User talk:Trzęsacz

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Trzęsacz!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. If you have experience contributing to Wikipedia, we have information that you might find useful.

Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can see the files you have uploaded in your gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg Only upload freely licensed or public domain content. Fair use is not allowed on commons. If you're copying files from another Wikimedia project, use the CommonsHelper You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Simply use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Simply tag it as {{speedy|reason for deletion}}. For more information read the full deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:47, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 21:21, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

png <-> jpg are not duplicate

Just a note to say that different file types of the same image are not considered {{duplicate}} with regard to speedy deletion through deletion policy.  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Cranach

Hello! Huge request to put this image in high resolution.--IgorSokol (talk) 17:55, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Lucas Cranach the Elder Portrait of King Ferdinand I, 1548 http://www.lucascranach.org/object.php?&obj=DE_SMS_G2486_FR345A&uid=892&page=4&fol=01_Overall&img=DE_SMS_G2486_FR345A_2013-07_Overall.tif

Can I get a response to the request?--IgorSokol (talk) 19:50, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Maybe it's possible to see this image?

Steinbrecher oder Die Steinbrecher ?

Du kennst Dich mit Robert Sterl aus? Weißt Du den genauen Titel des Werkes? Danke --Frze ^{> talk} 11:38, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Die Referenzseite, also die vom Museum, schreibt den Titel so. --Trzęsacz (talk) 11:43, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Danke: 1909 oder 1911? LG --Frze ^{> talk} 11:54, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Warum 1911? --Trzęsacz (talk) 12:02, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

• 

  File:Robert Sterl - Die Steinbrecher (1911).jpg

--Frze ^{> talk} 12:23, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Diese Seite sagt 1911. Diese Kunstpostkartenseite hat zwar nur Miniaturbilder, aber sie ist eine der wenigen Seiten mit den vollständigen Grundinformationen zu den Bildern. --Trzęsacz (talk) 12:35, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Dr. Quermann klärt das sicher auf. Schreibst Du ihm? LG --Frze ^{> talk} 13:06, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Trzęsacz, ist diese Version nicht besser, wenn auch etwas kleiner? Und hier leicht beschnitten. Gruß --Oursana (talk) 00:20, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Ja, sieht besser aus. Man könnte versuchen, das „große“ Bild zu bearbeiten. Das Flickr-Bild ist auch gut. Vielleicht will der User Frze das drüberladen? --Trzęsacz (talk) 00:34, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Nö, ich nicht, wenn dann bitte extra neue Datei. Kein wirklicher Mehrwert, nur in der Farbe ein kleiner Unterschied, müsste man mit dem Original abgleichen. Das beschnittene gefällt mir überhaupt nicht, ich mag es ja auch nicht, wenn jemand meine Fotos "beschneidet" im schmerzlichen Wortsinn. LG --Frze ^{> talk} 05:57, 10 March 2014 (UTC) CC: @Oursana

File:Albrecht Altdorfer - Schlacht bei Issus (Alte Pinakothek, München).jpg

Hallo Trzęsacz,
soeben habe ich Dein Revert bemerkt. Es ist gute Praxis die Informationen zu einem Kunstwerk und dem dieses abbildenden Photo mit {{Category definition: Object}} und {{Object photo}} zu trennen und erleichtert gerade bei Kunstwerken wie der Alexanderschlacht die Wartung ungemein, alles in allem hat sie wohl gegenüber dem Speichern der Informationen je Datei große Vorteile. Der Beschreibung zur betroffenen Datei wurden so schon kleinere Korrekturen zuteil und ich kann auf diese Weise die kleine Angabe zur Entstehungsgeschichte, die zumindest fragwürdig ist, demnächst, wenn ich Zeit dazu finde, einfach abändern, ohne in 71 Dateien editieren zu müssen. Deshalb würde ich die vorherige Fassung gern wiederherstellen, wenn Du nichts dagegen hast!?
Beste Grüße und vielen Dank, --Marsupium (talk) 02:02, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Nein. Meine Bilder sind immer gut und ausreichend beschrieben. --Trzęsacz (talk) 02:47, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

