Dafürhalten eindeutig, dazu der provokante, nationale Empfindlichkeiten treffende Bildinhalt, also warum sowas nicht gleich löschen. Es erscheint mir beinahe so, dass einige der hiesigen Admins einschl. Dir selber den Zweck von Commons nicht ganz verstehen bzw. falsch interpretieren. Auffallend in diesem Zusammenhang ist z. B., dass es hier eine Menge Dateien gibt, die nur in bestimmten Ländern der Erde gemeinfrei, in anderen dagegen (noch) geschützt sind. Dies widerspricht schon dem Projektnamen Commons, also Gemeinsames, Allgemeines etc. Hier sollte demzufolge nur abrufbar und vorhanden sein, was in allen (nationalen bzw. regionalen) Teilprojekten rechtlich einwandfrei verwendbar ist, also angesichts der fast globalen Verbreitung von Wikipedia nur solche Medien, die praktisch überall auf der Welt(vielleicht mit Ausnahme von Nordkorea oder Syrien?) legal sind.--IusticiaBY (talk) 00:00, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Sansushi.jpg

Eduardo P (talk) 23:57, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

In case this was meant as a deletion request, it has already been performed by colleague Russavia. --Túrelio (talk) 06:23, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Your added tag on the artworks by Mall Nukke

Hallo! You have added the 'no permission since|month=June|day=6|year=2012' tag to three of my uploaded pictures in [[27]], although I explicitly mentioned as the Source - Given by the author... Now I asked the author to send an extra e-mail to the permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, which she told she did. Are there any other problems, or can the tag be removed? Kaarel (talk) 21:26, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

In case you are refering to File:Odysseuse-eksirannakud-1992-3.jpg, you only wrote "Given by the author". Don't take it personal, but in the real world of Commons that has not value at all. In all cases of copyrighted works, uploaded by somebody else than the original author, a permission verified by OTRS is necessary. I hope the "extra e-mail" from the author has all the information required; otherwise you should use the template in Commons:OTRS. --Túrelio (talk) 21:45, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

I asked the author to use in her e-mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org the form provided by the template you added ([[28]])... Has she not done so, or is that still not enough? Kaarel (talk) 08:17, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

I can't tell you as I am not an OTRS volunteer. It usually takes some days for the processing. However, you can add {{OTRS pending}} to every image covered by this permission. This give you more time and prevents premature deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 09:55, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Riviera di Levante Sole.png

Are you sure? The uploader is a recurrent copyvioler, here and on it.wiki. --Esculapio (talk) 16:57, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

I am only sure, that http://www.etineris.net/it/blog/rodi-garganico-vertice-marino-del-triangolo-degli-agrumi.html is not the original source for that image. The image on that site has only 490x253 pixels and is in an article posted on 29 luglio 2011. In addition it is cropped in relation to "our" version, which has 643x480 pixels and was uploaded on May 4, 2010 to Commons and 1 month earlier to :it. Of course, the image may still be copyvio, but we need to know the true source. --Túrelio (talk) 18:00, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Stockbasis2

User Stockbasis2 has removed the flickr blacklist tag from many images today I see--not just this one. Thought you should know this. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:11, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

All reverted. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 08:24, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

• I hope that someone else checks flickrreview for images from blacklisted accounts in case someone removes the flickrreview note that the image is from such an account. Best Regards from Canada and Goodnight, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:51, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Erich Honecker 1981 cropped.jpg

Hi JJ Georges, cropping or retouching an image from somebody else, does not make you the author. I have therefore corrected your wrong authorship entry. --Túrelio (talk) 16:11, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Woops, my bad, I worked too quickly. JJ Georges (talk) 12:12, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Media issues

I'm new to Wikipedia, and I've wanted to contribute some great images, but I have no knowledge on how to work with the copyright so the images don't stay. If I could get some help on it, that'd be great!

Pierce97x (talk) 16:10, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

See Commons:First steps for a tutorial (if english is not your first language, the tutorial is also available in many other languages). A basic principle is, if you originally created the image (which you want to upload), you are free to choose any license, that is compatible with Commons. However, if you are not the original creator of the image, you have to provide evidence that its creator has indeed released it under a free license. So, your upload File:White-stripes-conan.jpg was obviously not created by yourself. You have put only the word "Antiquiet" as the source, which is rather useless, as nobody knows what that means and there is no easy way to check whether your claim is true. Only when I discovered that you had put the actual source link (which should have gone into the source entry) into the license template, I could check the external site. However, the external site is not under a free license and I didn't find any evidence that "Johnny Firecloud" has released this image as PD. --Túrelio (talk) 20:24, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Cordyceps.store.tibet.jpg removal

Recently you removed this photo due to prohibition from commercial or derivative works. Since the photo is not being used for commercial purposes and was not altered, I am wondering why it was removed. An explanation would be appreciated when you get around to it. Thanks. Jatlas2 (talk) 18:22, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi Jatlas2, per our founding policy Commons accepts only images that are free also for commercial use and for making derivative of it. You probably uploaded an image from Flickr, where many users put their image under a CC license, which forbids commercial use (NC) and/or derivative works (ND). So, the problem does not deriva from your intended way of use, but from our general policy. We also don't allow fair-use, as opposed to :en wikipedia. --Túrelio (talk) 20:13, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for clearing that up, I appreciate it. Happy editing... Jatlas2 (talk) 16:55, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Blacklist

I guess that Commons will have many blacklisted images since Stockbasis2 can simply revert your edits and the images still remain here. This is another example. It would have been better if images from blacklisted flickr accounts were deleted within 12 hours with a notice given to the uploader. Its unfortunate. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:21, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying me. I've blocked him for 1 week and reverted all his edits. Of course, though the account is black-listed not all image need to be copyvios. I'll have to check what's our SOP in such cases.

RE: your proposal: post it on COM:AN or COM:VP an ask for comment. --Túrelio (talk) 06:43, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment: I will think about this. We all want to AGF but sometimes it does not work out as we all wish sadly. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:47, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

The blacklist is on Commons:Questionable Flickr images/Users (warning: large list) and the ids are added to User:FlickreviewR/bad-authors so the bot is aware of them. You can request additions to that list on Commons talk:Questionable Flickr images. Regards -- RE rillke questions? 10:13, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

@Rainer, die Frage in diesem Fall ist eher, löschen wir alle von einem badlist-Flickrkonto stammenden Dateien pauschal oder ist doch eine (im Zweifelsfall mühsame) Einzelbildprüfung angesagt. --Túrelio (talk) 10:17, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Und eine weitere: Öffnen wir die Liste, so dass auch Lizenzprüfer sie bearbeiten können? -- RE rillke questions? 10:33, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Und: Wollen wir löschen oder nur solche Reverts des FlickreviewRs von Nutzern verhindern, die keine Lizenzprüfer, Patroller oder Administrator sind? Das ginge auch einfach mit dem Missbrauchsfilter. -- RE rillke questions? 10:33, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

He, ich hatte mir eine einfache Antwort erhofft, keine weiteren Fragen. ;-) --Túrelio (talk) 10:53, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Please stop this

Why did you undo my courtesy blanking. I am intending on leaving this project. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 15:18, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Read my initial edit-summary, then you know what to do. --Túrelio (talk) 15:19, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

You need to stop this. Please see wikipedia:wikipedia:courtesy blanking. I am just very stressed out at this point. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 15:22, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

First, we are at Commons not at Wikipedia. Anyway, the conditions mentioned on :en aren't met here. I might be sorry that you are stressed, but you first put stress on a number of other people, first of all on Jameslwoodward. As I told you in my edit-summary, you may retract your desysop-request, but this should be done per a verbal statement by yourself, not by deleting a request page with many comments from other users. It's like in the real world: if you publish a wrong statement about somebody in the public, then you need to put the correction also into the public. --Túrelio (talk) 15:27, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Just as a note, I did request to end it. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 15:29, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

O.k., I've asked for an uninvolved colleague to close it. --Túrelio (talk) 15:32, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

I'd like to annotate that C3F2k stole my and DSchwen's and perhaps also Magnus' spare time, if he has E-Mail on talk-page changes enabled. After seeing all this fuss, I am not inclined to do anything voluntary for this user in future unless I see a more friendly language and someone who reads messages with care before "responding". If C3F2k feels having too much spare time, C3F2k can read Commons:Welcome and find a useful hobby there. I made the experience that one can talk with Jim in case one disagrees and, if one uses a nice language, one receives a nice response. C3F2k should ask himself how knowledgeable (s)he is in the area (s)he engaged to work and perhaps whether this only free content would prohibit a lot more, if strictly applied to Commons due to other laws than pure copyright law and whether it is the right way to start a de-sysop as a response of one or two disagreements with the user in concern. Regards -- RE rillke questions? 17:25, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

File:DOSB 2012-04-24.ogv

Moin du. :-) Kannst du die ältere version (mit geschützer Musik) löschen? (Wo frage ich sowas offiziell an, damit ich nicht immer meinen Commons-Lieblingsadmin belästigen muss?) LG --Martina talk 13:39, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

{done}}. Du kannst ganz normal eine speedy mit der Vorgabe Versionslöschung (version deletion) und der Rationale "copyrighted audio track" stellen; ansonsten geht natürlich auch COM:AN. Gruß nach Hamburg. --Túrelio (talk) 13:54, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Ah okay, die Variante version deletion kannte ich noch nciht. Danke und dir ein schönes Wochenende. --Martina talk 14:13, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

File:500 Topiary.jpg

hello :) why this image violates any copyright? The museum says expressly: Freedom and sharing of photos and the photo is a my work--Pava (talk) 10:08, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

This (car and dog) is a work of contemporary art and thereby copyrighted. The museum is not the artist/creator of that work. Any reproduction needs the permission of the original artist. Besides, 1Veertje explained that already to you. --Túrelio (talk) 12:09, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Cevad Prekazi Türk Telekom.jpg

Hi Ultraslansi, is this poster permanently installed or temporarily? --Túrelio (talk) 12:55, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi, It was temporarily for Galatasaray-Manisaspor match --Ultraslansi (talk) 13:00, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks and sorry, as then it cannot stay, because freedom-of-panorama exemption of copyright in Turkey requires permanent installation, as in most other countries. --Túrelio (talk) 13:04, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

File:! Ford B 1923.JPG

Moin Túrelio!

Soll das eim Trollantrag sein oder ist das wirklich ernst gemeint? Wüste nicht was an diesem Bild auszusetzen ist, eigenes Werk keine Urheberrechsverletzung, das fotografieren von Autos ist in Deutschland nicht Verboten (Panoramafreiheit usw.) --Huhu Uet 14:45, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

'Nabend. Bei solchen Begründungen "nthmögık;İaaagnı45265" und "kcnucjkusmakmcmjuv" doch offensichtlich. Schon von Denniss revertiert. Hätte aber auch keiner hier gelöscht. Hast du einen Feind in Ankara? ;-) --Túrelio (talk) 14:36, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Dacht ich mir doch schon, und ne, Feinde in Ankara eigentlich nicht, war noch nie dort. Komm meist nicht weiter weg, wie ein Misthaufen stinkt ;-). --Huhu Uet 20:16, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Territorio Onda Siena.png

Is it possible to delete the first version of this picture (the one of the 13th June 2012)? The map was partially wrong. --PMM (talk) 14:41, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:32, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

File:10ng93wu49h93h.jpg

I am inclined to delete all the user's uploads. Tell me your thoughts. -- RE rillke questions? 14:42, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Seems justified. I would just recommend to check every 10th of his uploads for copyvio (3 are already marked by me) and if positive, deleted them all. --Túrelio (talk) 14:49, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Halifax shipyard cranes 2.png

I don't think this re-direct needs to exist. It only went to my gallery an a bot log that tweaked it. All up to you of course. Feel free to delete this post as well--Canoe1967 (talk) 18:32, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

O.k.,  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:39, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Wegen deiner Frage

hier: Ja, das war ich. Ich hatte sie dann wieder zurückgezogen, weil ich eigentlich keine Werke von fremden Urhebern mehr hochladen will. Aber ok, du hast es trotzdem wiederhergestellt, passt schon, rechtlich ist es ja keine Problem. Ich war jetzt ne Weile inaktiv und hab mich umbenennen lassen, deshalb kommt die Anwort etwas spät :-) Steak (talk) 10:14, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Deleting a renamed category

Hallo Túrelio, besser, oder? ;-) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ∇) 23:37, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Ja, Danke. Ich hatte das selbst gesehen, nachdem die Löschung erfolgt war, es aber nicht mehr der Mühe für wert befunden. Die speedy-Skripte funktionieren leider nicht so selten anders als sie sollten. --Túrelio (talk) 06:01, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Achso, ein Scriptfehler, okay.

Dank dir für's Verschieben auf meine Diskussionsseite! Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ∇) 12:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Sativasur cabalgata2.jpg

I think you've made a mistake in deleting this redirect, the file has been here since 2010. Whether the redirect is currently "in use" is not a criteria for it's deletion, there's external uses to consider and previous use in articles, page histories and non-wikilinked mention on talk pages. We normally keep redirects unless there is a good reason not to :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 21:13, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Well, the cited deletion rationale was just the one by User:SLV100, who had speedy-tagged it. I've now Google-checked the web for "Sativasur_cabalgata2" and found no hits. If you still want to have it back, I can restore it. I'm just fearing the moment when Commons has more redirs than actual files. --Túrelio (talk) 21:22, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I would like it back, I will post a message on SLV100's page too. Personally I wonder about the day when we have more deleted files than actual files :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 21:54, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks :-). I think we just wanted the last revision restored (with the redirect, not the whole image :-). Might be easier to just delete it and recreate it as a redirect? --Tony Wills (talk) 21:31, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

I don't know what went wrong the first time, but I repeated the whole procedure and now it's o.k. --Túrelio (talk) 07:46, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

venezuela, piroa localisation map

i found this map on this site: http://www.populationdata.net/indexcarte.php?option=pays&mid=295&pid=227&nom=venezuela-relief which is under creative commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 2.5) and it is written under the map that the source is the CIA.

i wrote it in the sources on the image page also (i completed with the ling to populationdata.net but it is useless: the source is the CIA)

i put my name, along with CIA on the info because I édited the map: i've translated some names in french and used red for localisation of the piroas. --SyntaxTerror (talk) 10:52, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

O.k., thanks. The description is netter now. I will removed to no-source tag. I only wonder whether the original map was really created by the CIA, as it looks like usual commercial maps. It would be great if you could do some research on that. For example by running the "original" map file itself, http://www.populationdata.net/images/cartes/ameriques/amerique-du-sud/venezuela/venezuela_relief.jpg, through Google-image-search[29] tyring to find the same map with a more trustsome (than "CIA") credit. --Túrelio (talk) 11:01, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

i'm not interested to search if this map is from CIA: i know it already. if you knew internet world maps better, you would have recognised immediatly a CIA map. this work is for the french wikipedia, so let the credits in french, thanks.--SyntaxTerror (talk) 12:25, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

File:PhilipHammond DefenceSec.jpg

Please don't upload this to en.wikipedia, it's not a fair use image. There's already a free image of him which I'm about to restore to articles. One Night In Hackney (talk) 07:32, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi, you are talking to the wrong person ;-). I only notified the fair-use folks: see this image which is highly used on :en, will be deleted from Commons. Check whether you want to "fair-use" it on :en. So, it's a decision that will be made on :en. --Túrelio (talk) 07:35, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Well you added the template, so I assumed you were going to upload it? It's no longer used on en, we don't use fair use images of anything if there's a free equivalent, and there's a free equivalent. I've removed the image from the articles it was used in, so should it just be deleted like the others? One Night In Hackney (talk) 07:38, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, I should also have mentioned by "removed" I actually meant reverted to the free image. One Night In Hackney (talk) 07:43, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 07:44, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Please delete my photo

Hello....I appreciate the fact that you like "File:Sunrise 10-20-12", however, it was only up-loaded for a discussion that was going on in the Sunrise talk section a while back. That discussion is over and the relevant text has been removed as well as the photo. Also, I have two sister photos up-loaded that are nearly identical without the telephone pole in the foreground. I would appreciate a "speedy deletion". Thanks in advance. Pocketthis (talk) 16:25, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 21:24, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Conservape-tan.png

It's fair to call something anti-Christian if it involves opposition to Christianity in general, or involves opposition to things because they are Christian. However, satirizing one semi-strange non-mainstream offshoot of Christianity because it runs a rather poor-quality and ultra-opinionated Wiki is really not the same as general anti-Christian sentiment. Would you call an "I hate Westboro Baptist" sign "anti-Christian"? Even if said sign were held by someone who considers himself or herself to be a fervent Christian? -- AnonMoos (talk) 10:09, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

As I wrote already in my edit-summary, this icon willfully uses and propagates anti-Christian stereotypes/cliches (somewhat sad face, 2 crosses one person, overall somewhat stupid appearance, overall impression of aggressively preaching). For me, this is not a political/party question (I'm not a US citizen and - as opposed to you[30] - I am neither with the US democrats nor the republicans), but a question of intellectual honesty.

As a thought experiment, assume there would be some Jewish (or Muslim) conservapedia, the content of which you would reject the same as the existing conservapedia. If there would be a similar Wikipe-tan figure using the old antisemitic stereotypes, would you then also fight with teeth and claws against categorizing it as anti-semitic? --Túrelio (talk) 11:03, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

That's nice -- it satirizes vehemently-haranguing street preachers who wear 1970's style earth-toned "granny dresses" and accompanying clogs (if there are any such people still around left to be satirized) -- and of course, it only satirizes those in the United States (see flag). Meanwhile, even many far-right and or quasi-fundamentalist Christians think that Andrew Schlafly's "Conservative Bible translation project" is fruitcake looney-tunes wacko (not to mention deeply disrespectful of Christian scriptures).

If you want to do something useful in this area, then you could try to properly label File:Cry-wolf.png, where the racist bigot Carlos Latuff included side-curls on the character at the left to indicate his profound contempt for Judaism as a religion. I really don't see how File:Conservape-tan.png remotely expresses contempt for religious Christians in general in the way that File:Cry-wolf.png expresses contempt for religious Jews in general... AnonMoos (talk) 13:27, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Cry-wolf.png is already categorized into cat:Antisemitic pictures, which is quite an achievement, considering Latuff's fan group on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 18:10, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

OK (for a long time it was not allowed to be categorized correctly, and a description of what it really is got bounced to the talk page). By the way, I've visited this page about 4 times, and the whatever-it-is image at the top hasn't successfully loaded once. It might be best not to put an image which must be several hundred kb in filesize at the top of a page which people have to use to contact you... AnonMoos (talk)`

Urheberrecht

Hi Túrelio. I need some advice on following two images: File:Staaten mit Mitgliedsorganisationen der Union der Europäischen Föderalisten 2011.png and File:Nachname Springborn Verbreitungskarte relativ.png. Can you tell me whether they are copyvios and why (or why not)? Thanks. Moros y Cristianos 18:26, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I think that both, especially he first one, are below the threshold of originality and thereby not copyrightable. --Túrelio (talk) 18:38, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Woman figure.jpg

Hi Salvatore of Nina, your licensing of File:Woman figure.jpg does not make sense. If it is really your own work, then you do not need to add PD-Art. However, if it is not your own work, then you cannot add PD-Art, because it seems to be a 3-dimensional piece and PD-Art is only for 2-dimensional works. --Túrelio (talk) 09:00, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Salam, hörmətli dost! Yüklədiyim şəklin lisenziyasını dəyişdim. Ümidvaram bu lisenziya uyğun olar.--Salvatore of Nina 14:02, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi Salvatore, I am not sure that it fits for PD-AZ-exempt. Did you scan the image from that book or did you get it from http://azhistorymuseum.az/index.php?mod=5&view=item&id=172? --Túrelio (talk) 09:11, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Thomas_Robinson.jpg

Hello Túrelio ;) What do you think about File:Thomas_Robinson.jpg? I think it is a photoshop edited image, froma copyrighted file...--Delfort (talk) 08:19, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Seems to be a plain copyvio from http://www.sports.ru/tribuna/blogs/mik24nba/323910.html. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Chimera Apulia Louvre K362.jpg

Hi Túrelio, I'm not sure you wanted to merge this kind of info from the duplicate pic: ' To terrorize its prey it will often sing the national anthem of the strongest country, or songs from Elton John...' Jastrow (Λέγετε) 09:45, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Oops, I just copied and pasted it, without reading. My bad. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 09:47, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

DR

Hola Túrelio, disculpa mi español. Sobre esto, te pido que tengas en consideración esta solicitud de borrado sin atender. Debido a que ya recibí un aviso por posible violación de derechos heredados, creo que es preferible eliminar los archivos. Carrousel 19:37, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Hola, in order to understand you correctly: you did shoot the original photo, right? And somebody from the family of this "Jasminne You" claims rights over this photo? --Túrelio (talk) 20:10, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Yo recibí permiso del autor para subir esas imágenes, pero como en ese tiempo desconocía el tema de las licencias no pedí ningún registro que me concediera los derechos. Actualmente la productora de esos eventos reclamó los derechos de todas esas imágenes, a lo que el autor accedió. Ya que no tengo como atribuirme sus derechos en este momento, creo preferible que sean eliminadas para evitar algún conflicto. Espero comprendas. Carrousel 20:16, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

O.k. As this is the only image of this person, could you please look at Flickr if another free image of him is available? Are there more of your uploads, which were actually not shot by yourself? --Túrelio (talk) 20:43, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Another problem is that this image is heavily used on external websites, which is no surprise as it was uploaded as PD more than 1 year ago. You will either need to notify all those external users who have copied it to their website about the impending deletion or we need to keep a public record of the upload. (Those who use it per hotlink will realize the deletion anyway.) Otherwise all these re-users, who relied on your PD-release, are at risk to be sued by the true rights holder for copyright infringement. --Túrelio (talk) 06:25, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Actualmente me encuentro en la tarea de buscar reemplazos de esas imágenes, en este caso especifico como se trata de una persona fallecida es más difícil, pero deben haber. Me encargaré de comunicar las razones sobre la retirada del dominio publico de estas imágenes a quienes las hayan usado en medios externos para que comprendan el problema. Muchas gracias por la atención. Carrousel 22:31, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Image has been deleted already. --Túrelio (talk) 06:25, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Copyviol ?

Hello Túrelio ;) I'm here again: File:Lavezziinallenamento.JPG is a crop from this image. The user who uploaded the file is well known for his several copyright violations on it.wiki... --Delfort (talk) 15:41, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 16:08, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Block?

Want to block me? you own the commons? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steven185 (talk • contribs) 5. Juli 2012, 09:45 Uhr (UTCTúrelio (talk) 09:37, 2 August 2012 (UTC))

You want to play by our ruls and policies? Obviously not. Now you got blocked. --Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Mother Teresa

Hello Túrelio –

I really appreciate being able to use your great photo of Mother Teresa in my forthcoming book, “HE♥RTGASM – Increasing the Intimacy & the Ecstasy with Your Beloved.”© Of course, I will give you credit as outlined in Wikimedia-Commons.

This book features communication skills and spiritual principles used to achieve greater intimacy and love in relationships -- and eventually to experience ecstatic love-making.

The image of Mother Teresa is used in the section on FORGIVENESS, and whom I quote as saying, “We know that if we really want to love we must learn to forgive.”

If you would like to see an abridged version of the book, I’m presenting a course online on www.dailyom.com called “Awaken Your Relationship Magic.” If you go to the top bar, choose “Courses,” then choose “Relationships,” and then look for the title and/or my name, Toni De Marco. You can enroll in the course for as little as $1. Or if you prefer, I can email you you the entire chapter in which your photo will appear.

Thanks again, Toni globaltoni@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Globaltoni (talk • contribs) 7. Juli 2012, 07:26 Uhr (UTC)

Good to see you back :)

The build up in speedy copyvios was noticed ;). Thanks for all the work. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:08, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Though, I will not be able to return to my usual work level, as I am on holiday in a small Bavarian village at 900 m above see level and with less-than-optimal net connection. --Túrelio (talk) 10:38, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Please don't forget to enjoy your holiday ;-) -- Rillke^(q?) 10:57, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Damn - we will drown... Have a great break. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:21, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Einen wunderschönen Urlaub - genieße die Zeit! --4028mdk09 (talk) 14:04, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

user:Kontrollstellekundl

Hallo Túrelio,

schaust du dir bitte mal die Edits vom user:Kontrollstellekundl an. Dieser Benutzer hat zahlreiche Bilder ohne Absprache deutlich beschnitten. Wenn es das machen möchte, steht ihm frei eine weitere Crop-Version zu erstellen - so finde ich das aber destruktiv. Einige Überschreibungen (Beispiel) habe ich schon rückgänig gemacht. --Atamari (talk) 16:27, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Atamari, hab ihn mal drauf hingewiesen (dazu haben wir ja sogar eine quasi-policy Commons:Avoid overwriting existing files). --Túrelio (talk) 17:44, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Quora screen shot confusion

Greetings, Turelio! Forgive me for not including the proper accent a grave or a gout, or maybe acute? I forgot the correct names in French, and I don't even know if those are proper for your name anyway, but I thought about it, and tried a little, for whatever that is worth. Anyway, I don't understand what is going on with that Quora article screen shot, name is File:Quora Screen Capture - Summer 2011.png. I do understand that it was marked for copy vio deletion in Augout, 2011, and shows as red lined, which is correct (see the Quora article page, there is a collapsed drop down in the info box where that may be confirmed). Yet when I look at the Quora talk page, I notice that the file is NOT red lined in the deletion notification. When I click on the NOT-red-lined wikilink, I am told that no file with that name exists, which is odd but still acceptable. IF that were all, I wouldn't be bothering you! But then when I run Global Usage, I get one hit. To where? Right back to Quora again Either the image is deleted, or it isn't.