{{Object photo}} gibt es grade nicht deshalb, damit Deine Bilder „gut und ausreichend beschrieben“ sind, sondern damit die die Objekte gut, ausreichend und einheitlich beschrieben sind und sich bei Bedarf korrigieren lassen, dafür sind Partikularlösungen recht hinderlich. --Marsupium (talk) 03:40, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Es gibt genug unbeschriebene Bilder wo Du Dich engagieren könntest. --Trzęsacz (talk) 03:52, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Das ist unsachlich. --Marsupium (talk) 04:08, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Sterlbilder

• 

  File:Robert Sterl - Steinbruch mit Arbeitern.jpg

• 

  File:Robert Sterl - Arbeiter im Eisenwerk (Krupp) - 1919.jpg

Hallo Trzęsacz, kannst Du bitte mal schauen? Danke -- Frze ^{> talk} 09:37, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Virgin of the Rocks (Louvre).jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Virgin of the Rocks (Louvre).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Angelus^(talk) 22:33, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Ok, I have fixed the link of the source. Kind regards. --Angelus^(talk) 22:38, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked

This user has been blocked 1 day The reason for the block is Attacks on other people like this and this are not done. Time to cool down a bit. I understand that you are angry but making comments like this and calling other people's work vandalisme is not okey. I hope you understand that and that you can start fresh tomorrow when you are hopefully cooled down. The administrator listed in the block log can give you further information. See also the contributions of this user or the upload log in order to find out why this user has been blocked.

Natuur12 (talk) 22:00, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

bruun rasmussen

HELLO! Please provide this image in high resolution. 853/334: George Dawe, style of, first half 19th century: Portrait of Tsar Alexander I of Russia [1] 853/121: Karel van Mander (III), attributed to, 17. century: Portrait of King Christian IV. [2]

After 25 November 2014. --Trzęsacz (talk) 18:16, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Maybe now, November 28th, you can place these images?

here and here --Trzęsacz (talk) 19:55, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Many thanks/

File:The Hunted Slaves by Richard Ansdell 1861.jpg

Hello Trzęsacz. Would you not agree that the above file is a duplicate of File:Richard Ansdell - The Hunted Slaves - Google Art Project.jpg? Green Giant (talk) 15:48, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Green Giant, the color of both files is many differend. The Google Art Project-file has not nice colours ( its to red). --Trzęsacz (talk) 17:54, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Then perhaps redirect the Google one to your upload? Green Giant (talk) 19:07, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

How and why? --Trzęsacz (talk) 19:12, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

I don't see much point having different versions unless the artist painted two versions. Since the difference is more down to software than anything else I think we should only keep the one that is closest to the actual painting. I was intially thinking COM:DUPE might apply but the colours are different so it would probably be a regular deletion under COM:D#Redundant/bad quality. Green Giant (talk) 19:48, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

There are paintings in much double and multiple copies at Commons. But this is not a problem. Who knows exactly how the paintings look like in real life? --Trzęsacz (talk) 20:43, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Fair enough, as long as it is just two copies. However, i would appreciate it if you could put a note to link the two files so people will know that they are of the same painiting at least. Green Giant (talk) 21:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

My uploaded image has a link. --Trzęsacz (talk) 21:45, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Ah I must have missed that, thank you anyway. Green Giant (talk) 21:53, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

(-: --Trzęsacz (talk) 23:27, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Leonardo da Vinci Virgin of the Rocks (National Gallery London).jpg

Habe mich hier über Dein danken gefreut und Du hast Post. Gruß --Oursana (talk) 13:35, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

{{category redirect}}

For longer existing categories, we would generally use the template {{category redirect}} rather than delete them. This allows the cats to be found in lookups.  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:10, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

I know. However, there are at least three artists with this name. Of these, two at Commons; David Cox the elder and David Cox (Junior). Therefore, the category name David Cox (artist) is non-specific. --Trzęsacz (talk) 15:34, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Bonhams & dezoomify

Hello! I noticed that you uploaded some images of paintings from the Bonhams site recently. I am wondering, did you use dezoomify on these and if so, what is the base url for the images? I can't get dezoomify to work with Bonhams. Or is there another way to access the full-resolution image? Thank you for all of your uploads, they are wonderful contributions! Thanks for any help! Laura1822 (talk) 15:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Laura1822, Bonhams files are not with dezoomify or other zoom-functions. You must cut the stert from the Image-Url.
example:

http://www.bonhams.com/auctions/18783/lot/119/
http://images1.bonhams.com/image?src=Images/live/2010-10/13/8189911-2-1.jpg&width=640&height=480&halign=l0&valign=t0&autosizefit=0
http://images1.bonhams.com/image?src=Images/live/2010-10/13/8189911-2-1.jpg

much fun and greetings, --Trzęsacz (talk) 12:22, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you! I never thought it could be so simply! obviously I forgot to look at the url! Sorry for not responding sooner, haven't been on Commons in a few days. Laura1822 (talk) 19:23, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Trzęsacz

File:Caspar David Friedrich - Fenster mit Blick auf den Park (ca.1810-11).jpg s. File:Window-Looking-over-the-Park.jpg 🍷🌙 --Oursana (talk) 02:24, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Jetzt sind sie nicht mehr gleich hier. Die Eremitage hat eine neue Webseite und stellt die Bilder jetzt größer ein. Ist aber - glaube ich - noch nicht fertig. Leider verlinken jetzt alle alten Referenzlinks ins Nichts. --Trzęsacz (talk) 02:32, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Du hast schneller repariert als ich den nächsten aufschreiben konnte.--Oursana (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Es sind jetzt schon erheblich mehr Bilder online als letztens. Das da oben verlinkte Bild ist von hier. So groß findet man sonst nichts. --Trzęsacz (talk) 02:44, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

smb.museum auf Erwachsene.., bisschen zu spät. Gruß--Oursana (talk) 00:41, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

click 🎅; ich hab Dir gemailt.--Oursana (talk) 03:49, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Guck mal morgen. Hab ihn schon gesehen und empfehle ihn Dir sehr. In B läuft er bestimmt auch. Er gefiel mir viel besser als zum KHM. Ist OmU. Du hörst wirklich gute Bildbesprechungen. Gruß --Oursana (talk) 03:44, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Danke. --Trzęsacz (talk) 18:42, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

und.. ich schreib Dir noch, kann aber Abend werden. --Oursana (talk) 13:52, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Anton Goubau

Thanks for pointing me to these additional sources. I am still trying to figure out how to make the zoom-thing work. FRAYK (talk) 10:06, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Here is a beautiful page for many zoom functions for Wikicommons. Maybe you can translate from German. Greetings --Trzęsacz (talk) 16:47, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Gemäldegalerie Alte Meister, Kassel

Hello, Trzęsacz! Prompt loading mechanism high resolution pictures from the site http://altemeister.museum-kassel.de. Thank you very much for your help.

Dear Trzęsacz! Recalls its request and ask you to help me. /lois976/ —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.120.130.126 (talk) 15:57, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Gustaf Wilhelm Palm - Vy över Ariccia (1841).jpg

File:Gustaf Wilhelm Palm - Vy över Ariccia (1841).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PatHadley (talk) 12:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Rosa Bonheur - Lion (The lock out).jpg

Hi, Trzęsacz, what is the exact description to this file? A lock out it can hardly be, I suggest meant is a Lookout Lotje (talk) 14:18, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi Lotje, thanks for the note. I've corrected the title in „Lion (The look out)“, according to Sotheby's. --Trzęsacz (talk) 16:05, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Joachim Patinier

Hi Trzęsacz, I have created this subcategory with the real name of the artist (Joachim Patinier) to put together works rightly attributed to Joachim Patinier himself. A lot of works in category Patinir are not from him. It's the reason why a have created also subcategories Attribuée à Joachim Patinier (wrong or dubious attribution), Atelier de Joachim Patinier (Joachim Patinier workshop), and Disciple de Joachim Patinier (Follower of Joachim Patinier).

NB : Joachim Patinir is in fact the bad mame : it is the flemish prononciation of Patinier (« fabriquant de patins » in Wallonie).