Might you look into this, at your leisure? Since it is a copy vio matter, the image shouldn't be floating around somewhere, somehow. If the file IS in fact uploaded to Commons, and/ or may be used legally on en Wikipedia, then we should be using it. I tried to figure this out myself, and am bothering you only because you deleted the image, according to the log. Deletions can't be reverted (not until we are given resurrection rights, and no one has that ;o) so I am confused! Thank you, and no rush on this. Sorry I'm so chatty. --FeralOink (talk) 21:50, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi FeralOink, File:Quora Screen Capture - Summer 2011.png is definitely deleted. It doesn't matter that the link to the file on :en doesn't appear in red, though I don't know exactly why that is the case. The usage hit is o.k., as the "link-code" for the file is actually still on that page. So, despite appearing otherwise, everything is o.k. now. --Túrelio (talk) 18:09, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much for following-up, on an admittedly minor matter, yet in such a timely fashion. I do appreciate it. I found it very reassuring that you said everything is o.k. now. I tend to worry, and would likely have fussed over this. Now my conscience is clear, that I have not been neglectful of details. I wish more Wikipedia folken were like you! Please enjoy the remainder of your Bavarian Alpine holiday! --FeralOink (talk) 07:47, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

 ;o) <~~ A friendly piggy for you!

Very well handled

Hi Túrelio, I just wanted to say that you have handled yourself impeccably in the way that you handled the English Wikipedia Arbcom drama. Asking Fae for his permission to release details to a third-party demonstrates that you have the privacy of our editors at heart, and in mind, when dealing with such things.

You may be interested to know that I have contacted enwp Arbcom on numerous occasions since an RfA on Fae on enwp with some non-private information and comments, and with an offer to provide confidential information (with the consent of those involved), and have reiterated this on numerous occasions. SilkTork's explanation of enwp Arbcom wanting to investigate harassment and the like on Fae doesn't stand up to scrutiny, when at no stage has any Arbcom member seen fit to contact myself to ask me about background and information I may be able to provide, and have offered to provide.

This appears to be a case of enwp Arbcom going on a witch-hunt, and they have found their witch. And it appears to me that several of these Arbcom members have moved beyond expected norms and are treating this case to settle personal and wikipolitical scores.

Beyond that, you should be commended for the way you have handled yourself. russavia (talk) 20:55, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Russavia, it may be that enwiki Arbcom didn't choose to interact with you, despite your offers, because you are currently under a one year block, have a history of arbitration enforcement blocks, have recently directly criticised arbitrators and may reasonably be considered belligerent. It's hardly unreasonable than in such circumstances, arbitrators from enwiki may choose to liaise with other Commons representatives that are not you, to ensure the smoothest and most neutral handling of the matter. Put simply, you've given them no reason to trust you. It certainly has no bearing on whether enwiki Arbcom's actions 'stand up to scrutiny'. NULL (talk) 00:26, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

@Russavia, thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 18:12, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Spammer re-created page you cleaned

141.105.66.52 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RBL • abusefilter • tools • guc • stalktoy • block user • block log) has recreated a talk page you just deleted today; this time it's blatantly criminal spam (advertsing CVVs for sale). (I'm omitting the page name, so that it isn't shown after an administrator deletes it; you'll see it in the IP's contrib list. I wonder why that particular talk page is targeted by spammers.) --Closeapple (talk) 23:57, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. I've deleted it again and bookmarked it for the next time. --Túrelio (talk) 18:01, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Fail to create new Category (resolved !!)

Hello again, there appears to be some technical reason why Category:Henry Grattan fails to evolve, despite several attempts to create it (after I uploaded a new file to it). In addition it should be possible to move page Henry Grattan to File:Henry Grattan, but this is also barred. I wish to have his four related files in his one category. Would be great if you could somehow sort it all out, thank you. Greetings Osioni (talk) 15:11, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Just discovered that I failed to categorize Category:Henry Grattan, which is now ok. Excuse the alarm. However the problem to move page Henry Grattan to File:Henry Grattan still remains. Osioni (talk) 15:31, 21 July 2012 (UTC). Ignore my questions, Túrelio, just discovered there is an existing File:Henry Grattan. All now fixed, excuse any time I've taken, best wishes, Osioni (talk) 16:08, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

No problem. I am currently on vacation in a small village in the Bavarian mountains and therefore I am only sporadically online. --Túrelio (talk) 18:15, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Battlements et Chemins de ronde

Bonjour Túrelio. Tu as, à ma demande, supprimé la category:Chemins de ronde car je supposais qu'elle faisait double emploi avec la category:Battlements. Or, on vient de m'expliquer sur le Bistro que battlements=créneaux et Chemins de ronde porte le même nom en français qu'en anglais. Peux-tu recréer la catégorie ? Père Igor (talk) 15:14, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

 Done J'ai recréé la category:Chemins de ronde. Désolé pour le dérangement. Père Igor (talk) 17:16, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

No problem. I am currently on vacation in a small village in the Bavarian mountains and therefore only sporadically online. --Túrelio (talk) 18:15, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

File:HolzRadfahrerinEuskirchen 0839.jpg

Hallo Túrelio, diese Radfahrererin ist von Peter Nettersheim. Seine Holzstatuen stehen vorwiegend am Niederrhein. Nach der Menge, die ich schon gesehen habe, stehen da sicher mehr als hundert. Hier ist noch eine: File:Schlosspark-Köln-Stammheim-Peter-Nettesheim-Ausstellung-2010.JPG. Wenn ich mal nachsuche, finde ich bestimmt auch noch ein paar Bilder seiner Figuren. -- Ies (talk) 15:38, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe mal Category:Peter Nettesheim angelegt. Dann sind File:HolzFrauEuskirchen 0838.jpg und File:HolzStrassensaugerEuskirchen 0836.jpg vermutlich auch von ihm oder? --Túrelio (talk) 15:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Inzwischen habe ich Herrn Nettesheim kontaktiert und von ihm die Originaltitel der Skulpturen erhalten. Was noch fehlt, ist ein Artikel über ihn auf :de. --Túrelio (talk) 09:48, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Deleted images

Hi, Túrelio. Probably those images are same:

• File:加納真実大道芸人.jpg = File:加納真実厚木大道芸.jpg
• File:秋川玉成寮.jpg = File:秋川高校玉成寮.jpg

Could you control his/jer contributions ? Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 06:14, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

thanks for the delete

Can normal editors re-name pages? As I get better, I frequently need to update filenames/titles--SVG seems to naturally promote growth.--69.168.144.153 14:09, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi Unknown, sorry for the late answer. Are you refering to Commons? If yes, see Commons:File renaming for details. File (whether image of audio) name can only be changed (renamed) by admins and file movers. I am not sure that this is also true for gallery pages. Categories cannot be renamed (in the strict sense). --Túrelio (talk) 09:27, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

What is the reason/issue?

[31]? Cheers --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 15:05, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Resolved

--Cwbm (commons) (talk) 18:16, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Pabellon Girona Fontajau

Vi que hace tiempo eleminastes la foto de la ficha de pagina Pabellon Girona Fontajau por violacion del copyright segun tu en la pag http://www.panoramio.com/photo/13024252, como veras ya dije que soy el autor de la foto como sale en panoramio subida por jmsolerb , osea YO, asi que vuelve a admitirla, GRACIAS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmsolerb (talk • contribs) 29. Juli 2012, 18:56 Uhr (UTC)

Und täglich grüsst das Murmeltier...

und Geolina weiß mal wieder nicht so recht weiter ;-). Ich habe auf der Wikipedia einen Artikel zum "Gartenhaus Mantels" mit einer Weiterleitung vom "Kerstenschen Pavillon" angelegt. Das Lemma haben wir auf dem AC-Portal so festgelegt, weil architektonisch wohl korrekter. Natürlich klappen jetzt die Verlinkungen auf Commonscat nicht...weil es ja keine Cat: Gartenhaus Mantels gibt. Und die, die es jetzt gibt [Category:Kerstenscher_Pavillion] ist orthografisch nicht so ganz richtig, Pavillon wäre mir lieber;-)...Kannst Du, wenn alles andere, Wichtige und weniger Wichtige im RL geschafft wurde, die Sache mal bei Gelegenheit entzerren??? Vielen Dank und liebe Grüße aus dem Norden....--Geolina163 (talk) 16:57, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Bin wieder zurück und habe erstmal alles auf Category:Kerstenscher Pavillon umgestellt. Wenn dir eine Kat.Gartenhaus Mantels lieber ist, können wir das noch nachschieben. Gruß von 1 km Ost/Südost. --Túrelio (talk) 07:26, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Alles bestens, vielen lieben Dank...wenigstens orthografisch etwas gefälliger xD. Ich hoffe, Du hast Dich schon wieder im trüben Westen eingelebt...und bist nicht gleich wieder von der rheinischen Hektik überfallen worden ;). LG aus dem Nordwesten...--Geolina163 (talk) 15:14, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Bitte um Wiederherstellung

Guten Morgen, bitte stelle File:Eichstruth in EIC.svg wieder he. Du hast heute morgen einen redirect auf Dietzenrode-Vatterode erstellt und damit die Situation verschlimmert, denn Dietzenrode-Vatterode zeigte zu der Zeit Eichstruth. Soll heißen: nicht Eichstruth war falsch , sondern Dietzenrode-Vatterode (wie man im übrigen ohne weiteres durch Prüfung der Imagemap hätte feststellten können). Das habe zwischenzeitlich korrigiert. Bitte ändere auch den/ die Links in den Lemmata sowie die Falschkategorisierung wieder zurück. Ich muß ehrlich sagen, dass ich etwas verärgert bin, denn erst gestern abend um 21:37 Uhr konnte ich mit der Duplikat-Markierung überhaupt auf den Fehler aufmerksam werden. Und dann werde ich um 8:43 Uhr am folgenden Tag vor vollendete Tatsachen gestellt? Wenn wir uns hier nicht mehr die Zeit geben, zu reagieren, dann machen wir so richtig was falsch! Ich habe genauso ein RL wie Du... --Hagar66 (talk) 07:50, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Ich hab sie jetzt erst einmal wiederhergestellt. Grundsätzlich: für dupe-Löschungen gibt es keine Zeitvorgaben (anders als bei no-permission, no-source, usw); d.h. wenn eine dupe-Situation vorliegt bzw. es, wie hier, von jemand (in diesem Fall nicht von mir) als dupe-speedy markiert ist, kann sofort gelöscht werden, sofern "dupe" tatsächlich zutrifft, was hier zum Zeitpunkt der Löschung definitiv der Fall war. Als ich heute früh anfing, standen >600 Dateien zur Schnelllöschung an. --Túrelio (talk) 08:06, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

"Exact duplicate" that wasn't

I see that a couple of years ago, you deleted File:Seattle - Fiestas Patrias Parade 2008 - Wicked Witch 01.jpg as an exact duplicate of File:Seattle - Fiestas Patrias Parade 2008 - Wicked Witch 02.jpg. But it's not an exact duplicate: 01 was the raw photo and 02 has increased contrast.

In recent years, when I edit my own photo with GIMP I've taken to uploading the new version to the same name as the original - almost certainly a better practice - but at the time I did these I hadn't considered doing that. (I'm also working with a better camera these days, which could better handle a contrasty shot like this.) It's imaginable that someone might want the original raw version of a photo like this so they could try different postprocessing.

No big deal in this case, but do please be careful that when you delete something as an exact duplicate, it really is a duplicate, not a different colormapping. - Jmabel ! talk 00:34, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Sorry. To me it looked just as an overexposed "dupe" of the remaining version; should have read the description. In general: you are right: this - not so rare - problem results from the policy/advise to upload retouched/different versions of an image under a different filename, which may be not so wise, especially if performed only shortly after the original upload. If you want the "raw" version restored drop me a note. --Túrelio (talk) 08:19, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

User_talk:Sreejithk2000/Archive_7#File:1033177_unprocessed.jpg

Could you please have a look at this discussion, Túrelio? Please restore that file, and if you really need to, delete the other one. I don't like those sudden deletions that happen without any deletion request and discussion. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:52, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Restored. However, it is clearly a duplicate (which does not require a DR discussion) and it had been dupe-speedy-tagged by Sreejithk. Besides, there is still no note or anything on that page ("do not modify" does NOT refer to deletion). Therefore, the same problem will likely happen again. --Túrelio (talk) 10:00, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Even with a note it will probably happen again. I will look at a another way to find a solution. Thanks for the revert. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 10:11, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Downtown street and buildings, Juneau, Alaska.jpg‎

When you deleted and redirected the above, I think you left behind some description. Please check, as I recall, another user had added some identifying information for thelocation which was not in the Flickr record. Thanks, Dankarl (talk) 04:02, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:37, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Duplicates

Could you delete File:Pomare II, engraving by R. Hicks cropd.jpg, File:Liliuokalani, photograph by Menzies Dickson cropped.jpg, and File:A Favourite Poodle Hatching Poultry!! or A present of Feather Breeches from the Sandwich Isles-2.jpg? Don't redirect them, just delete them.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 05:29, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

And File:Liliuokalani by M. Dickson.jpg--KAVEBEAR (talk) 07:36, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Seenesulane and Peeter Laurits

Hi Turelio, thanks for notification. Seenesulane and Peeter Laurits are indeed one and the same person, therefore there is no need to delete the uploaded artwork by Peeter Laurits

See my reply on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 10:46, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Reply.

It is not a painting, it is a structure. There are many structure of these types are made during the festival. You can see more if you visit the categories. This structure was made by 3 boys along with me. At the day of festival I took the photo. -- JDP90 (talk) 13:17, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

O.k., thanks. I would recommend you to mention this somehow in the image description. Otherwise you will receive more questions like mine from other admins. --Túrelio (talk) 13:23, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. I have uploaded a similar picture and I was asked the same question. I have clarified that before to some users and admins. Regards. -- Joydeep (talk) 13:28, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Helping with my images

I just wanted to thank you for adding data to the images that I have uploaded onto wikimedia, as I really appreciated it. I was wondering, if you might consider adding the images I have uploaded to their articles on wikipedia by any chance, I completely understand if you wouldn't want to, but I thought that I could add the images to wikimedia and you add them to their articles (Only if the images are licensed under the OGL of course haha), as I would be eternally grateful. Kind regards Slytherining Around32 (talk) 18:00, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

O.k., I've proposed[32] to use your portrait of Ruth Kelly as a replacement for the current image in the article on :en. --Túrelio (talk) 13:11, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Schloss Sonnberg Barockgarten Figur 1.jpg

Hallo Túrelio,

ich habe das retuschierte Foto, dessen Original Du wunschgemäß gelöscht hast, neu hochgeladen. Das Vorschaubild zeigt auch das retuschierte Foto mit der entsprechenden Beschreibung, die normale Bilddatei zeigt aber wieder die unbearbeitete Version. Was ist da schief gelaufen?

Freundliche Grüße --Manfred Kuzel (talk) 12:25, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Manfred, das ist wohl ein Cache-Problem. Ich habe sämtliche Größenversionen von File:Schloss Sonnberg Barockgarten Figur 1.jpg einzeln angeklickt und immer die retouchierte Rückwand gesehen. Leere einfach mal deinen Browser-Cache. --Túrelio (talk) 12:45, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Danke Túrelio, hat geklappt. MfG --Manfred Kuzel (talk) 14:12, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Perro pueblerino en La Azulita.jpg

For me it was an image very well, but I see thou consider a quite useful, then it is better that my photo is not deleted, thanks. -- George Miquilena (hablar) 14:03, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Beethoven Hornemann.jpg

Hallo Túrelio, ist diese Miniatur denn in Dänemark ([33])? --Botaurus (talk) 20:03, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Ähem, keine Ahnung. Ich hatte diese Kat. bei der Duplikatlöschung von File:Beethoven by Christian Hornemann (1803).jpg einfach rüberkopiert, in der unreflektierten Annahme, dass sie stimme. Lösch sie einfach, wenn du auch nur halbwegs der Überzeugung bist dass sie nicht zutrifft. --Túrelio (talk) 20:09, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Ich hatte bei diesem Bild mal recherchiert, was nicht so einfach war. Hornemann hat wohl mehrere Miniaturen von Beethoven gemacht (in Bonn), die sich alle ähneln. Beethoven hat diese z.T. an Freunde verschickt etc. Auf Dänemark gibt es dabei jedoch keinen Hinweis, so dass ich annehme, dass das nicht zutrifft. Grüße --Botaurus (talk) 20:26, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Duplicate of a copyvio

Hello!
This file File:Kofi Live 2012.jpg was marked as a duplicate of now-deleted File:Kofi Live March 2012.jpg by me. I had also marked the now deleted file for copyvio. I thought the same reasoning would be applied for this file for deletion. But apparently it hasn't been, till now. I have now marked it with copyvio too. Just FYI maybe. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 09:25, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi AnimeshKulkarni, yeah, seems this rationale had been lost over the processing by that many people. Though, it was still on the radar due to the no-perm tag, but the copyvio-tag is also appropriate. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 09:46, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Deletion

• File:Prédios do bairro Botafogo.jpg - blurred image.

?

Good day Mr. or Ms. Taisuoms,

My name is Scotty, and within my wiki there is a Listed option now. My friends from here and I agreed that I could stay in good perspective of our project scope as well as not "inadvertently flaunt" any of the contributions to our Organization (I'm permitted to test within the Sandbox). I have been asked from brothers and their families to make sure their works do not become as profane as say "urbandictionary" where references are much to do with flamebait or hate speech coding. May I please have the list removed so I may stay; I gave my Word the contributions I moderate are to remain a part of the project.

Your Best Friend, Riseandsine

Hi Scotty, I have no idea what you arte talking about. What "list" do you refer to? Did I delete any of your uploads and you disagree? --Túrelio (talk) 21:40, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

User: Zzzquil - image you have tagged for deletion

Hi Túrelio, Yes, I am the person in the images. Zzzquil (talk) 21:00, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Image deletion

I cannot understand the reason why the image was deleted. There ae a lot of similar images uploaded to illustrate Wikimania 2012. Is there any special reason? Regards, --Dmitri Lytov (talk) 21:24, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Though I speedied the images, for the rationale see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nicole and Dmitry (3).jpg. Also see directly above your posting here, there answer by the requester to my question on her talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 21:26, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

User talk:Skinlabderide

Why only a 1 day block? Indef as vandalism-only imo. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:01, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Because I have no idea, why a logged-in account does such edits. Feel free to increase the block length. I need to go to bed. --Túrelio (talk) 22:03, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Ethnic Rock

Hello, This is the cover art for Ethnic Rock . The cover art copyright is believed to belong to the record label or the graphic artist(s). The image is used for identification in the context of critical commentary of the work for which it serves as cover art. It makes a significant contribution to the user's understanding of the article, which could not practically be conveyed by words alone. The image is placed at the beginning of the article or section discussing the work, to help the user quickly identify the work and know they have found what they are looking for. Use for this purpose does not compete with the purposes of the original artwork, namely the artist's providing graphic design services to music concerns and in turn marketing music to the public. http://www.amazon.com/Orient-Rock-Merhaba/dp/B007QI2V7Y You can check the address.I think use of the cover art in the article complies with Wikipedia non-free content policy and fair use under United States copyright law.

Hi, are you talking about File:Seyyal Taner Ethnic Rock.jpg? Anyway, as you are writing about "Wikipedia non-free content policy", it seems clear that you are not aware, that here you are not on Wikipedia, but on Commons, and Commons does not allow fair-use. Try uploading it locally at :en Wikipedia. --Túrelio (talk) 08:14, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

User talk:Geyersberg

Hallo Túrelio,
ich habe dir soeben auf der Diskussionsseite von User:Geyersberg geantwortet. Uploader und Ersteller der Bilder sind identisch, er ist mir zudem persönlich bekannt (VHS-Kurs "Wikipedia für Senioren" in Bonn). Allerdings tut sich Geyersberg als Neuling mit den ganzen Formalansprüchen in WP und commons sehr schwer und braucht etwas Hilfe, daher betreue ich ihn regelmässig bzw. habe in der Vergangenheit die Bilder für ihn hochgeladen. Gruß, -- Achim Raschka (talk) 09:08, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

O.k., Danke. --Túrelio (talk) 09:39, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Ne schönne Gruß

Gödeke (talk) 20:38, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Danke schön! Ich hoffe, dass du am Samstag gut nach Hause gekommen bist und wir beim nächsten Stammtisch etwas mehr Zeit zum sprechen haben als diesmal. Immerhin, deinen "Klenkes" findest du hier. --Túrelio (talk) 20:41, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Meinen Klenkes findest du längst auf meiner Seite. Zum quatschen wars iwie einfach zu ungemütlich. Na beim nächsten mal ... --Gödeke (talk) 20:47, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Deletion

I proposed my pictures to deletion, because bad quality e an other that is duplicated:

• File:Rua Senador Vergueiro à noite.jpg
• File:Degraus em Santa Teresa.jpg

Eduardo P (talk) 22:29, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:25, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

File:David Mundell3.jpg

This actually is under the OGL despite what the source says, so I've listed it for undeletion; you should have notified the uploader on deleting the image. —innotata 23:25, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

The deletion rationale by One Night In Hackney, who speedy-tagged the file, was "Image appears on page 2 of the image library, which states "These images are copyright of the Scotland Office and are not to be used without permission". Sorry about the missing notification, I had assumed that the original speedy-tagger had done this. --Túrelio (talk) 06:32, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Re: IM ?

Hello. IM means International Master, chess fans know what is going on :) Please see more about it. Regards, pjahr @ 08:41, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

O.k., thanks for background. However, in images of older chess players from Germany I would really recommend you to write the full words instead of IM, as some uninformed journalist might draw wrong and damaging conclusions from it. --Túrelio (talk) 08:47, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy-Delete-Antrag Foto Bischof Stohr

Hallo Turelio. Ich habe gesehen, dass du meinen Delete-Antrag für das Foto Albert Stohr gestern abend irgendwie begutachtet hast (geschlöscht ist es aber wohl noch nicht?). Mir ist wohl ein Fehler passiert beim upload, indem ich die Datei umbenannt habe. Ich kann sie nicht neu hochladen, weil dann eine Doppelungsmeldung kommt. Sorry, aber es ist wirklich kompliziert und total zeitraubend, wenn man das nur alle paar Monate mal macht ;-) Ich habe eine permission-Mail an den Fotografen, einen älteren Herrn, versandbereit wegen Urheberrechten (er wartet schon darauf), brauche aber noch die URL-Adresse vom Foto dazu. Herzlichen Dank für alle Hilfe, Barbara --Barbamz (talk) 09:34, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Barbara, nein, ich hatte den LA nicht wirklich "begutachtet", sondern nur die dort hineingesetzte speedy-Vorlage auskommentiert, weil dadurch die Seite mit allen an diesem tag gestellten Löschanträgen zur Schnelllöschung markiert worden war. Ich denke, dass ich das eigentliche Problem (CMYK-farbkodierter Scan) nun gelöst habe und der LA sich erledigt hat, oder? Für dich bleibt aber trotzdem etwas zu tun; da das Foto nicht von dir ist, musst du die Genehmigung des Fotografen (oder seiner Nachfahren) an permissions-commons@wikimedia.org mailen. Details siehe: Commons:OTRS/de. --Túrelio (talk) 10:14, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Vielen Dank. Ich sehe jetzt an meiner upload-Liste (lol, es ist nur noch ein Foto übrig; nach der Mail vom Fotografen fahnde ich später zuhause, falls ich sie noch habe), dass das Foto Stohr samt Begleittext jetzt komplett gelöscht ist. Ich probiers dann heute abend vom heimischen PC nochmal neu, wandele das Bild vorher in RGB um. Die Sache mit der Permission ist mir einigermaßen klar; das leiere ich dann auch an. Schönen Tag noch!--Barbamz (talk) 10:53, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Ähem, gelöscht? File:Bischof Albert Stohr auf dem Bodensee - Foto Leonhard Veith August 1959.jpg. Die URL ist übrigens http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bischof_Albert_Stohr_auf_dem_Bodensee_-_Foto_Leonhard_Veith_August_1959.jpg .

Schau bitte auch mal auf deine Disku und deinen LA. --Túrelio (talk) 10:55, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Im DR (meine Güte, was das alles ist) habe ich mich geäußert, danke. Zum meinem "Disku" bzw. deiner Bitte dortselbst (Foto Kaiser) siehe oben: Ich bin gerade "auf Arbeit", kann das aber nur am PC zuhause recherchieren. Merci nochmal, Barbara --Barbamz (talk) 12:32, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Bildchen ist jetzt im Artikel und Fotograf Veith wegen permission angemailt (so auch der Fotograf im anderen Falle). Schönen Abend noch! --Barbamz (talk) 18:03, 16 August 2012 (UTC)B.

Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:David_Mundell3.jpg

Hi Túrelio, hope you're well. A deletion of yours was brought up at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:David_Mundell3.jpg. Just thought you'd like to know. Best, FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:54, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Fastily, thanks for the notification. --Túrelio (talk) 07:40, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Mis fotos

Hola Túrelio, he notado que no has borrado 3 de mis fotos que solicité para borrarlas porque son de alguna forma útiles, bueno, yo las veía innecesarias, hasta casi sobrantes, pero si tu consideras que son útiles, respetaré eso y no las volveré a nominar para el borrado. ---- George Miquilena · talk 16:58, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

I lied -- George Miquilena · talk 21:12, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Neues Foto Erik Peterson

Hi Turelio, ich bin's schon wieder. Trotz der Hitze: Wärest Du so nett, noch so ein OTRS-Pendig auf folgendes neues Foto (für den wiki-Artikel Erik Peterson) zu peppen? thumb|Add caption here http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Erik_Peterson_in_Rom_20-Nov-1938gif.gif Die Familie in Rom (bzw. Dr. Diana Peterson), die die Rechte hat, wird baldigst die permission-mail retournieren, die ich gerade abgeschickt habe. Die freut sich, wenn es endlich damit klappt. Heißer Dank aus Mainz, Barbara --Barbamz (talk) 19:19, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:16, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!--Barbamz (talk) 20:19, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Please add this account to a list of Bad Flickr accounts

Dear Admin Turelio,

I think that someone like you should add the above flickr account to a list of bad flickr accounts so that there are no more DRs like this As you noted in the flickrlink, it was a flickrwash from Getty Images here and yet the uploader still uploaded the image to Commons. When I tagged the image for speedy delete, the uploader removed the speedy delete tag, so I had to file a DR instead. I assume the uploader did not see your message as the image was on the flickr account at least 3 years ago--so the flickr account should just be added to a list of bad flickr accounts to avoid this problem in future. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:37, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Hmm, MboyoT was already on the QFI-list. --Túrelio (talk) 20:22, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

• This is very strange indeed. I don't know why this happened. Hopefully another person won't upload the image and think that it was actually own work by this flickr account owner. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:56, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Frage ...