TG 642 (talk) 07:54, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi TG 642, the right name is Patinir, see Museum of Fine Arts Antwerp nl, fr, en. So please revert your edits and if you have any references you could use Commons:Categories for discussion--Oursana (talk) 16:09, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi Trzęsacz, Well, this is a controversy : see Base de données BALaT (Belgian Art Links and Tools) : Dominique Allart, Patinier, Joachim, in Dictionnaire des peintres belges.. Also, two important works of this painter (Le baptême du Christ of the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Wien, inv. 981 and Les tentations de saint Antoine of Museo Nacional del Prado, Madrid, inv. P 1615.) are signed : « IOACHIM / D. / PATINIER ».

As I told you before Patinir is the flemish (dutch) pronunciation of the wallon (french) word Patinier (maker of "patin"). Your reference in Koninklijk Museum vor Schone Kunsten is Patinir is because Antwerpen (Anvers) is a flemish city. Many referencies of this artist is Patinier : see for exemple Kunsthistorisches Museum of Wien. In fact, countries keep the easiest form of the name to use it easily with the current language they use: Patinir in UK and Spain ; Patinier in France (a widespread family name in northern part of France and in Belgium), Belgium, Austria...

This controversy is not very important (Quentin Metsys in France become Quinten Massys, Metsys, Matsijs or Massijs somewhere else); the big point here was to create a subcategory to put together media of the works realy made by Patinier/Patinir. So, if you don't like subcategory:Joachim Patinier you can change the name of it to Œuvres de l'artiste, or something like this, but please don't remove it. Thank you.

--TG 642 (talk) 08:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Different notations can be found at many old masters. But here at Commons there must be only one category. Category:Joachim Patinier is not a sub cat of Category:Joachim Patinir. It is a duplicate wit a other notation. You can rename or move categories to a other name and one is than a rederict for the other. What to whom I do not care. Maybe Commons:Categories for discussion is the right way. --Trzęsacz (talk) 09:07, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Vincent Willem van Gogh 036.jpg

Hi !

First of all, please be kinder in your comments. Yes I'm sick, I have a bronchitis, thanks for asking, but I will not delete my account for this :)

I think it is better, when we have multiple pictures of the same painting, to have a category for the painting, put all categories such as Category:Paintings by Van Gogh in the Pushkin Museum or Category:Vineyards in art put on the category (since they apply to the object), and on the file, just put the category of the object and categories relevant to the file, such as Category:Google Art Project works by Vincent van Gogh (not applicable in that case).

The advantages I see :

1. in Category:Paintings by Van Gogh in the Pushkin Museum for instance, the painting appears only once and not four times. It means that when you add sub-categories and files of Category:Paintings by Van Gogh in the Pushkin Museum, you have exactly the number of paintings in Commons.
2. if someone find a new category applicable to the painting, they have to add it once, in Category:The_Red_Vineyard, and not in every file of Commons about the painting.

Have a nice day :) Léna (talk) 14:51, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Apologies, but Category:The Red Vineyard is not a categorie name, it is mess. Get well soon. --Trzęsacz (talk) 21:35, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Art-students and copyists in the Louvre gallery, Paris (Boston Public Library).jpg

Hi. I removed Category:Boston Public Library collections from that file (along with hundreds of postcards) because it's already in a (not very clearly named) subcategory: Category:Winslow Homer wood engravings‎. There are subcategories for most collections, so no need for hundreds of files redundantly in the parent category. --Junkyardsparkle (talk) 19:48, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

The Category:Winslow Homer wood engravings is a single accident, with this name and by the categorization. The category should be called: Wood engravings by Winlow Homer in the Boston Public Library or better Prints by Winlow Homer in the Boston Public Library. However, there are so many pictures. That's a lot of work. Otherwise, you're right about the matter ago. I remove my remove. Greetings --Trzęsacz (talk) 20:04, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Gustav Jahn - Bergmotiv.jpg

File:Gustav Jahn - Bergmotiv.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

156.58.252.19 13:40, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Christian Goller - Madonna mit Kind unter einem Apfelbaum.jpg

File:Christian Goller - Madonna mit Kind unter einem Apfelbaum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 17:21, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Christian Goller - Bildnis Karl V..jpg

File:Christian Goller - Bildnis Karl V..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 17:24, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Justice with the serpent device - Christian Goller.jpg

File:Justice with the serpent device - Christian Goller.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 17:30, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

National Gallery of Art

Hello! Please, if it is not hard to download these high-resolution images.--IgorSokol (talk) 15:01, 23 September 2015 (UTC) Dyck, Anthony van, Sir Henri II de Lorraine c. 1634 http://www.nga.gov/content/ngaweb/Collection/art-object-page.34046.html

Studio of Justus Sustermans Anonymous Artist Sustermans, Justus Mattias de' Medici c. 1660 http://www.nga.gov/content/ngaweb/Collection/art-object-page.37632.html

Here & here. --Trzęsacz (talk) 21:00, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Many thanks--IgorSokol (talk) 08:05, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Czartoryski Foundation

Hello! I saw that you are also interested the works of Cranach. I hope that it is possible to download the images at the highest resolution. I'm interested in the first three portraits: Sigismund I the Old, Bona Sforza, Sigismund II Augustus--IgorSokol (talk) 14:23, 6 October 2015 (UTC) http://muzeum.czartoryskich.pl/en/node/17954 http://muzeum.czartoryskich.pl/en/node/17954/view/hires

see here for the images and here fore the big file (16000 x 8555 px). --Trzęsacz (talk) 22:36, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much and good luck in all affairs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IgorSokol (talk • contribs) 08:27, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Please do not recreate deleted content

 

---

Your image or other content, File:Christian Goller - Madonna mit Kind unter einem Apfelbaum.jpg, was recently deleted in accordance with our process and policies. You have recreated this content after it was deleted; please do not do this. If you would like to contest the deletion, please visit Commons:Undeletion requests and follow the instructions there to have the deletion reviewed. Recreating deleted content outside of process is not allowed, and doing so repeatedly may cause you to lose your editing privileges. Thank you for understanding.

Also: File:Justice with the serpent device - Christian Goller.jpg and File:Lucas Cranach d.J. - Bildnis Karl V.jpg.

If images are deleted as the result of a proper deletion request, there is a reason. If you think the decision was incorrect, use the deletion review process.

But DO NOT simply re-upload the files in question.

Consider this an official warning. If you do it again, your account might be blocked.Rosenzweig τ 17:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Van Gogh - Landschaft in der Abenddämmerung.jpeg

Thank you for your letter. I have seen the painting at the "Van Gogh, My Dream Exhibition" in Budapest, 2013. This exhibition showed digital reconstructions of the originals, Obvously this picture was mistakenly rotated in this exbhibition, and I accepted it as real. Now, seeing the original in Madrid I am convinced that it was a mistake. I reverted it again to the right position.

Best--Szilas (talk) 15:38, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks --Trzęsacz (talk) 17:29, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Egon_Schiele_005.jpg

Trzęsacz, why did you change the license on File:Egon_Schiele_005.jpg from {{PD-old-auto|deathyear=1918}} {{PD-Art-YorckProject}} to {{PD-Art|PD-old-auto-1923|deathyear=1918}} and remove the link to the Yorck Project's permission statement for their scans of public domain paintings? Unless I've misunderstood something, we don't need to rely on PD-Art for these scans since we have a release for the scans from the Yorck Project. —RP88 (talk) 03:24, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

-1923 is for the USA-license. {{PD-Art-YorckProject}} is nonse / copyfraud. Greetings --Trzęsacz (talk) 03:30, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

I have no complaint with the addition PD-1923, that is fine with me. I was just curious about your removal of the {{PD-Art-YorckProject}} license. If I understand you correctly, you think the text of {{PD-Art-YorckProject}} license tag is misrepresenting the licensing details of the scans donated via Commons:10,000 paintings from Directmedia. Wouldn't the correct solution be to either fix {{PD-Art-YorckProject}} or maybe nominate it for deletion instead of removing it from individual files? —RP88 (talk) 03:42, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