... an Dich als erfahrenen Benutzer: Ich hatte die Verschiebung von "Kochi Yakamiya Hachimangu 03.jpg" gemäss Wunsch des Uploaders durchgeführt. Bleibt denn der Redirect in so einem Fall immer bestehen? Oder wäre es nicht sinnvoll, wegen des offensichtlich falschen Namens den Redirekt zu löschen und auf den Seiten, die diese Datei verwenden, eine Änderung durchzuführen? Ich blick da noch nicht 100%ig durch und wäre um einen kurzen Hinweis auf das richtige Vorgehen dankbar. Und noch was: Ich habe auch gesehen, das man angeblich verschieben kann, ohne einen redirect anzulegen, aber bei mir kann ich dieses Häkchen im popup-Menü nicht entfernen. hast Du da auch einen Hinweis für mich? Danke schon mal, Gruß, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 13:32, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Ach ja, wenn bei o.g. Bild der SLA nicht opportun ist, kannst Du ihn gerne entfernen. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 13:33, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Nun, ich sehe die Unmenge von redirs auf Commons durchaus etwas kritisch und bin auch öfter schon für redir-Löschungen kritisiert worden. Wenn eine Datei unter einem bestimmten Namen lange auf Commons lag und aufgrund der Natur der Bildes eine externe Nutzung zu erwarten ist, dann sollte der redir natürlich beibehalten werden, weil das Bild sonst auf allen Seiten, wo es per hot-link genutzt wurde, verschwindet. Im Fall des o.g. Bildes ist es aber anders: da wird der alte Dateiname offensichtlich[34] noch auf unseren Projekten genutzt. Deshalb auch meine Anmerkung auf "File:Kochi Yakamiya Hachimangu 03.jpg". Du könntest die Substitution nun entweder manuell vornehmen oder per duplicate-Vorlage den User:CommonsDelinker/commands damit beauftragen.

Verschieben ohne redir geht natürlich nur, wenn der alte Dateiname auf keinem Projekt mehr genutzt wird. --Túrelio (talk) 13:40, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Ah, perfekt. Das erhellt die Lage. Also ich habe (für diesen Fall) die Lösch-Hindernisse manuell entfernt indem ich auf den Projektseiten den neuen Namen eingetragen habe. Danke für die Hilfe! --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 14:23, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Files

I wish it were possible to recreate new files. That was not blocked access to the recreation of deleted files. That's the problem. Myself recreate new files, through the "Special:UploadWizard", without the blocked access.

When I'm going to taking new photos, I recreate "File:Brasil Cacau", uploading a new version with "Special:UploadWizard", for example.

I had to change the jpg format in File:Igreja Metodista do Catete.jpg to File:Igreja Metodista do Catete.png. I didn't get recreate File:Igreja Metodista do Catete, then changed the format jpg to png. And I got. Did you understand? Eduardo P (talk) 17:33, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

"File:Igreja Metodista do Catete" is not a valid filename, as it has no extension. True, you cannot rename a filename.jpg to filename.png/tif/gif/whatever. --Túrelio (talk) 18:29, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Copyrighted file???

You want to delete the File:Tiroide paratiroide gal.jpg. I can't understand why? You claimed it is copyrighted but I think it isn't. It is a labelled in Gallician version of the File:Illu thyroid parathyroid.jpg (labelled in English), which is marked as a file without copyright. I don't know if I've followed all the steps for modifiying and uploading correctly, but I think I did. The original file has been used in the English Wikipedia and others for a long time. What's exactly the problem with the file? What have I made wrong? Please, don't delete it.--Miguelferig (talk) 19:05, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

The main reason for my tagging was that it had no clear source (only now I found that you meant File:Illu thyroid parathyroid.jpg) and that the author name (Fuelbottle) was not identical to the uploader name. Now I see that the file is o.k., but it was your unclear source_entry which led to this problem. --Túrelio (talk) 19:14, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Versionslöschung

Kannst Du von dem File "meine" Versionen löschen? Das war ein Anfängerfehler/Dummheit: File:Piazza dei Cavalieri di Malta, Rome.jpg --Gödeke (talk) 09:56, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Es gab aber nur 1 Version, die ich als "meine" (bzw. deine) erkenne. Da sie die aktuelle war und man keine aktuelle Version löschen kann, musste ich zuerst auf die erste Version zurücksetzen, weshalb nun ich als Uploader dastehe. Erst danach konnte deine Version gelöscht werden. --Túrelio (talk) 10:41, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Sry, dachte es wäre einfacher gegangen, danke. --Gödeke (talk) 12:47, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

A mandoca for you

A Mandoca for you, from Maracaibo, for being a good administrator :)

-- George Miquilena · talk 21:13, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 15:14, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Borrado File:Cristo_de_las_Injurias.jpg

Hola, has borrado el archivo "Cristo_de_las_Injurias.jpg". Lo he subido porque el archivo original: http://www.flickr.com/photos/45762667@N08/5639235760 permite ser compartido y alterado, dando crédito al autor, tal y como hice. ¿que he hecho mal al subirla o enlazarla para que la borres? ¡Gracias! --Xpao (talk) 22:17, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Hola Xpao, the problem is that the Flickr user has restricted the image to non-commercial use (C-NY-BY-SA), which is shown by the striken-through dollar sign. Images uploaded to Commons need to be free also for commercial use, therefore we do not accept images released under a CC-NC-something license. Of course, you may try to get the Flickr user to lift/removed the NC-restriction, then we could host the image. --Túrelio (talk) 06:14, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Entendido Túrelio, Thank you!!--Xpao (talk) 15:57, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Commons fair use upload bot blocked

Hi Turelio, I wanted to just call your attention to a discussion at en:Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Commons_fair_use_upload_bot, where one of your {{Fair use delete}} taggings on File:1907 arrest of Dora Thewlis.jpg is confusing some people. Could you please drop in and clarify what happened and why you tagged the image? Thanks! Dcoetzee (talk) 01:57, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

 Done. I hope I wasn't too frank ;-).[35] --Túrelio (talk) 07:56, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Category:Lambertuskerk

As far as I remember, Category:Lambertuskerk wasn't a duplicate of Category:Saint Lambertus Church (Heemse), rather Category:Saint Lambertus Church (Heemse) was a copyvio of Category:Lambertuskerk (without the rename-request). --129.125.102.126 16:20, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Well, a category can hardly be a copyvio. But anyway, I've simply performed a speedy-request by NeverDoING and I'm not sure what you want me to do. --Túrelio (talk) 16:29, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

I don't care too much about the copyright on the category. On the other hand, I expect that the contributors to the original (Category:Lambertuskerk) are better able to answer questions about either category; and that's another reason to honour CC-BY. A speedy-delete-request for the original by a copyist should be rejected. Please, don't simply (your words) perform requests.

I want you to make a null-edit to Category:Saint Lambertus Church (Heemse) to give credit to the authors. I can't, because I don't remember all the authors. --129.125.102.126 17:20, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

I don't really understand. "credit to the authors" of what? Of a category? You can't really belive that creating a category earns anyone any copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 18:07, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

What part of "I don't care too much about the copyright on the category" or "I expect that the contributors to the original (Category:Lambertuskerk) are better able to answer questions about either category" did you fail to understand? I don't care about the copyright, I do care about the history, because the authors might know a bit more about the subject than a random copycat. You removed the history of Category:Lambertuskerk at the request of a pseudonym who blatantly copied the original, instead of (IIRC) changing the target of the rename-request or (IIDRC) adding a {{Move}}. If you don't understand (your words) why the history matters, please refrain from simply (your words) performing requests. --129.125.102.126 18:22, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Am I the only one who's a bit confused by this? mr.choppers (talk)^-en- 18:39, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Well, it seems that the friendly Mr. IP thinks that the following standard codes that were added by User:Gouwenaar, the IP him/herself and User:NeverDoING (the same that was labelled above as "a pseudonym") to former Category:Lambertuskerk should give them a place in history (the cat history, of course).

• {{Rijksmonument|20017}} {{On Wikipedia|inline | nds-nl=Sint-Lambertuskarke (Hiemse) | nl=Sint-Lambertuskerk (Heemse) }} {{Object location dec|52.56949074|6.601443585|region:NL-OV_type:landmark_scale:1500}}<!-- Location from http://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lijst_van_rijksmonumenten_in_Hardenberg_(plaats)&redirect=no&oldid=22478048 --> [[Category:Rijksmonumenten in Hardenberg]] [[Category:Churches in Hardenberg]] [[Category:Heemse]] [[Category:Saint Lambertus churches in the Netherlands|Heemse]]
  

--Túrelio (talk) 18:51, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much for mentioning User:Gouwenaar. However, IIRC "Location from http://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lijst_van_rijksmonumenten_in_*" isn't used by either Gouwenaar or me, but had been added before User:NeverDoING copied it. Could your Pseudonymous Majesty please be kind enough to check that? --129.125.102.126 19:54, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Nevertheless it had been added by IP 129.125.102.126 on 6. August 2012, 09:56 Uhr (Link only visible to admins). --Túrelio (talk) 15:09, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Then I must apologize for misremembering. Thanks again. --129.125.102.126 14:58, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Bild weg...

Wie ist dieser Vorgang zu verstehen? -- Paul Peplow (talk) 15:47, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Falls du die Löschung des Bildes auf Commons meinst, kannst du hier den Lösch-log sehen. Selbst auf der unmittelbaren Quellenseite auf Flickr steht klar "AFP Photo Jon-Are Berg-Jacobsen / Aftenposten bzw. Jon-Are Berg-Jacobsen/AFP/Getty Images". In D./A/CH kann die vermeintlich freie Nutzung dieses Fotos schnell mal 500 Euro kosten. Dadurch, dass irgendeine angebliche PR Agentur Lwp Kommunikáció ein solches Foto als CC-By-lizenziert erklärt, muss man das nicht glauben. Flickr ist ebenso wie Commons ein Projekt mit User-generated content, mit all den damit verbundenen Problemen; im Unterschied zu Flickr überprüfen wir aber proaktiv den Urheberschaftsangaben der Hochlader. --Túrelio (talk) 16:10, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Danke für die Info. -- Paul Peplow (talk) 16:24, 25 August 2012 (UTC) Aber müssen solche Entscheidungen nicht speziell ermächtigte Nutzer treffen und umsetzten (wie OTRS-Team)...?

Welche Entscheidungen? Dass das eine URV ist? Das kann jeder sehen und jeder darf die Datei auch entsprechend SLA-markieren. Löschen können es natürlich nur Admins. --Túrelio (talk) 16:26, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Nun gut, ich habe das große (A) vermisst (engl. müsste es dann wohl ein kleines a sein...), aber jetzt eben deinen Babelbaustein gesehen... Seltsam ist nur, dass gerade jetzt die Datei gelöscht wurde (nach Einbindung in Kontext), obwohl Lizenz-Ungereimtheiten längerfristig im Visier der Ordnungshüter sind. -- Paul Peplow (talk) 16:39, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Hmm, die Datei ist binnen 4,5 Stunden nach dem Upload auf Commons gelöscht worden, das ist doch recht zügig, oder nicht? Auf Flickr liegt sie seit über 1 Jahr, weil sich keiner darum kümmert. --Túrelio (talk) 16:41, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Okay, ich hatte nicht auf das Upload-Datum geschaut; bin davon ausgegangen, dass die Datei dort schon länger lag (weil sie ja schon älter ist...). -- Paul Peplow (talk) 17:23, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Como subir estas fotos a Commos ?

Por que razón borraste estas fotos??? (Bot: Eliminando "Hinchada_de_Club_Aurora_2.jpg". Borrado en Commons por Túrelio. (Copyright violation: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=2944565929535&set=o.25379152977&type=3)) y (Bot: Eliminando "Hinchada_de_Club_Aurora.jpg". Borrado en Commons por Túrelio. (Copyright violation: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=2384861342863&set=o.25379152977&type=3&permPage=1 ))

y como puedo hacer para subirlas nuevamente?

Gracias

Aurora75 07:09, 27 Agosto 2012 (UTC)

Hola Aurora75, en anglais porque yo no sabe sufficiente espanol. File:Hinchada de Club Aurora 2.jpg seems to have been copied from this Facebook page. Same problem with File:Hinchada de Club Aurora.jpg, taken from here. Facebook content is not under a free license, except when there is an expressed statement from the photographer. You should not re-upload these images. You may try to find out who is the true photographer and then ask him for a release under a free license. See Commons:OTRS/es for details. --Túrelio (talk) 07:15, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Deleting some photos of my contributions

Dear Túrelio, you has put the deleting template of 7 photos of my own work. How I can to demostrate the authority of my works for avoid the deleting? I can´t understand how some image files hosted in wikimedia hasn´t problems in the past and now are questions of the image authority. for example, File:FranciscoBejarano.jpg and File:Estatualuiscoloma.jpg are photos taken with my own camera. thank you, Regards. --Cvluis (talk) 09:57, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Cvluis,

to start with your last question. As we have very many uploads and only few people in the patrolling of new uploads, it is very common that when a new upload catches the attention of a new-uploads-patroler and he/she find a problem with it, he/she also checks all other uploads of the respective user. This comes simply out of our experience that when there is 1 problematic upload, there are often more.

I don't remember which of your files caught my attention, probably it was File:Carmenuñezfotos.jpg. When I viewed this image and saw your date-entry "2012", it was clearly not correct. When I found that at least one of the persons in this montage had died in 1923, it was clear to me that you can't be the photographer and that it can't be "own work" as you had claimed. Otherwise you would be at least 100 years of age. So, who is the photographer? Where did you find this photo? As you very often refer to the archives of some "José Luis Jiménez", who is this "Jose Luis Jiménez"? When did he die? Is he your father?

Image File:Estatualuiscoloma.jpg is even more complicated, as we have also the copyright for the statue itself. Who created this sculpture? When did the sculptor die? Where is this sculpture located? --Túrelio (talk) 12:31, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio, i understand. I had confusions writing the details of the photos, for avoid the deleting, what i can do? I need send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS or simply change the information in the image details. Regards. --Cvluis (talk) 20:03, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Well, I would prefer if you would answer the questions above. Then I can see what more is needed. --Túrelio (talk) 20:06, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello! I going to answer all questions from all files uploaded for Wikimedia:

File:Estatualuiscoloma.jpg Is a sculpture from Ramón Chaveli Carreres in 1919, and the photograph was taken by Jose Luis Jimenez, and he share the photo with the self|cc-by-sa-3.0 license.

File:FranciscoBejarano.jpg Is a photo taken by Jose Luis Jimenez, and he share the photo with the self|cc-by-sa-3.0 license.

File:Fernando de la Milla Alonso de la Florida.jpg is a photo by Camara of 1930, and the life of the author plus 70 years.

File:Manuel Luis Ortega Pichardo (archivo Jose Luis Jiménez García).jpg is a photo from a familiar archive of 1934, the photo was given to Jose luis Jimenez, and the life of the author plus 70 years.

File:Pemartinsanjuan.jpg as the last file, is a photo from a familiar archive of 1934, the photo was given to Jose luis Jimenez, and the life of the author plus 70 years.

And File:Isasi Ivison.jpg Is a photo taken by Jose Luis Jimenez, and he share the photo with the self|cc-by-sa-3.0 license.

I wish that this information can help you to remove all doubts from my media. Regards, --Cvluis (talk) 10:43, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

O.k., thanks. I will work through all the images over the next day. The statue in Estatualuiscoloma.jpg is still protected (sculptor died only in 1947), but it should be covered by FoP of Spain. However, my most important question is still unanswered and that is about "Jose Luis Jiménez" (see above). If you don't want to answer that publicly, you may either send me an email or disclose it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org where it is also treated confidentially. --Túrelio (talk) 12:45, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi, thanks. Jose Luis Jiménez is a other colaborator of Wikipedia, and i help her to upload some files to wikimedia and to compose some biographies, because he don't know to write with Wikipedia editor, and all images that he gives me to upload are under the self|cc-by-sa-3.0 license. I hope to ask your question of the identity of Jose Luis Jiménez (Her User account is Jljimenez). Regards. --Cvluis (talk) 18:44, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

So, it is this account User:Jljimenez, right? --Túrelio (talk) 19:15, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Exactly. --Cvluis (talk) 13:26, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Turelio again, I like to know if my uploads going to remain in wikimedia, i only watch the missing of evidence of permission tag, and that says my files can be deleted the next monday. Thanks, regards. --Cvluis (talk) 12:42, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

• File:Fernando de la Milla Alonso de la Florida.jpg: said to be shot in 1930 by Jose Luis Jiménez García. Is this real? How old is User:Jljimenez?
• File:Manuel Luis Ortega Pichardo (archivo Jose Luis Jiménez García).jpg: said to be shot in 1934 by unknown photographer, but choosen license-tag is valid only if photographer surely died >70 years ago. That doesn't fit. Was any honest research done to identify the photographer?
• File:Pemartinsanjuan.jpg: said to be shot in 1937 by unknown photographer. Then, how do you know it was shot in 1937? Further questions as 1 line above.
• File:Isasi Ivison.jpg: said to be shot in 2012, which is surely wrong. So, when was it shot and by whom?
• File:FranciscoBejarano.jpg: as this was originally shot by User:Jljimenez, then he needs to confirm this either on the image page or by sending a confirmation to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (COM:OTRS).
• File:Carmenuñezfotos.jpg: shows a person who died in 1923, but claimed to be taken by Jose Luis Jiménez García. Again, how old is User:Jljimenez?
• File:FranciscoLorente.jpg: When was this image really shot?

That should be enough work for you to do. --Túrelio (talk) 22:37, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Turelio, I could confuse with my information. The photo of File:Fernando de la Milla Alonso de la Florida.jpg wasn´t shooted by Jose Luis Jimenez, of course (he isn´t too old), the date when I providing it´s the date of the shoot, but Jose Luis Jimenez taken the photos directly from the family descendants. I can know exactly the photographer name and data, but the date of the photo takes evidence that the shoot was more than 70 years ago. The same case are with the files File:Carmenuñezfotos.jpg and File:FranciscoLorente.jpg, for the file of File:FranciscoBejarano.jpg I was send a confirmation to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Regards. --Cvluis (talk) 11:54, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Well, then we have a problem. If File:Fernando de la Milla Alonso de la Florida.jpg was not shot by Jose Luis Jimenez, then why does the author entry carry his name? Did I understand you correctly that File:FranciscoLorente.jpg and File:Carmenuñezfotos.jpg also were not shot by Jose Luis Jimenez? Only File:FranciscoBejarano.jpg was truely shot by him, right? --Túrelio (talk) 12:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I confused to put the name of the source of the photo instead the author of the photo. If Jose Luis Jimenez obtain the photo from the descendants of the photo character, how i can put the information fields? Only File:FranciscoBejarano.jpg was shoted directly by Jose Luis Jiménez, and I send the confirmation permission email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Regards. --Cvluis (talk) 12:33, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

I will go offline now and cannot look into it today. Anyway, in all cases, in which Jose Luis Jimenez was not the true photographer, you need to remove his name from the Author entry. In those images, which were from his archive, you should put "Archive Jose Luis Jimenez" into the Source entry, but not in the Author entry. --Túrelio (talk) 12:41, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi, i can't understand this. I was from the last 28 of August claim the true information of my suspect copyright infraction images files, and them all photos be removed. How i can to improve Wikipedia and Wikipedia if i must to send to wikimedia a sworn statement of i'm not deceive to wikimedia?. And there a lot of users, and i can to report, that are uploading some images without any control of the copyright. I like to know if the Wikimedia administrators are creating a hunt for me and others users. Excuse my reproachfully and sarcastic tone, but i can't to understand this situation. Regards. --Cvluis (talk) 22:39, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Though it's pretty cold comfort, it doesn't matter much that the files have been deleted, as un-deletion is just 2 clicks for any admin. Objectively, there were quite some inconsistencies with your uploads, though I am confident that it may be possible to solve them for most of the files. As per our policy we have to delete files if there is reasonable suspicion that they are not free. At the moment we have the problem that we are overwhelmed with uploads due to the recently started "Wikiloves monuments" action in addition to the currently high rate of clear copyvios which we need to detect shortly after upload. The few volunteer sysops at Commons have simply far too much workload in these days. So, don't despair. You can either wait til I have more time or try to involve another admin, eventually a es-native speaker. --Túrelio (talk) 20:13, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Genehmigung und Lizensierung von Kunst

Hallo Túrelio! Vielen Dank für deine klaren Anmerkungen zu den von mir hochgeladenen Bildern. Ich habe eine Email mit den entsprechenden Angaben an die OTRS-Mitglieder geschrieben. Herzlichen Gruß, Cuna13 (talk) 19:38, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Prima. Ich habe die Bilder entsprechend markiert, so dass mehr Zeit bleibt. --Túrelio (talk) 19:43, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

God's work

Thanks for looking out for my picture, unfortunately that was my edit. Currently I'm trying to find alternatives for Template:Gods Work as it seems to be on the death row ^[36]. --Eternal-Entropy (talk) 19:32, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

I thought so. However, any legally relevant edits are not acceptable from IPs. You need to log-in and repeat the edit. That was the only reason for my revert. --Túrelio (talk) 19:37, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Wuppertal - Am Diek - Villa Halstenbach 03 ies.jpg

Da will eine IP diesem Schild eine Niederdeutsche Sprache hinzufügen - weil gerade mal ein Wort irgendwie von dort den Ursprung hat (einen Eigennamen). Ich finde das aber weit hergeholt. Wie ist deine Meinung? Siehe auch User talk:Atamari#Diek. --Atamari (talk) 21:08, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Mit der IP bin ich auch schon "zusammengerasselt"[37]. Für die Sachfrage fehlen mir die etymolog. Kenntnisse. Meine generelle Haltung bei Kat.streitigkeiten ist, solange es keine Over-categorization ist oder das Bild/den Abgebildeten in einen problematischen Zusammenhang stellt, bin ich eher großzügig. Wenn es total falsch ist, wird es eh früher oder später jemand anders wieder ändern. --Túrelio (talk) 21:18, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Deletion

The author this images is me. And these images were taken in bad quality. I can try to photograph again.

• File:Avenida Borges de Medeiros.jpg
• File:Avenida Borges de Medeiros (2).jpg
• File:Avenida Borges de Medeiros (3).jpg
• File:Doggis - BarraShopping.jpg

Eduardo P (talk) 22:29, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Toril Moi

Discussion goes at User talk:Evenfiel.

Sock question

I noticed your comments at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Administrator Acting Against Policy and Misusing Sysop Tools? Is it just me, or is 150.135.161.183 an obvious sock puppet of User:Sex-position-demonstration, who User:Martin H. just indef blocked? Shouldn't this IP be blocked indef as well as a sockpuppet of an indef-blocked user? I thought I'd ask someone since I've only been an admin for a couple weeks. INeverCry 22:57, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Your conclusion is surely true. However, IMO it might be fair (to the blocked) and appropriate (for the benefit of the project, prevent creation of a new vandal) to allow the blocked user to some reasonable extent/period (which might be reached soon) to discuss the rationale of his block. The regular place for this is his own talkpage. As he choose to complain about the blocking admin, it's now COM:AN/U. As his complaint was clearly rejected by several admins, this discussion might be closed soon and from that point on, these IPs could be short-time blocked if he goes on with the discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 23:08, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

The IP is also posting to Martin's talk page, which seems pretty close to harrassment. This user has tp rights to appeal his block, so why is his post to ANI as a sock even valid? INeverCry 23:21, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Konserve für Email-Erlaubnis von nicht-panorama-freiem Kontent

Hallo.

Ich habe Innenraumfotos von einem Bauernmuseum. Der Besitzerverein ist bereit eine Genehmigung auszustellen. Gibt es hier bereits ein Beispiel wie so eine Email aussehen solle?

mfg, Thomas

Ja, schau mal hier Commons:OTRS/de für den Hintergrund und hier für eine Vorlage. --Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

incorrectly namend

Hallo Túrelio, bzgl dieser involvierten Angelegenheit würde ich gerne nochmal um Deine Aufmerksamkeit bzw. Tätigkeit bitten. Grüße -- πϵρήλιο ℗ 12:09, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Dort kommentiert. --Túrelio (talk) 14:10, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, ja genau die Kategorie sollte den dortigen Namen haben. Ein "of von familie" gibt es nicht. Gibt es dafür vielleicht eine Move-Funktion oder muss ich das jetzt alles händisch machen oder reicht Hotcat? Grüße -- πϵρήλιο ℗ 18:26, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

User MoZ1337

Ciao Túrelio! I think he didin't uderstood "how to respect copyrights"... Thank you!--Cirimbillo (talk) 14:01, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Blocked again. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 14:05, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Justyna Steczkowska photos

Hi, could you help me with the deletion of the accepted Justyna Steczkowska photos?

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Justyna Steczkowska singing 04.jpg --Dany kruk (talk) 21:17, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

I have left my votes, but I can't decide/close this DR as I have opened it. --Túrelio (talk) 21:44, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

RE: File:TateHirst0153.JPG

Hi! I think it was there for an exhibition, but I'm not entirely sure because I don't live in London. I wasn't sure if I could upload it or not. --MaryG90 (talk) 12:19, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

If not permanently, then it is not covered by FOP and violates the artist's copyright. May be, you could do a little research to find out whether it is still there. --Túrelio (talk) 12:22, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

If that image File:Damien Hirst0111.JPG is related to the above mentioned image, then it's clearly an exhibition. --Túrelio (talk) 12:54, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Yes, you're right. It's not there anymore. Thank you for the info (about this photo and the other one ;) I'll be more careful next time. --MaryG90 (talk) 12:56, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Photo of Dr. William R. Wiley (File:William R. Wiley.jpg)

Hello,

I am the webmaster for the Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL) website http://www.emsl.pnl.gov/emslweb/. We are in the process of updating our page on Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_Molecular_Sciences_Laboratory and would like to use a photo of Dr. Wiley that is on the website http://www.emsl.pnl.gov/about/wiley_emsl.jsp and also available on Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/emsl/4517693659/. Why can't we use it?

Thank you!

Hi Webmaster Fletcher04, for such kind of questions you should use my regular talkpage. Anyway: the problem is that on Flickr, this image is restricted to non-commercial use, an restriction which we don't accept per our policy. Now, the question is, why does a US federal institution, whose works are PD-USGov per law, use such a restriction? It might be that it's not their image, i.e. it wasn't shot by one of their personal. Therefore, I would recommend you to contact directly either the Flickr account or the ESML press/PR dep. and ask them about your wish. If they have the rights over this image, they should surely grant your wish, if they don't have, they can't. If that doesn't work, and as Dr. Wiley is dead already, you may use the image per fair-use, but only locally on :en wikipedia. --Túrelio (talk) 16:40, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi Turelio,

I've search and can't find our discussion on this topic. We've changed the licensing on Flickr per a discussion with our internal Media Folks. http://www.flickr.com/photos/emsl/4517693659/. If this is acceptable to you, can you restore the image?

Thank you!

Do they/you know who was the photographer and when this image was originally shot? --Túrelio (talk) 19:35, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments entries

Hi, I have found some entries to Wiki Loves Monuments deleted on the basis of the following:

• Copyright violation: EXIF name not the same as uploader File:Sunset_by_the_Yatch.jpg
• Copyright violation: Watermark suggest copyright - not same name as uploader File:Church_for_Everyone.jpg
• Copyright violation: Copyright in watermark is not the uploader name File:Green_University.jpg

I believe it can be expected that the watermarks of the uploader may actually be the uploader's real name and it would be different from an account name the uploader had registered. The arbitrary deletion without careful consideration is very discouraging and would defeat the purpose of enticing active participation in Wiki Loves Monuments based on the reasons given. I may be wrong but I am hoping for a quick response regarding the matter. -- Wiki Loves Monuments Philippine project manager (talk) 02:15, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

I totally reject your accusation "arbitrary deletion without careful consideration". All 3 files were tagged for speedy deletion by one of my most senior admin colleagues and then performed by me, as I found the given rationale plausible.

In general: if we find an upload highly suspicious of being a copyvio, it needs speedy deletion, as from that moment on we are aware that it might be illegal and violate the right of another person or institution. This is also coded in our policy: Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. Of course, sometimes we err in our initial assessment, not the least as we have limited resources. But that is not a real problem, because a file can easily be undeleted.

Back to the problem at hand: an account calling himself "Greedyplus" surely doesn't sound very trustworthy from the beginning.

Now, his upload File:Sunset_by_the_Yatch.jpg not only has an artist's credit "Jonathan A. San Juan" in its EXIF and IPTC data, but also has a big watermark "Copyright" through the whole image, rendering it rather useless, in addition to being discouraged on Commons (Commons:Watermarks).

His upload File:Church for Everyone.jpg has a watermark saying "maynard andrew photography 2011"

His upload File:Green University.jpg has a watermark saying "(C) Maynard Rabanal 2011"

Also, all his remaining uploads have disturbing "Maynard Rabanal" watermarks.

• File:Manila Post Office.jpg in the middle of the image.
• File:Heart at Peace.jpg and File:Our National Hero.jpg at the bottom; could be cropped away

Doing some more time-consuming research, I found the blog http://maynardandrew.blogspot.de/, whose owner calls himself "Maynard Andrew Rabanal", which suggests that at least 5 of the 6 images may come from this photographer. Whether Greedyplus (talk · contribs) is identical to Mr. Maynard Andrew Rabanal still needs verification. Therefore I suggest that you contact either User:Greedyplus or the above mentioned blog-owner Maynard Andrew Rabanal and ask him to send either a permission for the uploads or a confirmation of the identity of user/blog owner, to be sent from an email address clearly associated with the blog or Maynard Andrew Rabanal, to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (emails to this account are not published or publicly disclosed). If you agree to this I can temporarily un-delete 2 of the deleted files, except File:Sunset by the Yatch.jpg, which still needs 1) an explaination and 2) removal of the watermark.

In addition, I suggest that you from "Wiki Loves Monuments Philippine" notify/educate your contributors, not to put watermarks on their uploads, as this makes the images less usable and as they will be removed anyway, if possible. They may put the name or wording for their attribution/credit into the EXIF data. --Túrelio (talk) 07:09, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick response. I have sent notice to the uploader regarding the matter regarding watermarks. As per several WLM discussions when we were still starting the project back in February, they advised us not to include in our criteria the need for photos not to bear watermarks and would rather leave it up to the jury to decide if they shall consider it. Our website gives some tips on what to submit, but cannot impose it as a requirement, as per advise of the WLM International Committee. I would appreciate notices, if similar incidents arise from entries coming from the Philippines before further action can be taken so as not to cause any confusion. Namayan (talk) 07:54, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

O.k., I have undelete 2 images.

If you want to get notified in case of similar problems, you should name a project or talk page, which is patrolled (more or less) round the clock. --Túrelio (talk) 07:59, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

That is great Túrelio! Thanks for the understanding and support. I'll create a page for that. Namayan (talk) 08:08, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

I shall use this as our project talk page Commons_talk:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2012_in_the_Philippines. Namayan (talk) 05:31, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

I have linked it with a note on COM:AN. --Túrelio (talk) 06:23, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for telling me about the fake reviews

Thanks Ebaychatter0 (talk) 16:24, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

murals in Italy

Hi Tùrelio I'm Boban475. Sorry but I dont' speak very well and I'm new in Wikimedia Commons.... I have delete the photo that I have load yesterday.

Hi Boban475, the problem is that that photos of recent works in Italy (murals, buildings, statues), which are still copyrighted, cannot be uploaded to Commons as they violate the copyright of the original artist/architect, as Italy has no freedom-of-panorama exemption (Commons:Libertà di panorama) from copyright. You might talk to my admin colleague Trixt who is Italiano. --Túrelio (talk) 09:03, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Herbert Beck - Fotos vom Werk

Hallo Túrelio, auf meine Email an die OTRS-Mitglieder kam leider keine Reaktion; die Fotos auf der Seite sind nun gelöscht. Soll ich noch eine Woche abwarten, ob die Fotos wieder "entlöscht" werden oder nochmals eine Email mit der von Wiki-Commons empfohlenen Einverständniserklärung abschicken? Ist hierfür handschriftliche Unterschrift wichtig? Lieben Gruß, Cuna13 (talk) 09:19, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Cuna13, bei OTRS gibt es oft eine "Warteschlange". Du kannst mal auf Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard nachfragen; manchmal beschleunigt das die Dinge etwas. --Túrelio (talk) 09:23, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Personality Warning

I uploaded this photo [38] from flicker with the right licence but there is a personality warning tag. What does it mean and what am i suppose to do? --Kendite (talk) 16:37, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

You are supposed to do nothing, as this warning is not directed at you, but to re-users of all images with identifiable individuals. It is meant to prevent misuse of such images. --Túrelio (talk) 18:33, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Deletion

• File:MegaMatte - Città America.jpg

When I took the photo of the Mega Matte snack bar. A lady said she owner the store, said he has not authorized me to take pictures of this subsidiary MegaMatte. Accused me he was going to arrest me. I think better, withdraw this photo of that subsidiary MegaMatte of Commons. Withdraw the photo File:MegaMatte - Città America.jpg.

Eduardo P (talk) 18:36, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:49, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Élevage01.jpg

Hi Bloody-libu, who has performed the "cropping" of the head from the original image? --Túrelio (talk) 07:00, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio,

I thought it was Spedona like he uploaded the file but he doesn't answer on his user talk... You can delete it, the file is unused. Bloody-libu (talk) 14:33, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Hmm, I didn't question its legality, I had only doubts about the correct attribution / author entry and I can't see the original page on :fr. --Túrelio (talk) 14:39, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

The original page on fr. said only "{{GFDL}}", whithout description, source or author. Bloody-libu (talk) 14:41, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

But uploaded by User:Spedona, right? Well, then we can assume he did it. --Túrelio (talk) 14:42, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I assumed he did it when I transferred the file. I asked a confirmation on his talk page but I have no answer for the moment. Bloody-libu (talk) 14:47, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Scandisk65

Gracias por la advertencia y perdón por las molestias ocasionadas. Estaba en la creencia de que modificando la imagen original se podía considerar una imagen nueva. Ahora ya sé que no es así. En lo sucesivo solamenete subiré imágenes de cosecha propia.--Scandisk65 (talk) 08:43, 6 September 2012 (UTC)Scandisk65

Hola Scandisk65, no sabe sufficiente espanol para escribirte. It is good to see that you show insight into this. Please check all your remaining (not speedy-tagged) uploads whether they are truely and originally yours. Those which are not yours and which are not very old (might be public domain) you should request by yourself for deletion in order not to violate the copyright of the original creator. --Túrelio (talk) 08:48, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Avaza collage.jpg

Так правильно оформлено? --AltynAsyr (talk) 16:15, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

User:Yomut is your second account? --Túrelio (talk) 21:12, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

yes --AltynAsyr (talk) 08:46, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

O.k., if you want to retain both accounts, which is not forbidden, then you should put a note on each userpage, like "This is an alternate account of User:AltynAsyr/Yomut. --Túrelio (talk) 09:34, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Deletion of my picture

Hi , I need my personal photo to be deleted from commons, can you please do it for me? or can I delete it myself?? this one --Bbadree (talk) 17:53, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 21:13, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks sir. Bbadree (talk) 18:25, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

File:2012 Novak Đ in New York1 during US Open1.JPG

Can you please stop mark down those pictures as a ready for deletion? All these pictures are done by Neshy, I have his email where hui is asking me to upload these pictures on Vikipedia. If you wont I will forwarded to you that email. Thanks----László (talk) 22:28, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Do you really understand the problem with the photos showing posters with a photo? Or do you claim that this Neshy also took the photo which is shown on the poster? --Túrelio (talk) 22:33, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

In addition, all the other images have the problem that they are not found under the source which you provided. --Túrelio (talk) 22:40, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for responding. I understend photo about poster and that is realy for speedy deletion, and I did not react on those. This File:2012 Novak Đ in New York1 during US Open1.JPG, this File:2012 Novak Đ in New York1 during US Open2.JPG and this File:Sports store in New York with Novak Đoković equipments1.jpg has to be deleted. If you can please do it, thanks my fault. My reaction was on this file File:2012 US Open Novak Đ vs Paolo Lorenzi1.jpg because I was thinking that you started to put everything for speedy deletion. I will give a source right a way in next couple minutes for that picture. One question, what and how I can put the source if is not my work and pictures is not on internet and I have that picture in my email (got sent from autor to me for uploading). Thanks for answer. You can do that on my talk page if is ok with you.----László (talk) 22:48, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

You should then write "sent by photographer" in the source entry. However, this always requires an OTRS permission, sent by the photographer to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . For details see Commons:OTRS. --Túrelio (talk) 22:52, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for explenation. ----László (talk) 23:12, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

I sent requiest for this photo File:2012 US Open Novak Đ vs Paolo Lorenzi1.jpg to this adress permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. On that email beside template I also incuded my correspodention with Neshy and his request.----László (talk) 23:43, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

O.k., I have tagged it accordingly with OTRS-pending. --Túrelio (talk) 07:40, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Babi Dewet

Hey Dude! Why did you delete Babi's Picture? The ORIGINAL PHOTOGRAPHER uploaded it. As you can see at her book cover HERE: http://issuu.com/fcbabidewet/docs/capaabertasan?mode=window&backgroundColor=%23222222 (Saw Mayara Moura's name there? yes.)

Next time, please do a proper Google research instead of messing around articles.

Sincerely Yours Da5vi

I'm not your dude. Next time, use civilized language or stay away from this page!

Provided you are talking about File:Babi Dewet autora.jpg, which you didn't care to tell, how do you think I found the earlier publication which lead the deletion, if not by Google search? User:Mayamoura claimed this image to be from September 8. However, a far better and uncropped version of the same image was published already in June 22 on http://todateen.uol.com.br/leretdb/entrevista-com-babi-dewet-autora-de-sabado-a-noite/, which makes the upload highly suspicious for being a copyvio. And no, your link above isn't of use for me, as it's far too small to read the image caption. Anyway, feel free to request undeletion at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests. --Túrelio (talk) 22:27, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for licensing update

Hi,

Thank you to have fixed the license here.

When I saw someone have uploaded a photo with a -NC license, I sent a mail through Flickr to the author, and she agreed to relicense it. You were faster than me to edit the description. --Dereckson (talk) 09:40, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 14:08, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Foto "toro"

Efectivamente es la foto de una pintura. Tanto la foto como la pintura las he realizado yo. El resto de fotos también son pinturas y las he realizado yo. Saludos. >>>>> jgquino20 10/09/2012

Thanks for the feedback. I've put all your paintings into Category:Joaquín González (Quino). --Túrelio (talk) 16:22, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Hilfe...

Hallo Túrelio, ich hab da (File:Staatsweingut Meersburg.jpg) ein Bild neu hochgeladen und dabei die Version von Rizzo überschrieben... mein Versuch dies wieder rückgängig zu machen ist irgendwie gescheitert. Kannst du bitte die Urversion von Rizzo wieder herstellen? Danke für deine Hilfe. Lieben Gruß --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 22:26, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Hallo 1971markus, anscheinend hat der revert ja doch geklappt. Soll ich deine Version (2.) weglöschen? --Túrelio (talk) 07:00, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, so richtig geklappt hat es leider doch nicht... die aktuelle Bild-Version hat leider ein anderes Maß als die Ur-Datei. Ich glaube es wäre gegenüber Rizzo nur fair wenn seine Datei wiederheregestellt würde. Danke! Bis Bald... Lieben Gruß --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 20:50, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:55, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Julian Schieber.jpg

Hallo, da du die OTRS pending-Vorlage eingefügt hast, gehe ich davon aus, dass du auf deine Mail-Anfrage eine Antwort erhalten hast? --Yoda1893 (talk) 10:54, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Ja, noch am selben Tag meiner Anfrage, und ich habe sie umgehend an OTRS weitergeleitet. --Túrelio (talk) 12:06, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Danke für die Info. Hast du dazu eine Ticketnummer? Ich hab nämlich hier bei XenonX3 nachgefragt, weil da noch ein paar andere Bilder dranhängen und ohne Ticketnr. (siehe XenonX3s de-Benutzerdiskussionsseite) kann er den Vorgang schwer finden. --Yoda1893 (talk) 21:48, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Hab bei XenonX3 auf :de geantwortet. --Túrelio (talk) 07:34, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

XenonX3 hat das Ticket gefunden (siehe seine de-Diskussionsseite) --Yoda1893 (talk) 13:57, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

O.k., dann werde ich das Bild entlöschen und dann sollte er umgehend das Ticket darauf setzen (und am besten gleich auch auf die anderen davon erfassten Uploads). --Túrelio (talk) 13:59, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Danke für die hier leider nicht immer selbstverständliche aktive Hilfe zur Bildrettung u. a. durch deine Kontaktaufnahme mit dem Rechteinhaber. :) Schön dass man auf Commons auch Leute die Bilder überprüfen, die alles dafür tun dass sich so eine Überprüfung der Urheberrechte zum Guten wendet. :) --Yoda1893 (talk) 14:27, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Possible copyvio by Pierrele

Hello Túrelio,

Pierrele is a user familiar with uploads of copyrighted images. He recenlty imported File:USFL Saison 1967 Deuxième division.JPG. Could you check that it is not the same as File:Fumel Marmande 1967 Montée en nationale.JPG already deleted by you for copyvio ? Udufruduhu (talk) 12:44, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi Udufruduhu, no, they are not at all identical. However, the "USFL Saison 1967 .." image is still a reproduction of a photo from 1967 and I doubt that the original photo is his. --Túrelio (talk) 14:25, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Sorry konnte mich nicht melden !

Hallo Turelio! Jetzt habe ich reagiert und folgendes ans OTRS Team geschrieben. Danke nochmals. Hallo OTRS Team,

erneut wurde die Autorenschaft an meinen eigenen Bildern angezweifelt. Dieses Mal hat dies sogar zur Löschung eines meiner Bilder geführt: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:1592.1H%C3%B6hler_Prof._Gertrud.JPG

Ich erkläre hiermit, das die von meinem Benutzeraccount Chester100 hochgeladenen Dateien von mir, Udo Grimberg, erstellt wurden. Dies trifft auf alle von mir hochgeladenen Dateien, bei denen entweder über die Metadaten oder die Dateibeschreibung Udo Grimberg eingetragen wurde.

Ich bitte darum die genannte Datei wiederherzustellen und für zukünftige Dateien ein OTRS Ticket bereitzustellen, um eine Löschung meiner Bilder zu verhindern.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Udo Grimberg / Benutzer:Chester100

--Chester100 (talk) 17:18, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung. Ich habe File:1592.1Höhler Prof. Gertrud.JPG vorläufig entlöscht; OTRS wird es dann endgültig machen. --Túrelio (talk) 18:14, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

User:Arthro

Hallo Túrelio, darf ich Dich um etwas bitten? Arthro scheint ein Neuling zu sein, der bei falschen(?) Kategorien Löschanträge stellt. Bevor er Ärger und damit Frust bekommt, magst Du ihm vielleicht einen Tipp geben? Ich bekomme es in Englisch derzeit schlicht nicht hin. Danke! LG, --4028mdk09 (talk) 20:58, 11 September 2012 (UTC) Schade, dass es hier nicht so etwas ähnliches wie ein Mentorenprogramm gibt.

Danke! --4028mdk09 (talk) 05:23, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Gern geschehn. --Túrelio (talk) 14:22, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Deletion requests

Hi Túrelio, I don't know who to course this to, but a WLM Philippines participant (User:Rosesale) wasn't able to properly upload her entries using the Special Upload Wizard for Wiki Loves Monuments Philippines, thus her entries weren't categorized properly and were not counted in our statistics. She had them tagged for deletion and wanted to upload them again, but I guess because of the metadata information her images are being rejected even she uses a different file name. May I request the following images be deleted so she can re-upload them again?

• File:Strong_Wall.jpg
• File:What's Inside.JPG
• File:A_Page_From_the_History_Book.JPG
• File:Standing Proud.JPG

-- Namayan (WLM Philippines) 12:47, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 14:21, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. -- Namayan (talk) 22:38, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Was habe ich falsch gemacht?

Hi Túrelio, was ist hier passiert? Ich meine, nach der Verschiebeaktion habe ich das Bild noch gesehen. Liegt es am Umlaut? den hatte ich irgendwie übersehen. Hat aber doch sonst funktioniert. Vielleicht kannst du ja mal reparieren und berichten. Ich habe noch einige Verschiebungen vor (hier finden sich noch einige mit Denkmal xxx Namen). Gruß. --Schiwago (talk) 21:17, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Ähem, also ich sehe momentan kein Problem mit File:Altefähr Kirchweg 7.jpg. Umlaute sind technisch auf Commons kein Problem, aber möglicherweise für externe Nutzer, weshalb ich das i.a. vermeide (ist aber keine Vorschrift). --Túrelio (talk) 06:29, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Und schon isses wieder da! Gestern Abend war das Bild verschwunden. Technik, die begeistert;) --Schiwago (talk) 13:51, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

File:SchulgartenBehnPanther.jpg

Der Schulgarten in Lübeck ist eine öffentliche Parkanlage, also warum keine Panoramafreiheit?--Kresspahl (talk) 09:43, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Der löschende Kollege ist manchmal etwas, äh, pauschal. Habs wiederhergestellt. --Túrelio (talk) 10:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Danke! Ist hier zwar noch Rotlink, aber wird schon kommen.--Kresspahl (talk) 11:16, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Er hatte es schon wieder gelöscht, obwohl ich ihn sogar benachrichtigt hatte. Na ja, nochmal undeleted. --Túrelio (talk) 12:28, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Hofareale in Haynrode C.jpg

Bitte, Turelio, nimm das Skript sofort sofort heraus. Das bremst meine Arbeit ganz beträchtlich. Sollte das Bild so nicht einstellbar sein, dann lösch es bitte -- Haubi (talk) 15:42, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Auf deiner Disku gehts weiter. --Túrelio (talk) 16:21, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Sorry

(Google Translate) Sorry Túrelio but because there are better pictures of those things, for example, ordered the deletion of File:Maracaibo culture 2012.JPG because these photos are the same, but better: File:Cultura en la Autopista 1, San Francisco, Maracaibo, Venezuela.jpg File:Muros culturales, Autopista 1, San Francisco, Maracaibo, Venezuela.jpg This is a small amount of all the photos I uploaded, I want to Wikimedia Commons has really useful content. In the future I'll be more careful with the photos you upload to try not to disturb this anymore. -- George Miquilena · talk 23:19, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

DPV

Hi, thank you for asking me, i get the permission, the picture was given by DPV himself. was i need to do to give the permission ? --Babouba (talk) 09:59, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi Babouba, you should forward the permission or whatever you got from DPV to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . Emails to this address are treated confidentially. In any case, if you are in contact with DPV, you should ask him whether he knows who was the photographer. As he seems to be only 5 years old in tis photo, it may either be a family member or a kindergarten photographer. If it's a family member, we can assume implicite permission; nevertheless, providing the name would be helpful. --Túrelio (talk) 10:04, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Could you delete these copyright violation pictures?

• File:Marriage of Kamehameha IV at Kawaiahao Church (bw).jpg
• File:Marriage of Kamehameha IV at Kawaiahao Church1.jpg
• File:Marriage of Kamehameha IV at Kawaiahao Church (cropped).jpg

--KAVEBEAR (talk) 22:09, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Disney's Shake It Up Photo

− Hello, I have oploaded a photo created by myself from the tv show Shake It Up. I have not made the HOLE photo by my self, but I have been cutting the girls into the picture. So please, with all means, do not delete it. I have my rights to use it to the danish wiki page about Shake it Up! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Potterhead113 (talk • contribs) 16. September 2012, 16:34 Uhr (UTCTúrelio (talk) 15:16, 16 September 2012 (UTC))

Hi, assuming that you are talking about File:Shake it up season 2 picture.png, this was rather obviously a Disney movie capture/still. Anyway, even if the girls were your own work, which I somewhat doubt, the background has enough creativity to be copyrighted by Disney. --Túrelio (talk) 15:16, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

WLM deletion request

Hi Túrelio, may I once again ask a favor to have this photo entry File:Mile_long_barracks,corregidor.jpg deleted as it wasn't uploaded using the Special Upload Wizard, the uploader confirmed he is submitting it as an entry. Many thanks. Namayan (talk) 02:27, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:30, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. 12:38, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

check my last upload

Hi again. this is my final upload (last upload). please check it. and decision fot it stabile! :) thanx.Dooste Amin (talk) 08:09, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Replied on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 09:55, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Derivative work or not?

Hi. No FOP in Russia but this is a photo from a meeting. I want to know, is it a derivative work or not?--Melikov Memmed (talk) 09:06, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

I have no idea how old the monument in the background is. Of that is a problem the upper part could be cropped away. Otherwise we could open a deletion discussion to attract some input from other users. --Túrelio (talk) 09:09, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I generally want to know in Commons such photos (photos from meetings with monuments where no FOP) are derivative work or not?--Melikov Memmed (talk) 09:27, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Technically it might be considered a derivative. But whether this derivative is also a copyvio, depends on the circumstances. In many cases it might not be a problem as the monument is only de minimis. --Túrelio (talk) 09:35, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks--Melikov Memmed (talk) 09:52, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Error

Based on what the file is deleted David Michael Bentle 16 September 2012 Rostov on Don stadium Olimp 2.jpg, before you delete something, we must analyze the situation and make smart decisions. I am the administrator of the Russian section and perfectly know the rules of the project's image obtained consent to the deployment of the file in the repository Commons. Please return the file and return to do it to the page of Wikipedia, he was removed from the bot. I consider your actions as harmful and rash does not correspond to the status of the administrator. The page you brought up as evidence in Russian agreement described the author's photo on the Announcement is it to Commons under a free license. JukoFF (talk) 19:03, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Nice that you know the rules and the situation on Commons sooo well, that you feel entitled to throw around accusations. Lets summarize the known facts:

• the same file[39] as the deleted File:David Michael Bentle 16 09 2012 Rostov on Don stadium Olimp 2.jpg was uploaded to http://fc-rostov.livejournal.com/159728.html the same day but some hours earlier than it was uploaded to Commons. Both images have identical resolution and an identical watermark (upper right corner). The earlier upload to the other site strongly suggests that "our" version was copied from there.
• The fc-rostov.livejournal.com site only carries the note "Copyright © 1999 LiveJournal, Inc. All rights reserved", but no further evidence of a free license. I have Google-translated all text on that page, nothing mentions free licensing.
• The site http://alekseystarostin.ru/, from where the image on fc-rostov is linked-in, also says only "© 2012 Aleksey Starostin" without any evidence of a free license.