This image is public domain anyway. Since the Yorck-project has nothing to do with. --Trzęsacz (talk) 03:47, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Are you saying that the source listed at File:Egon_Schiele_005.jpg is wrong? The source field says we got this scan from the Yorck Project. Is that incorrect? If we did get this image from the Yorck project and they've agreed to release their digital reproduction into the public domain, this image is PD even in legal jurisdictions where reproductions of two-dimensional public domain are copyrightable (which is not the case for PD-Art images). —RP88 (talk) 04:03, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

The source is completely true. --Trzęsacz (talk) 04:08, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Joos van Cleve

Hi there, I've noticed that you are uploading some files related to Joos van Cleve and you have tools to upgrade the image and remove watermarks. Maybe you'd be interested in modyfying and uploading the file at the following link [3]? More info about the painting - File:Joos van cleve, trittico con adorazione dei magi, 1520 ca. 01.JPG, thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghdjgkudfkj (talk • contribs) 10:51, 18. Jan. 2016‎ (UTC)

here is it --Trzęsacz (talk) 17:49, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Eckersberg4.jpg

File:Eckersberg4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rsteen (talk) 07:45, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Anscheinend Irrtum beim Datei-Upload

Hallo, dir ist anscheinend irgendeine Verwechslung unterlaufen, als Du die Datei hochgeladen hast, die jetzt den Namen File:Antoine Pesne - Porträt des Königs Friedrich Wilhelm I. von Preußen.jpg trägt: Dateiname und sonstige Informationen stimmen mit der angegebenen Quelle überein, nur das Bild selbst nicht. Stattdessen hast Du ein Bild vom noch jungen späteren Fritz Zwo von Preußen hochgeladen, siehe auch File:Friedrich II. of Prussia c. 1736.jpg oder die Google-Bildersuche.

Ich dachte, es sollte dir selbst überlassen werden, wie man da vorgehen soll. Ich persönlich würde eine Löschung und anschließendes Neuanlegen bevorzugen, weiß aber nicht, ob das nicht irgendwelche Admins in den falschen Hals bekommen würden. Wenn Du kein Problem damit hast, könnte auch ich eine Löschung beantragen mit dem Hinweis, dass Du nach Löschung das richtige Bild unter demselben Namen hochladen würdest. --Speravir (Talk) 19:49, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Ich bin einigermaßen verwundert. Ich vermute, daß dieses Bild damals bei Bildindex anstelle des jetzigen war (es hat auch die gleiche Seitenlänge von 1200 px). Ich habs repariert. Danke für die Aufmersamkeit. --Trzęsacz (talk) 19:04, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

OK, hab’s schon bemerkt. Nur ist nun die Quellenangabe bei File:Antoine Pesne - Porträt des Kronprinzen Friedrich von Preußen.jpg nicht mehr nachzuverfolgen. Ich hatte ja gedacht, dass Du versehentlich die Version, die derzeit als Referenz angegeben ist, genommen hast, zumal auch sie dieselben Maße hat, Direktlink: Bild in der Royal Collection. Und in der Tat: Nachdem ich beide hier heruntergeladen hatte, besaßen sie dieselbe Größe und ein Dateivergleichsprogramm sagte mir, sie seien identisch. Ich werde daher gleich mal die Quelle ändern. --Speravir (Talk) 23:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Es bleibt mir ein Rätsel, wieso dieses Bild an der Stelle hier hochgeladen wurde. Es könnte ja sein, ich hatte mehrere Bilder im upload-Ordner, und habe mich nur vertan. Das bei Royal Collection die Bilder bei 1500 px groß sind, weiß ich jedoch. Ich hätte es also nicht mit 1200 px down geloadet. Wie auch immer, ich habe eine Dupklicatebaustein gesetzt und der Fall ist dann hoffentlich bald erledigt. --Trzęsacz (talk) 00:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Ach so, das andere Bild ist auch von der Royal Collection. Darauf hatte ich gar nicht geachtet. Die womöglich sonst übliche Dateigröße von 1500px stimmt in diesem Fall aber nicht, sieh es dir an. Ansonsten ist es mittlerweile wirklich erledigt. --Speravir (Talk) 19:26, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Hans Rottenhammer - Venus und Mars (Rijksmuseum).jpg