So, I still fail to see where the free license, that you mentioned, is found. Direct me to it, then I can consider undeleting the image. --Túrelio (talk) 19:42, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

• We say quietly. on page http://fc-rostov.livejournal.com/159728.html , Indicated that the original of these photos is available at http://starostin-a.livejournal.com/75629.html on this page in the dialogue between the author of photos and me (and nicknames starostin_a vesel_kartinki) is a dialogue in which the author agrees to the placement of photos under a free license. The source of N's personal website for compliance, in the description of the photos on Commons, you can specify both the source. 188.123.237.71 13:49, 19 September 2012 (UTC) JukoFF (talk) 13:50, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

O.k., I have temporarily undeleted the file, just out of good-will, as I can't really follow your conversation on livejournal. I have removed the copyvio-tag but added a no-permission-tag (which is less speedy). Now you should ask a ru-native-speaking Commons' admin to check whether the dialogue contains a valid permission and eventually to remove the no-perm-tag. Probably the dialogue needs to be archived in OTRS, as the livejournal entry can go away at any time. --Túrelio (talk) 21:01, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

At my request, party resend email with your permission, I think your mistake is obvious, please return the photograph in all language versions, from which it was removed by bots with your submission. JukoFF (talk) 16:33, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

You seem to have problems to acknowledge facts. My above listed evidence was clearly suggestive of a copyvio and in such a situation deletion is mandatory (Commons:PRP), otherwise we would deliberately risk a copyright infringement. Even your conversation with Ahonc[40] shows that I was not the only one who failed to see a permission on the page you provided. While I am glad that now, 8 days after upload, a valid permission has been arrived at OTRS, that doesn't change the fact that it was missing on September 19.

Next time when you upload similar material, before a permission has been accepted by OTRS, you should put the {{OTRS pending}} template on the image page, as this gives you more time and usually prevents a copyvio-tagging. --Túrelio (talk) 19:36, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy Gonzales categorization?

Why was File:Mouse eating.ogg put in Category:Speedy Gonzales? Just a misfire? I don't see any clues from the surrounding contributions. --Closeapple (talk) 01:19, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Too long away, I don't really remember. May be because the mouse was running away so fast. --Túrelio (talk) 06:21, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Sources

What would be a verifiable source for these PD photos?

Sardaka (talk) 07:01, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

The one you provided now is somewhat better than "French archives". Ideally, the source should allow us/others easily (online) to assess the copyright status. See File:Detectif.jpeg (not your upload, but the same case) is said to be from 1900, which is splendid nonsense, as they weren't even born in 1900. Also the image is so small, one cannot identify the possible date of the newspaper. In general, images from that time aren't necessarily PD, as a photographer working in 1933 could well have lived for some years after 1941. --Túrelio (talk) 07:12, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

I have just added new sources. I think I'm getting the idea, but for future reference, would L'Affaire Papin etc be acceptable? I was going to upload some more pix from that book, but I won't if the source won't be accepted.

Sardaka (talk) 07:42, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

This morning I have requested for deletion several Papin-associated uploads from another user. My primary intention is not to get them deleted at all cost, but to get a solid evaluation of such images. For images for which you don't have any author information, it might be wise to wait for the outcome of these DR discussions. Another option would be to ask an experienced admin from France, such as User:Yann or User:PierreSelim, for his opinion. --Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

WLM deletion request

May I request for this entry: File:Saint William the Hermit Cathedral.JPG to be deleted? Many thanks. Namayan (talk) 22:34, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:26, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Why ?

Because, It's very funny to add this template. Cordialy --Citron (talk) 21:11, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Flickr - DVS1mn - 51 Chevrolet Styleline (2).jpg

As an experienced Admin, please decide to mark to keep or delete this image. It is not a standard derivative image--more like a paragraph on a history of use of a vehicle. If you think its OK, please feel free to pass it. If not, please delete it. I don't know about this situation. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:47, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

• PS: This other situation is interesting. Another image here with the same license problem. But first please mark the above image, I mentioned with the paper notice. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:30, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

This will need input from US-based colleagues, as it was shot in the US and the threshold of originality differs from country to country. Regrettably, COM:TOO isn't of help here, as it is focussed on images, but not on text. I'll file a regular DR to attract some input. My gut feeling is that it has originality and might have to go. --Túrelio (talk) 08:33, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

• Thank You for your response. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:28, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Sss.jpg

Hi Túrelio. I noticed the rename request for this artwork. I see that the uploader seems to be one of the copyright holders, Rodion Potapov, but the image itself cites two copyright holder names at bottom, the other being Lyudmila Dubas, whose name is above Potapov's. I just wonder if permission is needed for this image? Also the Russian description given by the uploader just means "the town". INeverCry 17:45, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Wow, you are better in Russian than I (who knows nothing of that language). I've tagged it as no-permission. Let's see what the uploader says. The rename is important as there are a lot of deleted uploads with the same name. --Túrelio (talk) 18:09, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

I'm still a beginner with Russian, which is difficult to learn because of the switch to a completely different alphabet based on Greek rather than the Latin-based alphabet English and Spanish speakers are used to. Anyways, the main title on the two arches in this image is "школа маленьких волшебников" (Shkola Malen'kikh Volshebnikov) which might make a good title for the image. In English it means something like "School of little wizards". INeverCry 18:46, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Category:Alpaca wool

• 21:22, 11 November 2010 Túrelio (talk | contribs) deleted page Category:Alpaca wool ((incorrectly named) duplicate of Category:Alpaka wool)

It's the other way round: "Alpaka" is German, "Alpaca" is English. Since the second word is the English "wool" not the German "-wolle", "Alpaca wool" is the correct name and "Alpaka wool" a misspelling. I've re-created the category description at Category:Alpaca wool and {{category redirect}}'ed Category:Alpaka wool there. Deryck Chan (talk) 00:43, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Oops, you are right. Had been speedy-tagged by :de-compatriote. Seems, I shouldn't perform deletions that late hour. --Túrelio (talk) 07:21, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Re

Oh, i has taken too long. Please, eliminate this too until the OTRS has come. I don't know what is happening there at OTRS. +PrinceWilly 12:48, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

O.k. --Túrelio (talk) 12:51, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Gräfrath

Kannst du Bitte die Files "File:-Gräfrath Historischer Ortskern H 01.JPG" bis "File:-Gräfrath Historischer Ortskern H 23.JPG" löschen, ich will die Heute Abend erneut hochladen. Die Filenamen sind falsch. Siehe mein Upload-Logbuch. --Atamari (talk) 13:44, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Heute brauchte ich eigentlich keine Beschäftigungstherapie, es gab schon genug.  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 14:19, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

!

Discúlpame pero esta foto http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cartel_promocional_del_concierto_de_Anahi_en_Buenos_Aires..jpg fue tomada con mi celular horas antes del concierto, por eso yo soy la autora, yo la tome. --JudithJunkers (talk) 20:53, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Sure, I do not doubt that. The problem is that the content of the poster itself is copyrighted and by publishing your photo of that poster you are violating the copyright of the creator of the poster. The freedom-of-panorama exemption of Argentinian copyright law covers only buildings, nothing else. --Túrelio (talk) 20:59, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Kannst Du

die DS von Gerardus schützen? Da ist schon wieder eine Bot-Meldung aufgeschlagen. Danke. LG, --4028mdk09 (talk) 21:13, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Hmm, sie ist seit März vollgeschützt. Vermutlich sind sämtliche seitdem aufgeschlagenen Benachrichtigungen von Benutzern mit Admin-Rechten (ich bin auch dabei, Schande). Allerdings dürften die meisten Meldungen per automatisiertem Skript erfolgt sein, also nicht individuell unter bewusster Bearbeitung der Disku. Ich muss mich erstmal schlau machen, ob man auch das verhindern kann. Gruß. --Túrelio (talk) 06:39, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Etwas ähnliches hattte ich mir schon gedacht. Danke Dir fürs Kümmern. Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 19:44, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Headshot removal

It has recently been brought to the attention of Peter DeLuise that you have removed his personal headshot (in which he owns the copyright for) from his Wiki page. It is kindly requested that this headshot is put back, and not changed again in the future.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterDeLuise (talk • contribs) 24. September 2012, 23:26 Uhr (UTCTúrelio (talk) 06:31, 25 September 2012 (UTC))

Hi PeterDeLuise,
the way you are writing suggests that you, i.e. the account PeterDeLuise (talk · contribs), are not the real Mr. Peter DeLuise. Is that correct?

Re: "Wiki page" - I am not sure to what you are referring with that term. I have neither deleted the image (likely you are refering to File:Peter DeLuise Headshot.jpg) nor removed it from anywhere. However, I had tagged it for deletion for suspected copyvio. The uploader, you, had declared it to be from September 24, 2012, while it was found to be published already in 2008[41]. Also, it has been found elsewhere in higher resolution[42]. In addition, you claimed "PeterDeLuise" being the author (=photographer), which is somewhat unlikely with such a shot. Taken all this together, the file is highly suspicious of being the work of somebody else, i.e. a copyvio. In such a situation, speedy deletion is appropriate — the more as undeletion is rather easy, if evidence of true authorship/rights are provided.

Now the solution: you should ask the true rights holder for this image to send a written confirmation 1) of his ownership of the copyright and 2) of the release of the uploaded version under a cc-by-sa-3.0 license to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). (emails to this address are treated confidentially) An OTRS volunteer will then check the permission, issue a so-called OTRS ticket and put a label on the image page, which marks it as having a valid permission. --Túrelio (talk) 06:31, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

sources etc

I need some clarification about PD. Does PD mean that the creator has to have been dead for over 70 years? Can a pic be in the PD if the creator has not been dead for 70 years, if so in what circumstances? (I asked one of those other people but frankly didn't understand a word he said.)

Sardaka (talk) 07:31, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

to 1) today yes, for most countries, surely in France. {{PD-France}} (click on it) even suggests the possibility of a longer protection.

to 2) yes, if the creator put it voluntarily (per declaration) in the PD, as today several users do with their contributions to Commons, but which is very unlikely for a photographer of early 20th century. There may be other reasons, such as #2 in {{PD-France}}. However, claiming a work/photo to be anonymous requires a thorough research, as you and any re-user may be hold liable if the work actually isn't anonymous and still protected. Therefore, :de-wikipedia does not accept any anonymous works, which might still be copyright per age of creation. As the Papin photos concern France, you might ask a fr-native admin/user, such a my colleague User:Yann for example, who might know more specifics about exeptions and exemptions in France copyright laws. --Túrelio (talk) 07:49, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Gentiana Tur0004.jpg

Dear Túrelio,

I have identified your picture Gentiana Tur0004 as Gentiana utriculosa (Schlauch-Enzian) and categorised it as such.

Best regards, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 17:51, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Dear Reginald, thank you. --Túrelio (talk) 18:16, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Rekonstruktion

Hallo Turelio, kannst du mir helfen, die Metadatei zu entfernen? Die gehört ja nicht zu einer Rekonstruktion?! Danke! --Haubi (talk) 21:53, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Ich hatte dir schon heute vormittag auf :de geantwortet bzw. nachgefragt, weil mir unklar ist, was du genau meinst. Schau dort bitte mal nach und gib mir hier Bescheid. --Túrelio (talk) 21:57, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Ich meine die Metadatei des Bildes meine Cameradaten betreffend. Diese Rekonstruktion hat nichts mit einem Foto mehr zu tun --Haubi (talk) 15:18, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Metadaten, nicht Metadatei; deshalb war ich mir nicht sicher was du überhaupt meinst. Habe ich nun gemacht. --Túrelio (talk) 15:56, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Izumo Taisha

Hi, Turelio. I need your help for something I don't know how to handle. Izumo Taisha's photos (it's an extremely important Shinto shrine in Japan) are classified under Izumo Taisya, while Izumo Taisha is a redirect. Alas, the opposite is correct. Taisya is a Japanese romanization used nowhere else. Nobody but a Japanese would use it, and it's technically obsolete to boot. Wikipedia uses the spelling Taisha. Can you help? Urashimataro (talk) 03:38, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

The proper command for such an operation is {{moveto|<new category name>}} .

I have created Category:Izumo Taisha with the same content as Category:Izumo Taisya and corrected all interwiki links on the other projects. However, as I am busy the next days, you need to change the category name for all media currently in the old category.

What about the sub-cats Category:Haiden, Izumo Taisya, Category:Izumo Taisya models, Category:Izumo-Taisha-Kyoto-bun'in, Category:Main hall, Izumo Taisya and Category:Izumo-Taisya-Osaka-bunshi? Can they remain or should they be renamed following the same pattern Taisya -> Taisha ? --Túrelio (talk) 06:08, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Many Thanks for the help. Will fix the remaining categories this afternoon after work. Urashimataro (talk) 22:08, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Help

Hi Tú, another adm, I believe, eliminated this, but he din't see the OTRS permisson template, I guess. A lot of sysop do that, I don't know why. Can you upload the pic again? I received the authorization yesterday and sent to OTRS in the same day. Thanks. +PrinceWilly 15:52, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi Willy Weazley, well, actually it wasn't a OTRS-permission, only a "OTRS pending", which may take some days to become an accepted permission. Anyway, I agree that such an early deletion was unnecessary. I'll contact my colleague. --Túrelio (talk) 16:03, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Image seems to have be restored in between. --Túrelio (talk) 14:13, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Fair use

What is the situation about fair use? I got a tag that says fair use is not allowed on Wiki, but Wiki is full of fair use images.

Sardaka (talk) 08:25, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

What do mean by "Wiki"? That is generic term and there are many of them. "Fair use" as such is legal construction in US copyright law (though in several other countries there may be similar exceptions) and was first used on :en-Wikipedia. There may be a few more Wikipedias which have similar exemption policies (see List of WMF projects with any Exemption Doctrine Policy), whereas many large Wikipedias, such as :de, do not allow this or similar exemptions. The most important practical aspect of "fair use" is that it requires local upload at the project. On the other hand, Wikimedia-Commons does not (per our policy) and cannot (per the legal definition of "fair use" in US copyright law) allow "fair use"-media. So, when you intend to use "fair use" material, you have to check that possibility with the project in which you want to use it, and follow their policy. --Túrelio (talk) 08:40, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

foto de coki ramirez

deja de cambiar las foto esa de coki es horrible la q pusieron !! STOP!!!

You are not authorized to overwrite an image that belongs to another user. Besides, 3 of your 4 uploads so far have been found to be copyvios. If you go on with that behaviour, you will be blocked permanently. --Túrelio (talk) 21:28, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Re: if in use, it's not out of scope

Roger! ;-) Though I still wonder how such images could be useful in whichever project... Thanks for your advice, bye! :-) -- Vonvikken (talk) 22:11, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

The best way to get rid of them, is to search for a better equivalent, offer it on the pages where the bad one is currently used and, as soon as the bad has no more uses, file it for deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 22:15, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Ok, I'll try to find them!... -- Vonvikken (talk) 22:28, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments PH deletion of entries

Hi Túrelio,

May I kindly request the following images to be deleted, as the user failed to upload them correctly using the appropriate special upload wizard.

• File:Wood carvings at Manila Cathedral front door.jpg
• File:Baluarte_de_San_Diego,_Intramuros.jpg
• File:King_Carlos_VI_Monument_at_Plaza_Mayor,_Intramuros.jpg
• File:Rizal_Monument_at_Plaza_Armas,_Fort_Santiago_(close-up).jpg
• File:Rizal_Monument_at_Plaza_Armas,_Fort_Santiago.jpg
• File:Fort_Santiago_facade.jpg
• File:Bonifacio_Monument.jpg
• File:Manila-Acapulco_Galleon_Monument.jpg
• File:San_Agustin_Church_facade.jpg

Kind regards, Namayan (talk) 08:10, 29 September 2012 (UTC) (Wiki Loves Monuments Philippines)

Thanks for the quick response. Can I also have these deleted too?

• File:Malinta_Tunnel_1.JPG
• File:Malinta_Tunnel_2.JPG

Namayan (talk) 12:57, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 23:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio we'd like to thank you for all your assistance. If we could just have the following reinstated (File:Malinta_Tunnel_1.JPG and File:Malinta_Tunnel_2.JPG) I would truly appreciate it. They international WLM committee allowed us to just manually categorize them to qualify as entries. Your help has been most helpful. Maraming Salamat! Namayan (talk) 02:17, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 14:10, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Zalán Tibor az Ünnepi Könyvhéten 2012.jpeg

Hy! Upload error. Reset. New upload. Tambo (talk) 16:19, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Bitte um Wiederherstellungfolgender Kategorien:

Bitte um Wiederherstellung folgender Kategorien um em evtl. Schreibschutz:

• Category:Platzhoffstraße 25
• Category:Funckstraße 13
• Category:Funckstraße 79
• Category:Funckstraße 94

Da läuft ein Admin Amok.. Danke. --Atamari (talk) 11:25, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Category:Vigelandsanlegget

This category is again being filled up with images that will not be free until 2014, per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Norway (the artist, Gustav Vigeland, died in 1943). Is it possible to temporarily hide/delete the non-free images, and then restore them in 2014? - 4ing (talk) 20:01, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

 Done. Deleted, but listed in cat:undelete in 2014. --Túrelio (talk) 13:17, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Personel

Hi Tú, please, I was looking at this, and I've got confuse. For getting an OTRS-member permission flag, where do I go? I'm a volunteer since saturday.+PrinceWilly 03:04, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi Willy Weazley. I just saw this coming by and you needed to go to Commons:Bureaucrats' noticeboard; I requested it for you already. Trijnstel_talk 14:07, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

NoUploads in Category:César Lombera

Hi!, I wanted to know if there is any problem with Category:César Lombera. All the images are from sculptures in the street in Spain where we have, almost at this time ;), freedom of panorama. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 00:29, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi Elisardojm, that is a standard warning tag for artist who aren't dead for >70 years. Besides, you should consider that this category is for the works of César Lombera, not only for his works in Spain. FOP terms differ from country to country. For example, a photo of a sculpture of César Lombera in France would be a copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 12:48, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Ah!, I see, thanks for the info!. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 10:57, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Pandit Ram Kishore Shukla with Rajiv Gandhi at 7, Race course road in 1988.jpg

Is this image OK? The uploader uploaded an image of a photo that has 2012 camera metadata of a photo originally taken in 1988. I notice he/she uploaded another photo from the same flickr account. Perhaps it is OK or it may be a flickrwash. If it is OK, then it would be important as Commons has few good pictures of Rajiv Gandhi. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:22, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment: I don't know user Sphilbrick well but he has added an OTRS ticket to the image. So, I guess it is OK. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:07, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

OTRS tag has been added already. --Túrelio (talk) 13:30, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Artikel Sprawności harcerskie (pl)

Hallo,

mir ist aufgefallen, dass du 2009 bei dem Artikel Sprawności harcerskie das Bild http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Harcerskie_sprawnosci.jpg durch ein PNG ersetzt hast. Ich verstehe nicht, wieso. Schon die Konvertierung des JPGs in ein PNG durch User:Nevetsjc scheint mir sinnfrei. Das PNG ist (natürlich) deutlich größer (1,52 MB vs. 237 KB). Kannst du mir erklären, wieso du das getan hast? Bzw., wieso das Bild überhaupt konvertiert wurde? Die Seite Specialità (esploratori) verwendet ebenfalls das PNG.

Danke, --Area42 (talk) 14:26, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Ähem, du hast ja ein tolles Vertrauen in mein Gedächtnis ;-). Ich führe jährlich 10-20.000 Löschungen durch, da kann ich mich wirklich nicht erinnern, aus welchem Grund ich vor 3 Jahren mal so etwas banales getan habe. Das png-Format ist m.W. im Unterschied zu jpeg verlustfrei, aber ich habe die png-Version ohnehin nicht selbst erstellt. Derjenige, der sie erstellt hat, hat auch die Duplikat-Vorlage eingesetzt[43], die ich dann ausgeführt habe. Der Austausch auf :pl und anderswo dürfte dann vom CommonsDelinker-Bot vorgenommen worden sein. Davon abgesehen, aus dem Logbuch der jpg-Datei ersehe ich, dass die Datei 5 Tage nach meiner Löschung ohnehin wieder entlöscht wurde. Deshalb verstehe ich nicht so ganz das Problem. Wenn dir die jpg-Datei mehr zusagt, dann setze sie doch einfach wieder ein. --Túrelio (talk) 13:29, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

kurzes hallo...

Hallo Túrelio, heute abend wäre mal wieder ein Stammtisch in AC... vielleicht können wir uns da mal wieder persönlich hallo sagen... Es wird auch ein neuer, eifriger AC-Bilder hochlader erwartet... Lieben Gruß --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 14:37, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Markus, ja ich werden kommen, obwohl das noch heute früh auf der Kippe gestanden hat. Bis heut abend. --Túrelio (talk) 14:39, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Supi... --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 14:49, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Hallo nochmal... bitte denk beim tritthart auch an die WP:PB, nur so kann er auch zurückbestätigen... :-) Lieben Gruß --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 22:54, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Personality rights

Can you please explain the rationale underpinning your statement "publication may even violate personality rights" in File:Mi ex.jpg? Sven Manguard Wha? 23:42, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

If you have seen the now-deleted image, it should be evident. In case you hadn't: the image which pictured from zero distance a young woman and young man, both fully identifiable, in a posture suggesting a personal relationship (both fully clothed), carried the filename "My ex" suggesting that it depicted the uploader either with his ex-girlfriend or her ex-boyfriend. It's rather likely that the other ex-whatever would consent to publishing such an evidence of a former relationship, even though I'm not suggesting that it was meant as an attack or revenge image. --Túrelio (talk) 06:32, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Curva Sud Milan.jpg

Hello Túrelio! Can you have a look at File:Curva Sud Milan.jpg? I think the user took the picture from web: no metadata, very used image on the forums since a lot of years...--Delfort (talk) 10:05, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

And from the same user File:Roma al tramonto.jpg: here is written "Copyright 2011 Gerald Brimacombe"! --Delfort (talk) 10:09, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Taken care of. --Túrelio (talk) 10:37, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Copyrights

Hallo Túrelio, eine Frage und Bitte. Wer kann mir (auf deutsch) kompetente Auskunft zu Copyrights geben? Bist Du der richtige Ansprechpartner? Grüße. Orchi (talk) 20:39, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Ähem, das ist ungefähr der Frage vergleichbar, kannst du mir Auskunft über Nahrungsmittel oder Urlaubsziele geben ;-). Es kommt drauf an. Stell einfach die Frage, notfalls auch per Email. Ich geh jetzt aber in die Heia; Antwort, sofern möglich, deshalb erst morgen. --Túrelio (talk) 20:49, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

....danke, ich schilder Dir Morgen die Frage. Grüße. Orchi (talk) 21:52, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Mmm, ich bin heute und die kommenden Tage nur sporadisch auf Commons (zu viel RL), versuche aber nach deiner Frage zu schauen. --Túrelio (talk) 07:11, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

---

...ich versuch', mich kurz und knapp zu fassen:

• es geht z.B. um dieses Bild: File:Disperis johnstonii.jpg
• mit diesem Disclaimer: SOF
• meine Skepsis: siehe: © by www.lulu.com
• relativ neues Buch: "Terrestrial African Orchids"

Auf der Homepage der SOF Schweizer Orchideenstiftung sind viele Bilder aus aktuellen Büchern. Auch bei vielen Fotos sind copyrigths der Fotografen. z.B. "© by R. van Vugt".
Ich bin mir nicht sicher, wie die Bilder und der Disclaimer zu handhaben sind. Mit User: Esculapio, der das Bild der Disperis johnstonii in commons übernommen hat, habe ich auch schon Kontakt und Fragestellung aufgenommen.
In der Vergangenheit habe ich schon sehr viele Bilder der SOF für commons bearbeitet, aber stets darauf geachtet, dass die Bilder unter {{rm:PD-Art}} fallen. Hier ein Beispiel Florence H. Woolward - The Genus Masdevallia.
Haben die Schweizer vielleicht andere Bestimmungen? Habe ich meine Fragen verständlich gemacht und kannst Du helfen? Grüße. Orchi (talk) 18:25, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Tja, das Problem versteh ich schon. Es ist ein bißchen wie bei Flickr, wo man der angegebenen CC-Lizenz auch nicht einfach so vertrauen sollte. Es stellt sich auch die Frage ob die erwähnte "Nutzung" auch die Weiterverbreitung einschließt, was im allgemeinen Sprachgebrauch keineswegs selbstverständlich ist. Mir scheint es klug, alle Übernahmen von der SOF-Website mit einem OTRS-Ticket zu verbinden. Unter diesem Ticket sollte ein screenshot 1) vom Disclaimer und 2) von der jeweiligen Übernahmeseite gespeichert werden (zumindest in der Schweizer Rechtsprechung spielt Gutgläubigkeit eine wichtige Rolle). Für die bereits auf Commons vorhandene Bilder müsste man das halt rückwirkend machen. Zusätzlich wäre es m.E. ratsam, bei ein paar der von dort übernommenen Bilder eine Stichprobenprüfung zu machen, mit dem Ziel die Zuverlässigkeit der laut Disclaimer anscheinenden CC-BY-Lizenzierung zu überprüfen. Dazu müsste dann der eigentliche Urheber direkt kontaktiert werden, was natürlich mit ein wenig Aufwand verbunden ist. --Túrelio (talk) 18:52, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Wenn ich mich richtig erinnere, ist das oben erwähnte Bild das Erste, das nicht unter {{rm:PD-Art}} fällt. Ich nehme mal Kontakt zu Benutzer:Nillerdk vom OTRS - Team auf. Leider muss ich hier auch ein paar Tage pausieren. Vielleicht rufe ich in der nächsten Woche bei SOF an. Danke und Grüße. Orchi (talk) 19:11, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Am besten wäre, wenn OTRS vorab eine Ticket-Nr. dafür vergibt und dir mitteilt. --Túrelio (talk) 19:12, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Hallo Túrelio, nach Deiner Empfehlung habe ich mit User:Nillerdk Kontakte über e-mail aufgenommen. Er hat im Grunde die gleichen Empfehlungen wie Du gemacht. Heute hatte ich Gelegenheit, ein längeres, gutes Gespräch mit dem Kustos der Stiftung zu führen. Zu dem von mir oben aufgeworfenen Fragenkomplex kann ich folgende Antworten weitergeben. Die SOF hat von allen Autoren die Erlaubnis, Bilder auf die Homepage der SOF zu verwenden. Das copyright bleibt bei den Autoren. Außer den Bildern ohne copyright und den Bilder aus alten Büchern, bei denen die Rechte abgelaufen sind, müsste für die Nutzung in Wikipedia von jedem Autor die Genehmigung zur Weiterverbreitung eingeholt werden. Diesen Weg empfahl der Leiter der SOF auch auf meine Frage nach Übernahme von Orchideenfotos aus Diasammlungen (speziell bereits Verstorbener Wissenschaftler). Hier werde ich in einem besonderen Fall versuchen, zur Witwe eines Bildautoren Kontakt aufzunehmen, um für die copyright - Bilder auf der Homepage der SOF eine OTRS Genehmigung zu bekommen. Nun noch zum Bild File:Disperis_johnstonii.jpg: Ich schlage vor, das Bild zu löschen und werde dies auch dem italienischen Nutzer Esculapio mitteilen. Er wird auch froh sein, Klarheit in der Angelegenheit zu haben. Vielen Dank für Dein Verständnis und Deine unermüdlichen Hilfestellungen. Grüße. Orchi (talk) 19:18, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

O.k., ich habe für das Bild einen LA gestellt. Gruß. --Túrelio (talk) 21:12, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Nancy Gay

Some days ago you deleted File:Nancy Gay (portada).jpg, pointing that it was taken from a website. The user has discussed it with me, I explained him the reasons for deletion, and he told me that he's the owner of that blog as well. As a result, I restored the image and placed the OTRS pending template, waiting for the e-mail confirming all this. As we have talked in Spanish, I'm explaining this to you, so you are aware of what's going on. Cambalachero (talk) 00:59, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 06:05, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Advice

Hi Túrelio. Can you take a look at these recently uploaded club logos? I nominated one for deletion because it looks like a bird, and I noticed that several others look very complex. I wonder also about the "own work" and pd-self on these as they're individual club logos. I figured I'd ask you before going ahead with more DRs etc, since there's so many of these. Thanks for your time. INeverCry 04:12, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Oh my, ;-). I'm often puzzled with the evaluation of logos, due to the extreme differences in the threshold for originality between countries, which actually determines whether a logo is copyrightable or not. This leaves us with the question on which country's threshold level we shall base our evaluation. The originating country's level might be a good choice, but how about use of the same logo in a low-threshold country? Commons:CB#Trademarks gives only very general guiding.
From this unanswered question to the other: I think we should not accept "own work" claims for works which are rather clearly not the work of the uploader, even if the copyrightabiliy of the work might be somewhat in question. --Túrelio (talk) 07:06, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

I think what I may do here is DR the 5 or 6 of these that I think are obviously above the threshold for now (there's one in there with a pirate ship in it :). INeverCry 17:23, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

London Burning

I've done the indef block you requested. I was sad to see that you had to deal with such a disgusting response. That kind of thing seems pretty rare here, or atleast I hope it's rare. INeverCry 17:23, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Indeed, such extreme reactions are very rare, especially when the attacking person is traceable as in this case. In view of the strong British libel laws, I could even take these people to court, which I don't intend to do, of course. It is enough that the photographer may send his lawyer to them for the copyright infringement. --Túrelio (talk) 18:43, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Uploaded files cannot be opened any more

Hi Túrelio, maybe you can help? What happend to my 3 files in category Echinops spinosissimus:
Echinops spinosissimus - Santorini - Greece - 01.jpg
Echinops spinosissimus - Santorini - Greece - 02.jpg
Echinops spinosissimus - Santorini - Greece - 03.jpg
They cannot be opened any more. I think, this is a technical problem. The fourth file from this series can still be opened: Echinops spinosissimus - Santorini - Greece - 04.jpg
The thumbnail preview works with all 4 files. Funny.

Best regards Norbert -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 18:55, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Also bei mir wurde gerade alle 3 einwandfrei mit Vorschau plus Thumb angezeigt. Und bei Nr. 3 habe ich sogar mal die Vollauflösung geöffnet. Schließ einfach mal deinen Browser oder geh mal mit einem anderen Browser auf die Bilder. Viel Erfolg. --Túrelio (talk) 18:58, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

This User

Dear Turelio, This Indian user uploads images from the web without giving an online source. Sometimes when I find an online source from flickr, the images has an ARR or NC restriction. I have tagged a few of his images for deletion or as copyright violations but perhaps you could send him a 'brief message' on copyright. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:27, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment: Where did this image below come from exactly on flickr? No one knows since the uploader never gives the source.
• File:Mumbai skyline 3.jpg

Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:29, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

• Finally this image File:Mumbai skyline 2.jpg is from here and the license is ARR. --Leoboudv (talk) 06:32, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

All deleted, except one, which I could trace to Panoramio. --Túrelio (talk) 08:03, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

OK. Thank you for sending a message to the uploader and for acting here. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:46, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Düserhofstraße

Kannst Du bitte die ganzen unter Düserhofweg eingestellten Bilder nach Düserhofstraße verschieben? --Gödeke (talk) 15:54, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Ähem, wo finde ich erstere denn? Eine Kategorie gibt es davon nämlich nicht, nur Category:Düserhofstraße. --Túrelio (talk) 16:01, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Sind die mittleren drei Bilder in der Cat. --Gödeke (talk) 16:53, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Ah, jetzt kapier ich. Ich hatte zunächst verstanden, dass du die Bilder von der Kategorie Düserhofweg zur Kategorie Düserhofstraße verschoben haben wolltest. Tatsächlich wolltest du sie aber umbenannt haben. Jetzt erledigt. --Túrelio (talk) 19:19, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Thx --Gödeke (talk) 21:16, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Source of File:Pony Ruiz.jpg

Hello, the file has a source, it's an image from Flickr and I mention the url and the author. --UAwiki (talk) 09:29, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

O.k. Now it has, before it has not. --Túrelio (talk) 09:38, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Imagen de artista plastico mauricio colmenares-escultor,pintor,diseñador industrial.

Hola Túrelio un cordial saludo.

Yo soy el autor de contenido de la imagen,texto del file:artista plástico Mauricio colmenares-escultor,pintor,diseñador industrial.Mi user es arteexclusico y mi firma artista plástico Mauricio colmenares,mi verdadero nombre es Mauricio andres colmenares montoya.

Por favor revisar si tengo problema con la imagen,me puedes encontrar en videos de youtube canal artista plástico Mauricio colmenares(donde encontraras un enlace a mi facebook),vitralmosaicorocaresinafusion@hotmail.com

Aportando conocimiento en hacer vitrales,mosaicos,esculturas con piedras naturales translúcidas,sin vidrio,fusionar las técnicas entre si.

Esperando tu ayuda,un cálido abrazo.

--Artista plástico Mauricio colmenares (talk) 17:18, 13 October 2012 (UTC)Artista plástico Mauricio colmenares (12 de octubre 2o12,11 am) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arteexclusivo (talk • contribs) 13. Oktober 2012, 18:13 Uhr (UTC)

Hola Mauricio, sabo solo basicamente el espanol. Can we communicate in english? From your YouTube page I can now see that all parts of File:ARTISTA PLASTICO MAURICIO COLMENARES-ESCULTOR,PINTOR,DISEÑADOR INDUSTRIAL.jpg are also by you. So, the image is o.k. for me now. --Túrelio (talk) 16:23, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Hola túrelio

Gracias por la revisión buena de mi archivo,no olvidar quitar la nominación a borado,mil gracias. --Artista plástico Mauricio colmenares (talk) 17:24, 13 October 2012 (UTC)Artista plástico Mauricio colmenares

The deletion request had already been removed before. --Túrelio (talk) 06:31, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

PLease check your email as soon as possible.--Sicaspi (talk) 19:37, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks, I appreciate it. Drmies (talk) 20:24, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 15:06, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Deleted picture is not a copyright violation

Good afternoon, you recently deleted the picture "Gene Paul, Mary Ford & Les Paul in the mid-1960s.jpg" and wrote "We were notified on COM:AN that the original photo was shot by Bruno Bernard (further evidence for that [1]), who died only in 1987. The image might be still copyrighted, but surely Joel Kerr is not the author."

You are indeed correct that Bruno Bernard shot the picture. I apologize for the error as this picture was originally uploaded with several others and the metadata got mixed up. However, Gene Paul hired Bruno Bernard for this photo shoot, and therefore Gene Paul owns the copyright. As I'm sure you know, a professional photographer like Bruno Bernard did not shoot high quality promotional photos for free. Gene Paul holds the copyright for this picture and emailed verification to Wikimedia Commons (permissions-commons at wikimedia dot org) on 8/28/12.

If this is sufficient information to restore the picture, it would be appreciated. If not, can you please advise me on how I can assure Wikimedia Commons that this picture is not a copyright violation? I've tried very hard to do everything by the book but it's a challenging process and I'm not sure what my next step should be, so any advice would be very much appreciated. Thank you.Lovelounge (talk) 19:32, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

ps If needed, Gene Paul could upload this picture from his own Wikimedia Commons account, if the system would allow it since it was already deleted once.

Hi Lovelounge, I've only tagged File:Gene Paul, Mary Ford & Les Paul in the mid-1960s.jpg as likely copyvio, but did not delete it. The deletion was performed by my colleague User:INeverCry. However, I wonder why it is still deleted as here it is said, that it had been undeleted. Anway, I would recommend you to ask INeverCry to undelete it (again), so that the OTRS-ticket can be added. --Túrelio (talk) 20:05, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Image permition on "Arolde de Oliveira". File "Casamento Arolde e Yvelise"

Hi Turélio,

My name is Sylvio and i work in the office of the congressman Arolde de Oliveira, from Brazil. Here we’ve started a new deppartament, in order to search and study his story as a brazilian congressman since 1982. We’ve started editing a new page on Wikipedia and uploading to it some photos from his files. We have a permission term for using these photos and we would like to use them on his wikipedia's page. But we've received a notification that says we’re not allowed to use this material because, as they meant, they’re not sure about us having this permition. How we can solve this particular case? We put some pictures on our account on Flickr, and that is an account that we pay to share this content.

What do you say about that? Is there a way to figure out a solution?

Thanks for yous attention. Sincerely,

Sylvio Netto — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sylvio Netto (talk • contribs) 16. Oktober 2012, 23:13 Uhr (UTC)

Hi Sylvio, let me explain the current problems:

• File:Casamento Yvelise Arolde.jpg needs the date (year) when the original photo was shot. More importantly, the image is missing a license and who is the photographer? Rather surely not Mr. Arolde de Oliveira who is himself shown in the image. If Mr. de Oliveira is sure to have all rights from the photographer, then he (or his legal representative) needs to send a confirmation of his rights and of the license, which you - being the uploader - should have chosen. I recommend {{cc-by-sa-3.0-br}} which is adapted to Brizilian copyright law.
• File:Deputado Federal Arolde de Oliveira.jpg had been found at http://www.aroldedeoliveira.com.br/noticias/em-pronunciamento-arolde-de-oliveira-fala-sobre-os-royalties-do-petroleo and was therefore thought to be copyvio. You wrote that the author is "Agência Câmara dos Deputados do Brasil". Well, then you need to provide general evidence that all works by this Agência are under a free license or you need to make the Agência send an individual permission for this image to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . For the procedure and a permission tempate see Commons:OTRS/pt. --Túrelio (talk) 06:36, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

hallo Túrelio...

...ich hab da mal ne frage: da gibbet auf dem bild nen neuen baustein bezüglich lizenzangabe... wir verstehen nicht was der da soll! kannst du bitte mal draufschauen? LG --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 22:25, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Guten Morgen Markus, klar, auf der Bildseite ist keinerlei Lizenzvorlage/baustein. Ein Wunder, dass das erst jetzt bemerkt worden ist. Natürlich ist das eine reine Formalie, aber dennoch erforderlich. Wegen des Wikipedia-Logos ist es etwas aufwendig. Man, am besten Geolina als Hochladerin (oder du), müsste die Lizenz von File:Wikipedia-logo.png, also CC-BY-SA 3.0, und den WMF-Trademark-Baustein auf die Bildseite auf :de übertragen. Ich hoffe, dass die Vorlagen dort ebenso funktionieren wie hier. Ah, gerade sehe ich, der Finger, da steht nirgends wo der herkommt. Auch die Google-Bildersuche hat nicht weitergeholfen. Da müsstest du mal Geolina fragen, ob sie den Finger schon separat hochgeladen hatte (dann wird das noch als Quelle eingetragen) und, wenn noch nicht separat, ob sie das Fotos davon selbst aufgenommen hat. Im letzteren Fall wäre es auf jeden Fall ratsam, dass sie, selbst wenn du die Reinbastelei machst, zumindest einen Bestätigungsedit macht. --Túrelio (talk) 06:16, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Hallo nochmal... Alo hat nen Lizenz-Baustein gesetzt, wir hoffen das ist in ordnung so? Wir hängen nicht am Bild (ist ja schon erledigt) könnte also auch durchaus gelöscht werden (muß aber nicht)... wichtiger ist aber das Bild auf unserer AC Seite, da könnten ähnliche Probleme folgen.. bitte hab da ein bissl obacht, wir wollen es nicht komplizierter haben als nötig... Danke Túrelio --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 23:21, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Guten Morgen Markus, das Logo-Bild auf :de sollte jetzt o.k. sein. Bei File:Logo Wikipedia Aachen.jpg, das auch ohne jeden Lizenzbaustein war, habe ich nun denselben wie beim Ursprungs-Wikipedialogo eingesetzt. Damit sollte das gesichert sein. --Túrelio (talk) 06:30, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: Wikimedia Commons page User talk:Listen close has been changed by Túreli

dear Tureli,

could you please give me a email-adress of someone who I could talk to about my last uploaded photo? I have the permission of the photographer but I just dont know where to go through all these wikipedia-wikicommons-procedures-or-whatever and I just want to change the photo.

thanks a lot, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Listen close (talk • contribs) 17. Oktober 2012, 13:19 Uhr (UTC)

Replied by email. --Túrelio (talk) 14:55, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Braille-Zeile.jpg

Ja, da haben wir wohl einen Fehler gemacht. Können Sie das Bild bitte löschen? Die anderen Bilder stammen von Herrn Sachse, der für die DZB arbeitet. Die Vollmacht senden wir in ein paar Tagen zu. Sorry für den Fehler. Liebe Grüße

Martin Waschipky — Preceding unsigned comment added by Waschoi (talk • contribs) 17. Oktober 2012, 16:00 Uhr (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 14:53, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Tùrelio, danke für den Hinweis, das wusste ich nicht. Ich habe bereits mehrfach Buchcover bei Wikipedia gesehen, aber das wird dann wohl aufgrund des Alters frei gewesen sein. Bitte lösche das Bild um jegliche Probleme zu vermeiden. Danke - Teddyfan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teddyfan (talk • contribs) 17. Oktober 2012, 16:48 Uhr (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 14:53, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Corpo negro.svg

Olá! Desculpe, mas não sei exatamente como proceder quanto a isso. A imagem, na verdade, é uma tradução, uma simples edição, de outra que já estava disponível no domínio, mas em língua inglesa (pode ser encontrada em http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_body). Estou participando do projeto Wikipédia na Universidade e precisarei dessa imagem nas próximas semanas para os artigos nos quais estou trabalhando. Como proceder para resolver a situação?? Não quero de modo algum causar problemas.

Abraço, Vf moritz (talk) 00:30, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi Vf moritz, I have transferred the license from the source image and corrected the author entries. However, you should make 0-byte edit with a confirmation for my changes in your edit summary. --Túrelio (talk) 06:23, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

1. Version von File:AC-Seilgraben32.JPG

Traurig, da hat jemand mein Trafohäuschen gelöscht. Kannst Du das bitte wieder herstellen? Wenn ja, dann bitte als File:Trafohäuschen AC-Seilgraben 32 (Anbau).jpg --Gödeke (talk) 15:15, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
PS. Die zweite Version zeigt auch nicht 32 sondern das Hinterhaus von 32. --Gödeke (talk) 15:21, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Du meinst die 1. Version des Fotos von Peter Tritthart, ja? --Túrelio (talk) 15:23, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Genau --Gödeke (talk) 16:48, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

File:MarleneAguilar 06.jpg File:Tbw 400px.jpg File:The Key Cover 'red'.jpg

Please be advised that I have personally asked Miss Marlene Aguilar if I could use her photographs for Wikipedia including the cover of her books. She agreed.

I am one of her soul children. Her supporters call her She Dragon. I am part of a group of freedom fighters who belong to She Dragon's Army.. have been in her home several times. Recently, on October 9, 2012 I protested with her in public in front of the Supreme Court against Cybercrime Law.

I just spoke to her on my mobile phone now and she says she is willing to write a letter of authorization for me allowing me to use the photographs I posted on Wikipedia. She added that she is willing to email you or call you on the phone. Also, if it please you, you may call he mobile phone <redacted>. She may also be reached via Skype - <redacted>

Many of my photos has given a ticket from OTRS. i uploaded it on the same time and date, but this Files has been deleted ,

Thank you! Jeryco Amor Mora

I have redacted the cell and skype contact information. Please do not post other people's personal contact information on Commons, regardless of the circumstances. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:10, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi Jeryco, if you are in contact with Miss Aguilar, please ask her to send authorization from her business/official email address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org for File:MarleneAguilar 06.jpg File:Tbw 400px.jpg File:The Key Cover 'red'.jpg and File:MarleneAguilar new.jpg. The authorization needs to contain 1) a statement that she is the rights holder and that she is able to and does release the above mentioned image files under the choosen free license; 2) information for each photo who was the photographer and in what way he/she wants to be credited.

After you got her feedback that she has sent this permission, you can contact me again, so that I can un-delete the 3 deleted files.

Besides, when you upload the work of others, such as File:MarleneAguilar new.jpg, you should never claim "own work" and never write your name in the author entry.

Another question: was File:Steve and Marlene.jpg really shot originally by you oder did you just upload it? And when was is shot?

Same questions go for File:Marlene Aguilar Back.jpg, File:Condemned by Millions Cover.jpg, File:WOH cover.jpg and File:Bringer of Death Cover.jpg.

--Túrelio (talk) 07:27, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Pussy Riot photo

Hi Túrelio. I noticed that File:Pussy Riot by Igor Mukhin.jpg was CSDed earlier today. I removed the CSD because I don't think it was legitimate. I left a note for Vera about this also, as I saw she'd done some work on the image. I'll keep it watched. INeverCry 19:25, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I had the same impression. I actually made a short Google-search whether the image is credited to Reuters, but didn't find it. --Túrelio (talk) 19:31, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Deutsche Zentralbücherei für Blinde

Eine Mail ist rausgegangen. Nun sollten die Rechte geklärt sein. Bei DZB-Front kommt allerdings immer noch der Hinweis, dass dies fehlen würde. Grüße Waschoi

O.k., ich hab das no-permission durch OTRS-pending ersetzt, was dir (bzw. den ORS-Kollegen) mehr Zeit gibt. --Túrelio (talk)

File:Anksa Kara.jpg

Hi,

Many thanks for bringing this to my attention. I have put it back. Elfix (talk) 17:38, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 06:14, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Tucano Mk.52 - KAF112-McGrath.jpg

You deleted this file without checking my talkpage, I have permission to publish this file, can you give the author a few days to send the permission, which was already been given to me.

Well, there was really no need for that with a file that carries the statement "This picture is © Matthew McGrath and may not be used or published without permission.", which is a no-go. Anyway, I've temp-undeleted the file now and added an OTRS-pending tag, which gives you quite some time. However, YOU will need to remove the above cited restriction, provided the permission allows that, because it contradicts any free license. --Túrelio (talk) 06:14, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Dobritz (Dresden), Leuben, Kiesse, Trümmerberg.jpg

Ich erkläre in Bezug auf das Bild File:Dobritz (Dresden), Leuben, Kiesse, Trümmerberg.jpg, dass ich

die Inhaberin / den Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes um Erlaubnis befragte und eine Zusage erhielt.

Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 3.0 Deutschland“ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/legalcode).

Ich genehmige somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann.

Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, auf Grund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen.

Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft auf der Wikipedia eingestellt wird.

Ich bitte um vollumfängliche Wiederherstellung. Danke.

--Frze (Diskussion) 06:26, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Frze, du musst die ursprüngliche Erklärung des Rechteinhabers an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org mailen. --Túrelio (Diskussion) 08:26, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Ich bitte um kurzzeitige 7-Tage Wiedereinstellung zwecks Beibringung der Freigabe durch Fotograf/ Rechteinhaber. Danke --Frze (talk) 16:55, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Dobritz (Dresden), Leuben, Kiessee, Trümmerberg 107 FOCO7206ps.jpg neu hochgeladen mit berichtigter Benennung. Hoffe, es in dieser Zeit hin zu kriegen. Danke --Frze (talk) 17:15, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Dobritz (Dresden), Leuben, Kiessee, Trümmerberg 107 FOCO7206ps.jpg hast du ja korrekterweise mit OTRS-pending markiert, was dir genügend Zeit geben sollte. --Túrelio (talk) 19:27, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Kevinabrown.gif

Did you decline the correct speedy? Thank you for the others, Nemo 14:59, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

I don't see why this should be a correct speedy. The image is correctly displayed for me. What kind of problem do you see? --Túrelio (talk) 15:30, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Bitte bei File:Monzel.jpg nachsehen

Hallo Túrelio darf ich dich bitten, mal bei File:Monzel.jpg nachzusehen? Ich wollte dort die Kategorien wie bei File:BernhardHäring0001.jpg ergänzen, doch jetzt bleibt alles rot und ich weiß nicht weiter. Eigentlich gehörte Monzel auch noch in eine Kategorie "Soziologe". Für Deine Hilfe im voraus danke und freundliche Grüße.--Meinolf Wewel (talk) 12:08, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 22:05, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Re:File:Acarigua 2010 010.JPG

Es: Hola ese vitral es parte del techo del Centro Comercial Acarigua, en la ciudad de Acarigua en el estado Portuguesa –Venezuela. No poseo información de quien fue su creador

En: Hello this is part stained glass ceiling Acarigua Mall, in the city of Acarigua in Portuguesa State, Venezuela. I do not have information on who was its --Veronidae (talk) 22:05, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Es: Hola como te indique anteriormente los vitrales son parte de la estructura decorativa de la instalacion en la parte central hay un domo o cupula donde se localizan los vitrales asi que se puenden ver desde el interior o el exterior yo lo fotografie desde adentro por me parecio mas hermoso durante el dia pero en la noche si se sube a la azotea se ve iluminado desde el exterior son parte de los atractivos que en dicha azotea o techo se encuentran, en realidad son similares a los de muchas iglesias se pueden ver desde elexterio o desde el interior.

En: Hello as I indicated above the windows are part of the decorative structure of the installation in the central part there is a dome or cupola where the windows are located so that puenden view from the inside or the outside, I photographed it from within by I found more beautiful during the day but at night if you climb to the roof is lit from abroad are part of the attractions in this roof or ceiling are actually similar to those of many churches are visible from the exterior or from the inside.--Veronidae (talk) 18:37, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Es: Esa imagen no tiene ningún problema, la quieren borrar, aquí siempre es el mismo cuento, solo basta que uno suba algo para que llegue alguien alegando cualquier cuento , estoy cansada de ver eso vitrales en cualquier cantidad de sitios web y no hay ningún problema solo hay problema acá porque siempre hay alguien buscándole cinco patas al gato, así que si la quieres borrar no hay problema lo único que espero que luego no venga y la suba un europeo las misma imágenes con la misma información ya que eso me ha pasado en el pasado, de toda maneras gracias.

En: That image has no problem, they want clear, here is always the same story, just enough that you get up something for someone claiming any story, I'm tired of seeing that windows on any number of websites and there is no problem only no problem here because there is always someone looking for him five legs the cat, so if you want to delete it no problem then just hope that does not come up a European and the same images with the same information as that has happened in the past, all thanks ways. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Veronidae (talk • contribs) 31. Oktober 2012, 15:09 Uhr (UTC)

Category:Aerial_photographs_of_Freiburg

Category:Aerial_photographs_of_Freiburg has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Schubbay (talk) 12:51, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Micha Chodara.jpg

These images do not infringe auroskich is given as the source and the license is given that can be downloaded from Google and various other sites, the author wishes to publish them.

Always sign your comments, please, using --~~~~.

There is no statement about a free license on the alleged source website. In addition, there remains the question who is the true photographer. --Túrelio (talk) 15:30, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Bilder Hanna Scholz & Marcel Glauche

Hallo Túrelio! Kontrollierst du bitte nochmal nach ob das alles so richtig ist! Bin jetzt kaputt! VG ----Martin ^{der Ältere!} 21:17, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:17, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

that picture of vijay doesnt need a source as it is published under FAL free art licence

please read the user guide in this page http://artlibre.org/licence/lal/en

That's nonsense. As this image is obviously NOT the own work of the uploader, the uploader has to provide EVIDENCE that the rights-holder (usually the original photographer) has indeed released it under the claimed free license. I have asked to uploader to do this on his User talk:Stylishedit.