File:Hans Rottenhammer - Venus und Mars (Rijksmuseum).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vincent Steenberg (talk) 07:43, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello Trzęsacz, thanks for uploading a version with the original colors. How did you do this? When I download a jpeg from the Rijksmuseum website the colors are usually slightly off. Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 08:03, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Vincent Steenberg, both images have the same color values. But they appear different in Mozilla. On the colors I have not changed. I have transferred the background information of the smaller image into the larger image (see also exif-dada). regards --Trzęsacz (talk) 14:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Oh, I see. I didn't know this was possible. This might open new doors. Fæ, did you know about this? Vincent Steenberg (talk) 16:17, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

The question is, what is the right color. --Trzęsacz (talk) 02:54, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

I'm assuming its the one which is less pale and less greyish. But I've stumbled onto another pair like this: File:Bacchus en Diana Rijksmuseum SK-A-17.jpeg and File:Hendrick van Balen (I) 001.jpg. The first is higher in resolution, but the second seems to have a complete color profile. I understand you're saying that its possible to transfer (part of) the metadata from the first to the second file? If you have a moment would you be willing to explain how this is done? For example, what software do I use? I've aleady tried editing the second file through "properties", but without result. Thanks. Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 07:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

For this I use the Stone Age program „Paint“. I open the small image with „Paint“ and copy & paste the large size image in the page. Save and ready. Check it in the above-linked images. greetings Trzęsacz (talk) 18:36, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Wow, genius! That works brilliantly. You made my day. No, you made my week. Thanks a lot! Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 16:44, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Jan Brueghel the Younger - Dorpsbewoners op het ijs.jpg

Toll, wie hast Du es angestellt, die Version im Maximalzoom herunterzuladen? Ich hatte mir das angesehen und nicht geschafft. Und toll auch, dass Du wusstest, dass es im Creator-Template ein „formerly attributed to“ gibt – es gibt immer wieder etwas Neues zu erfahren. — Speravir_Talk – 17:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Das Bild wird rausgeschossen mittels eines speziellen tools. Trzęsacz (talk) 18:36, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Hört das spezielle Tool auf den Namen Zoomify? Wenn ja, dann habe ich mich wohl zu doof angestellt. — Speravir_Talk – 21:43, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Dante Gabriel Rossetti - La Castagnetta.jpg

Hi! I think this is a mistake: source is not Christie's (it's Rossetti Archive), but painting was sold at Christie's in 1892 (see "Object history" or source). --Micione (talk) 02:08, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

I now. But [[Category:Sold at Christie's]] is only for the source template {{christies online|ID=...}}. --Trzęsacz (talk) 02:14, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I know, but Category:Images from Christie's is only for files from the Christie's website. It seems to me that my mistake is more acceptable of your :) --Micione (talk) 00:00, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

I did not invent the category name. It just is. --Trzęsacz (talk) 00:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I do not understand. --Micione (talk) 00:14, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Apropos Christie's-images (and other zoom files): You're doing good uploads, and describes your images also nice. Maybe you can read a little bit German language, so here's my tip: . this is a site for zoom uploads. To first you must install Pearl Crescent Page Saver Basic 2.8 in your mozilla firefox for shooting the tile images. The other is simple, I think, you come to understand well. greatings --Trzęsacz (talk) 00:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

I can't read German language but I think I understood equally. Maybe I will do it. Thanks and greetings to you! --Micione (talk) 01:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Micione and Trzęsacz, there is in English also Help:Zoomable images. It’s not the same content, though. — Speravir_Talk – 21:47, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Speravir, ok, thank you! (Notification not worked...) --Micione (talk) 20:02, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

cdf

Filmchen und.. Gruß--Oursana (talk) 09:58, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Bruun Rasmussen

Hello! Huge please download these pictures in high quality--IgorSokol (talk) 17:09, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

1621/53: Painter unknown, 17th - 18th century: Portrait of King Frederik III. http://www.bruun-rasmussen.dk/search.do?pg=2&iid=300838556&cid=453&mode=detail

865/125: Karel van Mander (III), style of, 17th century: Portrait of Christian IV. http://www.bruun-rasmussen.dk/search.do?pg=6&iid=300838547&cid=453&mode=detail

I have they on my PC. I will upload after the auctions in the end of mai. greetings Trzęsacz (talk) 18:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

I understood. Thank you--IgorSokol (talk) 18:56, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

here and here. --Trzęsacz (talk) 02:13, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Many thanks--IgorSokol (talk) 10:09, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

My request has lost its relevance. I figured out how to download. All the best--IgorSokol (talk) 11:23, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Zoomify

Hi! Thanks again for Zoomify, but I have a problem: can you take these images, please? --Micione (talk) 17:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I can not make it. Perhaps you ask here again? greetings --Trzęsacz (talk) 18:09, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

@Micione, here and here an exemple. The number inside the URL is the Object-number (accession number) from the Museum web site. have lots of fun with it and greetings --Trzęsacz (talk) 18:18, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Fantastic! You're great! Thank you very much und danke! :-) --Micione (talk) 21:50, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Nikutowski, Wilde Fahrt - Wild trip, 1855.jpg

File:Nikutowski, Wilde Fahrt - Wild trip, 1855.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kati Kreutzner (talk) 13:51, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Werkstatt von Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Porträt des Philip Melanchton.jpg

File:Werkstatt von Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Porträt des Philip Melanchton.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vincent Steenberg (talk) 07:01, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Johann der Beständige, Kurfürst von Sachsen (Winnipeg Art Gallery).jpg

File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Johann der Beständige, Kurfürst von Sachsen (Winnipeg Art Gallery).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ven1127 (talk) 15:57, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Categories

Hi, why did you do this one? When reverting edits, you should always tell the reason. Guidelines are definied in Commons:Categories (over-categorization) and you should follow them, too. Here the painting has already own category (Category:Nude on a Blue Cushion - Amedeo Modigliani - 1963.10.46), which has been categorized further and then the file should not be in those same categories again (only in its own category). --Velma (talk) 13:13, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Help

Hi,

I would like to ask if it is possible to post this works

https://www.artsy.net/artwork/edouard-manet-the-execution-of-emperor-maximilian-of-mexico-june-19-1867

https://www.sfmoma.org/artwork/35.4516

http://pinacotecabrera.org/en/collezione-online/opere/the-dead-christ-and-three-mourners/?frompage=altissima

http://pinacotecabrera.org/en/collezione-online/opere/the-marriage-of-the-virgin/?frompage=altissima

http://pinacotecabrera.org/en/collezione-online/opere/human-flood/?frompage=altissima

http://pinacotecabrera.org/en/collezione-online/opere/the-virgin-with-child-angels-and-saints/?frompage=altissima

http://focus.louvre.fr/en/mona-lisa

I don't know how to save them to my computer =(

Help me please.

Excuse my English ___________Danielguidoc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielguidoc (talk • contribs) 11:45, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

the site of pinacotecabrera.org has lower left a little window with the button "Download hi-res Image"
the image from the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art is copyrighted in the USA (painting created 1935)
the other I must see later. greetings Trzęsacz (talk) 01:48, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

HAMPEL

Hello!

Maybe you can upload these two portraits Separately in large size.

1) BILDNIS DES KURFÜRSTEN MAXIMILIAN III JOSEPH VON BAYERN

2) BILDNIS MARIA ANNA SOPHIA VON SACHSEN (two separate portraits of the largest size)

https://www.hampel-auctions.com/o/Sueddeutscher-Maler-des-18-Jahrhunderts.html?a=111&s=553&id=637&acl=1110892

Thank you in advance--IgorSokol (talk) 15:52, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Madame et Monsieur. --Trzęsacz (talk) 20:01, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

I can not save images in this form. Please convert, for example, to jpg format--IgorSokol (talk) 17:30, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

You must install the Add-on Pearl Crescent Page Saver Basic 2.8 in your web browser (possibly only Mozilla). With this tool you can saving the files with one click. greetings --Trzęsacz (talk) 18:20, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Many thanks--IgorSokol (talk) 11:24, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

(-: --Trzęsacz (talk) 17:05, 6 July 2017 (UTC)