By the way, what have you, User:Bothiman, to do with an image, that was uploaded by User:Stylishedit? --Túrelio (talk) 17:42, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Source for that vijay picture (File:Illayathalapathy vijay, at thuppakki shooting spot, Oct 2012.jpg) what I have uploaded sir it was owned by the thuppaki film team and they have published it without watermark in the internet tis is one of tat

http://gallery.oneindia.in/tamil-movies/thuppakki/photos-c5-e38361-p265775.html

you have protected tat photo so i was unable to add the source so you have to add the source wat i have shown above ..

Please always sign your comments by using --~~~~.

This http://gallery.oneindia.in/tamil-movies/thuppakki/photos-c5-e38361-p265775.html cannot be the source, because the image on that site has only 500x753 pixels, whereas the uploaded image has 570x858 pix. In addition, the content on http://gallery.oneindia.in/ is not free. The terms of service clearly state that "No part of the Service may be reproduced or transmitted to or stored in any other web site". And finally, neither the image page not the TOS page mention any free license. --Túrelio (talk) 19:15, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

This actor vijay's photo was actually released by the film markers of his upcoming film Thuppakki without watermark(copyrights) for promotional purpose of their film Thuppakki to all the media sites and social networking sites not only this oneindia site. therefore the above mentioned media site like oneindia has placed their own watermark.But the picture what I published is without any watermark on 28th october 2012 as this is the original version released by the makers of his film Thuppakki found in a social networking site which I don't remember now but I damn sure that photo is without any watermark(copyrights). therefore ,I kindly ask you to some how,whether you reupload it or change the licence as your ownwork. because I understood you know more than me about wikipedia because this article of vijay doest not have a proper looking good photo and this picture really looks good for the article. so its all in your hands. thank you sir:):)Stylishedit (talk) 06:34, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Stylishedit, I understand your good intentions. However, there are some misunderstandings.

• a work of art (which is above threshold of originality) is automatically copyrighted by its creator currently for 70 years p.m.a.
• a watermark or a copyright sign is not necessary (it was in the past in the US) and its absence is irrelevant for the existence of copyright.
• the above described distribution of this image is characteristic for press or promotional images. However, such images are usually (if not stated otherwise) free ONLY for use in context with the promoted event and are not free to be changed (derivatives) or used commercially. Such restrictions violate Commons' policy.
• nobody on Commons, not even Jimbo himself, could legitimately add a license tag to this image, as there is no evidence so far that it's under such a license.
• as you are interested in the Thuppakki movie, why don't you directly contact the production company (press or PR dep.), tell them what you want to do (they should be happy about that!) and ask them whether they could release the Vijay portrait in a sufficiently high resolution under a free license? Important: "for Wikipedia" is not enough, it needs to be a free license such as the recommended Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license. See Commons:OTRS for details and even for a ready-made template for such a request.

--Túrelio (talk) 08:38, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much for explaining it to be patiently sir I appreciate your patience I will contact the production department of the film immediatly for the licence sir through twitter if they r not providing it i will inform you and you can delete it immediately sir thank you sir:):)Stylishedit (talk) 14:13, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Polish deletion notice of Admin page

That really takes the cake - is there a bizarre actions on commons page? I suppose it would get too big too quick to be of any amusement SatuSuro (talk) 14:25, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Collège(1922).jpg

The owner of this image has been contacted and will be emailing a communication granting permission to the permissions-commons@wikimedia.org shortly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deschenes Regnier (talk • contribs) 1. November 2012, 21:48 Uhr (UTC)

Seems to be fine now. --Túrelio (talk) 21:43, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Filles2.jpg

The owner of this image has been contacted and will be emailing a communication granting permission to the permissions-commons@wikimedia.org shortly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deschenes Regnier (talk • contribs) 1. November 2012, 21:50 Uhr (UTC)

Seems to be fine now. --Túrelio (talk) 21:43, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Eastern European map images

Anything I can do to make those maps available again? They are really fantastic maps and the wiki pages will benefit greatly to their addition and thus suffer greatly in their absence. (polskaGOLA) (talk) 00:33, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

The only way I see is to directly contact the author (Vladimir Nicolaev) and ask him whether he is willing to release them — may be in a somewhat lower resolution, that is still good enough for the purpose — under a free license. For the formalities see Commons:OTRS. --Túrelio (talk) 07:25, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

off-line

Folks, I will be off Commons for this and the next week.
For regular requests, please ask one of my colleagues. For urgent requests, go to COM:AN. For very urgent requests requiring my involvement, send me an email (provided you are logged-in). --Túrelio (talk) 08:03, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

I'm the member of Miss Banana band

I uploaded a photo and was asserted copyright violation from you. The author is my band's vocal, and I'm editing our wiki. Please don't make it as copyright violation.

Many thanks, Kurt Huang the bassist of Miss Banana

Hi Kurt, there are several problems with your upload.

1) you did not state under which license this image is released. This is absolutely necessary. See Commons:Licensing for details. Recommended license is CC-BY-SA.

2) if Mr. Tien Tien Chang is the photographer of File:MissBanana.jpg, then you need to ask him to send a confirmation 1) that he is the photographer and 2) that he agrees to release his photo under a free license to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . He should send this email from your official band email address, hotmail and alike are not accepted.

--Túrelio (talk) 08:40, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

File:American Embassy in Ljubljana.jpg

Hi, the building's architect was misrecognised. It was actually Alfred Bayer (1859-1916; cf. File:US embassy Ljubljana.JPG), which makes the file ok for Commons (see COM:FOP#Slovenia). Can you please undelete it? Thanks a lot. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 20:32, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 21:32, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Archiv

Hallo Túrelio! Wie lege ich hier ein Archiv an?? Hier ist doch kein Feld wie bei de.WP ???? Viele Grüße und einen schönen WA!----Martin ^{der Ältere!} 21:11, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Martin, falls du Disku-Archiv meinst: keine Ahnung, ich archiviere hier komplett manuell. Stell die Frage mal auf Commons:Forum. --Túrelio (talk) 06:51, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

License correction

Hi Túrelio, I have five uploads that you tagged as violating copyrights, I was new back then and I did not know how to deal properly with licensing, I've been learning about it and I believe I have made the necessary corrections to those files,and I have provided explanation to the reason why I chose each license in the discussion page of each file, so I appreciate if you take a look at them and untag them if they are OK now.

File:The Eighth wonder 1.jpg

File:Bicar with his Lute and Buzuki.jpg

File:One of Bicar's paintings of Nubia.jpg

File:The Eighth wonder 2.jpg

Thank you Karimalaa (talk) 21:55, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

I'll look into it later. Currently I don't have enough time. --Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Antwort: User:Massimilianogalardi

Ja, gut gemacht :-) --Dэя-Бøяg 20:08, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Name to fix

File:Heerde520201.jpg redirects to File:Heeerde520201.JPG. These files were duplicates. The correct name is Heerde, so the redirection should be inverted. Can you fix that? --Havang(nl) (talk) 09:59, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Will look into that later this week, but I fear that the deleted one may be damaged by the deletion/undeletion bug that plagues us since weeks. --Túrelio (talk) 13:22, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:21, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Pigeon Breeds (EE)

Hallo, OK, die oben genannte Seite ist (bewusst) keine Galerie, aber damit außerhalb des Projektrahmens (s. other pages)? Ich hatte sie angelegt, um einen Überblick über die auf Commons angelegten Kategorien und damit auf eventuell noch fehlende Bilder zu bekommen. Zudem halte ich es für ein mehrsprachiges Projekt durchaus im Rahmen auch die Namen einer Rasse in anderen Sprachen zu erfahren, zumal der Kontinent da ganz schön vorgelegt hat. In dem Sinne könnte jemand eine bestimmte Rasse auch über diese Übersicht finden. Z.B. jemand der einen deutschsprachigen WP-Artikel anlegt und schauen möchte, ob auch Bilder der jeweiligen Rasse auf Commons vorhanden sind. Die gewählten Namen hier sind leider nicht immer selbst erklärend und folgen auch nicht ausschließlich der englischen Benamsung des EE, wie ich erfahren durfte. Also mindestens zwei Nutzungsmöglichkeiten sollte diese Seite schon haben... LG 84.181.55.190 14:06, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

O.k., das ist nicht ganz von der Hand zu weisen. Diskutier das aber erst mal mit den auf dem Themengebiet aktiven Leuten. Wenn ein paar andere das auch meinen, dann bitte sehr. Dass die Seite inzwischen von einem Kollegen gelöscht worden ist spielt keine Rolle. --Túrelio (talk) 14:29, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Da sind leider nicht so viele aktiv, wie im Hundewesen. Die Haustiere im Allgemeinen (abgesehen von Hunden und Katzen) dümpeln da ein wenig hinterher. Der letzte aktive Eintrag bei der en:Task force war vom Dezember 2008. Auf DE sieht es leider kein bisschen besser aus. Also wer sind die auf diesem Gebiet aktiven Leute? Ich kenn keinen. --84.181.55.190 14:48, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Keine Ahnung; ich mag zwar Katzen, interessier mich aber nicht für Tiersystematik. Wenn auf dem Gebiet eh keiner aktiv ist, stellt sich natürlich wieder die Sinnfrage dieser Seite. Wenn es mehr für dich selbst gedacht ist, dann melde dich doch einfach richtig an und stell die Seite in deinen Benuterznamensraum. --Túrelio (talk) 14:55, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Gerade darin liegt ja der Sinn dieser Seite. Es ermöglicht dem sporadischen Nutzer "seine" Kategorie zu finden. Die Kategorien Category:Unknown pigeon breeds und Category:Domesticated pigeons quellen über mit nicht näher klassifizierten Tauben. Häufig auch in kyrillischer Schrift oder einer anderen slavischer Sprache. Meinst du nicht auch, ein Wegweiser könnte da irgendwie hilfreich sein? Und wenn es nur hilft zwei (neue) Bilder richtig zuzuordnen? Französich, Deutsch und die Herkunftssprache könnten da echte Hilfen sein. Im Benutzerraum nutzt die da überhaupt nix und wäre vertane Liebesmüh. --84.181.55.190 15:05, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Jetzt nach Category talk:Unknown pigeon breeds kopiert. --Túrelio (talk) 15:18, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

OK --84.181.55.190 16:53, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Undelete

Hi Turelio,

Would you undelete Category:SMS Hannover (ship, 1905)? I found an image to go in there. --  Docu  at 09:08, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:50, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Proposed close

Hi Túrelio. Can you please take a look at this: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by FishyPhotos? I proposed the close 4 days ago, and the DR has been open for over a month. Thanks for your time. INeverCry 22:36, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Oops, this is too big for this hour. Will try to look into next days. --Túrelio (talk) 22:40, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. No hurry. Have a good weekend. INeverCry 22:47, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Jack Glass

File:Jack Glass.jpg, is an image of a deceased man.I intend for it to be used on his Wikipedia page.What tag does it require for it's licence?DColt (talk) 21:41, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

It doesn't matter that the depicted is deceased. As the photo was obviously shot in recent years, the photographer can't be dead for >70 years. Therefore, you need to provide evidence that the image has been put by its photographer under a free license. --Túrelio (talk) 21:44, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Info Veranstaltung Dom 15.11

Hallo Túrelio, ich weiß nicht, ob ich es schaffen werde, daher hier eine kurze Info: [44]..es darf fotografiert werden ;-). LG, --Geolina163 (talk) 11:00, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Danke für den Tipp. --Túrelio (talk) 11:46, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Manchester Oxford Road platforms, 2010.jpg

Dear Admin Turelio,

If you know how to add the right geograph template for this image and pass it, please feel free to do so. (PS: I accidentally left this message on your wiki talkpage until I noticed that it was not Commons--so I removed the message and placed it here) Best Wishes, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:09, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:32, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

• Thank you for your help. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:17, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Bronisław Komorowski.jpg

We have a serious problem with this photo on Polish Wikipedia. Probably it was originally posted on Flickr as free, but the party who posted it had no permission from the photographer and/or his agency (en:PAP). Today we received a request from the agency for the photo to be removed from Wikipedia (hence from Commons). On Flickr this photo is currently marked as copyrighted [45]. If it is true that original license on Flickr was erroneous and later changed, we actually have a copyvio. I don't know if we can interpret the law in our favor: of course we had used the photo in good will, but once we have been informed that we are not allowed to use it, we no longer are legally protected. At least I understand Polish Copyright law this way. The problem is that the derivative of this photo is being used in more than hundred pages on dozens of Wikipedias as an official portrait of the President of Republic of Poland. It is a political issue now ;-). I have personally mailed the agency asking them to free this photo. We should wait for their response, but in the meantime, the photo and its derivatives (File:Bronisław Komorowski rotcropped.jpg and File:Bronisław Komorowski 1.jpg) should be marked as probably violating their copyright. This is just to be fair and look professional ;-). With regards, Mulat (talk) 15:41, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Mulat, o.k. I hadn't this background information when processing the speedies. Could you eventually forward the complaint from the agency to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org) and include the filenames? I've requested them for (regular) deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 15:49, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

I asked the agency to send full consent (CC BY-SA) to OTRS, but they did not do that so far. I just asked them again, let's wait. Mulat (talk) 21:40, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Breaking stuff

Hi! you have deleted Category:Givat Hahagna, Carmel Which was linked from the article in he.wiki, you broke this link. Can you please check category links crosswiki before deleting them? best matanya • talk 09:19, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Matanya, I have no direct way to check this. The cat was empty (Orrling's speedy-rationale: "Multiple spelling errors") and its page showed no interwikis. In dupe/rename-speedys for cats with interwikis I do of course check (and eventually correct) the backlinks on the other projects. --Túrelio (talk) 09:57, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Orrling is indef blocked in he.wiki for troling, please check when you process his requests. Thanks matanya • talk 10:45, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

I am sorry to say but this was not the first broken link to he.wiki that I found. As I see it, since Orrling is indef blocked in he.wik, part of his delete request should include information about such links Hanay (talk) 11:08, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

O.k. I'll try to pay special attention with deletion requests related to :he. --Túrelio (talk) 11:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. Hanay (talk) 11:31, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Pomníček v Měděnci.jpg

Hi Túrelio, there is a permission in OTRS for this file. Please, can you undelete it? Thank you. --Harold (talk) 09:22, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:58, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Mussolini's Palace of Italian Civilization, Rome - 2754.jpg

Do you think this file must be deleted for Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Palazzo della Civiltà Italiana? Raoli ✉ (talk) 22:17, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Regrettably, yes. I've nominated it. --Túrelio (talk) 22:20, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

And for the same reason Category:Auditorium Parco della Musica (Rome) and Category:Auditorium Parco della Musica (Rome) - Exterior? The author Renzo Piano has created Auditorium Parco della Musica in 2002. Raoli ✉ (talk) 22:46, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Oh my. As I don't have much time currently, feel free to file a DR. --Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Ok, I've done it with multilingual reason. :( Raoli ✉ (talk) 13:18, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Sobre wiki.

	Necesito saber un poco de información.
	Hey! Túrelio, según Wikipedia tu eliminaste mi aporte. Lo cual no me agrada, sabes esa es parte de mi tarea que tengo que presentar en una exposición. ¿No se porque te tomaste la (molesta) molestia de eliminarlo.? Rudolfh Otero (talk) 05:10, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Hola Rudolfh, I have no idea about what you are talking or to what you are referring, as there are no uploads from your account and as the above posting was your first edit on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 07:20, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Article Gaëlle GHESQUIERE photographe française : photo de présentation, autoportrait File:Gaëlle GHESQUIERE.jpg

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaëlle_Ghesquière

Bonjour Monsieur, La photo utilisée par le magazine l'union ( lien) est une image libre de droits réalisée par Gaëlle GHESQUIERE distribué gratuitement par le service de presse. Cette image est sur de nombreux liens: http://www.evenement-a-paris.com/default.asp?p=344 et je puis le prouver en vous communiquant la photo HD QUe dois-je faire pour remettre cette image qui est la propriété de la personne de la page? En aucun cas , c'est une violation de copyright. Bien cordialement.

File:Presse

portrait personnel de la photographe

Hi Zaidou, the problem is that so-called "press photos" are considered not free enough for Commons, in general. They are usually free only for the purpose of reports directly related to the depicted person and not for any other puprposes. This may not be the case with File:Gaëlle GHESQUIERE.jpg, but so far no evidence has been provided. The source page is clearly copyrighted. You need to provide a statement of permission and of free licensing from the original rights holder (either the photographer or the depicted person) and forward it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 11:59, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Auditorium Parco della Musica (Rome)

Can you give your opinion in this thread or close it if necessary? thanks Raoli ✉ (talk) 19:27, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Deletion requests/FoP Italy

Hi Túrelio. When you have a moment, could you do me a favor. After this request of deletion I decided to occupy my time to list the files with the same problem. I drew up a list of many files to delete. The problem is "no FoP in Italy". Could you check if everything is correct on User:Raoli/Deletion requests/FoP Italy? Thanks! --Raoli ✉ (talk) 22:37, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

I've added the whole discussion in the Administrators' noticeboard. Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:57, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Clarification on NC licenses and Flikr

Hi Turelio,

I saw that you removed an image I uploaded yesterday because it didn't have the correct license. I do see now that the Flickr license info page does explicitly forbid images that include a Noncommercial clause, even if the image is otherwise licensed as CC-BY-SA. But I'm not sure I understand why that is, and can't find a good rationale for the policy. I'd appreciate it if you could inform me of why images like these aren't allowed on commons, so that I can be more careful in future. Cheers, Jtmorgan (talk) 00:02, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Per our policy we require that all works, uploaded to Commons, need — per copyright — to be free for any kind of use, including commercial use (which may be disallowed by other rights, of course). For details see Commons:Licensing. Creative-Commons (CC) license are a sort of module system, which allows you to combine very different elements. While (nearly) all CC licenses have the BY module (requiring attribution), the use of the licensed works can still be restricted to non-commercial use (NC) or to the mere use of the original work, disallowing to create derivatives of the work (ND). At Commons we consider the last two licenses modules as not free enough and thereby works licensed CC-..-NC, CC-..-ND or CC-..-NC-ND are not allowed. --Túrelio (talk) 07:25, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

photo

Dear Túrelio: I see, koui2 has nominated the photo: [46] for speedy deletion. I agree with you, it doesn't qualifies to be deleted immediately, but may I ask why you think it should be deleted at all? Also please be kind and let me know which photo from here would not be a potential threat for a future deletion, that one could choose for the actual wiki page? I would appreciate your reply. Tibetibe (talk) 01:22, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

The conversion of the speedy into a DR was simply a compromise to prevent an escalation, as you can read out of the edit history. So far, the original nominator has not provided evidence for a copyvio. If that doesn't change, deletion is rather unlikely. --Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you dear Túrelio: Well, to be honest, I think user koui2 is putting deletion tags to the photos (just my opinion) because he is rather angry that his attempt to be the article deleted didn't work out. He nominated article about Latsabidze for a deletion about 2 month ago, then there was a big discussion going on, and no single person (including administrators) has voted for deletion, in fact everybody thought that article had to be preserved and improved. I think I will need to report his action as an abusive user, if you would help me in this please. I need to know who is dealing here with those kinda situations. There must be some user/administrators who are dealing with such behaviors. Much appreciated and thanks for your help! Tibetibe (talk) 17:58, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Tibetibe, sorry for the late reply, but currently I am rather busy in real-life. I hope that the speedy-nominations by koui2 have been stopped now. If he goes on with this, i.e. nominating images without a valid rationale, you may report this at COM:AN/U. However, for now I recommend to watch and wait, i.e. put all concerned images on your watch-list. Even, if an image is inadvertently deleted, it can easily be restored, provided the deletion rationale is shown to be wrong. --Túrelio (talk) 07:42, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Deleted file

Hi,

can you explain why you deleted the file: File:TWR XJS Goodwood.jpg the source of which is http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikesm/5918216093/

It has a creative commons license.

to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work to make derivative work

I cannot see why this cannot be used on wikepedia as there is no commercial use of the file.

Hi, per Wikimedia policy we require that all works, uploaded to Commons, need — per copyright — to be free for any kind of use, including commercial use (which may be disallowed by other rights, of course). For details see Commons:Licensing. Therefore, it doesn't matter that Wikipedia per se is not considered as commercial use. --Túrelio (talk) 07:25, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Commons talk:Sexual content/Archive 3

Thanks for looking out for the integrity of the archive. - 12:04, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 20:01, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

File:08290051Monreal.jpg

This file was transferred from Wikivoyage, and it is a downscaled copy of File:MonrealHaeuserAmElzbach.JPG. I first nominated it for speedy deletion but then decided it would be more efficient to inform you, so you can take care of it yourself. Since you were a trusted Wikitravel user, all of your uploads were transferred and are now in the dedicated category, Category:Files by Wikivoyage user Túrelio. You may want to look into the category and decide what to do with them. Thanks in advance.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. There will be more of these, as a number of my images on WT have been (legitimately) copied to the original Wikivoyage. I really have to think about the potential forensic consequences of deleting them. --Túrelio (talk) 20:01, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

fyi

Normally uploaders contact the deleting administrator for an explanation, prior making a request at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests. I didn't do that here, as you thought you were deleting a duplicate that someone else had tagged. Geo Swan (talk) 21:05, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

See my comment at COM:UR. --Túrelio (talk) 21:16, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Château de Chantilly-Serment des Horaces-20120917.jpg and File:Château de Chantilly-Tapisserie du grand escalier-20120917.jpg

Hi Dvillafruela, could you please add the name of the original artists of the works. --Túrelio (talk) 08:43, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour Túrelio.
Hélas, trois fois Hélas! Je suis pris en défaut... Mais ce qui je puis te certifier, c'est que les auteurs sont morts depuis longtemps ! À bientôt.
Daniel Villafruela (talk) 09:09, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

I had the same assumption, otherwise it would have gone into DR. If you can't find out the artists names, just add the century from which these works are. This will also prevent similar requests as mine at a later time. --Túrelio (talk) 09:12, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Massive copyvios

Hi Túrelio,

Looks like pretty much all the content uploaded by MCGF-media (talk · contribs) is actually subject to copyright and he uploaded tons of it lately (see [47]) ; how can we initiate a procedure for the whole content at once? Dealing with each file would be very long so I was wondering if there were something easier and more appropriate to this case. Regards, Koui² (talk) 15:04, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

See Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request. However, I would recommend this only for files from the same source/rights holder; otherwise this may go slower than my no-permission-tags which are actually speedy-after-1-week tags.

Already done Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by MCGF-media by Eugene. --Túrelio (talk) 15:49, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the answer and the update. --Koui² (talk) 17:00, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

=/

Cara tinha algumas imagens minhas que eu mesma fiz( não foi tirada da internet)! por que deletou?? aí já é exageiro!! quero aquela imagem de volta!

Sorry, I don't fully understand that language. If you are sure that your deleted upload did not violate the copyright of the photographer, you may request undeletion at Commons:Undeletion requests. --Túrelio (talk) 21:06, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Dufy Les Allies.jpg

Hello Túrelio. You may remember having participated in a previous deletion discussion on this file. Another contributor has nominated it again for deletion, based on the generic copyright attached to any artistic work by French copyright law, regardless of the registration of the pattern. In view of the industrial nature of the product, I initially argued the copyright owner was assumed to be the company who released the product, then found evidence of the transfer of copyright to this company (in case of ownership by a company, the 70 years protection is computed from the publication). Your opinion would be welcome. There is a parallel discussion on File:Victory rooster.jpg, here.I apologize for my unsufficient initial argument which led to your initial closure . — Racconish ^Tk 09:05, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Kebs19 (talk · contribs)

You deleted File:Xerostomía 2.png from Kebs19, but all of their medical uploads are copyvios. See File:Aparato_de_Baermann.png and here for example. Can you speedy delete these? Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:08, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Done. Also the rest of his uploads is questionable. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 16:38, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

I'm not sure about the outdoor images, but it is odd that they would upload PNG images. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 21:49, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Butal2

Yes I am the author of this file (photo of Ulster Museum) Notafly (talk) 10:01, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Category:Impossible Sites dans la rue

Hi Túrelio, i added the creator template. does it work? I uploaded many images of artists and i should developed better category pages: is this template the correct one? I'll also prepare some wikipedia articles related to artists (for the encyclopedic ones of course). I noticed that there are few images of contemporary artists and productions. and the art categories are not so well developed in particular for "not in public domain" artists. please let me know if you have any suggestion. thank you. --Iopensa (talk) 10:11, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Yes, this does give enough information. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 10:13, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Author unkown

Hi Túrelio,

You nominated the following picture for deletion. The author is unkown, so asking permission is impossible. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Systeem_zonder_oog_voor_varieteit.png

Cheers,

Tim

Hi Tim, at the surface, yes. But, as with most "unknown author" works, how thorough did you search for the author? Some projects (Wikipedias) do not accept such works, as they always carry the legal risk, that the true author identifies himself and sues re-users for copyright-infringement. You should also know that even "officially" anonymous works are copyrighted in most legislations for 50 or 70 years after first publication.

In regard to your upload: as of yet, you have not provided sufficient information about this image to host it on Commons. When and where was it first published? Are drawing and text from the same author or is the current image a derivative of the original drawing? --Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Obvious or probable copyvio

I noticed you marked File:SantaPark Northern Lights.jpg as {{copyvio}}, i.e. to be speedy deleted, with the comment "Marking as possible copyvio because https://www.google.de/search?[...]". The speedy delete templates should be used only in obvious cases, not for possible cases.

I think it is quite obvious here that the uploader User:Santapark has a possible connection with santapark.com, which is the probable owner of the image rights. The web link gave no useful information to me, but I suppose it was supposed to show the image has been published outside Commons. Such publication is more or less the only reason we want the image and in no conflict with the uploader having permission to licence it freely. Please ask the user to mail OTRS (as I now did), if you do not trust the licence claim.

If instead you think the image is out of scope, don't use "copyvio" as reason for deletion. I think the image is in scope, as I wrote on the talk page. If you do not agree, a proper deletion request is the way to go.

--LPfi (talk) 11:01, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

See my reply at File talk:SantaPark Northern Lights.jpg . --Túrelio (talk) 12:55, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. But I really think one should assume good faith in cases like these. --LPfi (talk) 21:10, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Statues of John Lennon

Hi Túrelio:

But where is the problem with my photo? There's a picture of an identical statue in Cuba (the same sculptor), and that seems to have no problem in Wikipedia.

See:

John Lennon Memorial in Cuba

And the mine:

Estatua de John Lennon Costa Rica--Apega71 (talk) 16:33, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Very simple: both statues are copyrighted by their sculptors. But, Cuba has an exemption[48] from copyright for works in public space (so-called freedom-of-panorama exemption), whereas Costa Rica has not, as I have already stated in the DR. That means that your photo violates the copyright of the sculptor; you are not allowed to publish it. In such a situation, the only way to get a valid permission is to ask the sculptor himself if he is willing to grant it. --Túrelio (talk) 19:59, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Hola

Feliz Navidad y un Prospero Año Nuevo. Con cariño Veronidae La Osa Gruñona

--Veronidae (talk) 00:05, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Danke. Auch von mir Frohe Weihnachten. --Túrelio (talk) 13:04, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

file:Greg LeMond 1991 Tour de France.jpg

Just wanted to say thanks for deleting the above-named photo file and permitting the correct version to remain online. Cheers! joepa^T 20:59, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 13:03, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Simpl?

"To change a category, click the "(±)" link next to the category name. This will open the input box where you can enter a new category name." Das klingt sehr simpl, wenn man nur wüsste, wo das "(±)" zu finden ist! -- Steinbeisser (talk) 14:04, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Ähem, ich hab keine Ahnung worauf du dich hier beziehst. Anyway, dieses (±) bekommst du nur angezeigt, wenn du das in deinen Benutzereinstellungen so eingestellt hast. Schau einfach mal, ob du bei File:FunkenflugGrill 9647b.jpg unten auf der Seite in der Kategorierenleiste die 6 (±) siehst, die ich dort sehe. Wenn nicht, musst du deine Benutzereinstellungen ändern und zwar Einstellungen>Helferlein>Kategoriehelferlein>Hot Cat. --Túrelio (talk) 14:43, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

also, der Spruch steht in der heißen Katze bei "change a category" - inzwischen komme ich der Sache dank Deiner Hilfe bereits doch ziemlich näher, weiß jedoch noch nicht wie ich eine Kategorie in der unteren Leiste bearbeiten (umbenennen) soll, die im Kategoriengezweige an letzter Stelle steht und daher nicht auf ebendieser Leiste erscheint. -- Steinbeisser (talk) 12:10, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Falls du mit "untere Leiste" die "Versteckte Kategorien" meinst, die sind, sofern sie bei dir angezeigt werden, genau so zu bearbeiten. D.h., ändern über das +- Zeichen. Hinzufügen kannst du über die normale Kat-leiste, die springen automatisch nach unten, weil sie eben als hidden markiert sind. --Túrelio (talk) 13:22, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Ja-neee - es ist folgendes: Wenn ich diese Category:Colors of prussian infantry 1806 - 1918 z.B. umbenennen möchte, finde ich ja unten nur die nächsthöhere Kategorie in der Kategorienleiste (also hier: Category:Colors of prussian infantry) wie kann ich jetzt das "(±)" neben die umzubenennden Kategorie setzten? Das wäre dann des Pudels Kern - um es mal literarisch auszudrücken (kann sein daß ich mich doof anstelle, entschuldigense ein paarmal!) -- Steinbeisser (talk) 09:54, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Nachdem ich die Diskussion auf deiner Disku, die PigeonIP netterweise verlinkt hat, gelesen habe, ist mir klar geworden, dass wir die ganze Zeit aneinander vorbei geredet haben. Ich hatte verstanden, dass du die Kategorisierung von Dateien/Seiten ändern wolltest, du dagegen wolltest eine Kat. als solche umbenennen. Auf deiner Disku sind ja jetzt mehrere Möglichkeiten aufgezeigt. --Túrelio (talk) 13:02, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

 Info User_talk:Steinbeisser#Category:Colors_of_prussian_infantry_1806_-_1918 --PigeonIP (talk) 10:24, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Womit die Sache itzo ausgestanden wäre - für deine Bemühungen ein dreifach donnerndes DANKE -- Steinbeisser (talk) 14:46, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Re: Vandal comments

Hello Túrelio; I'm fine with this, does not bother me much, so it can stay. Wpedzich (talk) 19:40, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

O.k. --Túrelio (talk) 19:42, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Image

Dear Túrelio,

The image-file 'Iaijutsu.jpg' is not the same image-file as 'Iaijutsu-practice.jpg' because in the 'Iaijutsu-practice.jpg' you will see the kanji (Japanese character) for the term Iaijutsu.

Best regards,

Kontoreg

Hi Kontoreg,

my main problem with file:Iaijutsu-practice.jpg was that you claimed it completely as your own work, when it was just File:Iaijutsu.jpg with an added kanji character. You can re-upload it, but only with proper attribution of the original image and its author. --Túrelio (talk) 22:20, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Norbert Berens 2012 g.JPG

Hi, I've copied your question to File_talk:Norbert_Berens_2012_g.JPG --Jwh (talk) 11:11, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Lakhdar Belloumi (1986 WCQ).jpg

oh, you act very quickly. I modified license. Regards. --Faycal.09 (talk) 16:25, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Sure, the longer the time since upload, the more copyvios slip through. I don't see this image at http://madjer1987.skyrock.com/1533440696-Algerie-Tunisie-1985-3-0.html. Seems not to be the source. --Túrelio (talk) 16:42, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Yes apparently the pic was deleted from the site however we can see the player Belloumi in the picture showed in the site (with the players of the team). We can too see him here against Tunisia and the pic here. --Faycal.09 (talk) 19:11, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Images

Bonjour, je vais essayer de ne plus rajouter d'images interdites mais j'aurais deux questions :

• Sur l'article italien La vera gola profonda, il y a une capture d'écran affichée, est-ce que je peux la transférer sur commons pour la mettre sur l'article français ?
• L'article anglais Chuck Traynor affiche une image, est-ce que je peux également la transférer sur l'article français ?

Gregory 14 (talk) 23:37, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

a) No. As you can see here, this image is labeled as copyrighted (probaly similar to US fair-use) and as to my knowledge this not allowed on :fr Wikipedia.

b) No. As you can see here, this image is under fair-use, which (as to my knowledge) is not allowed on :fr Wikipedia.

Sorry. However, you might talk about this problem with an admin on :fr Wikipedia. --Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

This DR

This DR could be a big problem. The flickr account...may have to be blacklisted if the author is proven to be flickwashing. Best Wishes, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:51, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment: Thanks for your comments in the DR. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:47, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Greg_LeMond_1988_Vuelta_a_Andalucia.jpg

Hi. I completely understand why you deleted file:Greg_LeMond_1988_Vuelta_a_Andalucia.jpg and realize I made an error in reviewing the licensing of the original image on flickr. I contacted the photographer and advised him of the issue and am waiting for his response. If he agrees to re-license the image without the CC-NC (non commercial) clause and instead goes with one of the two flickr licensing options that work in the commons, I intend to re-upload the image. Should I do so under the same title, or a different title? Please advise, as I do not want any trouble and am just trying to do my edits correctly and tranquilly for the best of the community. Thank you. joepa^T 22:26, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

If the image file is the same, it would be better to request un-deletion of the deleted image, as soon as it is on Flickr with a compatible license. You may either ask me (or any other admin) to do this. --Túrelio (talk) 07:31, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi - I spoke with the photographer and he changed the license to (CC BY 2.0) so we could use the image. see: http://www.flickr.com/photos/warrick/5337946599/ I appreciate your assistance in rectifying this and would like to formally request un-deletion of the deleted image. If/when you approve the un-deletion will I be automatically notified or should I watch this space? Thanks! joepa^T 09:41, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Wow - you're fast. Thanks! joepa^T 19:12, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Miarey

thanks for marking the images as copy violation.

groetjes --Neozoon (talk) 00:55, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 11:56, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Category:Severians

Original research. See Severians. --Zozula (talk) 11:18, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

User 46.174.26.245

Please pay attention to. User vandals files: File:Охорона врожаю у колгоспі.jpg; File:Black and red boards Kievskaya oblast 1932.jpg; File:HolodomorVyizdValky.jpg adding Category:Dozhinki in Russia. --Zozula (talk) 11:26, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Category:Zhniwniok in Silesia

In Category:Zhniwniok in Silesia going regional features holiday en:Dozhinki in en:Silesia. Please do not delete this category. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 09:12, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Mojdeh Lavasani1.jpg

Hi dear Túrelio, I took that picture and all rights reserved for me, Why did you remove it?M.rafiei56 (talk) 16:03, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Because all three images were tagged as copyvio by User:درفش کاویانی with the rationale "copyvio=کاربر فلیکر صاحب این تصاویر نیست، او بدون اجازه این تصاویر را بار کرده‌است.". --Túrelio (talk) 16:12, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

These pictures have different sizes than those pics. Be sure to I have truly permission to publish them. درفش کاویانی Have not trust me because I have been wrong before that on my inexperience in Farsi Wikipedia. Trust me please.M.rafiei56 (talk) 18:44, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

What do you think?M.rafiei56 (talk) 14:25, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi M.rafiei56, I'm too busy currently to go deeper into this. In order to ease communication and speed-up the process, I recommend you to ask one of my Farsi-speaking colleagues User:Mardetanha, User:Mmxx or User:Wvk to look into this. --Túrelio (talk) 22:12, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Deja de borrar las imágenes

No tenés ningun tipo de injerencia ni moral ni derecho a borrarme mis imágenes, más si no conocés nada del origen. Te pediría por favor que dejes de hacer eso. Espero no tener que volver a escribir acá, ya que me se intolerable que desprecies las contribuciones de los demás. (To reply), 19 December 2012 (UTC)

To the contrary, it is my duty as an administrator to detect and delete copyright violations. You need to learn what you are allowed to upload to Commons and what not. Also, it is not me who needs to know the origin of your uploads, it is you, as the uploader, who has to present evidence that these are either your works, as you have claimed[49],[50],[51],[52],[53],[54],[55], or that the images have been put under a free license by its photographer. --Túrelio (talk) 21:40, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

On FreeVideoDub (Dec 2012).png deletion

Hello, Túrelio! Could you please explain me the problem with this file? It was uploaded to Flickr with an appropriate license. I didn't upload screenshots often and I might miss some details during the upload process. But I expected I were notified if any problem arose; actually the file was just silently deleted. I'm able to provide OTRS letter if necessary.B7elijah (talk) 15:16, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

OK, I agree with you, thanks! It would be better to upload it with 'fair use' restriction, 'in the absence of the free alternative'.B7elijah (talk) 16:12, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	For your many thousands of contributions to Commons over the years. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Happy holidays

	Happy Holidays!
	I hope you and your family and friends are happy and healthy, and that things are going well for you. Happy Holidays and best wishes for the New Year! INeverCry 21:21, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

User:DemonXP

Same dude deleted my own pic. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1300.Bulgaria.png Kick him out of wiki! DemonXP (talk) 21:51, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Though such a comment hardly merits reply, to set things straight:

- I did not delete this image, I only notified you of the impending deletion after I recognized a problem with it.

- The problem with this file was recognized 9 minutes after your upload and you were notified immediately.

- However, you didn't care. Only 4 months later you rant and claim it was your photo.

- I doubt that this photo was shot by you, as it was then found on a journal website[56]. But even if it were your photo, it would be derivative as it showed an obviously post-war sculpture, which is still copyrighted by its sculptor. As Bulgaria has no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright, the photo is a copyvio anyway.

- As this was your second copyvio upload, guess who might be blocked next time. --Túrelio (talk) 09:33, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Virdee, Tejinder 2012.jpg

Hi Turelio,

This is the first time I've uploaded a picture to wikipedia so I wasn't sure if what i was doing was correct. This is also the first time I'm using talk; am I meant to reply on your talk page or on mine?

I only saw your message after I got the owner of the picture (wife of person depicted) to send a permissions email to 'permissions-commons@wikimedia.org.' However, I kept the default license which was Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0

That should be OK right? Thanks for your help.

Aegaeon555 (talk) 11:46, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Yes, it's fine now. I have just added the standard personality-template. --Túrelio (talk) 22:58, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Nadine Lustre 10.jpg

Hello, Túrelio. I acknowledge and respect that you had allowed for the possibility that the uploader of File:Nadine Lustre 10.jpg might be able to provide a valid license. However, I have subsequently tagged this image as a clear copyvio because I suspect the uploader is a sockpuppet with a history of copyvios. Please see en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anarose.antonio for more information. Thank you. – Wdchk (talk) 15:56, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

No problem with this. I see that the uploader has now been blocked by Tiptoety. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 19:24, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Copyright

Why I must delete these file?: Jieun3.jpg Songjieun going crazy.jpg I don't think violated copyright roles... these are a public images! and anyway I modified them, so don't become them of my propriety?

Because, 1) contrary to your claim you are not the author/photographer; 2) contrary to your claim they were not created today; 3) every image above the threshold of originality is copyrigthed automatically, in most countries for 70 years after the death of the photographer. "public image" is a term without meaning for copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 22:35, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Okay, I write the reference of original site!

No, that is not enough. You need a release of each of these image under a free license from the original photographer or rights holder. --Túrelio (talk) 22:48, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Okay, tell me how can I do it!

See Commons:OTRS/ja or Commons:OTRS/ko, depending on what your native language is. --Túrelio (talk) 22:52, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

I don't know the autors, so I delete them? If I must delete them, can you delete them for me? Because i'm new, I tried to delete them, but I can't!

Delete what, the authors? If you meant the images, sure, only admins can do this. --Túrelio (talk) 23:00, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

 Done now. --Túrelio (talk) 23:01, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! I have a last question: "If I take a snapshot with my pc from a music video, that image become of my propriety? I wait for answer

Man, you are demanding. I'm to bed now, as its rather late in my time-zone.

To your question: no, you would just make a reproduction of the work of someone else and you would have no copyright in it. See Commons:Derivative works for details and COM:CB for what you can photograph and what not. --Túrelio (talk) 23:20, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks again, good night!

Hans-Ulrich Rudel

Hätte gerne ein Bild aus dem Bundesarchiv für den oben genannten Artikel in wikipedia hochgeladen. Da gibt es ja ein Abkommen. Leider ist quer drüber ein Kopierschutz "Bundesarchiv". Ich wollte es eigentlich so einfügen wie bei Hans-Joachim Marseille. Ist mir leider nicht gelungen, da mir die Zeit zu knapp wird. Könntest Du ev. aushelfen? Bei Commons kenn ich mich ehrlich gesagt zu wenig aus . . . Keine Angst es wird nicht zur Gewohnheit werden, dass ich andere für meine Absichten einspanne ;-) Beste Grüße Adler 77

Wenn dieses Foto nicht im Rahmen der inzwischen ausgelaufenen Aktion mit dem Bundesarchiv zur Verfügung gestellt wurde, ist davon auszugehen, dass es eben auch nicht der CC-Lizenz vom Bundesarchiv unterliegt. Wo kommt es denn genau her? --Túrelio (talk) 19:55, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Von der Seite: [[57]]

Danke für Deine Unterstützung, wie gesagt commons ist Neuland für mich. Die englische Wikipedia hat immer Super-Fotos drin in der deutschen ist das ja eher seltener.

Beste Grüße Adler 77

Wie schon vermutet: ganz unten auf der Seite steht "Kostenfrei: Nein". Da das Foto anscheinend 1941 herausgegeben wird, ist es nicht völlig ausgeschlossen, dass der Fotograf "Fiedler" Anfang der 40er Jahre verstorben ist, so dass es 70 Jahre später gemeinfrei würde. Dazu müsste du aber sein Todesjahr hieb- und sichfest dokumentiert haben. --Túrelio (talk) 16:37, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Danke für Deine Unterstützung

Adler 77

re

Hi, I've left a note for you at my talk page. Please just note that you may want to reply there if no-one else handles my queries by the time you're available. Thank you. --Gryllida (talk) 02:48, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Grüße

Hallo, Túrelio, ich möchte Dir ein frohes Weihnachtsfest und für das neue Jahr 2013 alles erdenklich Gute wünschen.
Danke für Deinen großartigen Einsatz für Wikipedia im Jahr 2012 und Deine Hilfe für mich persönlich.
Viele Grüße. Orchi (talk) 12:28, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Help

Hello Turélio, I was trying to upload a new version of File:Brazil states1572.png, but something went wrong. The correct version is this: [58]. Can you help me? Thanks, Zorahia (talk) 16:44, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Seems to be o.k. now. --Túrelio (talk) 16:48, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Well, the correct version is [59], not [60]... Could you correct this? Zorahia (talk) 17:03, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

I fail to see (visually) any difference between both. If you look at the version history of File:Brazil states1572.png, which one (from top of the table) is the correct one? --Túrelio (talk) 17:05, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

It's the third (the version of 16:22, 24 December 2012). Zorahia (talk) 17:10, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

 Done. Hope it's correct now, as I will go offline now. --Túrelio (talk) 17:12, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks : )

		* * * 2013 !!! * * *
		Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Georgij -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:37, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Chase Ellison at the premiere of Fireflies in the Garden

Hi! Alright license this photo? http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chase_Ellison_at_the_premiere_of_Fireflies_in_the_Garden.jpg --Meow12 (talk) 18:37, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, no. This image is from Getty Images agency. Anybody caught using this photo will have to pay approximately more than US-$ 1,000 to them. You should not upload anything more from this Flickr-account. --Túrelio (talk) 23:38, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Airplane photos

Hi Túrelio, Harold Wahlberg is my grandfather. I inherited the photos I posted yesterday from him when he passed away several years ago. I see that you possibly found another copy of the A-12 photo on another website, is that correct? As far as I know he took the pictures I posted during the time he was stationed in Hawaii with the U.S. Army Air Corps. SuperAtomicAirplane (talk) 19:10, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Re: Etiquetado de la imagen File:Escultura de Jesucristo de Gladys Torres en la muestra Yeshúa. Maracaibo, 2011.JPG

Hello,

I got an authorization letter from the artist, which I sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org but I have not received any response yet. Any ideas about this?

Thanks, --Maor X (talk) 03:49, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Everything is fine now. --Túrelio (talk) 21:32, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Aufräumarbeiten

Hallo Túrelio, frohes Fest und vielen Dank fürs Aufräumen. Manchmal gibts Dinge, die gibts einfach gar nicht, so wie das fehlende "l" in Oberplanitz, und beim Versuch der Fehlerbehebung habe ich gleich den nächsten Bockmist gebaut. --Markscheider (talk) 10:57, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Alabama-Romania-03.jpg

I am confused about what information is missing. You want to see more data about the source (such as the actual person that took the photo) or a link to where the photo can be found on the Internet, or something else? Here is the link that the picture can be found. http://www.dvidshub.net/image/671786/romanian-chief-defense-visits-alabama-national-guard Is this what is needed? Briansmith451 (talk) 14:25, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Exactly. We need this to be able to verify the copyright claims for each image (uploaded by anyone) to Commons. See, even such an old (2004) photo File:Women wearing burka in Afghanistan.jpg does specify its web source. --Túrelio (talk) 11:07, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Re: [File:Zamek w Malborku.jpg]

I brought back old version of file. New version is [File:Zamek Malbork 27122012.jpg].
Thanks for information!
Wikipedysta300 (talk) 18:26, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Please put some image description into File:Zamek Malbork 27122012.jpg. If you want that your image version is displayed in the article on :pl wikipedia, you may exchange the filename in the article. --Túrelio (talk) 19:35, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Hola

Flickr dice: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/deed.en

Por qué lo borras???

Lo puedo utilizar, entonces porque lo borras????? Si quieres, hazlo por mi y consigue fotos del paisaje de azuero para poner en la wikipedia, que hay muy poca cosa.

Saludos.

Yo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rgarciacq (talk • contribs) 27. Dezember 2012, 22:36 Uhr (UTC)

Do you see the "nc" in your first line? That means "no commercial use". This license (actually a restriction) is not allowed on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 21:40, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Joe Chen 2.jpg

Deletion log showed:“Deleted old revision 20121228150623!Joe_Chen_2.jpg: totally different image by different user.”

Thank you to help me.--Pruneannam (talk) 15:22, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 15:26, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Help！

File:Lift Ladies.JPG？File:Lift Ladies.jpg？I don't know why it turned out like this.--Pruneannam (talk) 15:50, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

I don't know either; sorry. However, I have now uploaded the full-resolution version. --Túrelio (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

OK！Thank you.-Pruneannam (talk) 16:23, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Buenos dias

Hi! I came back to the monument, and I took photos again, since the dates were provided, and I overlooked yesterday: Baliuag, Bulacan[61][62][63] The Marker states: "Ang Baliwag kay Rizal" , made in October 15, 1925 (by Baliwag artist Roman V. Carreon[64][65]- where a woman holding a lyre stands behind him, whispering in his ear; At the foot of the familiar pose--standing, clutching a book) was inaugurated by then Senate President Manuel L Quezon on December 30, 1925. [66][67] Regards.--Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 12:34, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Great. Thanks for your efforts. --Túrelio (talk) 12:39, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Image dates added by Upload Wizard

Hi Túrelio - Thanks for fixing the dates on the Elisabeth Meyer photos; I had intended to get back to these but got busy and forgot. I fixed a couple Alaska dates - 1950 tallet is 1950s and it is almost sure that all these are from her 1955 trip. Likewise it is almost sure that all the India and Sikkim images are from 1933.

In any event, having to go back an change Upload Wizard dates is a nuisance. I have started a discussion on the Village Pump suggesting that where the original date cannot be determined from EXIF data the date field be left blank or templated as needing a date. Recognizing EXIF dates added by scanners would be more complex, but I think doable. The Meyer images appear to have had Flickr upload dates and I am not sure there is a general strategy for those.Dankarl (talk) 18:08, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

No problem with the fixing. That gave me the opportunity to have a look at these impressive shots. An image I found really impressive is File:Bror og søster i teltet på Finnmarksvidda.jpg; at first I wasn't sure whether it was a recent photo, simply by the look of the boy. --Túrelio (talk) 19:14, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Proangie

Hola mil disculpas la Molestia .. cuando puedo vole a editar la pagina de CAROLINA JAUME esta bloqueada, o como puedo hacer para enviarles la información correcta y ustedes puedan subirla??? Gracias por la respuesta Proangie... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proangie (talk • contribs) 29. Dezember 2012, 05:27 Uhr (UTC)

Though you have been blocked for 1 week on Commons by an admin-colleague, you can still edit http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carolina_Jaume on :es Wikipedia. --Túrelio (talk) 21:26, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

chats de Noël

In EWTN[68]Diane Bish's [69] organ piece would not be so impressive if her cat would have failed to sing. Yes, her cat did not fail her, the cat did sing amusing us and the audience. In my 5,000+++ uploads here in Commons, since 2010 (when I stayed away from photobucket, facebook, blogger, friendster and flicker for reasons), images are not made, they are taken: under the sun, rear, front and side facade, under human stress often. Commons photos should not be copied from elsewhere, but often they are; there is a great deal of difference, original photos in Commons have extended data details, plus the human factor - they breathe, they move and have hearts, so impressive - the towns, the churches, the culture and the very rich past. Thus, your cat in Christmas, is very impressive for it is taken by you and donated to us. Happy New Year and Cheers.--Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 07:58, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

User_talk:Zozula#Category:Icons_of_Ukraine

Hello, dear Túrelio! Happy New Year! Can you look at this user, who was blocked and warned before? He is from Ukraine, and while country created in 16-17th century, he added "8th-century Ukrainian art" etc. to Byzantine and Russian works, broked trees of categories according to his own nationalistic understanding of history... Please can you block him? He is really bothering. Shakko (talk) 09:53, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

User:SalganikEA

hi! This user uploaded his own photo. Please, don't mark it. --Gruznov (talk) 10:44, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

O.k., but then he should explain the prior publication under a different name. --Túrelio (talk) 10:47, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks :)

For all the work you do - it really is a pleasure to work with those who work so hard :) Best for 2013 --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:39, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Leonard-Rotter.jpg

I have permissions for all photos of artworks by Leonard Rotter from Romana Rotterová. Portrait of Leonard Rotter provided by RR was digitalized and processed by me, I consider it my own work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NoJin (talk • contribs) 30. Dezember 2012, 20:50 Uhr (UTC)

Sorry, no. By being "digitalized and processed" by you, it does not become your work. Please do as I had advised you on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 20:36, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Would be difficult, if not impossible. Daughter of LR is very old and sick, most time in hospital.I was able to visit her only twice this summer, she felt very strongly on preserving legacy of her father. Removal of the portrait would hurt her, not me.

Exif data are missing because all portraits were processed by Photoshop and resized.

Please give a notice, that LR was born 1885, photo was taken around his thirties, that means about 1915. It is a free work by all rules.--NoJin (talk) 16:33, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

According to :cs he was born 1895, which would result in a production date of 1925 per your own calculation. if the image was digitized by ou, then you had the original in your hands. Was it a print or a film negative? If a print, wasn't anything written on the backside or in a corner of the frontside? As this was rather usual at this time of photography. Did you make a copy of the backside? --Túrelio (talk) 16:51, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Re: File:Goat killed at Christmas Lunch.jpg

Hello, first of all, I would like to thank you for helping to improve the description. Your comments always nice to read. I added a little description in Spanish, then makes a translation. a hug --The Photographer (talk) 16:40, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

O.k. thanks. So this is a special local tradition. Happy new year. --Túrelio (talk) 19:27, 31 December 2012 (UTC)